Part 1: A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation
Tyranny is a habit which may be developed until at last it becomes a disease. I declare that the noblest nature can become so hardened and bestial that nothing distinguishes it from that of a wild animal. Blood and power intoxicate; they help to develop callousness and debauchery. The mind then becomes capable of the most abnormal cruelty, which it regards pleasure; the man and the citizen are swallowed up in the tyrant; and the return to human dignity, repentance, moral resurrection, becomes almost impossible.”
Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The House of the Dead
Margaret Anna — Off-Guardian June 28, 2022
If you’re the type of person who’s brimming with loving kindness and thinks everyone is sunshine and daisies like you, you’re due for a crash course on tyrants and their enablers.
Maybe you think the idea that philanthropaths are trying to liquidate a hefty portion of the populace is preposterous and anyone who says so is a misinformation-superspreading conspiracy theorist.
What’s a philanthropath? A philanthropath is a socio/psychopath masquerading as a philanthropist. This is a fairly accurate portrayal:
—
Bill Gates is a textbook example. If you’re exceptionally, prodigiously, monumentally deluded, you might think this planetary threat is a beacon of humanitarianism, but that’s only because he paid the media $319 million to tell you that while gasconading that his philanthropathic foundation has made a twenty-to-one return on its $10 billion investment (duper’s delight starts at 00:34) in the Vaccine Industrial Complex:
—
African women suddenly discover they’ve been sterilized via infertility-technology–laced tetanus vaccines, and Indian tribal children have died or suffered long-term injuries from Merck’s controversial Gardasil HPV vaccine—all thanks to the beneficence of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its NGO subsidiaries.
And I haven’t even gotten into his ties to the eugenics movement, friendship with Jeffrey Didn’t-Kill-Himself Epstein, or notorious TED talk citing “new vaccines” as a component of his population reduction aspirations.
It’s enough to make you want to watch this delicious pieing clip on repeat.
Another standard-issue philanthropath is DA-collecting, justice system–refurbishing George Soros, who looks like he’s been kept alive a century beyond his expiration date by sipping indigenous toddlers’ blood from satyr hooves.
Of course, you have the legacy lineages like the Ludlow–Massacring Rockefellers, retiree-defrauding Rothschilds, hypocritical Homestead-Mill–union-busting Carnegies (who teamed up with John D. Rockefeller to launch the petrochemical-pharmaceutical-medical complex), and the Hitler-heiling and Epstein–cavorting British Royal family whose munificent histories of philanthropathy are too immense, too boundless, and too tenebrous to outline here.
Frankly, those rabbit-holes are so dark, so tortuous, and so deep, I may never emerge if I travel down them.
And then there are the lesser-known varieties like the totally-not-a-Satanist Marina Abramović*, whose galactic fame and fortune can only be explained by a Luciferian handshake—a hypothesis bolstered by her tauntingly posing with fellow philanthropath Jacob Rothschild in front of the 1797 painting Satan Summoning His Legions.
As beguiling as such quixotic rabbit-holes appear, we don’t need to resort to dot-connecting the necromancers to prove the philanthropaths harbor devilish intentions.
We merely need to listen to them, their advisors, and their mentors.
Let’s start with these gobsmacking hopes expressed by former Director of the Club of Rome 1971 Project on Predicament of Mankind at MIT Dennis Lynn Meadows (emphases mine here and in subsequent quotes):
Globally, we are so far above the population and consumption levels which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it’s gonna come back down.… I hope that it can occur in a civil way, and I mean ‘civil’ in a special way. Peaceful.
Peace doesn’t mean that everybody’s happy, but it means that conflict isn’t solved through violence, through force but rather in other ways, and so, that’s what I hope for, that we can, I mean—the planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have.
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people.
Conversely, you can have more people … we could even have eight or nine billion probably if we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They’re always stupid. But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you could have them.
But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high standard, so we’re going to have a billion people. And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal so that people share the experience and you don’t have a few rich trying to force everybody else to deal with it. So those are my hopes.
Klaus Schwab’s beloved mentor and conscienceless, literarily-convicted war criminal Henry Kissinger appears to share these concerns, which he outlined in a December 10, 1974, National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM 200) on population growth:
- The second new feature of population trends is the sharp differentiation between rich and poor countries. Since 1950, population in the former group has been growing at 0 to 1.5 percent per year, and in the latter at 2.0 to 3.5 percent (doubling in 20 to 35 years).…
- Because of the momentum of population dynamics, reductions in birth rates affect total numbers only slowly.… Policies to reduce fertility will have their main effects on total numbers only after several decades. However, if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970’s and 1980’s.
Kissinger was most concerned about population growth in least developed countries (LDCs), partly because it could threaten access to “depletable resources (fossil fuels and other minerals)”:
[8] … the world is increasingly dependent on mineral supplies from developing countries, and if rapid population frustrates their prospects for economic development and social progress, the resulting instability may undermine the conditions for expanded output and sustained flows of such resources.
The now-declassified 123-page report stresses the urgency of implementing a population control plan in these nations:
[15] We cannot wait for overall modernization and development to produce lower fertility rates naturally since this will undoubtedly take many decades in most developing countries, during which time rapid population growth will tend to slow development and widen even more the gap between rich and poor.
Bill Gates seems to have especially taken this component of the World Population Plan of Action to heart:
[31(d)] Initiate an international cooperative strategy of national research programs on human reproduction and fertility control covering biomedical and socio-economic factors.
This passage is particularly sinister:
- There is an alternative view which holds that a growing number of experts believe that the population situation is already more serious and less amenable to solution through voluntary measuresthan is generally accepted. It holds that, to prevent even more widespread food shortage and other demographic catastrophes than are generally anticipated, even stronger measures are required and some fundamental, very difficult moral issues need to be addressed. These include, for example, our own consumption patterns, mandatory programs, tight control of our food resources. In view of the seriousness of these issues, explicit consideration of them should begin in the Executive Branch, the Congress and the U.N. soon.
With apparent admiration for China’s population control policies (“the People’s Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program”), the Kissinger report notes:
As Table 4 shows, the population of countries with centrally planned economies, comprising about 1/3 of the 1970 LDC total, is projected to grow between 1970 and 2000 at a rate well below the LDC average of 2.3 percent. Over the entire thirty-year period, their growth rate averages 1.4 percent, in comparison with 2.7 percent for other LDCs.
Between 1970 and 1985, the annual rate of growth in Asian communist LDCs is expected to average 1.6 percent and subsequently to decline to an average of 1.2 percent between 1985 and 2000. The growth rate of LDCs with market economies, on the other hand, remains practically the same, at 2.7 and 2.6 percent, respectively.
Thus, barring both large-scale birth control efforts (greater than implied by the medium variant) or economic or political upheavals, the next twenty-five years offer non-communist LDCs little respite from the burdens of rapidly increasing humanity. Of course, some LDCs will be able to accommodate this increase with less difficulty than others.
Moreover, short of Draconian measures there is no possibility that any LDC can stabilize its population at less than double its present size.
One of the short-term measures recommended is sterilization:
“Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available.”
Written the year following Roe v. Wade (now overturned), this report does not hesitate to praise abortion as a mechanism of population control—even while recognizing it is “politically sensitive”:
“No country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion.”
“Indeed, abortion, legal and illegal, now has become the most widespread fertility control method in use in the world today.”
Noting Section 114 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (P.L. 93-189) prohibits the use of A.I.D. funds for abortion programs, a caveat is made for research:
A.I.D. funds may continue to be used for research relative to abortion since the Congress specifically chose not to include research among the prohibited activities.”
Lest you be tempted to believe the philanthropaths’ cruel-to-be-kind dreams of democidal dictatorship for the “greater good,” both history and science have proven this monstrous marriage of Malthusianism and Utilitarianism as wrong as the celebrity COVID modelers’ data deceits deployed to provoke a manipulable mass panic.
Rik Mayall tried to warn us about such presumptuous puppeteers in his 2014 film, One by One, before his startling heart attack at fifty-six:
—
Part 2: Downloadable Digital Dictatorships explores the transhumanist implementation of the smart dictatorship Meadows longed for now that the technology is catching up with his and Kissinger’s democidal dreams. In Part 3: Yuval Noah Harari: Not the Man We Think He Is?, I examine footage left on the cutting-room floor in an attempt to better understand the psychology of this philanthropathic enabler and how his mentee, Klaus Schwab, is putting his philosophy into practice.
—
Margaret Anna examines propaganda, neuropsychology, culture, linguistic programming, and mass control in her aim to awaken the sleeping before tyranny triumphs. Visit her blog to read more of her work or buy her a coffee.
*I don’t really think Marina Abramović is a Satanist. That would be giving her too much credit. In a debauched art world where only controversy attracts fame and fortune, she is simply conducting parlor tricks to outrage and offend. It is a highly successful marketing tactic; the more rage and disgust generated, the more dinars.
Can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media
Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.
None of this applies to White people, who have volunteered to reduce their numbers drastically, in all of their countries. Africans double every 25 years, and China went back to a three-child policy, so nog and chonk are the guilty ones if human increase is bad
Margaret Anna’s article is something of a stylistic curiosity. After reading it, I looked over it again, selecting a few of the more tantalizing links that she offers. Her choice of references are not perfunctory, nor even just illustrative, but serve to bring background depth to her narrative and give resonance to her arguments. I don’t know if I’ve encountered such link-heavy journalism before. It’s almost as if the writer crafts her sentences to incorporate the link. It doesn’t seem forced though. On the contrary, the narrative is seamlessly integrated.
After consideration, I’d say that Margaret Anna’s supplement-rich style, is very effective in communicating the intricacy of her subject and bringing authority to her critique. Only a writer of superior calibre could achieve this.
The title of the article is, of itself, quite wonderfully poetic. If you’re going to introduce a neologism to a readership, it is as well that it’s such a juicy collocation as “philanthropathy.” I like that.
I wondered if it had been used before and I checked but the scant references to the phrase, all point to Margaret Anna’s article above. So, I guess, she must have made up “philanthropathy” herself. I give her ten out of ten, a big tick and a gold star for that.
I wouldn’t bring too much disputation to her arguments, either. I do think that she’s mistaken about Marina Abramovic, however. The Charnel House artist-in-residence is certainly a Satanist. What the author fails to grasp, is that a significant faction of modern-day Satanic devotées are non-theistical, although they may indulge pseudo-religious ritual. This creed of devilry is self-worshipping. Its initial expression was with Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan and its disciples but continues today in a reinvigorated incorporation, led by LaVey’s erstwhile lieutenant, Lucien Greaves, in the publicity-hungry, poseur-provocateur, Satanic Temple. The Dajjal look-a-like, Greaves is likewise a non-theistical Satanist. You don’t have to believe in Satan, nor need you advocate in his name, to be a Satanist by the contemporary standard.
Marina Abramović found fame not because of talent but because in this brief lifetime she chose to become a sorceress who, strangely, doesn’t use the dark arts to empower herself but in the service of others, and for which after her she dies she will likely spend a long, long time serving some very dark spirits before her soul is free to move on again. Not only that, but she was middle-aged and half her life over before she did find fame, and so her penitence will not be for a lifetime of sorcery but for a few brief decades.
What we see is the art. What we don’t see is the Black Magic.
As I have mentioned to various people, there should be a channel on cable/sat TV called “The Execution Channel” where there are 24 hour a day broadcasts of those involved with tyranny and crimes against the human race who get what they have coming (this would be live and recorded/rebroadcast executions).
With that, virtually all those mentioned in this article would be in a mass grave with .223 or .308 holes in their torsos.
This is the United States of America – defend us against enemies; foreign and domestic.
When you negate the source of life, God, then you choose death in all of your decisions. Death becomes your compass on which you base day to day decisions. For example, many liberals and/or progressives deny God and therefore base their decisions on death as in promoting abortion that is death to the child and mental, emotional and spiritual death for the parents. It is also death to the human race. They promote sex that does not reproduce life as in homosexuality, transsexuality, etc. They prioritize climate change and carbon taxes over human life. They promote socialism and communism which results in death in many ways to the individual.
These highfalutin Malthusians who are obsessed with depopulating the planet of the apes are swollen-headed primates of the lowest order. There’s plenty of room at the Hotel Concentration for all of these philanthropathological hippopotacrites.
If only 2 % of the time, money and effort that is wasted on “Defense” was invested in permaculture, TRUE sustainable practices, re-fertilizing the Earth instead of destroying it wholesale, etc., the Earth might be able to sustain 10 times more. Who knows?
All you need to do is allow the free flow of information and qualified people will rise to natural positions of authority. With a meritocracy, you have the return of sanity. What the Earth cannot sustain is the idiocy, mendacity and greed of the relatively small pack of lying hyenas, control freaks and perverts who are constantly telling people to believe their incessant lies.
Delete The DElite and the light brings delight.
Hitler, Jews, Satan, The Afterlife, Eden, Digital Dictatorship, SADS, Smiling Faces – Harry Vox, EyesIsWatchin, Media Giant, Rabbi Manis Friedman, Paul Gautschi, Delete Lawz, EyesIsWatchin, Sunshine Baby
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2022/06/hitler-satan-jews-afterlife-eden.html
Regarding population:
If you look at the UK, you’ll see that between 1970 and 2010 the population rose from 55.57 million to 63.45 million
Source
If you look at Pakistan you’ll see that between 1970 and 2010 the population rose from 58 million to 179 million.
Source
Now you know why they were more than happy to flood (and keep flooding) the UK with Indian sub continent peoples.
As lewis jones says above, whites are declining. No need for immigration, quite the contrary. What is needed is a reversal in population decline and to do that, well, hasta la vista abortion, end of LGBTQ+ and increase in heterosexuality. That’s not going to happen soon, but certainly with all the morons taking the vaccines, they’ll die off and those left will be the awake, who are of course anti NWO, jew, immigration, LGBTQ+, anti nationalism etc amongst others. Of course, there are many other reasons as to population decline, as we know, but what we’re seeing is the obliteration of the European peoples. We are only seeing one way immigration from Africa, the Indian subcontinent and the middle east.
The world is not overpopulated, certainly not in the west, or many parts of Asia. China and Japan have serious problems in the future, courtesy of low birth rates.
The way to SOLVE overpopulation, in the lands where there are too many people is simple – keep them in their lands and if WHAT THEY CAN GROW does not sustain their current population size, then it’s too large and needs to fall. You don’t need to play about with vaccine and depopulation through family planning. You simply end the export of foods to Africa and India. Their population size will mirror their food production capability.
> Africans double every 25 years, and China went back to a three-child policy, so nog and chonk are the guilty ones if human increase is bad
Ah, the glories of “humanity”. I wonder why all the “leaders” are such bloodthirsty bastards.
I’ve no idea if the figures you just trotted out are facts, but the africans are increasing because you and your friends in whitey land keep feeding them and giving them medicine. If you’d leave them alone then the world they live in would reduce their numbers. I wonder if you’re pro or anti abortion?
As for the “chonk” (did you mean chink?), the chinese “government” basically gave up. The lower child policy had zero effect because all the people just lied, because that’s what people are. If you had an island that could support 100 people and no more, the women would spew out brats regardless, no matter their skin color.
> the planet can support something like a billion people
I beg to differ. The planet is not their for humans. Any humans at all will destroy and spread evil wherever they go. If you had just 100 people, they’d be raping and torturing each other, not to mention every other living thing. Look what happened to fletcher christian and his pals. The plant can support this many people: 0.
chonk-you love my new word long time
@ White Elephant
> If you look at the UK, you’ll see that between 1970 and 2010 the population rose from 55.57 million to 63.45 million
> If you look at Pakistan you’ll see that between 1970 and 2010 the population rose from 58 million to 179 million
Ah, the wonders of statistics. You can quote lots of numbers to make it sound like you’re right. Here, let me try:
Pakistan population density today: 288 people per square km
UK population density today: 270 people per square km
Therefore, pakistan can send more people because there are less people per km in the uk.
> Now you know why they were more than happy to flood (and keep flooding) the UK with Indian sub continent peoples.
Who’s happy? The pakis? Or the government?
> As lewis jones says above, whites are declining.
> What is needed is a reversal in population decline
Why? You all keep saying it, but why? Most people on this planet aren’t white. You are (and so am I by the way) and you don’t want to be in the minority? But really, I’m curious, why do you think it’s needed? Because white is better? All the people that abuse me are white. All the people that threaten me are white. All the people trying to jab me are white. All the people that own and control my country are white. All the evil people are white. I’m under no illusion that once they’re non white things will change, but I still hate all the whites that have their knives into me.
> The world is not overpopulated, certainly not in the west, or many parts of Asia.
What a blase attitude you have. Whenever someone makes some pompous statement like that I always reply with why? From my point of view, the world is critically and irreversibly overpopulated. Why do I say it? Because the human population keeps on going up by 80m a year, because there are humans everywhere, because there’s nowhere for anyone that wants to escape from the humans to go, and because I just don’t like ’em.
> China and Japan have serious problems in the future, courtesy of low birth rates.
There’s that thing again: “low birth rates”. What on earth do you mean? I can’t even imagine, but I’m guessing you’ve looked something up on the internet, or just read what someone else wrote. Look, if the human population is ever going to go down, or even stop going up by 80m a year, then you have to have lower birth rates than before. You make it sound like the stinking things are going to die out.
> The way to SOLVE overpopulation, in the lands where there are too many people is simple – keep them in their lands and if WHAT THEY CAN GROW does not sustain their current population size, then it’s too large and needs to fall
I agree with you completely. And send the ones already here back too. But you’re ignoring their point of view. You say you want more whites. Well, they want more non whites. And because there are God knows how many more non whites than whites they’ll inevitably win, unless you’re willing to slaughter billions of them. The most numerous are indians and chinese. They’ll rule the world in the end, no matter what you do. Everything else is just spitting in the wind.
Voltman:
“If only 2 % of the time, money and effort that is wasted on “Defense” was invested in permaculture, TRUE sustainable practices, re-fertilizing the Earth instead of destroying it wholesale, etc., the Earth might be able to sustain 10 times more. Who knows?”
10 times more huh? How about 20? Or 50? Let’s have as many as the planet can contain without exploding. It’ll be ‘great’.
“All you need to do is allow the free flow of information and qualified people will rise to natural positions of authority. With a meritocracy, you have the return of sanity.”
Let me guess: you see yourself as having ‘merit’?
Do you even see what you wrote there? You said “all the people that I agree with should be able to own and control all the people that I don’t agree with” – which makes you exactly the same as the current ‘leaders’.
You won’t agree of course – no doubt I’m a “commie” – but personally I don’t want to live in a world where I don’t have the ability to control every aspect of my life, and for that to be true you need to remove all the money, all the power and all the ownership.
No doubt I also have no ‘merit’.
I always have a chuckle whenever I grab a glimpse of Marina Abramovich (yes yes Abramovich)…
because even though she is supposedly from ‘Serbian’ Orthodox Christian lineage and related to a famous Slav Patriarch…
She is in fact the female ‘happy Merchant’……
https://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/863/287/503.jpg
or perhaps..
https://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/025/251/cfb.jpg
what say you..is Marina a red sea pedestrian?
is Marina more Marrano?…
NB: Of course it’s no real surprise that the Orthodox Church of any denomination is full of animist ‘jews’ (whatever a ‘jew’ actually is)…
Just like the Roman iteration…
In fact I remember reading some paper detailing Italian somewhat recent genetic ancestry…and… that just like the Russians…. the southern Italians are genetically more of less ‘jews’ (or at least very very close)…
Sephardic (carthage) up through Sicily and Mongol Turks via ali babas bazaar to Venice and Florence… these were the types of course that brought the so called Renaissance (and it was for wealthy Semitics) with them, the banking ..glassware the kabala etc etc..
I mean.. take a good long look at that imbecile and traitor Salvini…
he could be Marinas brother..
Fantastic article, and I have to agree with Voltman and those who mark the problem of the incredibly shirking white man of the West to the glee of minorities in their midst who come from ever-increasing populations in developing nation.
Those who turn a blind eye to the population culling efforts going on everywhere and to the fact that the people of one culture or ethnic group are not a reasonable facsimiles of another to be shifted around the globe to fill in the blank spaces created by the top-down, social-engineering few, are now becoming the authors of their own misfortune. The social engineering and brainwashing through our governments. our public educational institutions, the media, and the entertainment industry to destroy family values and the desire for children have deliberately caused a huge birth dearth and demographic imbalance in the West. What will occur based on the successful testing ground in the West will be that much more vigorous efforts through more overt means are bound to be used to knock off the populations of the rest of the world, which unfortunately too many people in the West think is a jolly idea to somehow more equally spread the infertility blight.
Like everything else, the Few running things always seem to create a problem in order to be able to implement their solutions, which is clearly shown in this case where on one hand they make children scarce in most Western nations, and at the same time they destabilize developing nations with wars, debt rigging, resource exploitation, and privation in order to herd millions of displaced migrants across our borders like they were cattle.
Development with the sharing of information and know-how with every improving technology diversifies interests and is not only the means of sustaining more people but also is a from of natural birth control. The real task ought have been to ensure that the excessive materialism of the West did not replace the natural desire for family and children. The people in the developing world do not need artificial contraception and or any social engineering to destabilize and destroy the family system. We knew this in the West by the early 1960’s from the effect of our materialism, diversification of interests, and falling birth numbers. We also knew that the last thing which was needed to sustain our populations and our Western cultures were the efforts of those behind the money power and all of the anti-family and anti-child polices rolled out through our governments, the media and the entertainment industry. They were simply out to first destroy Western civilization and to make reduced number of children a condition of development in third-world nations.
These misguided Western rulers have buggered things up so bad that we have to wonder if their intent has been to destroy the Caucasian race and Christianity as some kind competition or rivals to their own tribe or creed in a quest for global hegemony. It also very much as if the neo-Malthusians in their ranks have mistaken the natural law seen in the adage, “The rich get richer and the poor get children.”. In third-world nations to reduce populations these money-power monsters have used use every toxin imaginable – in the food chain, in vaccines &, medications, in the water, in the air, and in every social and education policy imaginable all designed simply to reduce births. At the same time the people in their backwardness and poverty look on progeny and fecundity as security, and it does not make much difference to them if another child comes along. Having another child is not like the end of the world as it is for most of our child-phobic Western people.
No, I am not saying the balance is made by giving free food, machinery or even gobs of money to the poor as such giving only leads to continued outstretched hands. All that is needed is the sharing of knowledge and know how to enable the emergence of balanced and accessible, educational, social and business infrastructures like we have in the West while at the same time getting rid of all of the physical toxins and anti-family, anti-child polices we are deliberately inflicting on them and on ourselves.
Our increasing know-how and technology by itself is already a threat to sustaining ourselves with enough people simply through the effect of mass diversification of non-sexual interests, and as we now see in the West, the last thing we need is the insane ZPG stuff from the 1960’s and the 1970’s continuing to be imposed upon us. Nor do we need any efforts by the same crowd to diversify sexuality into non procreational ends. We have now at our doorsteps more and more people tripping into virtual reality through technological development and departing more and more from reality. They will need strong religious roots to connect them to true reality and to maintain the priority of children and family in order for there to be any real future with real people showing up in it.
100% right or bust,
Forgive me, I haven’t gone to Pakistan to count the population, but suffice to say the population, today is over 213 million today so the figures I gave were correct. Pakistan’s population exploded compared to the UK’s. That was the point I was making.
I, unlike you, do not want to see the white nations die out and I do not believe they will. I really can’t see where you’re going with your clear hatred of your own nation, but that’s something you have to deal with, not me.
Whites will rapidly reduce in population, but what will be left will be incredibly strong, resilient and intelligent peoples. And the rest of the world will know it. I really DO NOT see the whites being obliterated, especially by the Asian and Indian sub continent peoples. That’s not going to happen. What will happen though is the population will be decimated, but then those who will, will be the stupid.
And no, the world IS NOT overpopulated. What you fail to see is that you swallow the propaganda, hook, line and sinker. When they show you the world they show you Karachi, Mexico City, Mumbai, Tokyo, Lagos, Hong Kong etc, all the heavily populated cities. The rest of their country is vast open land, uninhabited. It’s just all the people are packed like sardines in the cities. I am under no illusion unlike you that the world is overpopulated. Far from it.
And yes, LOW BIRTH RATES. Look at Japan. China has had a one child policy that had to be ended because it was going to drastically reduce the future population. Look at the west? It’s population birth rate is something ridiculous like 1.4 or so, where 2.0 is needed to keep the population as it is.
You seriously need to relax more. You’re full of propaganda and in a terrible way, maniacal almost. The sky isn’t going to fall on your head and if you’re being attacked by whites (I can’t imagine where you are for that to happen, maybe you’re colour blind?) then I suggest learning some form of defense or relocating to where there are nicer people. Other than that, you seem to have given up already so I’d suggest taking the vaccine, not just for convid but also for monkey pox and do away with yourself quicker.
100% right or bust,
Forgive me, I haven’t gone to Pakistan to count the population, but suffice to say the population, today is over 213 million today so the figures I gave were correct. Pakistan’s population exploded compared to the UK’s. That was the point I was making.
I, unlike you, do not want to see the white nations die out and I do not believe they will. I really can’t see where you’re going with your clear hatred of your own nation, but that’s something you have to deal with, not me.
Whites will rapidly reduce in population, but what will be left will be incredibly strong, resilient and intelligent peoples. And the rest of the world will know it. I really DO NOT see the whites being obliterated, especially by the Asian and Indian sub continent peoples. That’s not going to happen. What will happen though is the population will be decimated, but then those who will, will be the stupid.
And no, the world IS NOT overpopulated. What you fail to see is that you swallow the propaganda, hook, line and sinker. When they show you the world they show you Karachi, Mexico City, Mumbai, Tokyo, Lagos, Hong Kong etc, all the heavily populated cities. The rest of their country is vast open land, uninhabited. It’s just all the people are packed like sardines in the cities. I am under no illusion unlike you that the world is overpopulated. Far from it.
And yes, LOW BIRTH RATES. Look at Japan. China has had a one child policy that had to be ended because it was going to drastically reduce the future population. Look at the west? It’s population birth rate is something ridiculous like 1.4 or so, where 2.0 is needed to keep the population as it is.
You seriously need to relax more. You’re full of propaganda and in a terrible way, maniacal almost. The sky isn’t going to fall on your head and if you’re being attacked by whites (I can’t imagine where you are for that to happen, maybe you’re colour blind?) then I suggest learning some form of defense or relocating to where there are nicer people. Other than that, you seem to have given up already so I’d suggest taking the vaccine, not just for convid but also for monkey pox and do away with yourself quicker.
THAT photo! I tell myself not to stare at her shnozz and look away. But I’m lured back and I’m staring at the shnozz again…
A shitty and useless comment. Yet so is this entire mendacious drama.
The higher educated women are the less they reproduce, Simple spend all that war money on education.
@ Fred B
> Those who turn a blind eye to the population culling efforts going on everywhere
That are having no noticeable effect. Look at the figures for the number of humans. They aren’t hard to find. Even your death jabs had no noticeable effect.
> to destroy family values and the desire for children
YOUR desire for children. Not everyone wants the damn things everywhere.
> have deliberately caused a huge birth dearth and demographic imbalance in the West
No they haven’t. Your deliberate ignoring of the facts — is that to ram home your opinion, or are you just too lazy to look things up? It’s true enough that you’re being replaced by foreigners, and that’s your own fault for doing absolutely nothing to stop it, but there’s no “infertility blight” or lowering of numbers of whites. The whites are having the same number of children they always had. What’s happening is that your white country is being flooded with non whites. A handful of cases of lower sperm count is probably the root of your claims of infertility, but we can all see where your claims of holocaust from a handful of death jab dead went can’t we? All you’ve got is some people who’s sperm count went down. That’s all.
> they make children scarce in most Western nations
Scarce? How? Show the numbers. They’re building more schools. They’re building more houses. Most of the occupants are white.
> We knew this in the West by the early 1960’s from the effect of our materialism, diversification of interests, and falling birth numbers
Delusion. There’s no “falling birth numbers”. There’s just increasing numbers of non whites and again, you have to do something if you want to stop that. What? Simply kill your owners.
> their intent has been to destroy the Caucasian race and Christianity
First, christianity doesn’t exist. Show me a christian.
Second, what’s so great about the white race? We hear a lot about how they invented this or that, but then we also hear a lot about how “tech” is being used to control and destroy everyone’s lives. Cars and planes haven’t exactly been a great advance have they? They cause pollution and their roads destroy everything everywhere they go. They also destroy community because instead of travelling together you’re all in your own little bubble, shutting out everyone else. Computers control your life, phones are used to spy on you, medical “tech” is used to poison you, building “tech” is used to create huge buildings filled with endless people, gun “tech” is used to create endless ways to kill and maim, chemical “tech” is used to create poison to spray everywhere, etc etc etc. No doubt it’s because “it’s being used wrong”, and if it were you it would be “used right”.
> All that is needed is the sharing of knowledge and know how to enable the emergence of balanced and accessible, educational, social and business infrastructures like we have in the West
So that the third world can become a concrete slab like the west already is? So that the third world can become a mirror image of your world? This desire to have everything the way you want it is megalomania. Your world sucks. Big time.
> while at the same time getting rid of all of the physical toxins and anti-family, anti-child polices
Again, YOUR desire to have endless children.
> We have now at our doorsteps more and more people tripping into virtual reality through technological development and departing more and more from reality.
And why? For the same reason people go to disneyland. Because the world you’ve created is hateful to them. People are looking for a way out. You sit in your big house and look out on the world and say “isn’t it great”? — and conveniently ignore the overwhelming majority living in tiny boxes and working as slaves.
> They will need strong religious roots to connect them to true reality and to maintain the priority of children and family in order for there to be any real future with real people showing up in it.
No one is religious anywhere. Even the arabs are faking it (I’ve known scores of them, and they’re all just keeping up appearances). And you once again mentioned YOUR desire to fill the world with children.
On balance, despite your side’s claims of evil and madness on the other side, their idea of reducing the number of humans is far better than your idea of increasing them. And all the other stuff like perversion is mostly on your side too (almost all the poofs are not billionaires). Luckily for you, all their supposed machinations aren’t actually haven’t any effect are they? No significant numbers of dead, no decreasing birth rates, ever increasing numbers of roads, airports, houses, hospitals, schools and numerous other concrete slabs. And all the things being done to you are easily prevented by you. It’s easy for you to stop the immigration and to remove the government. I find it amusing how you all claim that a homeless person is homeless because they “didn’t make the effort” to not be homeless, but you think “your” world is being destroyed whilst making no effort yourself to save it. I also find your religious overtures amusing — in a truly religious world there’d be no homeless people.
Jake stated:
“Sure she can. It’s hers not yours. Nor is it the government’s”.
Hmm…
Ok, let’s ride with that shall we?
What is the taking of a human life called, more importantly the PREMEDITATED taking of a human life? Correct, it’s called MURDER. What happens to murderers? Correct, they’re arrested, tried in a court of law and sentenced to a term in the local penitentiary.
How would a mother remove the baby if she didn’t have the luxury of having someone else do it for her? I know, how about we arrest the people responsible for the termination of the fetus and put them in jail too. After all they’ve performed the murder while the mother was an accessory to murder?
And so, what happens is that the abortions are left for the mothers to do. And if they of course screw up then they put their own life in danger – they die along with the child, inside, they’ve murdered – job done.
“And what if she doesn’t know she’s pregnant because she’s still a child? Or if she was raped by, say, a president of america? Or she is too embarrassed or shy to ask a “doctor” for one of the “gazillion”? Or having one risks her life? Or a “gazillion” other reasons to not want it?”
You’re not too bright are you?
Firstly, the unborn is innocent. Secondly, as for wanting to terminate the “president’s baby” that isn’t happening. Why? Well, presidents tend to be extremely wealthy and so by ridding herself of the child, she stops the chance of milking the president dry, as many women do with men today. You’ll find that women DO NOT have abortions with men who are high value. Hell no. That’s their golden ticket in child support. A president’s child is a monthly income of, well, around 14% of monthly income. A US president is paid $400k a year, so you’re looking at $56k minimum there. And then the child will need housed and so on. Getting up the duff to a president is NOT going to be an abortion in a month of Sundays. Not bad eh? Lying on your back, once or twice, to get an income of $50k+ a month? Beats the hell out of the income of heavyweight title fights, that last a round or so.
People like you are incapable of understanding ONE, SIMPLE, THING when it comes to getting pregnant – women are 100% in control of whom they have sex with (bar rape of course which is minimal). But more importantly, the vagina IS NOT a recreational activity for the male penis. It as two functions – the entrance for the penis to inseminate her and to birth the baby along with the housing of the urethra for the passing of urine. That’s it. So, if she’s got a man’s dick in her, it should be for one reason and one reason only – procreation. Any other reason is just masturbation. It’s nothing more than homosexual pleasure seeking. Absolutely no purpose, in life, other than selfish, sexual pleasure.
You do like changing your name a hell of a lot don’t you? Who are you? I know you’re also ‘You’re the Boss, Boss’ as well as ‘100% Right or bust’ of late. You always like to choose this particular type of moniker. Are you a regular poster who’s hiding their real identity?
But I’ll conclude; if a woman wants an abortion, fine. Just take the abortionist to court and try them for murder and the mother also. Guaranteed, if that happens, you’ll see the abortion rate plummet, if not disappear altogether. And if you disagree, then you have no moral high ground to disagree, should someone break into your mother’s house, beat her to death with her walking stick and be found not guilty in a court of law. Abortion is legalised murder.
Hey Adoofus,
I wrote “Who Knows?” This implies that I don’t know. Furthermore, it is not my business to determine how many people should be “allowed” to live…
I have made it my business to spot the lying trouble makers who are maintaining their positions of power by brute force and ridiculous edicts instead of logical, convincing and fair arguments. These colossal assholes are infinitely disgusting and grotesque; there are no words to properly describe them.
The Cowards That Be have been suppressing amazing energy production devices for 150 years if not more!!! Just that fact is enough to justify sending them to Sir Umbra Bellator for proper sentencing! With a nearly inexhaustible electrical power supply, people could live wherever they want, even in Siberia. The sick freakazoids at the top of this pyramid of institutionalized bullshit, control societies through the control of the energy flow. The last thing they want is people going off into the forest and starting new communities based around the availability of super cheap energy.
“Let me guess: you see yourself as having ‘merit’?”
I certainly do; do you have a problem with that?
“Do you even see what you wrote there? You said “all the people that I agree with should be able to own and control all the people that I don’t agree with” – which makes you exactly the same as the current ‘leaders’.”
No, I didn’t write anything close to that, you doofus!
“You won’t agree of course – no doubt I’m a “commie” – ”
I don’t agree because you put words in my mouth and makes baseless assumptions.
“but personally I don’t want to live in a world where I don’t have the ability to control every aspect of my life, and for that to be true you need to remove all the money, all the power and all the ownership.”
“…but personally I don’t want to live in a world where I don’t have the ability to control every aspect of my life…”
Such a world has never existed and will never exist so you might as well commit suicide right now and do your part to “save the planet”.
“…and for that to be true you need to remove all the money, all the power and all the ownership.”
I do not agree. Those who are SUPPOSEDLY charged by the public with maintaining law and order, administering justice and managing material affairs should be doing their jobs instead of persecuting those who support their very existence. They need to remove all the power from those criminals who have stolen nearly all the money and who claim all the ownership.
I wrote:
“All you need to do is allow the free flow of information and qualified people will rise to natural positions of authority. With a meritocracy, you have the return of sanity.”
Adoofus wrote:
“No doubt I also have no ‘merit’.”
Why are you doubtless? Do you doubt your own merit?
More assumptions on your part…without merit as far as I’m concerned.
I will leave others decide for themselves what has merit.
@ Fred..
Lord Churwell’s (zionist ‘German’ ‘jew’ and Churchill’s ‘handler’)”
‘Abdication of the White Man’…
the ahem…’technocrats’ having worked out what would work to defeat the Euromans psyche back at the beginning of the twentieth century. (probably much earlier)..
his weaknesses being greed.. vanity.. love of self serving bureaucracy and a faux sense of ‘fair play’..
and of course the nonsense and refined poison of ‘freedoms’ and ‘liberty’…
his women being the fulcrum.. the fundamental..
on which they will be turned.. the Spenglerian denouement…
..(until of course as we see now..the gals have served their purpose .. soon to be joining the men in the metaphorical bog grave.. replaced by tranny sub continentals bred with African orientals no doubt)…
@ White Elephant
> What is the taking of a human life called, more importantly the PREMEDITATED taking of a human life? Correct, it’s called MURDER. What happens to murderers? Correct, they’re arrested, tried in a court of law and sentenced to a term in the local penitentiary.
Er, no. Cops don’t go to jail. Soldiers don’t go to jail. Bodyguards don’t go to jail. Only YOU go to jail.
Also, I’d like to see the “court of law” argue for “murder” with no body.
> You’re not too bright are you?
LOL. I guess I’d be “brighter” if I just agreed with you right?
> Firstly, the unborn is innocent.
The “unborn” doesn’t exist. Does it have a passport? A birth certificate? A tax number? An address? As you seem to hold the machinations of your so called society in such esteem, the absence of all of those means it doesn’t exist.
> as for wanting to terminate the “president’s baby” that isn’t happening. Why? Well, presidents tend to be extremely wealthy and…
How can you go from your high and mighty “justice system” to saying that now the father has money it’s all ok? Are you mad? Ah, I get it. You’re one of these people that thinks your made up “laws” should only apply to people you want to control. Let me guess, you’re “rich”?
> People like you are incapable of understanding ONE, SIMPLE, THING when it comes to getting pregnant – women are 100% in control of whom they have sex with
And people like you are incapable of understanding that it’s none of your business what someone else does with their body. You’re like all the other freaking scum that own and control the world. Well, pass whatever “laws” you like, it won’t make any difference. Nobody is going to have children they don’t want because you and your fellow dictators want them to.
It seems that all this has bought out yet another group of vile slime from the underbelly of mankind. Who’d have thought it huh? Just when you thought the worst someone could do was to try and force you to take poison, along comes someone telling you to give birth – or else.
@ Voltman
> the lying trouble makers who are maintaining their positions of power by brute force and ridiculous edicts instead of logical, convincing and fair arguments
Oh look, it’s another dictator. If you decide X is better than Y then Y should get to run everybody else’s lives and own the planet?
Let me spell it out for you: your “logical, convincing and fair arguments” don’t amount to sh*t unless all the other people agree with you. And you realise they don’t right?
> The Cowards That Be have been suppressing amazing energy production devices for 150 years if not more
Sure they have. And the world is flat.
> “Let me guess: you see yourself as having ‘merit’?”
> I certainly do; do you have a problem with that?
Yes I do. Luckily, the chances of you ever having any ability to abuse anyone outside of your own family are zero.
> No, I didn’t write anything close to that, you doofus!
You like name calling don’t you? Does it give you a feeling of power? And yes, that’s exactly what you wrote. And you’ve now backed it up with stating that you consider yourself to be better than everyone else (to have “merit” as you put it). Why on earth should anyone do what you and other people like you say because you say they are “qualified” and should have “positions of authority”? You’re just another dictator that’s a legend in their own mind.
> Those who are SUPPOSEDLY charged by the public with maintaining law and order, administering justice and managing material affairs should be doing their jobs instead of persecuting those who support their very existence
More delusions of grandeur. Nobody charged anyone with anything. You may be one of the “doofus” that “voted”, but most people don’t want anything to do with your dictatorship. No one asked anyone to “administer justice” or “manage material affairs” either. And if you think anyone is “supporting their existence” you’re nuts. At what point did you or I or anyone else agree to be a part of this crapshoot? Your owners extort money from the public and abuse them in return. Your fascist dictatorship is not some nice little game of “merit” and “justice” — it’s a worldwide jail with everyone trying their hardest to destroy everyone else for cash. That’s why the world is like it is. All roads lead back to money and your hideous idea of “society”, where those with “merit” abuse everyone else because they’re “better” than them. In your world someone who can’t frame a logical argument should work in a factory, and anyone that can’t spout out the “law” verbatim deserves to be locked up for being “stoopid”.
> I will leave others decide for themselves what has merit
Too late for that. What exactly do you think is going on in the world? That it’s just gone a bit awry? And you want it all to flip back into you abusing everyone that you consider less important than you, whilst you lick the butts of your masters? Good luck with that.
@ Fred C
Canada – Fertility: Fewer children, older moms
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-630-x/11-630-x2014002-eng.htm
Germany – Fertility rate, total (births per woman)
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=DE
You will find the same stats for every affluent nation especially in the West, and in fact affluent Eastern nations have the same problem. Japan is in even worse trouble for an aging and increasing unsupportable population because they are racial purists and will not rely on immigration to sustain their numbers.
My point is different than most others in that I am saying we would not have to rely on so much massive immigration and that any transitional mixing of foreign cultures with ours would have been and still could be more gradual, less disruptive to our Western cultures, and more advantageous by simply maintaining our religious values which are the foundation of our civilization, and especially our family values, maintaining above all the love of children.
We do not need these people controlling the money power to keep screwing us over with their insane ZPG, population-culling shears pruning away anyone and especially our own young with their anti-family and anti-child polices, and now trying to right the tremendous imbalances they have created in our demographic by doing their best with viruses and toxic vaccines to knock off the elderly and the infirm, while still spreading infertility causing toxins in any area they deem as “underclass”.
As for your silly idea there are no Christians because you have never found one, I ask you what the world would be like if many people did not at least try to be Christians? You overlook the deeper meanings of the Gospels and the person of Jesus Christ where what matters is the conversion of individual souls to the realm of God – which if ever was sufficiently accomplished would transform the world. In fact, at least to myself, I am proof that if I did not convert, I likely would have the same mixed up, dishonest, and very pragmatic views which you appear to harbor. I would have continued in my relatively wayward ways ending up like some of my relatives and old friends, fragmented and largely childless. I do not boast because it is not I who can be credited for a better life, but the grace I get from the daily practice of this faith which enables me and many people I know like myself to maintain a central place for that which is holy in my life, and as a result to try to maintain a major shift from the choleric and self-centred side of the temperament circle to the more phlegmatic.
All of the sin, sloth, and vice junkies ought to know that treatment is available. It is just a matter of recognizing the difference between yourself and something much better, simply by looking Up^ and grabbing onto the dangling ladder right before you.
There’s Adoofus on the loose
I have his head inside a noose
Adoofus wrote:
Oh look, it’s another dictator. If you decide X is better than Y then Y should get to run everybody else’s lives and own the planet?
No, I never said that, never implied that, never even thought it.
Adoofus wrote:
Let me spell it out for you: your “logical, convincing and fair arguments” don’t amount to sh*t unless all the other people agree with you. And you realise they don’t right?
Wrong.
I wrote:
> The Cowards That Be have been suppressing amazing energy production devices for 150 years if not more.
Adoofus wrote:
“Sure they have. And the world is flat.”
Yes they have.
Adoofus wrote:
> “Let me guess: you see yourself as having ‘merit’?”
I wrote:
I certainly do; do you have a problem with that?
Adoofus wrote:
“Yes I do.”
I wrote:
Plenty of people have merit, value and discernment; that doesn’t imply they want to be dictators, Adoofus.
You have lots of problems.
Adoofus:
Luckily, the chances of you ever having any ability to abuse anyone outside of your own family are zero.
Luckily, the chances of you ever having any ability to influence anyone for whom “logical, convincing and fair arguments” do amount to something more than sh*t…is below zero.
Adoofus:
You like name calling don’t you?
I certainly do. I like calling THINGS by their descriptive names. And Adoofus is much more suited to you than Adolfus, which is nearly blasphemy. {{{smiles}}}
I call Adoofus because I didn’t write anything close to what you said I wrote! End of story: learn how to read properly or shut up.
I notice YOUR labels are completely off the mark: you labeled me a dictator based on completely twisted logic.
I wrote:
> Those who are SUPPOSEDLY charged by the public with maintaining law and order, administering justice and managing material affairs should be doing their jobs instead of persecuting those who support their very existence.
Adoofus wrote:
More delusions of grandeur.
There is no logic to your conclusion(s). Nor is there an obvious explanation for your obsession with me. Where is the delusion? Where is the grandeur? It’s all in your head.
By the way, a benevolent and wise dictator would be more desirable than the pack of maniacal doofuses we are presently forced to suffer under.
Voltman
The crap commenter who always uses a new name must be some sort of Commie who just wants Whitey to be nogged up to fvuck, and if that is racist, maybe rednecks are allowed to rail against it, crackers can cry out against it, Whitey can wail about it and honkies can howl over it
@Jake,
“Er, no. Cops don’t go to jail. Soldiers don’t go to jail. Bodyguards don’t go to jail. Only YOU go to jail.
Also, I’d like to see the “court of law” argue for “murder” with no body.”
Actually some do but more importantly, they’re NOT civies. They’re private contractors belonging to corporations and protected, up to point.
“Also, I’d like to see the “court of law” argue for “murder” with no body.”
No body? The mind boggles. I suggest you do some research on abortions. Should you wish to scour some of the darkest recesses of the internet you’ll find videos of the remains of an ‘abortion’ and many are VERY much bodies.
“LOL. I guess I’d be “brighter” if I just agreed with you right?”
Actually, you would.
“The “unborn” doesn’t exist. Does it have a passport? A birth certificate? A tax number? An address? As you seem to hold the machinations of your so called society in such esteem, the absence of all of those means it doesn’t exist.”
The unborn doesn’t exists AS A LEGAL PERSON, that is a legal fiction, a corporate sole. No contract has been signed by his/her parents, to create the strawman attached to their living, breathing, offspring. However it very much does exist as LIVING PERSON, a living soul.
Really, you don’t know very much do you? Talk about digging holes.
“How can you go from your high and mighty “justice system” to saying that now the father has money it’s all ok? Are you mad? Ah, I get it. You’re one of these people that thinks your made up “laws” should only apply to people you want to control. Let me guess, you’re “rich”?”
Again, more ignorance. I explained WHY the president’s baby wouldn’t be terminated. If you don’t get it, you never will.
“And people like you are incapable of understanding that it’s none of your business what someone else does with their body. You’re like all the other freaking scum that own and control the world. Well, pass whatever “laws” you like, it won’t make any difference. Nobody is going to have children they don’t want because you and your fellow dictators want them to.”
Again, I already explained it to you, but you’re not getting it. Women should only open their legs to have offspring or urinate. No other reason to. But you don’t get that.
“It seems that all this has bought out yet another group of vile slime from the underbelly of mankind. Who’d have thought it huh? Just when you thought the worst someone could do was to try and force you to take poison, along comes someone telling you to give birth – or else.”
Slime? Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! If there’s any slime here, it’s the disgusting people, like you, who have no regard for life whatsoever.
As other people on this forum have already stated, the child, developing inside the mother, is NOT the property of the mother. It’s a life unto itself. The mother is merely the incubator.
There’s nothing worse than people who are pro abortion. You have to be one of the worst people to walk this earth. You call people like me dictators who want to preserve life? What the f*ck does that make you then who doesn’t?
However, I’m actually an anarchist, so what I reckon is they should just get rid of the police, the armed forces and have no rules. So, you see, when a woman ‘offs’ a man’s child, growing in her womb, he then offs her. Justice, as they say, will have been served.