Ian Fantom – Aug 1, 2022
Dear Holly,
Click to enlarge
This is not a fast-moving case; it is very slow-moving, and it seems to me and to others, too, that it is being unnecessarily dragged out, and that a likely consequence of this is that Julian Assange will die in prison. For a remand prisoner to be held for so long and in such circumstances is I hope unprecedented in British legal history. If it isn’t, then our legal system is more corrupt that I suspect it is.
I am aware of the high reputation that the British legal system has earned in years past. But it can only deserve such a high reputation on a case-by-case basis. If a case is argued only by virtue of the past reputation, then that in itself undermines that reputation.
I do not share in your confidence in the impartiality and independence of the British legal system to give Mr Assange a fair hearing as he exercises his rights. There is obviously something very wrong in the handling of this case. The decision was ultimately handed to the Home Secretary, and she is in a political role in the Cabinet, for which you are partly responsible. It is the duty of Parliament to hold the Cabinet to account. The argumentation that you have obviously been handed by your party superiors is obviously flawed.
I once attended a seminar at the National Union of Journalists on the truthfulness of the press. At the bookstall at the back were two new books on falsehood in the press: ‘Flat Earth News’ and ‘A Century of Spin’. At the meeting a BBC reporter told us that they had received instructions not to check the validity of reports if they came from official sources. That means that the BBC would simply reprint whatever falsehoods the government were to give them. Most people nowadays believe that the government tells lies. Those like myself who have taken considerable effort over the years to do what the BBC should have been doing but isn’t doing, realise that what the public is perceiving is only the fibs, not the whoppers.
Another journalist pointed out that if it hadn’t been for their reporting, there would have been no Iraq war.
One of the contributors to the seminar was recently outed by the authors of ‘A Century of Spin’ as an MI6 agent. Another contributor gave me such an evasive answer to a simple question of mine on how he knew that his captors in Lebanon were Islamic Terrorists, that I had to wonder why. He replied, “I, too have heard conspiracy theories”. I answered that with: “I haven’t; I just asked an obvious question”. That was a question that ALL journalists present at that meeting should have been asking, but weren’t.
I recently heard in an interview on GBNews that half of professional journalists were educated at Oxbridge. I found that amazing. Oxbridge is well know for its loyalty above all to the political elite. That seems to reflect the situation in the Cabinet. The press in this country is no longer holding government to account, and neither is Parliament.
George Orwell pointed this out in the introduction to his Animal Farm novel, which was censured out. John Pilger more recently pointed out that the situation now is far worse than that.
All those in that journalists seminar knew what was going on. We live in extremely dangerous times. We don’t know where the loyalties of political parties lie. Your own leader is a member of the Neoconservative think tank The Trilateral Commission.
I think it is time that every MP should consider his or her position. Is their primary loyalty to the party or to the electorate? I recommend that you read The Light newspaper, particularly the July edition, No 23 (https://thelightpaper.co.uk/assets/pdf/Light-23-Final-Web.pdf) where you will find my article on page 9 on who actually is running Britain and the Cabinet.
On the Julian Assange case, it would be inappropriate to stay silent, when the future of journalism is at stake in this country, and in much of the Western World. Every decent journalist must by now feel threatened.
Ian
I stopped at “I am aware of the high reputation that the British legal system has earned in years past”. Obviously written by a lunatic or just another brick in the wall.
Assange was done for the moment he was lured into britain by the promises of a “lord”, and he’ll die in prison because the people in britain are as bad as their owners.
The high reputation of the British legal system… more corrupt than I thought it was.
Ian must be on some extra special sherbert.
The British legal system is a pile of horse shit. It has always been totally corrupt.
You only need to look at the different level of sentencing around the country. What happens in the UK is an international scandal.
As to Assange, he was a CIA asset as a child. When he was a hacker, he was treated with a very light touch, and even though he was a hacker, he still had a long standing relationship with an Australian university.
Nothing that Assange leaked surprised me, just as nothing Snowden leaked or said surprised me either. In fact, we knew most of it. The Guardian was in the thick of it from the start, so what does that tell you?
I would waste another minute on Assange. They could have killed him in the embassy, but didn’t, I wonder why.
It’s all theater for the sheeple masses, just like sanctioning a blogger, so what?
The UK anti terrorism laws required a judge to sign off so police could act. This required actual terror evidence, but most arrests, the majority were dropped, so there was zero terror evidence, so the judges are corrupt. That’s just a fact.
Politics is Jews versus Gentiles; if you do not start with that, you are boring
@IAN
Your whole system is masonry infested .
there helps only a bloody general cleaning !
first step to break the neck of jew snake .
Don’t tell me how bad the media is it’s in the hands of the Jews and those hands pointed their fingers at Bin Laden.
Today the media is reporting the CIA has killed Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul. He’s dead they they because he planned 9/11with Bin Laden. They also like to remind us the US military killed Bin Laden in 2011.
People who peddle this horseshit and the people who believe it, because of the lack of love for the truth, are people who are doomed, that’s not me saying it, it’s what your creator has said.
God’s grace does exist and we are saved by the grace of God and probably not saved if we do not love truth?
Unfortunately there are so many who want to believe Bin Laden did it.
Assange and Pilger should write something declaring they have changed their mind.
What about you Mr Fantom?
“On the Julian Assange case, it would be inappropriate to stay silent, when the future of journalism is at stake in this country, and in much of the Western World. Every decent journalist must by now feel threatened.”
l don’t now which is more tragic.. Fantom’s belief that yellow journalism ever had a moral independence… or the belief that the ‘British’ legal system has ever been ‘just’…
The detention of Julian Asange in my opinion is in fact unconstitutional according to our ancient laws. This man has not committed any criminal act under our country’s law and his detention has brought our legal system to an unprecedented level of disgrace. I do not need to ask the question of who controls our legal system.
It is without doubt those who also control politicians and the political system.
If anyone has the slightest doubt that Julian Assange is a narcissistic self-promoting fraud in the service of Jewish intelligence agencies they can simply look at his record. About 13 years ago Assange/Wikileaks released a list of David Irving’s donors, email lists and private communications. How is that for going against the ‘Deep State’? Well that certainly took guts didn’t it? How brave of him to expose the evil evil dastardly NAAZEEES. There are so many interviews where he preens and intones and demurs while lamenting a great injustice like the…the arrest of Pussy Riot. It was long ago but try to imagine that he had nothing better to do than take up the cause of…Pussy Riot. Then there was the release of a doctored Bradley Manning video of some hapless Baghdad citizens being blown away by an Apache Helicopter gun ship. That was an intentional government release to warn against anyone trying to stop the looting and destruction of Iraq. Bradley became Chelsea we’re told. And over the years Assange never stopped appearing on the porch of a CIA Lounge, the Ecuador Embassy, always pretending he was moments away from hauled away by the cops, went along with every staged appearance, acted in a amusing staged arrest, dated Pamela Anderson and fathered more children, gave more interviews, and more interviews…while locked up in prison. I read that he went in and out of that embassy more often than Elie Wiesel went in and out of ‘Nazi gas chambers’ in different death camps. Remember this, Wiesel said it was this way every day for years. How did he survive? It was a miracle. Now, Wikileaks did release old video exposing the fake moon landings but that was long after it was exposed as a fraud. The thing that made it obvious Assange was an employee of the alphabet agencies is that he never exposed filth like Netanyahu, Israel or the Halls of Co$t. All those years pretending the CIA was out to get him but couldn’t. Can you believe it? It’s about as laughable as the CIA trying to get Osama bin Laden all those years or the USSR landing contraptions on Venus in the late sixties.
If Assange ever wrote or said anything interesting does anyone have a genuine citation? Not something written by someone else or something he was reading from cue cards. Watch some of his interviews, he is obviously reading from a teleprompter or cue cards. He comes across as a self-absorbed bore but put some pallid, pudgy, ugly man on television and women go crazy and want to bear his children even though he neglects all of them afterward. But other than that, he is a towering intellect and the greatest victim of injustice since; right up there with the likes of Pussy Riot. His Swedish fake rape victim even said that he wore the same clothes again and again and smelled like hell. Look up her ‘testimony’ and claims if you doubt this.
According to Rich Hall of RichPlanet Tv: “It seems fairly unanimous to those with a critically thinking brain that Julian Assange is a fraud. All the clues are there that he is a puppet of U.S. intelligence masquerading as a champion of truth, and subtly propped up by mainstream media with their fake cynicism. I am sure there will be more evidence brought to light in future to make Julian Assange a bigger laughing stock than he already is. https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=830&gen=99
> This man has not committed any criminal act under our country’s law and his detention has brought our legal system to an unprecedented level of disgrace.
Erm… sending street urchins to botany bay for stealing apples to avoid starving to death? Or, to be “modern”, doing nothing about the pedos in the “royal” family and all the others in “government”? Not to mention the 100,000 dead pensioners.
In fact, I dare you to list the events that make you believe it was ever anything but a disgrace.
All the “judges” are rich bastards who think anyone who “breaks the law” must be “punished” — i.e. they’re completely without the ability to “judge” anything. If they’d been there in Solomon’s time, they’d have sent both mothers and the baby to jail for “antisocial behaviour”.
Notice ‘wikileaks’ never revealed anything of importance, like how 9-11 was a CIA-Mossad black op or how the mass media is monopolized by Jews. Assange was/is a Commie agent. Remember how he or his CIAntifa operation ‘wikileaks’ released the membership list of the BNP? Interesting how wikileaks never doxed antifa or some other Communist-anarchist scum groups.
I used to live in east london real Kray country
no black crime allowed there !
one day in lea bridge rd i ran into ronnie Kray outside the jailhouse rock club, the venue for the local rockers
Kray said to me and i have never forgotten this
” there are more criminals inside the legal system that there are outside it ”
god how true that is
The only use I had for Julian Assange, is the hope that he would finally reveal that Seth Rich was the source of the Clinton email information posted on Wikileaks. This in turn would link Hillary to Rich’s death and result in prison time for her. However, I realize that this will probably happen when pigs fly and Hillary will never be convicted of anything that will remove her from the world’s stage… Yet, I am still keeping my fingers crossed!
Anyone who has studied Assange; and I have, AND… who knows anything about physiognomy KNOWS that Assange is some kind of Cointelpro. He NEVER reveals or talks about anything real or… about those who are of the greatest concern. He’s exposed NOTHING of value, AND… that’s his job. In my opinion, he’s a phony through and through.
@Wellen Dowd
Any friend of Ivor Biggin? 😅
Quote: “… realise that what the public is perceiving is only the fibs, not the whoppers”.
The Big Lie technique. It relies very much on the fact that the masses are both stupid and easily frightened. Stupid because the enormity of the lie is beyond their intelligence, and second because should they realise the truth, they would be terrified (and therefore shut their minds).
You people don’t believe anything. I bet you don’t even believe your own parents.
Of course, you also believe that anyone that doesn’t believe what you do is a fool.
From viewing Assange’s visage its likely he’s of Jewish descent pretending to be a ‘white gentile’.