Introduction – March 29, 2022
Darwin’s “theory” has never been proven. It’s still just a theory and toward the end of his life Darwin himself reportedly expressed doubts about it.
That’s why they are still looking for a “missing link” and why after more than a century, it still hasn’t been found.
So why does NEWSWEEK (below) try to dismiss claims that the Rothschild’s paid Darwin to formulate his theory as “anti-Semitic”? After all, if we put aside the accusations of “anti-Semitism” it makes sense.
Given that the Rothschild’s power was built on material wealth, it follows that any belief system that strove to transcend the material realm and diminish its influence would be inimical to their interests. And Darwin’s theory only tightens the bond between mankind and the material realm in that it eliminates the principle of divine creation altogether.
The Rothschild banking dynasty has a reputation for wielding immense material power and influence. They are even reputed to have made deals with the Devil to ensure their continued material supremacy.
Indeed, they are rumoured to set a place for him at their dinner table. While we reserve judgement on that it is no more far-fetched than denouncing as “anti-Semitic” claims that the Rothschilds bankrolled Darwin.
And even if the Rothschilds did pay Darwin why is revealing that “anti-Semitic” anyway?
Is that because the Rothschild are Jewish? Let’s be clear, that there is a huge difference between the ordinary Jew and the Rothchilds; that’s as big as the contrast between the British Royal Family and poor Britons subsisting on welfare handouts.
There’s a clear distinction. So why does the following article conflate questions about the Rothschild banking dynasty with “anti-Semitism”?
Or are claims of “anti-Semitism” simply being used to shield the Rothschilds, and others in the globalist elite, from more serious scrutiny?
This story has appeared across a variety of media outlets and although in each outlet a different writer is responsible they all echo the same points. Primarily that claims that the Rothschild funded Darwin are implicitly “anti-Semitic”.
Given that the Rothschilds are also reputed to own major news agencies Reuters and Associated Press this should come as no surprise. What follows is a damage control exercise to protect the Rothschild’s reputation.
Lara Logan Claims Evolution Theory Is a ‘Rothschilds’ Plot
Ewan Palmer – NEWSWEEK March 29, 2022
Lara Logan. Click to enlarge
Fox Nation host Lara Logan pushed an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory that Charles Darwin was funded by the Rothschild family to invent his theory of evolution during an appearance on a right-wing podcast.
Logan, a former correspondent for CBS‘ 60 Minutes, questioned what the origins of Darwinism are during an interview on And We Know, a conspiracy theorist show which has also promoted the radical movement QAnon, reported Media Matters for America.
“Does anyone know who employed Darwin, where Darwinism comes from?” Logan asked. “Look it up. The Rothschilds.”
Logan went on to suggest that whoever employed Darwin to come up with his theory of evolution goes back to the top of the British government.
“It goes right back to 10 Downing Street, the same people who employed Darwin and that’s when Darwin wrote his theory of evolution. I’m not saying that none of that is true. I’m just saying Darwin was hired by someone to come up with a theory, right?” Logan said.
“Based on evidence, okay, fine. But even the people, the scientists, all of the people who can take you back to the Big Bang, what is the one question they can never, ever, ever answer? They can never tell you what that was. Whether it is the molecules or the energy, or, you know, all that stuff.”
The Rothschilds are a famous Jewish banking family turned business dynasty who are frequently linked to conspiracy theories and anti-Semitic tropes that Jews secretly control the world’s media, banks and governments.
Ewan Palmer’s defence of Lora Logan on the Darwin issue is soberly informed and level headed.
Does anyone really believe that ‘Jews secretly control the world’s media, banks and governments’ is a conspiracy theory, albeit in ample evidence? We all know that ‘the Jews’ in this context does not entail all Jews; it denotes the Jewish European and North American mega-money class of them, and the off-shoots of the latter.
One need only observe Ukraine right now. Who is in political control there since 2014? You must have noticed there the Jews in elevated political positions, and you probably know the names of their American Jewish patrons. Is that an antisemitic trope?
Why are these foreign Jews in Ukraine? Has it anything to do, would you say, with the importance of the need to destroy the Russian economy, and thereby salvage the USD for the continued welfare of the mega-money class?
This ‘antisemitic trope’ screech is a sabre-toothed canard.
Darwinism is dead. Readers of Colin Wilson or Nexus Magazine know this. It does not mean you have to go and embrace the Bible again, of course; if you use your own mind it will show you a lot, as it is a portal to the Cosmos. I hope you never lost your connection.
yes like marxism Rothschild pad through Engels to give money for this
same as Rothschild paid money through lord levy and David Abrahams to Tony Blair to get New labour party into power, it was always a mossad front party
but see this
My son Robert applied as a parcels delivery man
and the guy in broken English on the phone said
” sorry we dont employ English”
But what was worse was the English lad who blacked up his face
and applied for work at the BBC
he said he was Homosexual and had escaped from harasment abroad.
The BBC found out and they said he had lied on his job application and sacked him
it was on Omega news yesterday, what is going on it our country ?
I think Darwin was spot on. Ask the faithful where God came from and they’ll say, “He’s always been here.” That doesn’t answer the question it dodges it. They believe a wholly powerful supernatural being can just appear and has always been here, but then tell you life appearing in single-cell organisms is a nonsense. Then tell them all life evolved from those beginnings and some just scoff at the suggestion.
Ironically, given enough time evolution could see the rise of super beings, though that wouldn’t endow magical abilities all gods presumably have. I’ve experienced the supernatural and been frightened by it, but you don’t need the almighty God of the Christian bible to account for that. Nature can explain the spiritual realm, something that has arisen from our consciousness … good, evil, sadness and so forth.
I think the pagans were closest to the truth. If there is one god there are many, and they’d have better to do than concern themselves with the fleeting existence of mortals.
This woman only came to my attention about a week ago.
There’s a 10 minute video of her being interviewed by a male and female duo in a television studio in the US.
Lara may have been in Ukraine or Russia talking about the recent war and bio-weapons-labs in Ukraine.
She’s probably very correct about Rothschild and Darwin.
“Given that the Rothschild’s power was built on material wealth, it follows that any belief system that strove to transcend the material realm and diminish its influence would be inimical to their interests. And Darwin’s theory only tightens the bond between mankind and the material realm in that it eliminates the principle of divine creation altogether.”
Inimical adjective
in·im·i·cal | \ i-ˈni-mi-kəl
\
Definition of inimical
1 : being adverse often by reason of hostility or malevolence forces inimical to democracy
2a : having the disposition of an enemy : hostile inimical factions
b : reflecting or indicating hostility : unfriendly his father’s inimical glare
Believing in God; the one and only all powerful creator is ‘inimical’ to the interests of Rothschild Jews.
And to be sure, God is not a Jew.
Worship God the creator, and Rothschild will feel the heat from the God we worship.
Darwin a paid hack of Ratchild? He almost didn’t publish, and then when he waited 20 years – he was crucified by the theists and almost banished. The press crucified him as a monkey. You all forget what life was like back in 1859 – a society run by arrogant theocratic intellectuals who went on witchunts for anyone deviating from the RIDICULOUS BIBLE NARRATIVE ON ORIGIN.
Before Darwin your choice in how man got to earth was limited to a child’s nightmare story of some prick sky god who made Adam from dirt and spit then put him in a Garden of Eatin with a delicious tree of knowledge – then he makes a woman from Adam’s rib and uses her to tempt then condemn his top creation – casting them out into the world – naked (no fur) and they meet other people (when Adam was the first).
The story is so full of holes as to be hysterically laughable. If God was all powerful then why did he need dirt to make Adam, or his rib to make Eve? And what about all those outside the gates of Eden? And why does he set up Adam with the forbidden tree using reverse psychology? Just watch this to have a big laugh about WHAT EVERY WESTERN PERSON BELIEVED AS TRUTH BEFORE DARWIN:
If Man Obeyed God EDITED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71yYO-VdCx8
Genesis is not a believable story – and the Church was busted with Darwin’s new theory – and they knew it which is why they went for his throat and tried to silence him – just like Galileo. The situation with Evolution then is very similar to the scientists who have busted the Global Warming by CO2 myth now. A trace gas does not, and can not, control the temperature of earth – but those who have exposed the high priest liars of the IPCC are portrayed as heretics.
Anyways back to Darwin – no one knew about natural selection until he figured it out – so how could Rothschilds know? They didn’t and couldn’t. The idea about animals changing to stay fit in the world didn’t even exist except in Darwin’s mind. No one even fathomed in 1859 that humans and animals were linked at the DNA level.
Then with a broader theory of evolution, man evolving on the planet from previous animals was postulated long before the discovery of genes and DNA.
The missing link in the story is the Anunnaki – man is an artificial creation of the “gods”, which explains all the problems of man – like no fur, sun burning, under water birth, high fat tissue, hooded nose, etc.
So we have evolution + ET intervention as the most plausible theory as to why things are the way they are.
IMO all creation was created by godly
spirits with godly powers like the ET
aliens have + anunaki is bullshit !
I personally don’t subscribe to Darwin’s notion that apes evolved into hominids–myself preferring Blavatsky’s postulate that the lower colored races are a product of devolution (bestiality) than ‘evolution’–but I must say it is interesting how all the nonwhite races (Negroids-Mongoloids-Australoids) have simian physiognomies..
Anti-septic (intentional spelling) this, anti-septic that. Even if the devil’s vermin really were who and what they falsely claim to be, they don’t deserve NEVER to be even slightly offended. What I’d like to see when they scream “anti-septic” is a more or less “politically correct” rebuttal along the following lines.
————————————
How can it be “anti-Semitic” to criticise the one family that controls the entire world through the money supply? They’re not saints, and neither are they gods, though they may well believe otherwise.
The Rothschilds are descended from the Khazars, a Turkic-Mongol tribe that was driven out of what is now Ukraine because of their intolerable behaviour.
How can the Khazars pretend to be descended from the people of the Bible when their ancestors never set foot in the “Holy Land” and don’t have a single drop of Semitic (=Arab) blood?
If the Rothschilds are Khazars, and the Khazars have no ancestral connection to the Semitic Arabs, how can criticism of the Rothschilds equate to anti-Semitism?
To state facts, or even theories, CANNOT be anti ANYTHING. If we acknowledge that a Frenchman did something wrong, it doesn’t mean we hate all Frenchmen, so what’s the difference when we name someone who isn’t even a member of the group he only PRETENDS to be?
————————————
I accept that there may (or may not) be errors in the above, but perhaps someone better educated than myself could make use of it after applying any necessary corrections.
Lara Logan is right though of course an actor since she is allowed to get her message out in main stream media. Perhaps it’s a so called limited hangout to hide something else? I don’t know. Anyone?
The biggest problem with Darwinism is the assumption that things are improving… getting ‘better’…
Which to anyone not inflicted with late stage imbecility is obviously not the case…
The common imbecile, so it seems, is blissfully unaware that he is in fact regressing… and will soon be, according to the metrics of modern scientism and mental midgets like dawkins and harari that advocate darwinism an amoebic life form that subsists on sh*te.. floating round a cess pool..
Which I would of thought obvious… because most of ’em are already full of it and eat it everyday…
Isnt fox news owned by vanguard?
She works for them
and critisizes darwin for working for them?
to Nico X …
Your silly fantasy of “white” supremacy can easily be disproven by just one word: Japs.
The Japanese race, if they can be classified as such, and by extension Koreans, since they are of the same stock, are far superior to the Teutons and other White races in almost every metric: intellectually i.e. higher IQ’s, morally, aesthetic sensibilities … every metric.
The Japs throw a huge monkey wrench in your little fantasy. Also, over the decades, I have been astounded by the proportion of geniuses among the Vietnamese. Every Vietnamese person I have come across with in engineering have far surpassed white counterparts, in aptitude and overall intelligence. Of course I can’t make an broad inference from a limited sample, but your faith in the white race is bit misguided … and I’m speaking as a blue-blooded American who can trace his genealogy back almost four centuries to the original Pilgrims.
The Weishaupt conspiracy was looking for a mechanism to make evolution acceptable and were pleased with what Darwin and Wallace had said and gave it all the victories in the newspapers and periodicals. Weishaupt was working for Rothschild. They wanted a bottom-up Creation to undermine all the God- dependent authority in society.
Darwin’s theory of evolution is as credible as Tony Blair
Yukon Jack
Haven’t you seen the photo of Darwin doing the Devil’s Horn Salute, 2 fingers at either side of the had sticking up? He was a Mason, so his theory has to be fake, all Masons lie to the public. You say Darwin was the first to think animals changed to stay fit, what about Lamarck? What is so wrong with the logic used in the Bible statement in Hebrews chap 3 verse 4 ‘Of course every house is constructed by someone, but the one who constructed all things is God.’ You claim the creation story has holes, but fail to see that the people outside Eden were Adam’s children too, conceived after his expulsion from the garden, You may be getting mixed up with Cain, also their son, who in banishment for having killed his brother took his wife (in fact one of his sisters) and went to the land of Nod. There were already many brothers and sisters forming tribes, but all originating from Adam and Eve. Incest became a problem later in history as the human species gradually devolved from the perfection, that the original pair had before they sinned. Eve did not tempt Adam, it was the serpent who sowed doubts about God to Eve and Adam simply went along with his wife because he loved her more than God. The serpent as Revelation explains (Revelation 12 v 9) is Satan the Devil, a spirit being that chose to oppose God as he coveted worship for himself.
Darwins were inbred with the Wedgewoods and had to bring in the Galtons.
Huxley was Darwins bulldog… Everywhere you look there is eugenics and the Huxley family.
@Mike D…you sound moronic & seem to be ignorant of basic history–that all these major technological inventions (electricity, computers, automobiles, phones, airplanes, trains etc) were produced by Caucasian males, not Asians. The Asians or Japanese simply borrowed/appropriated it into their societies. All the great art of the world, once again, created by white male gentiles. If it wasn’t for the white man the negroes, asians, latinos & mongrels would still be living in the Stone Age.
@Mike D; I suggest you go back and look again, you are obviously judging white folk by looking at the american white people you know. Everyone knows that americans are as thick as two short planks (to put it nicely).
The average Japanese person is merely two (2) or Three (3) HQ points in excess of most average white folk from European nations (check if you don’t believe) and that can be easily put down to the jew ergo christianity, the jew education system and the yids TV. So the Japs are morally superior to white people are they, well I’ll tell you now my Grandad and some of his mates would have argued the toss on that one with you seeing as they actually fought against the Japs in Burma et al in WW11. As for the Aesthetic Sensibilities what complete and utter trash are you saying that white folk don’t appreciate art, the beauty of the natural world, music et al? Like I said we Europeans are not yanks
While I’m at it lets look at the Japanese Engineer have we? Tell me what has the Jap engineer ever invented, any idea? they may on occasion improve upon an idea but never invent, the true measure of intellectual superiority. I’ll give you an example have I? When the Japanese first accepted foreigners (primarily whites) into Nipon the whites introduced them to the firearm at the time the matchlock. Then foreigners were again barred from Japan for some 200 years or so. When Europeans were again shown acceptance the Japs were still using the matchlock, improved but still the matchlock while the Europeans had progressed to the self contained cartridge and repeating pistols.
Again Asian HQ superiority (which I might add isn’t generally apparent) can be put down to “dumbing down” of the white intellect via christianity, a corrupt anti white education system and the media all of jew extraction.
I should also have mentioned the Japanese have also rejected race mixing to a very large degree and have remained comparatively pure blooded. Europe and the Americas being easier to flood with lesser breeds.
@BARNEY
i dont worry about if rothschild is a
member of the tribe or accepted by
them or kazars . he is connected or
leader of the big worldmafia parasiting
on the people of all nations + races .
therefore he + is mafia are enemies of
worldpopulation specialy now under
covid fraud-Georgia-Guide-Stone- WEF+
jew World Order talmudist conditions !
Oriental IQ is inferior. They vary less and come out with a “high” (pretty low) average, and lack geniuses, who make all the difference. Jews kill the best of the goyim so we have been under a dysgenic effect. 106 IQ is pathetic and maybe we should all be at 180 or more.
Saw a post on DarkMoon once about the FACT that the first revision original “Origin of the Species” final paragraph (published in 1860) actually claimed that GOD created everything. After Darwin died, the social Darwinists like Huxley and others had the book rewritten to get God out of the book. Which means Darwin was NOT the atheist many claim. I did a post on my book site about this:
https://omegabooksnet.com/2021/01/14/snippets-of-the-prodigal-band-trilogy-controversial-topics-series-episode-five-evolution-vs-creation-intelligent-design-part-1/
Further, I’ve been an atheist in the past but never believed in the “theory” of evolution…you cannot create soemthing out of nothing, and, being a former math teacher, know you CANNOT DIVIDE BY ZERO! Something had to create those two particles that began “evolution,” and that “something” is GOD! Further, watch the Ben Stein movie “Expelled” where Stein lays into Richard Dawkins, who can’t answer Stein’s question regarding “something out of nothing.”
@grimsson …
Firstly, what we Americans may lack slightly in terms of culture compared to you Brits or other Europeans, we more than make up for it with courage and grit. That’s a fact. If you’re all alone in a dark alley at night, and thugs approach you … who would you rather have beside you: a Frenchman (“we surrender!”), an effeminate prissy Englishman, or a blue-blooded Yankee? I rest my case.
Think Jack Reacher; that’s your typical American!
As for your assertions about the Japanese and Asians, particularly the Chinese, in general: look, the historical record is more than clear. Chinese civilization was far ahead of Europeans in many respects until about the 14th century; and then stagnated for complicated reasons. Let me be clear: I’m not claiming one race is better, the other worse. All I’m asserting is to invalidate the moronic “white supremacy” outlook of people like Nico X. Our civilization has definitely achieved much. No doubt. BUT … But, we’re not alone.
As for the present day, you ask about engineering: well, ask any of your local Brit engineers about the extraordinary quality of Japanese heavy industrial equipment. The Germans have nothing on the Japs when it comes to high precision, high quality manufacturing equipment, not to mention their innovations in all areas from transistor design to structural engineering. Their CNC/CAM machines are industry standards, and pretty much all high-tech industry uses Japanese equipment to manufacture their high-end or specialized products.
Lastly, the Japanese and Korean tendency to keep their race pure is **itself** a sign of intelligence and a higher level of consciousness. What kind of premium should we put on that level of race consciousness? For all the blaming of the jews, it’s not uncles Cohen and Silverstein et al. that make white women chase after black and brown dck … white women are more than willing to do that on their own without the goading of the jew. What does that tell you about their emotional intelligence of whites?
Regarding Creation…it’s obvious that the universe is a “creation.” Look in the mirror…if you are honest, you know that what you see did not come about by a myriad of chance happenings. A computer would never be formed from tornadoes passing through a scrap heap, regardless of the number of tornadoes that pass through. And your body and all of its functions are infinitely more complex than a computer, not to mention the complexity of your mind! Looking around at the non-living world of nature, we see similar order and vast complexity. This didn’t come from nothing, and it didn’t create itself. Nothing ever does in our experience!
Regarding God’s origins: God is the creator, and the universe is the creation. Since the universe is His creation, God made the rules that govern it (i.e., the rules of physics, biology, etc.). He dictated that all living things IN HIS CREATION must have a beginning and ending. But God Himself is not subject to this rule…He doesn’t live IN His creation…He rules over it! The concept of a beginning or ending doesn’t apply to God.
You think in terms of what you’ve observed in this world because that’s all you know…that is your reality. Can a fish in a fish bowl imagine what it’s like to drive a car to the airport, jump on a plane, and fly across a continent? Can he imagine the cars passing by on the streets just outside the house that contains his fish bowl? Can he imagine solving a calculus problem? Comparing your intellect to that of God is vastly more foolish than a comparing the intellect of flea to that of Isaac Newton.
Atheism is materialism and rebellion to God; therefore, atheism is Satanism, for Satan is the god of the material plane, and Satan was the original rebel. Seek God, and He will reveal Himself to you.
Regarding negative comments made here regarding America/Americans: You all know here that America has been until recently the greatest nation the world has ever seen…in terms of inventiveness, in terms of prosperity, in terms of contributions to science and technology, etc. Things have gone bad lately because evil ones are now in control. The fish rots from the head down.
Regarding the Japanese vs. Europeans…both are great peoples…why argue over such a thing? A waste of time!
They haven’t found the missing link for our existence because ever since Darwin their attention has been focused entirely in the wrong direction. It is not our link to our animal nature which matters but the link to God. It is there. It is an transcendental link which our hearts – our souls – can contemplate and connect to in peace when liberated from all of the anxieties of the world.
@ Yukon Jack
Your’re employing false dichotomy by limited debate options to evolution or Biblical Genesis. This tactic is often used quite effectively as a method to label anyone who doesn’t accept evolution as a religious fanatic. Evolution can easily be refuted on a purely scientific basis. There is little or no evidence to support it, just theory and conjecture , much of it absurd and illogical.
— There are no transitional / intermediary fossils to support evolution. There are variations within kinds / species e.g. different breeds of dogs, but never evolve into another species. Darwin’s finches had beak size variation but never became anything other than finches.
— Abiogenesis never been proven to be possible. This is the fable .Rain fell on rocks for millions of years , chemicals washed off of rocks into primordial sea. then chemicals sprang to life , crawled up on shore and eventually became humans. Therefore humanity’s earliest ancestor was a rock.
— Mathematical probability of DNA and amino acid chains coding themselves through random process is nil. It’s like saying the faces on Mt. Rushmore were created by chance through rain , wind , and erosion.
— All missing link fossils like Java man , Peking man , Piltdown man, Nebraska man, all later exposed as frauds .Nebraska man’s existence was extrapolated from discovery of a single tooth , later admitted to be the tooth of a pig.
— Carbon dating not legit. No proof Earth is billions of years old
— How can male and female evolve ? Both have to exist simultaneously to work.
— Common DNA or common structures in different species doesn’t prove common ancestry , rather proof of a common designer.
These are just a few points , there are many others. Life on Earth, as well as our Earth realm [ flat , stationary , enclosed system ] was intelligently designed and created by some supernatural force / being. How the creator is defined is up to the individual and a separate spiritual discussion.
“Given that the Rothschild’s power was built on material wealth”.
Rubbish, this claim made by a sheeple with downloaded material belief systems. Even the claimed ‘I care not who make the laws, so long as I control the money’ (not an accurate quote), is misdirection. The Roths use a large number of families, wealthy families, made wealthy by the Roths to manage the Roths portfolio of global assets. So in effect, this is a massive franchise system. All we see are the big corporations, banks and Federal reserve banks and the regimes who are on the hook for staggering debts, debts owed ultimately to the Roths. There’s no material wealth in debt, unless it gets paid back, and we know there’s no chance of the debt being paid back. This is why banks are legally allowed to hide their debts off balance sheet.
Once upon a time, the Roths were powerful because of their wealth, but now, their power is because they control all the non wealth systems, this is the sect, the NWO, which has policies that have no obligation to wealth, or the success of respected countries. The current state of play is to the death, one system V the new system, and I know many will say the Roths control both, but I am not so sure. The Western sect is evil, always has been, and the other free world sect doesnt appear to be anywhere near as evil as the West.
There are multiple gods. The bible itself says so. God said “let US make …”. Also the SONS of the GODS saw that…”. If there were gods and they had sons, then there must have been goddesses too, or are you trying to tell me the gods were hermaphrodites?
The worst thing Darwinists do is make “the environment” responsible for all the variety in life, when we see thousands of life-types yet only about twenty types of environment, and most of these having all the kinds of life. The second-worst thing is to think that survival is everything and whatever survives, by any means, is “successful”, so they are always justifying evil behaviour. This indirectly justifies the mafia that wishes to rule, and these people are, of course, behind the doctrine.
There is much interesting, thought-provoking, and intelligent commentary by many above. What follows from me won’t have any of those qualities…haha
I fail to see any mystery regarding the allegedly elusive “missing link” as evolutionary sub-humans remain around us in significant numbers. Take the American negro street ape, for example. I can easily distinguish no fewer than three distinct genetic species or sub-species lines of blacks. Two of those genetic lines exhibit clear simian physical traits and clear sub-human or animalistic behaviors. Sure, they can have moments in which the street ape can mimic some behavior of the evolved human for a short time, but their core behavior is that of the animal or savage sub-human.
On a different note, I have no doubt the Creator of the universe, labeled as God by many, had a direct hand in the creation of so much in the physical universe. However, I also believe the “Bible” is mostly a Book of Bullshit, especially the Old Testament, and is a key element in the long con the Jew has been running on a lot of dupes over centuries.
To Umbra Bellator–if we are from apes (but I also believe in degeneration TO apes), there were times when the early humans could still breed with apes and create a halfway being, and some Africans and others look like that. A half-almas in the Caucasus a few decades ago did look negroid. We still have these monkey-men. Yesterday I bought Nexus expecting to read about new technology but I got the dog-headed tribe of India, now gone, and Darwin will not help us with that either.
To markie–I think the male side is from a bacteriophage and the female side is from a single cell, originally not at all the same species and still basically a globe and a rod, like the planet and a megalith. Spiders may also be from bacteriophages. The sperm’s point of entry affects the new organism, as an acupuncture needle has to be in a certain place too. The bacteriophage injects genetic information.