Tim Kelly, Nobuhiro Kubo, Paul Sandle and Tim Hepher – Reuters July 14, 2022
Britain and Japan are close to an agreement to merge their next-generation Tempest and F-X fighter jet programmes, with the two countries aiming for a deal on a new joint project by year-end, three sources told Reuters.
It would be the first time Japan has sought a non-U.S. partner for a large military programme and the first major collaboration between Tokyo and London, going beyond what had been expected when industrial talks began five years ago.
“This would be an equal partnership between Japan and Britain,” said one of the sources with knowledge of the plan. It will cost tens of billions of dollars, he added.
The push to combine the Japanese F-X programme, led by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI), with Britain’s Tempest, managed by BAE Systems PLC, by December has not previously been reported.
The sources asked to remain anonymous because they are not authorised to speak to the media.
“The main thing that we are aiming for is to build a common jet, that may have small differences in design for each country,” said another of the sources.
Britain could handle exports in Europe, while Japan would take care of the Asian market, another of the three sources said.
Collaboration would spread development costs, while exporting would increase production lots and reduce the price per plane, helping both countries stretch their defence budgets.
It would represent a deepening of security ties between the two close U.S. allies. London is taking on a bigger military role in Asia under a strategic “tilt” towards the Indo-Pacific, and Tokyo is expanding defence cooperation beyond Washington.
Japan’s policy, pushed by the late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to strengthen Tokyo’s hand against neighbouring China, has taken on new urgency following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which Moscow describes as a “special operation.”
The switch to a European partner comes as Japan’s defence spending rises, with the budget expected to double over the coming decade as Prime Minister Fumio Kishida sticks with Abe’s national security agenda and fulfils an election pledge to “substantially” increase military outlays.
“We would like to decide how we can cooperate by the end of this year, and are considering various possibilities,” Japan’s defence ministry said.
Britain’s defence ministry had no immediate comment. The country’s air force head, Air Chief Marshal Mike Wigston, told a conference on Thursday that Britain is “exploring partnering opportunities and sharing our technological expertise with a range of international partners, including Japan and Italy”.
MHI and BAE declined to comment. Britain plans to give an update on Tempest at next week’s Farnborough Airshow, another source said, without elaborating.
OPENING FOR EUROPE
Japan’s partnership with Britain is a chance for BAE and other European Tempest companies, such as Rolls-Royce, missile maker MBDA and Italian defence group Leonardo to tap a growing market long-dominated by U.S. companies.
Efforts to merge the fighter jet projects follow deepening co-operation between the UK and Japan in recent years from the JNAAM missile project to sensor work and a deal to develop an engine demonstrator.
“You can see the direction of travel,” said Douglas Barrie, senior fellow for military aerospace at think-tank IISS.
It is more than 20 years since MHI, maker of the World War Two-era Zero fighter, and U.S. defence group Lockheed Martin Corp built Japan’s F-2 fighter, a short-winged derivative of the F-16 Fighting Falcon.
Lockheed, which later developed the F-35 stealth plane, had also been expected to help MHI build the F-X, an F-2 replacement, which Japan wants to deploy in the 2030s to counter advanced fighters from China.
The programme cost of developing the F-X is estimated by Japan defence ministry officials at around $40 billion, $700 million of which has been allocated this year, making it a lucrative proposition for Japanese companies that lost out as Tokyo bought American kit, including the F-35.
The BAE-led Tempest project to field a replacement for the European Typhoon combat jet has a government budget of 2 billion pounds ($2.38 billion) until 2025, when full development is slated to start.
It is one of two European initiatives for the next generation of air power alongside the Franco-German-Spanish Future Combat Air System, currently mired in divisions between partners Airbus and Dassault Aviation.
Lockheed, in 2018, had proposed using an F-22 Raptor airframe and F-35 components for the F-X, but that tentative partnership ended this year because U.S. control over the sensitive technology meant Washington could say when and how Japan maintained and upgraded its planes, the sources said.
A Lockheed spokesperson said questions about the programme should be referred to the Japanese government.
For Japanese companies, which were banned from exporting weapons overseas until 2014, the partnership is a chance to access foreign markets and European technology with potentially fewer restrictions than those imposed by Washington.
Tempest “is a flexible construct that lends itself to multiple forms of cooperation,” said defence analyst Francis Tusa.
The fighter will still need some U.S. components, such as for communications and data links, to ensure interoperability with U.S. forces.
As talks in Tokyo and London push ahead, it is still unclear what role, if any, the Swedish and Italian governments will have in the new project after agreeing to collaborate on Tempest.
(Reporting by Tim Kelly, Nobuhiro Kubo and Yukiko Toyoda in Tokyo, Tim Hepher and Paul Sandle in London; Editing by Jane Merriman)


I’ve not read this article, but I will focus on the headline, because there are a few important points.
This merger, or venture, if it goes ahead, proves conclusively, that the F35 is a pile of shit. The US won’t sell the Raptor. Why? Because its probably much worse than the F35.
The next point, bankrupt Britain originally said they would build their own 6th gen fighter. Well, the UK is bankrupt, so needs to get into bed with bankrupt Japan.
This move also tells us that the UK deep state doesn’t trust the US on China and Taiwan. The Japanese are much more up for a fight with China than Amerika is, even if Japan its ready to fight, but have closer ties to the UK makes sense.
Take the Soloman Islands aligning with China. Now, this isn’t a big military deal, but it sends an axe head through the US/Australian power myth, and the UK doesn’t trust the US either.
The WW2 legacy has almost faded away. They’ve died off, & and their children are dying off. The UK as this aircraft carrier moored off the EU, well, that idea has sunk.
When Russian fake news kingpins, ex military, politicians, ministers, senior diplomats and Putin, single out the UK for extra special nuke treatment, then you can see where Russia sees the real power, and that is the City Crime Cartels, and three letter agencies.
politicians wrecked our aircraft industry
in w w 2 Lord Mountbatten of boy-nobbing fame
had influence over the navy and wanted all aircraft moneys spent on ships
how we got together the planes for the battle for britain is mind boggling, we only won that as we had broken the german codes and bombed their aircraft on the ground
After the war the most incompetant of politicians the churchill family said te next war will be a nuclear one so we dont need planes and scrapped the TSR2 the plane the russians said was a world beater
and other top aircraft
god save us from politicians
With the global replacement in full action. Israel will do all the thinking for us. But the assembly’s can be done , with the help of Elon, in black Europe and black Northern America.
The F-35 isn’t so much a Lightning, more a …lights out. And the F-22 isn’t so much a Raptor, more a …rupture. And this thing won’t be so much an F-X either, more a …FA.
This whole stealth design concept seems flawed to me. If it isn’t sleek how can it be stealthy? Defence lobbyists must be slushing lots of taxpayer R+D funds back to politicians and top brass not to scrub these projects is all I can assume. Stealth boats look like a boot and stealth planes probably fly like one.
john Ferguson: after WW2, how many aircraft manufactures did we have? Far, far too many, and the UK kept throwing money at military development, and especially military aircraft.
The US has gone through the same mill and chucked sack loads of money at it and ended up with crap.
Because of deep seated prejudices, the UK regime won’t colaberate with France, which would make sense, but not in the UK. We’ll have teams flying back and forth to Japan, that’s oh so green.
So what of the F35…??? Jst hype and pretty pictures.
On one hand they want to save the planet and on the other they want to blow it up…
Go figure
JAPS BETTER BE FRIENDS
WITH CHINA !
> Britain could handle exports in Europe, while Japan would take care of the Asian market, another of the three sources said.
If I were to make guns in my potting shed I’d get arrested for something or other, but the “government” is allowed to make killing machines and open up a shop to any murderer that wants to blows people to pieces.
Good luck with selling to europe — they hate you even more than you hate them.
You can only have an air force if you have a government, but the Jews have ours
British engineers invented the scram-jet but did not develop it, as GB was losing its relevance. China did, decades later, and did not even change the name. It was the next generation after jet power
X-15 with experimented scramjet attached – in the 1960’s.
X-47A in 2004 = mach 10. But let’s just pretend they don’t know nuttin’
Dammit the paperwork must have fallen behind a file cabinet in the Pentagram basement.