HenryMakow.com – May 24, 2022
“The disease known as covid-19 is simply the common… re-branded and expensively marketed flu … The total number who have died from covid-19 has been established to be no more – and possibly fewer – than die every year from the ordinary flu.”
“Our watchwords are force and make-believe.” Protocols of the Elders of Zion – 1
“Make-believe” means deception, i.e. a psy op like 9-11 or COVID
“By way of deception, thou shalt wage war.” Mossad credo.
by Dr. Vernon Coleman – (henrymakow.com)
There is a myth that the covid fraud is over.
The fact is that they are still jabbing – now jabbing small children with an experimental drug that doesn’t work and isn’t safe or necessary – and they are steadfastly ignoring the damage done by the covid jabs and finding dozens of new explanations for the epidemic of myocarditis, strokes, hepatitis and death following in the wake of all those hugely profitable jabbing sprees. All warfare is based on deception and this is warfare so deception is inevitable.
They faked a pandemic, they faked a test and they faked a cure.
Deaths from regular seasonal flu have always been exaggerated. There can be little doubt that the annual flu jab campaign was actually laying the ground for what we now see. They have been planning this for a long time.
I think Anonymous is right.
I worry for this man the jews have been making threats for some time
tey made threats against kevin Field for his whistleblowing and he was found dead
my brother knew him well, other whistleblowers are told shut up or you will be killed
please god the good doctor remains safe
‘Babeelon seestym is the vam-pyaah.’
– Bob Marley
Vaccination system is the umpire.
– O
Whether they are jabbing people as frequently or not, the government stats everywhere show that those most vaccinated are dying most often. There is now a direct correlation between the vaccines and death rates from multiple causes.
The bar graphs from the government data in the following link are astounding:
“Your government quietly confirmed the fully vaccinated are developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome while they had you worried about Russia-Ukraine & the cost of living – DC Clothesline”
The general evidence is sound but unfortunately there is no basis is the evidence to say that the “slightly” vaccinated are slightly more immune to other diseases or even Covid than the unvaccinated.
For Canada you can see by the bar graphs and numbers that those “fully vaccinated” have almost three times the death rate from all causes as the unvaccinated, yet you still cannot get out of the country if you are not vaccinated, nor in any government-related institution can you keep your job, be rehired or be hired.
More wretched than even the people running our governments and the various agencies, the media, and most of our top corporations, are the judges in our court system. Yes, we should not criticize them because they cannot publicly defend themselves, but their betrayal of the public trust is even more grievous than from the other areas of power and authority. They have simply dismissed all wrongful dismissal cases by deferring to government policy relying on the fake guise of “emergency conditions”. In doing so they have abandoned the following: the Canadian Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms; their duty to determine the facts and to protect the basic rights of all individual persons, the common good, and the public trust. However, they instead have squandered all of that with their own administrative fixes silencing the truly independent judges, with the entire system paying obeisance to the power moguls behind the plandemic, protecting one fraud after another in order to usher in the “top-down” UN Agendas and WEF resets.
For instance, a highly-trained woman I know very well in her 30’s was forced to quit her managerial job in a leading government health agency in early 2021 in my province simply because she would not get vaccinated. She had a written medical exception from her physician but that made no difference If she did not quit in a week they would fire her without any benefits. She is married with a young child and the income was needed. So she quit and in doing so she was in any case denied all benefits, even unemployment benefits which she had contributed to. She tried to get hired in the private sector with her expertise but each time she applied and it was found that she was not vaccinated, they turned her away. Most recently she went through a lengthy interview process as an analyst with a large non-profit organization, and was found to be the perfect fit but then in offering her the job she was told that it was condition that she be vaccinated and turned her down instantaneously when she said she was not but had a medical exemption.
“Go to court.”, say the arm-chair lawyers, but I say that would be a fools errand because since the Covid fraud began we no longer have any basic rights, and also the appointed judge for the occasion would politely just hear the evidence and then differ to the government policy anyway, regardless of the actual government data showing the harm of the vaccines and that they do nothing to protect from the virus, regardless of the fact that most companies in the province do not insist on employees being vaccinated, and regardless of the fact that all of our judges are exempt from having to get jabbed with the crap. That is Canadian “justice” at its best which is nothing but enforced hypocrisy.
“Oh, but we are under ’emergency conditions’, and must comply with the mandates of our government and the top-down authority of the IMF bankrolling them and insisting on our total compliance. What would ever happen if we were to recognize some injustice in all of this and strike down the mandates? Why it would set such a terrible precedent for future pandemics and emergencies despite the disputed merits of the present one. It would lead to chaos and perhaps cause a huge rift between Canada and the ruling Western credit power. Think of what would happen in any actual really-serious emergency such as a real plague, a war, or a major catastrophe like climate change, if those who disagreed with the government measures coming down from their duly-elected governments….., and were given more than just a hearing and we were to rule against the mandates, why the courts would then be seen as a great source of dissention and chaos harming the common good. Oh no, we can’t allow that to happen. We cannot try the government during such emergency conditions even if it is obvious to so many that the emergency conditions are essentially contrived and fake. Besides are we not really bound to follow the diktats of those who appointed us? Are not the courts actually just another arm of the government and is not this whole idea of judicial independence nothing but academic theory? We will just have to turn a blind eye to all of this, despite the evidence. Besides those of us who do not obey will also lose their jobs. Such is the awesome power which rules over all we do.”
Yet, even in real emergency conditions was not the purpose of the Charter of Rights that the courts be a final check on government abuses, and to publicly and fairly canvas all of the circumstances and the justifications for the government measures? Surely in a pandemic, not just a fake one, but one where thousands were dying in our midst, there would be virtually no opposition to effective quarantines and restrictions, and is that not one of the major purposes of the Charter – to sift through “all” of the evidence, listen to all of the experts where there is real controversy, and to determine the truth (you know the actual facts), and to determine who is lying, such that the people, the common good, the public trust are protected and not abused by our governments and the power moguls who control them, and especially from likely useless and harmful vaccines where the people who are being forced to take them are not even allowed to know what ingredients are in them, let alone their probable risks.
Are not such “emergency conditions” which our entire society has been subjected to precisely what the Charter of Rights and Freedoms coming largely from Justine Trudeau’s father was designed to address and check, such that there would be in our laws those proper checks and balances, such that exaggerated, and contrived “emergency conditions” like this would never again be used as a pretext by our governments to abuse the people and manipulate them for ulterior reasons rather than to actually protect them. Should not our courts be a little more vigilant and cognisant of the fact that the WHO in 2009 deliberately changed the definition of a pandemic to virtually anything they deemed as such, even a common cold if they so deemed, and is it not a great travesty, a heinous justice, and an insult to all of our laws and standards for our governments simply to follow along so blindly with such subjective nonsense and diktat, and declare an emergency rolling out all of their oppressive mandates? Is there no reverence, respect, and substance to what we call an “emergency”? By deferring to this government of the day are we not using the entire justice system to institutionalize on-going massive fraud, harm, and injustice far outweighing any alleged benefits of the restrictions? Is that not precisely what the Charter was meant to prevent? Are our judges really no better than our politicians and the media when it comes to the truth and real justice?
No, I guess not.
@fred B
cut down the essays mate. It’s supposed to be a comments section.
NTI_Paper_BIO-TTX_Final.pdf
from NTI.org – Monkey Virus manufactured fear from 2019.
Rope time
What is he doing to us, the ones who have to look at his face?