By Savant – Irish Savant.net June 25, 2022
As the “new Churchill” Zelensky (having moved up in the world from making a living by playing the piano with his dick) struts the international stage in military fatigues while pausing occasionally to check on the state of his Swiss bank accounts and mansion in Israel, the West endlessly contrasts our boundless freedoms with Putin’s totalitarian police state. But nothing is further from the truth. Zelensky has now reached the stage where all opposition media outlets have been closed down, opposing political parties have not just been disbanded but their assets seized as well.
Welcome to the international rule-based order, an order which permits America and its lackeys to engage in piracy on the high seas, robbing the assets of foreign nationals and states and bombing to oblivion countries that “hate our freedoms”. Ah yes, I’m referring to those freedoms that we in the West enjoy which the rest of the world, or more accurately the enemies du jour conspicuously lack. In those benighted countries the media is controlled by a fusion of the permanent government and billionaires, only one narrative is permitted, there is in reality only one political party although others with superficial differences are allowed to play within strictly defined parameters, ordinary citizens opposed to the approved narrative are restricted to samizdat outlets, offend against a prevailing shibboleth and you get fired, fined or maybe jailed. Whereas on the other hand in the freedom-loving democratic West it’s…..well actually it’s pretty much the same, isn’t it?
Having been destroyed mentally and physically Julian Assange now faces life behind bars for practicing journalism. Real journalism, not its ghastly simulacrum that dominates the ‘profession’ today. Bear in mind that the Obama Administration sought to prosecute Assange under the Espionage Act but balked when it was pointed out that bastions of the free press such as the Washington Post, New York Times and The Guardian would also have to face prosecution for publishing classified material. And that’s what Wikileaks did: They published classified material, they did not steal it. Back in the days when we had real journalists this happened all the time. But it could have been worse for Assange: “Kidnapping, assassination and a London shoot-out: Inside the CIA’s secret war plans against WikiLeaks”. Ah yes, that international rule-based order again.
“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws” observed the Roman historian Tacitus. Stalin said something along the lines of “give me enough laws and anyone can be convicted of anything”. I imagines that he wasn’t referring to the finer points of the legal process here, rather the creation of an environment whereby everyone walked in fear of the State. The same process has been underway in the freedom-loving West for many years and has now reached a stage whereby it would be comical were not so menacing for ordinary people. In Britain you can be jailed for ‘staring’ at someone. And yes, some guy has already spent a few months in the slammer as the guest of HRH for that very offence. When and in what form does staring become an offence? Aha, that’s the point. You get your collar felt by the boys in blue if the ‘victim’ deems it to be offensive. This principle dates back to the notorious McPherson Report (the eponymous author has recently kicked the bucket, I’m pleased to tell you) whereby the ‘victim’ of a racist attack determines whether something said or done was ‘racially offensive’. “Perceived to be” to use McPherson’s ruling which at a stroke dispensed with the system of law that dated back to the Magna Carta. Because when the law becomes whatever a particular individual deems it to be there is no law.
As the philosopher of democracy Robert Dahl explained a generation ago, the first prerequisite of democracy is effective participation. But participation is now restricted to a number of uniparties. Any political party not conforming to the official narrative becomes marginalised and is ultimately rendered powerless. Remember there were political parties in most of the old Eastern Block Communist countries. But they operated within rigidly defined parameters. Just like in the freedom-loving West. And think about this: The British public has shown itself overwhelmingly opposed to mass immigration in poll after poll, going back more than fifty years. Yet the immigration went on in utter disregard for the wishes of the electorate. Last year alone, under a so-called Conservative Government, almost one million people immigrated to Britain. That’s adding a city the size of Liverpool or Glasgow in a single year. Democracy? Freedom? Will Of The People?
I close by inviting you to consider the reaction of a Fascist or Nazi who had gone to sleep in the early thirties and awoke today from his long slumber. His first assumption would be that his side had emerged victorious from whatever global conflicts might have ensued. He’d see a world ruled by an undemocratic partnership between the State and big business. The only jarring inconsistency being the sight of Labour and Socialist politicians at the apex of the political process.
Yes, let’s raise a glass to the freedom-loving West.
No fascist from the old days would have approved of to.
To say a fascist would approve of ANYTHING the nanny-and-butcher states are doing now is showing ignorance of what they wanted.
The fascists and national socialists lost because our nations have become what they were trying to prevent.
Good article!!.
To override the wishes of the public…..particularly the issue of immigration requires the connivance of the media…..with the CONSTANT theme of “RACISM”.
These treacherous MOFOS need to be held accountable.
The media DOES NOT reflect the views of the public…on the contrary they constantly attempt to mislead and manipulate opinion.
The visits of the Windsors to inner city centres for immigrants are part of the deception.The Windsors are very definitely crypto jews,without a shadow of a doubt.
Jews hate White people
Want to return to normality?
Destroy the media!
Every stinking facet of it from craven toadying ‘reporters’ to the film crews, buildings and transmission towers.
Crush it all without hesitation or remorse.
@ Franz,
Absolutely correct. The Fascist and National Socialists were formed solely to fight against the dystopian world we find ourselves in today.
Lest we forget….
it was that modern-day Judas Isacariot ZOGUK that – after years of “softening” him up – sent Julain Assange to meet his terminal torturers for 30 shekels….
with not a peep of protest from THICKUS Britannicus…
silly arse did the author not know hitler fought the NWO je2s for you me and our children ?
Savant’s conclusion has totally missed the mark, Goebbels said at the end of the war that history would prove them right. If he came back he would say I told you so.
@Jack Witchity:
Well said! In the past ten years or so, the Western countries’ political news media have lied like never before. There is no limit on how much and about what they can lie. The silly part is that they are also the one source of readily available public information.
This is an observation attributed to Mark Twain: ‘If you do not read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read them you are misinformed.’ Yet I am sure that in his time mass-media ownership was much more diverse than it is in our time.
The contemporary concentration of the international information-media ownership in the hands of one ethnic group is common knowledge that is no longer even contested. These media can lie their teeth out about anything at all. And they do, with a vengeance!
Yet, given the political will, these preventors of public education are easily corrected in this very simple way: 1. Legislate to disallow the concentration of MSM outlets in the hands of any identifiable ethnic/religious/political group. 2. Make the lies of the owners of media outlets, and their managers and journalists, punishable by law.
We need a news-media law with teeth and muscle!
“Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under.”
(H.L. Mencken)
Sophie, thank you.
I would agree entirely with your remedy were it not for the depressing fact that the same tribe have an iron grip on the levers of law making too.
It seems unlikely that they would legislate themselves out of control of the single greatest tool of their hegemony.
Because of course it’s not merely the appearance of degeneracy, hopelessness, hate and fear they promote through it, it arguably actually manifests those very outcomes in society by highjacking our not inconsiderable capacity to manifest.
Goebbels understood this, but too little and too late, and was a mere amateur compared to Sefton Delmer, the second generation Svengali who very probably dreamed up “The Holocaust”.
No, I’m afraid the only two things that might save us now is either a CME and resulting complete technological collapse (although even that is not absolutely certain as the enemy has many underground facilities) or direct action.
And the door for both is closing very rapidly.
lewis jones “Jews hate White people” … i don’t have a problem with that.
the problem is that the reverse doesn’t hold, i.e., “White people don’t hate Jews“.
honorable exceptions aside.
which, incidentally is the sole reason for the incessant “antisemitism” blather, to ensure that guilt chokes off the very reasonable hate in its sleep.
All to say that
NOT HATING JEWS IS IRRATIONAL
(and savant … that nazi remark of yours is such a circumcised thing to say, what next, that mRNA stabs are safe and effective?)
lobro–the first lesson of a good government would be that Jews are never to be trusted about anything, but they are at war with us day and night and have never allowed our power to get to the stage of hatching, let alone flying