Ethan Huff – News Target Aug 10, 2022
A brief clip from China in Focus news suggests more people have died in Taiwan from Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” than from the alleged “virus” itself.
We had to use an archived version of the clip since the original post on Twitter was either removed by the Big Tech platform or deleted by the original poster, but the 32-second snapshot featured a reporter stating:
“In Taiwan, the number of people dying after the [vaccine] is exceeding the number of deaths from the virus itself.”
This is a pretty clear-cut admission that something is very not right about the mass injection campaign. If more people are dying from the “cure” than they are from the “disease,” it is probably time to stop and take an inventory of the situation.
Ever since Fauci Flu shots were first introduced under Operation Warp Speed, birth rates in Taiwan and many other places has plummeted. This is another major red flag that deserves attention.
Unless Taiwan wants to continue losing its population – and perhaps that is the actual goal – then it should probably put a halt on all further administration of the shots.
Seeing as how the Chinese Virus is long gone except among the “fully vaccinated,” it could not be clearer that the “cure” actually is the disease.
“That was the plan all along,” wrote someone on Twitter in response to the now-archived video about how depopulation is the true agenda behind the injections.
“Why aren’t these jabs taken off the market?” asked another.
How is it possible that anyone is still falling for the covid jab scam?
Many others mocked the notion that the jabs are “97 percent effective,” or whatever the latest figure from Big Pharma might be. They say the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks, but where is the proof?
If Taiwan is a test case, then everything we have been told about the shots is false. That country is one of the hardest-hit when it comes to jab-related adverse events, and yet the jabs continue to be administered to the public.
“This can be described as ‘unimaginable’ in terms of the likelihood of happening due to random chance,” reported Great Game India about how Taiwan is on track to see a 26-sigma event this year for birth rates – check out our earlier coverage to learn more about sigma events.
“The Wolfram-Alpha illustration of likelihood by sigma only goes to ten-sigma. They thought that it would be pointless to show more sigmas. Except a 26-sigma drop in birth rate just happened in Taiwan.”
Unfortunately for the Taiwanese people, they really do not have much of a choice in the matter of vaccination unless they were to all band together and just say no to their government’s mandates.
At this point, though, it does not matter much as the vast majority of the country – more than 91 percent – is already considered to be fully jabbed, minus any “boosters” that might still be unleashed.
It is already too late, in other words, for the people who have taken the shots and are now sterile, or who are now in the process of developing vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS).
“It sounds like Bill Gates’ 15 percent reduction in global population through vaccines was a success,” wrote a commenter at Natural News, referencing a TED talk that featured Gates bragging about how if he and his cronies “do a really good job with vaccines,” then global population levels would eventually decline.
If you would like to read more stories like this one about Fauci Flu shots, you can do so at ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
A conspiracy of silence about the impact of mass migration has cost Britain dear
Failure to plan for the extra millions of people coming to Britain is behind many of our current woes
PHILIP JOHNSTON
9 August 2022 • 9:30pm
Philip Johnston
Twenty years ago this week, a new campaign organisation made its presence felt with a prediction that rocked the political establishment. Migration Watch UK said that Britain could expect more than two million immigrants every 10 years for the foreseeable future unless curbs were introduced.
The founder, Sir Andrew (now Lord) Green, a former diplomat who was alarmed by the apparent trends, and David Coleman, the Oxford University demographer, extrapolated on the net migration figures since Labour had taken office in 1997 to make the forecast. The story was sufficiently dramatic to warrant front-page treatment in this newspaper and was instantly denounced, not only by migrant groups but by the Home Office itself.
As it turned out, the prediction was indeed wide of the mark. The increase was far greater. Since 2002, the population of the UK has grown by around eight million and 80 per cent can be attributed directly or indirectly to immigration. Yet, until Migration Watch pushed its way into the public discourse, no one was allowed to talk about this issue.
A Telegraph front page in 2002, featuring the Migration Watch story
The Migration Watch report featured on the Daily Telegraph front page in August 2002
At the 2001 general election, party leaders were required to sign a pledge promising not to “play the race card” during the campaign, which effectively meant any debate about the impact of large scale immigration was shut down.
Of course, immigration had been a divisive issue in British politics before. In the late 1960s Enoch Powell had warned of “rivers of blood” flowing from a failure to confront it. Various Acts of Parliament were introduced to limit the rights of Commonwealth citizens to enter the UK freely and, from 1971 to 1997, net immigration averaged about 50,000 a year.
This was why Migration Watch’s claim that it would soon be running at four times that figure was so explosive. By the following election, in 2005, the issue could no longer be ignored. The accession of the former Warsaw Pact states to the EU and the UK’s open door to immigration saw a massive increase, even though the Labour government insisted it would have little effect.
The people who ignored this trend and castigated anyone who discussed it are the same people who today demand that more money is spent on the public services to sustain such a large population. This was never primarily a matter of culture, though that did matter to many people. Their concerns were dismissed as bigotry by supercilious middle-class “progressives” who regarded it as a welcome boost to the multicultural nation they were keen to build. But, of course, they weren’t competing with the new arrivals for jobs, schools and services.
The population increase over the past 20 years is the fastest in history. Even the post-war baby boom saw only a five million population rise between 1950 and 1970. There is an argument for high levels of immigration when the population is ageing, in order to sustain the tax base and fill job vacancies. Rising populations boost GDP, though not necessarily on a per capita basis. Overseas nurses, doctors, teachers and other professionals help support the services the growing population needs.
However, the extra hospitals, schools, GP surgeries, houses, transport links and the like that are required for such a large number of people have not been provided in sufficient quantity, which is why there is so much pressure on those services. Even the water shortages that we are facing today are partly a function of a population explosion in London and the South-east fuelled by immigration.
One point that Migration Watch was making in 2002 was that if no one talks about immigration then no planning can be done for the inevitable pressures that it brings.
The fact is that, until the mid-1990s, the actuarial assumptions that underpinned government forecasts of public service requirements were based on an almost steady population. For instance, officials assumed that more homes would be needed because of the break-up of families; but they vastly underestimated the rate of new household formation because the impact of immigration was not taken into account.
Popular concern about immigration was behind the Brexit referendum result in 2016 which was pushed over the line by first-time voters for whom immigration was the big issue, even if it was often non-EU immigration to which they objected most. When the Common Market was established, with free movement as one of its core principles, it was never envisaged that millions of people would move to one European country and settle there.
At the time, when most of eastern Europe was under Communist rule, it was not even possible. In the end, it was not the fact of immigration that led to the Brexit vote but its sheer scale, for which our politicians never prepared.
The progressives, who even now rail against those who supported Leave, should acknowledge their own complicity in pretending that immigration was not an issue.
Arguably, Brexit was less a vote about “taking back control” than reducing numbers and yet immigration is actually higher now that we have left the EU. The current political debate is fixated on around 20,000 would-be asylum seekers crossing the Channel from France, despite the threat of their being removed to Rwanda. However, the real story concerns overall levels. When Migration Watch was established, the net increase for the year was 190,000. In the year to June 2021, according to the most recent official figures available, it was 240,000.
This year, net migration is likely to be higher than ever and yet the issue has dropped down the list of voter concerns. Campaigners say it is no longer a “numbers game” which is why targets, once set by David Cameron and Theresa May, have been dropped.
“In Taiwan, the number of people dying after the [vaccine] is exceeding the number of deaths from the virus itself.”
Total deaths in taiwan = 9,373 from 24m population.
So, if it’s “exceeding the number of deaths from the virus itself” it’s 9,374? That’s one in every 2,560, and leaves 23,990,626 still alive.
Total deaths in uk = 186,087 from 69m population.
That’s one in every 370, and leaves 68,813,913 still alive.
Depopulation in ain’t.
Not that anyone ever died from the “virus”.
“It sounds like Bill Gates’ 15 percent reduction in global population through vaccines was a success,”
Total deaths in world = 6,449,180 from 8bn population.
That’s one in every 1,240, and leaves 7,993,550,820 still alive.
6,449,180 is 0.0008061475% of 8bn.
0.0008061475% does not equal 15%
Perhaps, the plan is not sudden death due to vaccine but a slow process of de-sterilization thru vaccines so the world is not shocked into a sudden un-availability of workers and for TPTB, enough slaves to serve them?
Biden and the jews set FBI to raid donald trumps residence
https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-fbi-agents-rummaged-through-melanias-clothing-and-personal-items_4659149.html?utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_campaign=mb-2022
The vaccine that Taiwan got was Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19, i.e. Sinovac 2.0.
Is it any coincidence that China is the W.H.O.’s favorite country—-and the W.H.O. is China’s favorite international institution—-and Taiwan is perhaps the most vax-suffering country in the world and China hates it so much that it would work with Pfizer (and the already hopelessly compromised Taiwan government) to hurt the Taiwanese?
The vax that Taiwan got was custom-made for Taiwan, never mind that it was an American pharmaceutical company that made it—-probably the only corporation more evil than Blackrock.
It all looks like karma for changing the name from Portuguese Formosa…
forgot his name, might be Antony M said before the clot-shot was rolled out that the ‘virus’ wasn’t the problem but the ‘vaccine’ that would follow. spot on how he knew it? I guess by going against the establishment you won’t get wrong.
and which genetic slurry were these people injected with?…. because it’s all good and well describing the toxic filth as ‘fauxci shots’ but there is a notional difference… (and perhaps purpose)…
when choosing your poison…
not important !
important only is for the jew pharma
that they cashed in billions worldwide
from government taxes . jew propaganda
even can sell shit, not only poison .
Life is the meaning of love
Love is the meaning of life
Covid’s a distraction from war
Was is a distraction from Covid
ad nauseum…
No Rixon, more people aren’t dying from the vaccine than covid itself, BECAUSE COVID DOESN’T EXIST. For the love of God, either put up and do your own article showing a peer reviewed medical paper that proves the existence of a ‘virus’, or shut up about covid being real.
Your headline should read: ‘More people dying from the covid vaccine than other vaccines combined’, or
‘More people dying from the covid vaccine than… (insert PROVEN medical condition/disease here).
Understand?
Whay Covid19 ??? It is a BIG LIE !!
@ellis c taylor…Looks like Colin Jordan is being proven right.
Brilliant prophetic words of Jordan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGi_wIWRYys
whata great piece about immigration
Oswald mosely long before enoch powell warned us of this
> Even the water shortages that we are facing today are partly a function of a population explosion in London and the South-east fuelled by immigration
What, you mean extra water didn’t fall from the sky because more humans appeared?
> This year, net migration is likely to be higher than ever and yet the issue has dropped down the list of voter concerns. Campaigners say it is no longer a “numbers game” which is why targets, once set by David Cameron and Theresa May, have been dropped.
Yeah, right. The invaders are allowed so they can be used for fire and hire by the billionaires that own all the companies. It doesn’t make any difference to the rich, because it doesn’t affect them. It’s the poor that lose their jobs and therefore their lives to these scum.
> Perhaps, the plan is not sudden death due to vaccine but a slow process of de-sterilization thru vaccines so the world is not shocked into a sudden un-availability of workers and for TPTB, enough slaves to serve them?
Perhaps the “plan” isn’t to kill you at all? Oh, what have I said?
> Taiwan is perhaps the most vax-suffering country in the world and China hates it so much…
Taiwan is #140 in the number of deaths per whatever you like, with the world average being at about #107, so it’s even below average. 139 countries are above it, including all the usual victims, so no, it ain’t the “most vax-suffering country in the world”. Oh, and the chinese don’t hate it either. Whether the handful of fascists that control china hate it any more than the fascists that control everywhere else I’ve no idea, and neither do you.
Thank you to the comments above who can do math on deaths and population, truly thank you. But here is another math problem for you, If every person contains 25 liters of water, how much extra water be around if 6 billion die. Would costal cities flood, would rainfall increase? Have fun.