Ethan Huff – Natural News.org Aug 11, 2022
An independent Dutch researcher has published a paper revealing that all-cause mortality has increased substantially in the Netherlands ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” were introduced.
The preprint study looks at about 350 municipalities across the Netherlands, evaluating excess death rates in comparison to jab uptake. Every area where lots of people got injected has seen all-cause mortality skyrocket, the data shows.
Since the second half of 2021, study author and computer scientist André Redert discovered, the Netherlands has seen a sharp uptick in his country’s “vaccination-correlated mortality-rate,” which now averages around 5 percent.
“This means that 5 percent of the deaths were distributed in ways consistent with vaccination rates,” explains Patrick Delaney, writing for LifeSiteNews.
“While this pattern does not prove these deaths were caused by the shots, it does prove that there is correlation between them, and plenty of evidence already exists of excessive death rates in highly vaccinated nations around the world.”
EuroMOMO Bulletin says “an elevated level of excess mortality” persists across Europe
All this time, government authorities both in Europe and the United States have claimed that as more jabs get into more arms, sickness and death will decrease. What the data actually shows, however, is the opposite.
The EuroMOMO Bulletin continues to publish reports indicating that “an elevated level of excess mortality” is being seen all across Europe. Just in the last several weeks, some 8,000 unaccounted-for deaths have been reported – and the jabs appear to be the culprit.
“Though a 5% increase may seem modest, historically it is significant,” Delaney adds. “When applied to the United States, this would indicate an extra 175,000 deaths per year, and for Europe likely more than 400,000 … Furthermore, indications of these trends are not lacking.”
The insurance industry has corroborated this with data showing a massive increase in death claims ever since Operation Warp Speed was launched by the Trump administration.
OneAmerica, an insurance carrier based out of Indianapolis, reported a 40 percent increase in death claims for the third quarter of 2021 when the jab campaigns were in full swing.
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10 percent increase over pre-pandemic,” announced company president Scott Davison. “So, 40 percent is just unheard of.”
Steve Kirsch performed his own calculations on the various numbers that have been released or drudged up, leading him to the conclusion that covid jabs are, in fact, responsible for most, if not all, of the excess deaths that are being reported all around the world.
The likelihood of this phenomenon happening by pure chance rather than as a result of covid injections is “basically never,” the MIT graduate declared, citing his work.
“In other words, the event that happened [to bring this about] is not a statistical ‘fluke,’” he added. “Something caused a very big change.”
In the third quarter of 2021 across the entire insurance industry, the Society of Actuaries Research Institute (SOA) discovered a 37.7 percent spike in life insurance death claims, which corroborates with OneAmerica’s data.
“That figure included an approximate 50-50 split between claims related to COVID-19 and those caused by other factors,” Delaney clarifies about how this figure was calculated.
In Europe, German health insurer BKK ProVita reported to government officials “a very considerable under-recording of suspected cases of vaccination side effects after [patients] received the [COVID-19] vaccine.”
According to board member Andreas Schöfbeck, “around 4%-5% of the vaccinated were under medical treatment for side effects,” which represents a rate about 10 times higher than what the German government was reporting.
Fauci Flu shots are deadly. To keep up with the latest, be sure to visit VaccineDeaths.com.
Sources for this article include:
22,542 dead from 17m = 0.001326% dead.
less than 10 deaths a day for the last 3 months
about 20 deaths a day for the 5 months before that
> An independent Dutch researcher has published a paper
> The preprint study looks at
In other words, he typed something into word and made a pdf from it. It hasn’t been reviewed by anyone, he doesn’t work for any known or reputable organisation, and he’s generally just a man in the street.
> “an elevated level of excess mortality” is being seen all across Europe. Just in the last several weeks, some 8,000 unaccounted-for deaths have been reported
8,000 from 750m = 0.0000106%.
Yes, the jabs kill, but so what? It’s not like you care about anyone else is it? This “everyone’s dying” is laughable. Almost as laughable as “everyone’s starving”.
What was it yesterday? All the nuclear power stations have secret mcguffins in them that make free power and no one knows about it (except the guy that posted here to tell everyone about it).
Slightly off topic, but I’ve noticed the covid stats articles draws the attention of that 77 Brigade entity that always appears with a different name and denies the jab is causing any harm.
I propose we call him the “Jellyfish” because of his amorphous name usage, low intelligence, and the fact he/she hasn’t a backbone.
The Jewish Overlords will utilize whatever means (vaccines/war/wog invaders/geoengineering change) to further reduce/eliminate the white gentiles & replace them with nonwhites…but hey millions of white Allied gentiles didn’t want to listen to Mosley or Hitler; but they’ll listen to Rabbi Jesus, Karl Marx, Bernard Baruch, Churchill & Stalin…lol
@ Simon Smith
So show us the dead figures smart ass. Show us the millions of dead.
Just because I’m bored of your crap doesn’t mean I work for the jews.
@Smithy (above)
You are missing the point !
ie That there is a DELIBERATE effort underway to harm & kill people en masse.
This truth can be arrived at by deduction using simple logic & reasoning.
1) Only 1-5% of deaths & injuries reported. Even so anyone can see the enormous numbers that make these lists.
2) Anyone injured or drops dead within 2 weeks of the jab officially given”unvaccinated” status
3) Any food product was causing harm to people would be instantly withdrawn.
4) A different vaccine years ago was withdrawn after 25 people died.
5) Corporate media & govt silence
6) Ongoing carnage including longer term eg the explosion of cancers caused..
7) Skyrocketing rate of still births among women who had jab
Etc etc etc……..What more do you need to know.
@ “Jellyfish”
Try your best to answer Simon Smith’s point regarding your employer
@Jellyfish
Living up to your new name.
there was also a sharp increase in a
small NZ town . i forgot . kiwis
should know more despite censorship
of their media .
what we need : a big frost dieoff that
a lot of afros+ moslems leave for their
warm homelands . they were intended
acording to Deagel to fill the gab .
Maths is good, but lies and statistics. Not forgetting the gigo acronym.
I don’t know anyone who died from the jib jab. But also no one died of c19.
Suicides, murder, overdose I suspect are very high. Also the extra Midas… Drug in UK early on is was a big concern.
The problem with this article, is that it muddles and conflates two distinct metrics; “overall mortality rates” and “ASMRs” or Age Standardized Mortality Rates.
In the UK, the Office of National Statistics records the number of deaths per annum; although the figure given, doesn’t include non-residents. Different European countries have their own characteristic quirks in this way but in Britain, illegal immigrants, exchange students with legitimate credentials or someone just on holiday, who dies in the UK, isn’t included in the official statistics. Still-births have a separate registry of death.
In order to bring a comparative methodology to EU mortality statistics, which raw statistics cannot provide, the nations of the EU (including the UK up until December 2020) adopted the EuroMOMO protocols for Excess Mortality Rates, called ASMRs or Age Standardized Mortality Rates. Here, each projected mortality rate for an upcoming year, is determined by calculating the mean average of the previous five years’ mortality counts, from a sample of 100,000 of the population. Thus a comparative modality is provisioned, free of population and demographic determinants. The excess mortality rate is usually given as a percentage increase (or decrease) over a five year mean.
So, if there’s a 5% increase in excess mortality rates, this means 5% of 100,000 or 5000 people. In consideration of the Netherlands, the population is 17.5 million, divided into 175 municipalities, so the 5,000 per 100,000 must be multiplied by 175 to get a nationwide statistic. (This is an abstract example because thankfully, as yet, there aren’t nearly as many excess deaths in the Netherlands as 875,000 annually.)
This methodology is different from the one used by the featured computer scientist, who uses a 1 million person sample across 740 of the municipalities. Governments use ASMRs. It’s important to bear this in mind to disambiguate the various statistical methodologies employed, in different countries, as well as by different independent researchers.
Otherwise, you’ll end up as hopelessly confused as “jellyfish/ sax,” whose understanding, in these matters, is glaringly deficient.
Apologies. There are 350 municipalities in the Netherlands, making a mean population distribution of 50,000 inhabitants per municipality. The featured study, in the article, is an “rASMR” or “regional Age Standardized Mortality Rate” protocol, omitting 10 of the municipalities from consideration. So, the government calculation considers 0.023% of the precise population of the Netherlands, (in the given example,) which is 100,000 people, or, as in the independent study above, 0.23% of the population is sampled.