Dr Carlos Rodriguez Manuel Hispaniola
on June 9, 2022 at 7:31 am
It’s that same man and woman again. I don’t believe she’s even a “dr”, but even if she is she’s just another scammer — and he definitely is. More pictures of who knows what that supposedly prove god knows what. No doubt they mention nano machines somewhere too. I wish someone would do an “analysis” of something else — a slice of chocolate cake perhaps — and show that blowing up the cake under a microscope also produces pictures of “frightening” things that look like little meteors or bugs or tadpoles. “I just happened to leave it laying around and it turned into the startship enterprise.” Besides that hardly being the actions of an “expert” in anything, what it actually means is “I couldn’t milk this cash cow any other way so I just made something up”.
achillleees
on June 9, 2022 at 11:01 am
Subzero -70C requirement may not be real, only an excuse to limit and control distribution and validation
Be suspicious of parasite, nanotech, nanonbot, graphene oxide stories
– could be pfizer trolling
Having dna chaning substances is dangerous enought
easy pleasey
on June 9, 2022 at 11:06 am
Material like that metallic lump must lead to blood clots, not biochemical blood clots but mechanically restrictive blood clots in narrow blood vessels for certain, leading to blood clots moving into the major blood vessels and major organs. It wouldn’t have to do much else besides be there to cause risk of death. It wouldn’t have to broadcast or receive anything, just clot itself.
Fred B
on June 9, 2022 at 2:57 pm
Ruby in my book has always been suspect of going over the top either because she is addicted to attention or because her theories serve to discredit the truth movement. If this case as a physician she ought to know that the aluminum is an adjunct and if biological material degraded there would be mostly something else left. Yes, it is very hard for the body to get rid of aluminium and the issue should simply be how much aluminum was in that sample.
In any case, none of this is real science. No one from the scientific community seems to be demanding disclosure as to what substances were in the different batches from the various sources and who they were given to, for any real independent tracking of the actual effects. Of course the “authorities” (meaning that “trusted foreign source”) would no doubt have been monitoring very carefully every single dose, most likely all collected in some Microsoft mainframe for continued biological manipulations.
Seriously, can you trust anything coming from the US? Yes, but people like Ruby tend to detract. Peters when it comes to the truth is first loyal to his nation, and has pumped the US get-off-the-hook lie together with psychiatrist, Andrew Kaufman, that there never was a Covid virus. It is a “light” US bioweapon flu virus developed no doubt with a host other more lethal strains, and it was deliberately released on us. My view, for what it is worth, is that with the huge and very sophisticated US intelligence apparatus you will find various experts pumping certain aspects of the truth in these matters but using their efforts mainly to defect from the actual source issue.
disclose you
on June 9, 2022 at 5:08 pm
> No one from the scientific community seems to be demanding disclosure as to what substances were in the different batches
There is no “scientific community”. Just a bunch of university layabouts all trying to one up each other to get yet another paper about nothing published so that they get yet another pay rise.
lewis jones
on June 9, 2022 at 8:06 pm
Peters looks more apologetic than he did–truth seeps out in the end unless the liar is “truly” deceived.
ken
on June 10, 2022 at 1:42 am
Stew is a narcissus. He loves to hear himself talk… and talk… and talk… ad nauseum. At first he claimed the virus didn’t exist,,, now it does and he has a person that sells supplements to help prevent some of the kill shots adverse events. Many people trying to make a buck out of this debacle. Typical I guess.
Dr. Jane I believe to be basically a good person but she likes attention.
It’s that same man and woman again. I don’t believe she’s even a “dr”, but even if she is she’s just another scammer — and he definitely is. More pictures of who knows what that supposedly prove god knows what. No doubt they mention nano machines somewhere too. I wish someone would do an “analysis” of something else — a slice of chocolate cake perhaps — and show that blowing up the cake under a microscope also produces pictures of “frightening” things that look like little meteors or bugs or tadpoles. “I just happened to leave it laying around and it turned into the startship enterprise.” Besides that hardly being the actions of an “expert” in anything, what it actually means is “I couldn’t milk this cash cow any other way so I just made something up”.
Subzero -70C requirement may not be real, only an excuse to limit and control distribution and validation
Be suspicious of parasite, nanotech, nanonbot, graphene oxide stories
– could be pfizer trolling
Having dna chaning substances is dangerous enought
Material like that metallic lump must lead to blood clots, not biochemical blood clots but mechanically restrictive blood clots in narrow blood vessels for certain, leading to blood clots moving into the major blood vessels and major organs. It wouldn’t have to do much else besides be there to cause risk of death. It wouldn’t have to broadcast or receive anything, just clot itself.
Ruby in my book has always been suspect of going over the top either because she is addicted to attention or because her theories serve to discredit the truth movement. If this case as a physician she ought to know that the aluminum is an adjunct and if biological material degraded there would be mostly something else left. Yes, it is very hard for the body to get rid of aluminium and the issue should simply be how much aluminum was in that sample.
In any case, none of this is real science. No one from the scientific community seems to be demanding disclosure as to what substances were in the different batches from the various sources and who they were given to, for any real independent tracking of the actual effects. Of course the “authorities” (meaning that “trusted foreign source”) would no doubt have been monitoring very carefully every single dose, most likely all collected in some Microsoft mainframe for continued biological manipulations.
Seriously, can you trust anything coming from the US? Yes, but people like Ruby tend to detract. Peters when it comes to the truth is first loyal to his nation, and has pumped the US get-off-the-hook lie together with psychiatrist, Andrew Kaufman, that there never was a Covid virus. It is a “light” US bioweapon flu virus developed no doubt with a host other more lethal strains, and it was deliberately released on us. My view, for what it is worth, is that with the huge and very sophisticated US intelligence apparatus you will find various experts pumping certain aspects of the truth in these matters but using their efforts mainly to defect from the actual source issue.
> No one from the scientific community seems to be demanding disclosure as to what substances were in the different batches
There is no “scientific community”. Just a bunch of university layabouts all trying to one up each other to get yet another paper about nothing published so that they get yet another pay rise.
Peters looks more apologetic than he did–truth seeps out in the end unless the liar is “truly” deceived.
Stew is a narcissus. He loves to hear himself talk… and talk… and talk… ad nauseum. At first he claimed the virus didn’t exist,,, now it does and he has a person that sells supplements to help prevent some of the kill shots adverse events. Many people trying to make a buck out of this debacle. Typical I guess.
Dr. Jane I believe to be basically a good person but she likes attention.