HenryMakow.com – April 14, 2022
The works of H. G. Wells are perhaps the most candid expose of the New World Order conspiracy from the approving perspective of a participant.
We are experiencing the culmination of an ancient conspiracy.
by Edward Menez – (henrymakow.com)
When I was young, I read a lot of H.G. Wells’ science fiction novels. Some of the famous ones I enjoyed are The Time Machine, The War of the Worlds, and The Island of Dr. Moreau. Wells’ writing was fairly good, with interesting speculative ideas about the future in it.
Indeed, Wells, along with Jules Verne, have each been called “the father of science fiction”. But little did I then know that Wells dabbled in more than science fiction. One of his alternative, less-known works is titled The New World Order. Who would’ve guessed the Father of Science Fiction could also write non-fiction?
Men like Bertrand Russell and H.G. Wells don’t just suddenly appear out of nowhere and become famous writers. Their work is heavily promoted by the media and for very good reasons. They joined the same clubs as the NWO set; they thought the same way; they tried to bring about their own version of The Great Reset before Klaus Schwab took up the flag. So who were men like Wells and Russell exactly? Why were they promoted so heavily by the media? And what kind of clubs and social circles did they float around in?
There’s quite a bit about the “Coefficients Club” on Ken Adachi’s website here. At the end of the article, is a list of recommended books, some with a short blurb. Here’s the one I want to get and its summary:
George Orwell was also given access to insider thinking, as was Aldous Huxley.
If the globalists get their way those who refuse the Mark of the Beast will be driven underground and become the Morlocks while those who accept it will become the e-Eloi.
Is it because I is White, ? not like Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Schiff, rabbis, Marx, Freud and Bernays, Hollywood, BBC, all communications, , oR WERE wELLS AND rUsSeLL Jews? No, THEY WERE IN THE ORGANISATIONS CREATED BY THEM, AND ABLE TO WRITE. (CApS wrong accidentally)
This is an incredibly important exposure of what the Western establishment is really all about. Thank you Henry and Rixon.
@anonymous….Orwell was given some insider thinking but,Huxley was one of the ”insider thinkers”‘All of his family were.
If H.G. Wells & Bertrand Russell had any intelligence they would have joined Mosley’s BUF. Just a couple of pseudo-intellectual parlor Bolsheviks..
This is a useful chart for anyone interested in who the ”insider thinkers” were/are…connected to H.G. (the spider) Wellshttps://webbrain.com/brainpage/brain/6FBA86B0-0C57-9FCA-5CF9-D742DA541AAA#-409
https://webbrain.com/brainpage/brain/6FBA86B0-0C57-9FCA-5CF9-D742DA541AAA#-409
Henry needs to do a follow up article on HG Wells successor….Arthur C. Clark
Read the “The New Dark Age Conspiracy” throws the spotlight on these evil swine.
They focus on the wrong thing and no longer see spirit, soul, purpose, just the bodies, and the study of biology became Darwinism, which they took to be an insight and they were very proud of it. The image is bodies being shovelled into a landfill. Even children are not a lesson for them as they used to be.
Raeto West at big-lies.org suggests that Hilaire Belloc’s disdain for H. G. Wells’ advocacy of scientific materialism and his (perceived) marginalization of the Catholic Church’s role in history, prevented what could have been a most useful dialogue between the two men. Although Wells was quite ready and willing to engage in discussion with Belloc, the latter’s high-mindedness precluded any live debate in a public forum between the two. Instead, they got angry at each other in a series of books and articles.
Raeto West doesn’t actually say why he thinks that the two, never having met to discuss their contrary perspectives, was a missed opportunity, unless it’s in another of his many articles, which I’ve yet to read. I feel fairly sure, though, that I know what West is alluding to, given his usual loci of interest.
In H.G.Wells’ writing, there is a nascent understanding of the prevelance of the power of the jews in Europe, most clearly so in his 1919 “Outline Of History” and its popular 1922 redaction, “A Short History Of The World.”
Wells’ anti-semitism, if it can be so described, had little to do with intellectual probity but was more the influence of Victorian-era racial pomposity among the British gentry and had been inculcated in him early, during his private schooling. (Wells was actually from quite a lowly family, who were, for the most part, one step away from destitution for the duration of his childhood.)
Hilaire Belloc, on the other hand, had a much more mature understanding of the jews than Wells. The Anglo-Frenchman’s perspective may have been doctrinally Roman Catholic but his scholarship was far superior and as a writer, he did not spare the jews from weighty criticism, freely sharing his contempt and loathing of the chosenites. ( See Belloc’s 1922 polemic, “The Jews.”)
I think that what West (a.k.a. Rerevisionist) means to insinuate is that Belloc would have been a good teacher to Wells on the specifics of jewish machinations historically and also that the two men, a Scientific Materialist and a Christian, could have forged common ground, if at all, on this one issue, on the unrelentingly dastardly nature of Judah.