Ethan Huff – Natural News July 18, 2022
Just hours before now-former United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson resigned from his post on July 7, the British government quietly and strategically dropped a major bombshell confirming that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are not saving lives.
Since at least April of this year, the “fully vaccinated” population of England accounts for the vast majority of deaths that are being blamed on “covid” – this in terms of deaths per 100,000 people, which is how the data is presented.
While the unvaccinated are mostly doing just fine, going about their lives with normal health, those who took all the jabs in obedience to Johnson’s regime are dropping like flies, probably due to vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).
As you may recall, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) announced back in March that starting on April Fool’s Day, it would no longer be publishing the vaccination status of covid cases, hospitalizations, or deaths. Now we know why they did this. (Related: the UKHSA also deleted a study from its official reporting that linked covid injections to increased risk of infection.)
“At the time, the UKHSA claimed this was because the UK Government had ended free universal Covid-19 testing and this, therefore, affected their ‘ability to robustly monitor Covid-19 cases by vaccination status,’” reports Exposé News.
“However, this was a lie.”
Fauci Flu shots increase a person’s risk of death from “covid,” data shows
As the UKHSA was fudging the numbers and changing its reporting standards, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), another British government agency, published a report of its own outlining deaths by vaccination status in England. That report showed that England’s vaccinated population accounted for a whopping 94 percent of deaths between April 1 and May 31.
Once again, it becomes abundantly clear why the UKHSA changed its reporting requirements starting on April 1: because the data shows, without a shadow of a doubt, that covid injections are killing people, not protecting them.
“… now we can also reveal that this is not because the majority of people have been vaccinated, which in turn statistically results in more deaths,” Exposé News further reported.
“It is instead, as the ONS data shows, because the Covid-19 injections are increasing recipients’ risk of death if infected with Covid-19.”
Using Pfizer’s own vaccine efficacy formula, it can be further shown from official UK data that getting injected for covid has a negative effectiveness against death, meaning a person is more likely to die if he or she gets jabbed as opposed to just leaving natural immunity intact.
The Pfizer documents, which a court order forced the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release against the agency’s will, further show that the mRNA (messenger RNA) injections from both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna induce ADE, which causes natural immunity to wane over time, much like AIDS.
Because of this, many now refer to the immune degradation that occurs post-injection for covid as VAIDS, or vaccine-induced AIDS, as it bears many of the same hallmarks as traditional AIDS – though mechanistically the action of immune destruction is different.
“ADE can arise in several different ways but the best-known is dubbed the ‘Trojan Horse Pathway,’” Exposé News further explains. “This occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure.”
“Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off-limits (typically immune cells, like macrophages). That, in turn, can lead to wider dissemination of illness, and over-reactive immune responses that cause more severe illness.”
Fauci Flu shots are a death sentence for many. To keep up with the latest, visit ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
The Fake “Extermination” Camps of WW2
Another addition to Holocaustianity — aka, The Song That Never Ends About the Event That Never Happened” –is the distinction now made between “work camps” and “death camps.”
https://www.realhistorychan.com/holohoax-camps.html
Unrelated, apart from Boris forced from out by coup. Boris goes on to say that Labour (Red Tories, & part of the one party state), & the ‘deep state’ will seek to reverse Brexit once he’s gone.
So this is Boris getting cheap points for his memoirs, after dinner speeches, and presstitutions.
This is the first official admission that Brexit has been a staggering failure. But as I said many, many years ago, the only way for the EU to become a full blown super state, was for Britain to ditch all of its EU agreements. So when we rejoin, and I’ve know idea when, or if there’s even enough time to rejoin, the UK will rejoin with no dirty laundry.
I always suspected this to be the plan. For Britain to rejoin the EU after German has been broken by illegal US sanctions.
Who voted for Brexit? 👂👂👂🦻
More expose fluff. 94% huh? So, “rhoda”, HOW MANY ARE ACTUALLY DEAD? He won’t tell you, because 94% of 100 is 94, 94% of 200 is 188, and so on, and no one cares about such small numbers. By definition, most of the dead will be jabbed, because most people are jabbed. If 60% are jabbed, then you’d expect 60% of the dead to be jabbed. If fact, you’d expect it to be more than 60% because almost all old people are jabbed, and old people make up most of the dead because they die of numerous things. No one’s saying the jabs aren’t doing damage, but the expose has been pushing this crap for profit for years now. Tell us the numbers, not the percentages. I bet there’s less than 50 dead from the actual jabs, and no ones cares about them, any more than they cared about the 100,000 killed in the don’t care homes, or the 30,000 that die on the streets every single year.
What I have become cognisant of in recent years is the “Emperor’s New Clothes” syndrome that relates to unnecessary complexity – often of a mathematical nature – from economics to physics – and biology.
The process of obfuscation is to accept a body of “theory” e.g. Einstein’s General Relativity or Keynes ramblings – and I have read his so called magnum opus twice – that no one understands, but some may pretend they understand. They can only pretend to understand certain ideas because the cumbersome and even deliberate complexity perhaps, prevents clarity. In this lack of clarity there can even be different “schools” of say Einstein or Keynes.
In so far as there are divergences in the mainstream anointed paradigm, Hegelian dialectic is set up that defines the boundaries of the discussion; be these boundaries be economics or physics, and yes, biology. The permissible spectrum of debate employs people who are paid to work within their selected paradigm. Challengers are often derided as amateurs or sacked-ostracised if going again the grain. If you are an African president going against the scamdemic you are assassinated.
Germ theory and its attendant Ptolemaic epicycles devoted to immunity is another one of those bodies of theory that requires an initiate entry level of mumbo jumbo that embodies the priestly garb of whitecoat, stethoscope, and some voodoo incantation committed to paper with a red seal behind the desk of said priest. Said priest will also have unnecessary letters in front behind their name to give their words extra humph in the minds of the gullible. Indeed, some of their minor spells may have potency, but some of their more major necromancies might even invert their said intent.
Everyone taking an interest in the philosophy of science would have heard of Occam’s Razor, the principle of deriving theory from the fewest numbers of moving parts. That is the least numbers of equations or agencies involved in a particular phenomenon. The problem with the human ego is that the notion of understanding reality with the wrong paradigms exalts their skills as a debater and lawyer without achieving that Occam like clarity. I do not believe that the creation is something that can be comprehended only by initiates. Initiates can only be puppets in the political process.
Politicians twist language all the time to say what they don’t mean and mean what they don’t say but to resign then not leave just takes the piss.
Ivana Trump was double-vaxxed days before she died, according to sources close to the Trump family.
The former socialite and ex-wife of Donald J. Trump reportedly received a second Covid-19 booster shot and a Monkeypox vaccination as a precautionary measure in advance of a vacation to St. Tropez. Her vacation never happened because she was found dead in her New York City townhouse only a day before her scheduled excursion.
https://realrawnews.com/2022/07/ivana-double-vaxxed-days-before-death/
https://rumble.com/v1cd2ln-did-humankind-just-have-its-genome-poisoned-more-doctors-demand-investigati.html
This integration into DNA was no accident. They hoped for this – it’s a “breakthrough technology” and a “good thing” apparently.
https://www.medicaldaily.com/can-mra-vaccine-change-dna-459011
UK Gov investing £200 million into this sector via “specialist funds”.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bold-new-life-sciences-vision-sets-path-for-uk-to-build-on-pandemic-response-and-deliver-life-changing-innovations-to-patients
Life sciences has been one of the “chosen” drivers of economic growth since the early seventies, and despite having no success in producing any cures, it still is.
However the sector has been very successful in producing super risky gain of function pathogens for the military – securitisation of the sector going full steam ahead.
The average age of covodd death was older than the average lifespan, so how could the covodd jab possibly change that. Did it even prevent the already dying from dying from covodd, nope.
“A good day to bury bad news”. Literally.
Now watch as the ” heatwave is used to cover & kill people, I expect to see more heart related deaths.
It looks like the Shipman shot is working well.
I wonder how many white gentiles have been exterminated in 2022 so far? Ths Shipman shot combined with anti-white Judeo-Communist Russia’s invasion & implementation of Holodomor 2 in Ukraine–one can reasonably conclude that its not been a good year for ‘white population growth’. Yet take notice, the nonwhite population of the world (Negroid/Mongoloid/Latinos) increases every year into more & more billions of them…all waiting to invade England/USA/OZ/Canada to impregnate white pussy…while masses of dumb white males fill up stadiums cheering for their favorite simian sports team….
> Now watch as the ” heatwave is used to cover & kill people, I expect to see more heart related deaths.
Yeah, because heat doesn’t ever kill people.
> I wonder how many white gentiles have been exterminated in 2022 so far?
Probably zero. If you think otherwise, then prove it. Where are all the deaths? There’s no depopulation, just shifting all the money to your owners. The “middle classes” are laughing their heads off. The price rises don’t affect them one jot. They’re throwing cash around like confetti, buying stuff they don’t need and having endless “improvements” done to their mansions. Meanwhile, there’s now 350,000 homeless in the uk. Never mind.
Its worth to mention that 70% of british population is jabbed,
So out of 70% becomes 94% patiemts
@ Simon Smith
Part of the problem, is that the earliest investigations into medicine, the natural sciences and law, began during an era when educated men wrote in Latin and were likewise capable of referencing the works of the ancient Greek physicians, from untranslated scholastic works.
I don’t think that it began as obfuscation but it has certainly resulted in it. The English language doesn’t really become recognizably English, until Chaucer’s time and even at that, it’s replete with unfamiliar archaisms.
The languaging of classical academy is so preposterously convoluted as to be hugely prohibitive to wider understanding, even where, I would agree with you, the principle involved may be simple enough and potentially, accessible to all. As it happens, scientists from the nineteenth century onward, weren’t nearly as linguistically competent as their antecedents. In scientific nomenclature, you’ll quite often encounter absurd neologisms, with irregular (and, strictly, incorrect) combinations of ancient Greek and Latin in portmanteau constructions. Furthermore, Greek and Latin numerals seem to be used arbitrarily, depending on the cultural preference of the coiner of phrases or terms. This is true of prefixes, generally; one or the other of Hellenic or Roman seems to be quite acceptable.
What all of this amounts to, is mystique-building, which requires a voluntary concession to authority on the public’s part and moreover, their tacit acceptance of intellectual dependency.
Specialists dispense expertise, in part, at least, to elevate themselves socially, by evincing a reverend awe from the poorly schooled.
I can read Latin but I struggle with Greek, though I understand Greek letter values. Perhaps, that’s advantaged me a little but nonetheless, I have often endured the complexity of medical texts, till my head was spinning, with all the demands of its novel vocabulary. I have investigated legalise and legal process, until I’ve become so contemptuous for it, I’ve had to take the dog for a walk. They do enjoy making simple things formidably difficult but that doesn’t mean to say that, should occasion call, we can’t penetrate through the blarney and equip ourselves of what the initiates know. For example, I’ve represented myself twice, legally and I’ve won twice.
Simon Smith–they have to justify their salary and a life without work by kicking their explanations beyond comprehension by, for example, going into absurd territory: only today I commented somewhere about why glass is transparent, after a lecture that was impossible to understand. My explanation was simple
@andyay
Congratulations on the legal victories. Indeed, walking the dog might be regarded as an interesting figure of speech to delineate mental work from exertion in the physical world. My “walking the dog” yesterday involved a little bit of jogging that invited a little concerned comment from people who had watched what I presume was some BBC weather scare mongering…
In any case, the Latin (and Greek obfuscations?) were of course employed by the Catholic Church in order to spiritually disenfranchise the peasants. That I don’t subscribe to Christianity now gainsays that I might have been a Protestant back in the day before the internet – being constitutionally contrarian as it were. Censorship Mark I may have been the war against pagans, censorship Mark II, the preventions of English speakers the right(?) to read the Holy word(?) in our native language.
Interesting that you have wrestled with complexity in different areas to myself and have come to similar conclusions…
@Lewis
Yes indeed. But academia is steered by the funding it gets. Academic are politically clever in a very narrow “knowing what side their bread is buttered on”, but they are slaves to those who pay them. Slaves to their ego as well. I hardly ever observe titles such as Dr or professor or Sir etc etc I always feel we construct our own unnecessary hierarchy of deference when we do.
Ghost: much lower than 70%. 66, or more likely 60%.
@ jay
If you live over age 75 in the developed and advanced New World Order then you have had your share of life and it is time for you to completely retire from it, unless, that is you are something special to those in control of the purse strings.
The evidence is that the vaccines are hastening death rates of the most vulnerable and there are huge savings for our governments in following the IMF & World Bank Covid diktats when it comes to health-care costs and pension plans. I believe it is all very well planned and deliberate. Let me try to prove it to you.
The Covid 19 virus, the gain-of-function variations, and the vaccines have one thing in common. They all weaken the recipients’ natural immune systems making the very elderly and those with significant preexisting immune-compromising conditions more vulnerable to a variety deadly diseases. That is why death rates are up mainly for the vaxxed in those categories. As for the blood-clotting evidence from healthily athletes who have also died, it ought to be known if without athletic overexertion after being vaccinated they most likely would not have died. If so, then likely for any of the very elderly and the already significantly immune compromised their tolerance levels for exertion would be even more markedly compromised, such as for Trump’s ex-wife.
The evidence is that the virus(es) and the vaccines do bring more people closer to death’s door, and it is certainly a mystery why any government would continue forcing them on the people when all of the reliable evidence is that only such a tiny fraction of a percent of the population was ever at risk of death or anything serious from the virus – it being overwhelmingly that precise advanced-age group, and it also has been proven over and over again, and even admitted by many governments (including now Bill Gates), that the vaccines are not protecting anyone from the spread of the relatively benign virus. Clearly the evidence has been out for over a year now that the vaccines have caused far more harm than any good and are a disaster. Yet, the governments persist. So why?
Clearly, it it the nations with the most external debt per capita which are the most vaccinated (except for China of course whose vaccine figures are likely even more exaggerated than ours). It is also the most affluent nations on the globe which are the most vaccinated and also have the most external debt making them more hostage to the IFM- World Bank creditors fronting for the international banking cartel behind the UN Agendas, the WEF and the entire lockstep plandemic and the main push behind the forced vaccine programs. That is one inescapable correlation to site. Another is the fact that the same more affluent nations whose people have been most vaccinated have the lowest birth rates, and conversely the same data shows that the least vaccinated are of the poorest nations and which also have the highest birth rates.
Out of this one can ask that if the vaccines were planned to harm and not to protect then why would the international banksters target the people in the more affluent nations, when their traditional targets for culling has always been the poor and the underclass of the world? There are different answers to this question and one has been that the vaccines are really designed to protect the vaccinated, except for a few deaths, from a virus yet to be released. But that does not seem to fit the facts in that not even the masters of the universe could coordinate such a holocaust without causing mass uprisings. Therefore, if both the virus, or viruses, and the vaccines are in fact are harming the recipients then we already know exactly who are being most harmed, and then if we look at the other side of the global fertility data and consider the data with respect to increased life expectancy you find that precisely in all nations mostly under the thumb of the international bankster cartel with the lowest birth rates also have the most “excess” elderly, and with many others suffering from significant immuno-compromised conditions, the continued lives of these same people in the highly-vaccinated nations are presently crippling all of the pension and health-care plans. These same nations have very highest health-care and pension obligations on the planet. For instance, the average life expectancy for a person in Canada and Western Europe was 82 before the Covid vaccine care out.
To accelerate death rates of the “nearly dead” in order to alleviate alleged “unaffordable” health-care and pension obligations would serve to prune the demographic trees of the major debtor nations into shapes which the IMF & World Bank lenders would indeed find more acceptable and “sustainable”. Sustainability is after all the mantra for everything else they advocate. They are our major creditors and together with our governments they have already admitted that most pension plans and heath-care services simply are no longer sustainable or soon will not be with the now aging baby-boom population of mainly the highly vaccinated West.
Motive is clearly established in all of this and it ought to give rise to more people who simply want to continue living asking the following questions:
What exactly was in the vaccines there were given?
Who was given what in what batch with what ingredients? and
What in fact are the death rates for each and every age category for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated?
Coincidentally, these are precisely the questions which the IFM & World Bank hitmen and our governments refuse to answer.
Simon Smith, would love to be able to communenwith you more directlty; great comments!.
@ Simon Smith
Scholarly aptitude is less about expertise in a particular academic discipline, than it is about asking the right questions of the knowledge you’ve acquired. This is a dynamic process, involving the constant framing and reframing of problems which present.
Your initial post is exemplary because it offers the reader a way into approaching a subject, which may have eluded their framing; their manner of seeing.
The writers, whom we tend to like the best, are the ones who articulate our own unarticulated sentiments. The ones who, apart from delighting us with their wordsmithery, reveal processes of thought, that we can emulate, to likewise speak for our own souls with honesty. I think your first post gives voice to a concern that’s all-encompassing but people as yet don’t know how to penetrate into the issue of the disenfranchisement from language itself. I merely nuanced your thoughts.
I have argued in the past, like George Bernard Shaw did, for a phonetic simplification of the spelling of English words. There are too many phonetic redundancies in English spelling which prohibit learning.
An Italian friend once told me, that when he first spent time in England, he was amazed by how often English people asked someone to spell words over the phone. He observed that in Italy, the only occasion that anyone has, to ask how to spell something over the phone, is if there’s an awkward or foreign surname involved. English spelling is unnecessarily difficult.
My legal victories were unspectacular (but satisfying.) One was a tribunal (= a non-confrontational court) concerning redundancy pay. The other was my petition to Her Majesty’s Jury Central Summoning Bureau, informing them that I was declining their invitation to jury service. Everyone told me that I couldn’t win that one. I was supposed to provide a maximum of five foolscap pages, pleading my case, (preferrably in consultation with a legal representative;) as well as, three (or four) character references, one among whom had to be a religious leader, if your appeal involved a religious prohibition. Even after all of that, very few people annually are excused jury duty.
I dispensed with all of the etiquette and wrote a pithy five line long petition, with no character references and I deliberately submitted my appeal a month late, once they had started threatening me with fines. My five lines were sufficient for the Chief Clerk of Jury Summoning to respond, “Thank you for your reply. You are henceforth relieved of jury duty. Your further correspondence, in this matter, is not required.” Hehehe.
“Walking the dog” wasn’t a metaphor by the way. It would have been Chewy or Prudence, in those days.
@Rwa
You can email me at aloadofcobras@gmail.com (as can anyone else…)
😉