Will Jones – Daily Sceptic Sept 7, 2022
University COVID-19 vaccine mandates are unethical because the vaccines are up to nearly 100 times more likely to cause a person of student age serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalised with COVID-19, a new study has concluded.
The study, whose authors include Dr. Kevin Bardosh, a recipient of funding from the pro-vaccination Wellcome Trust led by Sir Jeremy Farrar, and Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg of the Florida Department of Health, presents a risk-benefit assessment of booster vaccines among people of student age and provides five ethical arguments against mandates.
The researchers estimate that 22,000-30,000 previously uninfected adults aged 18-29 must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent just one COVID-19 hospitalisation. In the study, which is currently undergoing peer-review, the authors analyse CDC and reported adverse event data and find that booster mandates are likely to cause a net expected harm. They estimate that for every COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, 18 to 98 serious adverse events will occur, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of serious injury which interferes with daily activities.
The authors add that given the high level of natural immunity following infection now present in the population, the actual risk-benefit profile is even less favourable.
On the basis of this evidence they argue that university booster mandates are unethical because:
1. no formal risk-benefit assessment exists for the age group;
2. vaccine mandates may result in a net expected harm to individual young people;
3. mandates are not proportionate: expected harms are not outweighed by public health benefits given the modest and transient effectiveness of vaccines against transmission;
4. U.S. mandates violate the reciprocity principle because rare serious vaccine-related harms will not be reliably compensated due to gaps in current vaccine injury schemes; and
5. mandates create wider social harms.
They consider counterarguments, such as a desire for socialisation and safety, and show that such arguments are weak and lack scientific and ethical support.
The authors include Dr. Vinay Prasad of the University of California and Dr. Martin A. Makary and Dr. Stefan Baral of Johns Hopkins University. A previous intervention in February by many of the same authors, published in BMJ Global Health, took a strong ethical stance against vaccine coercion in the form of mandates and passports.
It’s been clear for some time that the cost-benefit assessment of the vaccines will not be favourable for young people. But with leading scientists, including some funded by pro-vaccination organisations like the Wellcome Trust, now putting the case in top journals, hopefully the message will get through to politicians and administrators, especially in America, who continue to impose vaccine requirements on young adults.
While the present paper is focused on vaccine coercion, its arguments also apply more generally to the offer of vaccination to young adults, and raise questions as to whether vaccine recipients are being fully appraised of the risks and likely benefits before consenting to the inoculation.


https://keystonetoday.com/stories/631320864-excess-deaths-during-week-ending-aug-20-in-pennsylvania
Pennsylvania’s death count exceeded death expectancy during the week ending Aug. 20, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Pennsylvania suffered 2,718 deaths when 2,346 were expected.
Excess deaths are defined as the difference between the observed number of deaths reported and the average expected number of deaths, based on the same time periods. Death counts are compared with historical trends to identify whether the number of deaths is significantly higher than expected.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-62824337
There have been 300 more deaths than expected across Northern Ireland in the past 10 weeks, many as a result of acute pressures on the health system.
These excess deaths are a measure of how many more people are dying compared to the five-year average.
Experts say this trend may continue into the winter months and beyond unless healthcare pressures are eased.
An ageing population, delayed diagnoses and access to services as well as Covid are seen as contributing factors.
Once the changing demographics are considered – chiefly people getting older – death rates are 12% higher than normal, which equates to 340 more deaths than what is expected at this time of year.
A large number of the 340 people will have been elderly who will have died from conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
It will be years before the final figures are in so at the moment these figures are at best preliminary. When the last person has died from the vaxx and we know it’s from the vaxx, we still won’t know it’s over for a good while after that when clearly no more are dying or are expected to die. It could be twenty or thirty years before we know it’s over, just as people die years later from injuries or war wounds etc. Even then the figures may be tainted by the authors who will hold their own opinions about the safety of the vaxx, so I don’t think we can truly expect objective appraisals over such a divisive issue as this killer vaccine.
“The High-Speed Bivalent COVID Boosters Are Here”
By Dr. Meryl Nass, Global Research, September 07, 2022
https://www.globalresearch.ca/high-speed-bivalent-covid-boosters-here/5792659
“Covid Vaccines Up to 100 Times More Likely to Cause Serious Injury to a Young Adult Than Prevent It” .. Wow, who could have seen that coming…except all of us here and everyone who has the critical thinking skills just a hair above that of a turnip.
Anyone and everyone advocating or aiding & abetting injecting anyone, not just just children and young adults, with that toxic sewage Jew jab should be viciously beaten in the streets and executed. Anyone injecting children with that shit should be executed in particularly painful manners.
100 Times??? They could say a million times and still be right because that muck NEVER prevented ANY “harm”.