Mark Crispin Miller – News From The Underground March 21, 2022
They’ve been trying from the start of this long global nightmare to equate compliance with benevolence. Throughout 2020, they told us, inescapably, that putting on a mask (or two, or three) made you a Good Person (“Wearing is caring”); and then, throughout 2021, they told us, inescapably, that “vaccination” was (to quote the horrible Bergoglio) “an act of love,” so that the kindliest and most considerate of us were those who’d had as many jabs as possible.
Conversely, they portrayed the “anti-maskers” as a danger to us all, not just because they’d surely kill us (or at least “kill Grandma”) with their toxic exhalations, but, on top of that, because of their combustible “far-right” hostility to anyone—bus drivers, security guards—who dared to tell them what to do. The propaganda fostering that canard then took to casting “anti-vaxxers” as hideously selfish animals, utterly indifferent to the huge (imaginary) risk they pose to those who did get jabbed—a claim as obviously false as it was (and is) scientifically absurd.
I call it “obviously false” because, outside the fever-dream “reported” daily by the media, it’s always been the other way around. All along, it’s been the maskers who have always readily abused the “anti-maskers,” and then it was the “vaccinated” who chastised (or worse) those choosing, for whatever reason, not to get injected. And, of course, it was the latter, not the former, who, while getting pelted with such sanctimonious denunciation, have also been excluded, isolated, silenced, censored, fired, delicensed, fined and even jailed, or involuntarily committed, either for refusing to get jabbed, or for merely questioning the wisdom, or the consequences, of the “vaccination” program.
And then we’ve also heard, and some of us have seen, a certain darkening of personality among the “vaccinated,” or some of them—a marked new nastiness, intolerance, explosiveness, as if those “vaccines” were laced with choler, or its nanotechnological equivalent. I for one have been attacked insanely, out of nowhere, by the recently injected; and others have reported the same thing.
That history of nastiness against the non-compliant is the context in which we should now check out, and share, these poll results from Canada:
—
Subscribe to News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller
Hundreds of paid subscribers
News from Underground is based on my belief that, like journalists, academics have a civic obligation to help keep the people well-informed, so that American democracy might finally work.
Scroll to the foot of the source page to subscribe
In reply to the headline, I’ll read the essay later.
Because the ‘Jabbed’ are poorly in the head, They can’t think straight.
The Un-stabbed, (in the main) Want to see Russia knock out the antagonists of the impending new world order,
Its all about what we are told/Shown/Believe. & how we perceive it.
Then do us all a favour and go fight it. This cull can’t happen quick enough for me. These dumb fuckers, it’s all their fault.
It’s only fair to point out that all the vaccinated were persuaded by the MSM to take it,
and so would respond in similar fashion to the MSM’s current pro war stance.
Many more people (and Celebs) will have to be struck with obvious vaccine injury or death before they all wake up. Unfortunately, Rafael Nadal is the latest to find out why Novak Djokovic refused to get the vax.
I doubt the vaccine is making people more prone to government propaganda. The answer is obvious – people who want war with Russia (or any war for that matter) are stupid. When the poll found those people to also have taken the vaccine, it simply reinforces the first point.
I am not a writer, nor are my powers of elucidation equal to the author’s, but I can say that as with so many trained brains and critical thinkers these days what is missed by so many of them is that which is the most obvious. He presents a relationship between being vaccinated and supporting hostilities toward Russia, suggesting that the hostility exhibited by many of the vaccinated toward the unvaccinated could explain why they are more anti-Russian and eager for war than the unwashed and contemptable unvaccinated. Actually, the relationship is explained not by any biological reaction causing hostilities occurring in the vaccinated, but most obviously by the media. From the protests aground the world against the vax mandates more and more of the vaccinated are waking up and that awakening process is traced right to their beginning to mistrust the mainstream media and by looking to other sources for the facts.
Plain and simple, people are being brainwashed by the mainstream media becoming what we the unwashed call “the politically correct”. Like automatons they follow not only any style or trend propagated by MSM advertisers, but more more insidiously and in a much more sophisticated way, they are hypnotized with constant repetition from a variety of sources, and even subliminally simply to think the “vaccines good”, and “Russia bad”. The vaccinated simply reflect the official narrative on everything, and the only way to get the sheeple to wake up is to get them to disconnect from the MSM.
The masked + fully vaccinated are an UNTHINKING OBEDIENCE CULT
I say we send them all to Ukraine
I guess that the poll numbers here are due to the fact that those who believe in the MSM in general believed in the danger of Covid and the efficacy of the vaccines (and thus took the jab), and now also believe in the one-sided Russia-narrative.
On the other hand, those who like to make up their own minds, and get their information from alternatives to the MSM, did not generally take Covid so seriously, or consider the vaccines necessary – and also now question the wisdom of the narratives about Russia.
I don’t think that it is a consequence of the vaccines themselves.
I don’t think the vaccines are making people more controllable. I think they merely reveal who was already more controllable to begin with. I was pressured into getting the vaccine and caved like a coward, but it hasn’t made me change my feelings about it or about the threat of WW3. The reason the vaccinated are getting nastier, though, is because the social pressure to be “polite” — which used to be reinforced by the media — is rapidly disappearing. We love bullies in the United States. Idolize them as a matter of fact. But only if they agree with us. The vaccinated aren’t more “empathetic” or better people who took the vaccine because they truly wanted to help society. It was an ego trip to put on a veneer of being “good”. They did it for their own social credit score. The only way their score goes up is by making all those who refused to get it suffer.
The left hated bullies because they were the ones without power at the time. They didn’t want the Chads and Staceys to get away with being cruel to them — the nerds, outcasts, etc. So they fought against it. Once they got the power, though, they became every bit as mean and nasty as the people who once bullied them. They pushed for changes but it was all bait and switch. Kindler and gentler when they are the powerless, but ruthless when they direct it at others.
They didn’t hate Trump because he was a bully. They hated him because he bullied their team. They want to be just like him, not be better than him. They haven’t gotten meaner, they’ve just shown who they really were all along.
This would have been an exceedingly bizarre split a few years ago but it’s par for the course these days.
Those who believe the covid B.S. believe the B.S. about any other “event”. In short there are those who have thoughts and those who don’t and the majority ,as always, don’t .
How very sad.
That’s because by and LARGE, Canada is THICKER than all the combined shit of the THICKEST of the Brits.
Not cause-and-effect, just people believing the Establishment on both topics.
It’s a spiritual war. Read Psalm 10. We will suffer, die and cry out to God. He will come.
They were propagandised into taking the vaccine in the first place, so they were easily swayed already.
Here’s an important truism when considering Cause and Effect and the supposed direction of causal relationships: Association does not necessarily imply causation AND causation necessarily implies association. As comments above clearly indicate, it would not take many more answered questions to determine which is which in the associations mentioned (vaccinated/unvaccinated, support for war/no support for war). Finding funding to do the epidemiologic research validly and convincingly would be the much more difficult task. Who would care enough? Who would care NOT to know?!
I think this fellow is giving the common imbecile far too much credence.. they were after all imbeciles pre-corona hoax..
It’s definitely difficult to suffer fools gladly… so it seems much more sensible to let fools simply suffer…
and be glad…
The vaccinated are motivated by FEAR making them very compliant and easy to manipulate.
Stupidity, always beat’s Infinity ……..
It’s likely not the vaxx (yet it could be considering a possible 5G like control mechanism in the vaxx), but more like folks who tend to conform took the vaxx, and are so into conforming they buy into the “it’s all Russia’s fault” crapola. Folks who conform to the criminal psycho elite narrative also tend to be stoked by fear and put “safety” ahead of liberty…9-11 then, covid and then Ukraine-Russia now. So then the so-called “war” ends, then guess what? A new round of “covid”…. I stopped watching TV years ago, thank God!
And now a second associate at work who is triple ‘vaxxxed’ has contracted ‘Covid’. Or as I like to say, ‘down wid da Rona!’ At times it’s like I’m in a really pathetic sci-fi sitcom.
it is very simpel : ALL VAXED FOLLOW
THE STATE AGENDA ; they are sheeple .
You never know but the as yet unknown contents in the vaccinations may be exotic technology that is able to subliminally cause auto-suggestion to the vaccinated just like how some insects are known to zombify other insects.
As for the China Eastern’s Boeing 737-800 inexplicable crash Joe Vialls had documented similar type of crashes and the ‘technology’ that is used to do so.
One of the docs I can remember is titled “Home Run Used To Electronically Hijack World Trade Center Aircraft” which seem not to appear on the Joe Vialls website link on this http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk site so I am posting it here in its entirety from a copy I saved.
“Home Run”
Electronically Hijacking the World Trade
Center Attack Aircraft
Copyright Joe Vialls, October 2001
Click Here For Printer-Friendly Version
Pentagon Strike
Boeing 757 x 1
About 230,000#
WTC Strike
Boeing 767 x 2
420,000# each
Flight 175 Impact +1 Second
(Allow Time for Video to Load )
In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical purposes. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with the Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant both in concept and operation, “Home Run” [not its real code name] allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerized flight control system by remote means.
From that point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be recovered and landed automatically at an airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model plane. The engineers had no idea that almost thirty years after its initial design, Home Run’s top secret computer codes would be broken, and the system used to facilitate direct ground control of the four aircraft used in the high-profile attacks on New York and Washington on 11th September 2001.
Before moving on to the New York and Washington attacks, we first need to look at the ways in which an aircraft is normally controlled by its pilot, because without this basic knowledge, Home Run would make no sense. In order to control an aircraft in three-dimensional space, the pilot uses the control yoke (joystick) in front of him, rudder pedals under his feet, and a bank of engine throttles located at his side. Without engine thrust the aircraft would not fly at all, so the throttles are largely self explanatory: For more speed or altitude increase throttle, for less speed or altitude decrease throttle.
In order to raise or lower the nose of the aircraft, the pilot pulls or pushes on the control yoke, which in turn raises or lowers the elevators on the horizontal tailplane. To bank the aircraft left or right, the pilot moves the control yoke to the left or right, which in turn operates the ailerons on the outer wings. Lastly, to turn left or right at low speed or “balance” turns at high speed, the pilot presses the left or right rudder pedals as required, which in turn move the rudder on the vertical stabilizer.
Back in the early days of flight, the control yoke and rudder pedals were connected to the various flight control surfaces by thin cables, meaning the pilot had direct physical control over every movement the aircraft made. This was no great problem for an average man flying a small biplane, but as aircraft grew ever bigger, heavier and faster over the years, the loadings on the control yoke and rudder pedals became huge, certainly well beyond the ability of a single pilot to handle unaided.
By the late fifties we were well into the age of hydraulics, where just like the power steering on your automobile, hydraulic rams were placed in line between the pilot’s control cables and each individual control surface. Now when the pilot moved the control yoke, the cables activated sensors, which in turn activated one or more hydraulic rams, which in turn moved one or more control surfaces. For the first time since Bleriot and the Wright brothers, pilots were of necessity being steadily distanced from direct control of their own aircraft.
When the multinationals and DARPA finally came on the scene in the mid-seventies, aircraft systems were even more advanced, with computers controlling onboard autopilots, which in turn were capable of controlling all of the onboard hydraulics. In combination these multiple different functions were now known as the “Flight Control System” or FCS, in turn integrated with sophisticated avionics capable of automatically landing the aircraft in zero visibility conditions. In summary, by the mid-seventies most of the large jets were capable of effectively navigating hundreds of miles and then making automatic landings at a selected airport in zero-zero fog conditions. All of this could be accomplished unaided, but in theory at least, still under the watchful eyes of the flight deck crews.
In order to make Home Run truly effective, it had to be completely integrated with all onboard systems, and this could only be accomplished with a new aircraft design, several of which were on the drawing boards at that time. Under cover of extreme secrecy, the multinationals and DARPA went ahead on this basis and built “back doors” into the new computer designs. There were two very obvious hard requirements at this stage, the first a primary control channel for use in taking over the flight control system and flying the aircraft back to an airfield of choice, and secondly a covert audio channel for monitoring flight deck conversations. Once the primary channel was activated, all aircraft functions came under direct ground control, permanently removing the hijackers and pilots from the control loop.
Remember here, this was not a system designed to “undermine” the authority of the flight crews, but was put in place as a “doomsday” device in the event the hijackers started to shoot passengers or crew members, possibly including the pilots. Using the perfectly reasonable assumption that hijackers only carry a limited number of bullets, and many aircraft nowadays carry in excess of 300 passengers, Home Run could be used to fly all of the survivors to a friendly airport for a safe auto landing. So the system started out in life for the very best of reasons, but finally fell prey to security leaks, and eventually to compromised computer codes. In light of recent high-profile CIA and FBI spying trials, these leaks and compromised codes should come as no great surprise to anyone.
Activating the primary Home Run channel proved to be easy. Most readers will have heard of a “transponder”, prominent in most news reports immediately following the attacks on New York and Washington. Technically a transponder is a combined radio transmitter and receiver which operates automatically, in this case relaying data between the four aircraft and air traffic control on the ground. The signals sent provide a unique “identity” for each aircraft, essential in crowded airspace to avoid mid-air collisions, and equally essential for Home Run controllers trying to lock onto the correct aircraft. Once it has located the correct aircraft, Home Run “piggy backs” a data transmission onto the transponder channel and takes direct control from the ground. This explains why none of the aircraft sent a special “I have been hijacked” transponder code, despite multiple activation points on all four aircraft. Because the transponder frequency had already been piggy backed by Home Run, transmission of the special hijack code was rendered impossible. This was the first hard proof that the target aircraft had been hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by [FBI-inspired] motley crews of Arabs toting penknives.
The Home Run listening device on the flight deck utilizes the cockpit microphones that normally feed the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), one of two black boxes armored to withstand heavy impact and thereby later give investigators significant clues to why the aircraft crashed. However, once hooked into Home Run, the CVRs are bypassed and voice transmissions are no longer recorded on the 30-minute endless loop recording tape. If Home Run is active for more than thirty minutes, there will therefore be no audible data on the Cockpit Voice Recorders. To date, crash investigators have recovered the CVRs from the Pentagon and Pittsburg aircraft, and publicly confirmed that both are completely blank. The only possible reason for this, is data capture by Home Run, providing the final hard proof that the attack aircraft were hijacked electronically from the ground, rather than by “Arab terrorists”.
Many readers might by now be indignant; convinced this is incorrect or misleading information because of “those telephone calls from the hijacked aircraft”. Which telephone calls exactly? There are no records of any such calls, and the emotional claptrap the media fed you in the aftermath of the attack was in all cases third-person. We had the media’s invisible “contact” at an airline who “said” a hostess called to report a hijacking, and we had a priest (?) who “said” he received a call from a man asking him in turn to call his wife and tell her he loved her.
Presumably this man would have had his wife’s name filed in his cellphone, and faced with imminent death would have called her direct. The FAA helped out by claiming that it had “overheard” a heated argument from a cockpit where the radio transmit switch had been left in the “on” position. When push came to shove, the FAA was forced to retract, and admit that the mythical argument was not on the tapes at all.
Critically, the passenger manifests for all four aircraft serve as the final (independent) proof that no alleged hijackers or anyone of Arabic name boarded any of the four aircraft used in the attacks. As Laurence T. May points out:
“On September 11, airline check-in counters were the only places in the United States that required travellers to present a photo ID in order to travel. A photo ID meant (and still means) a card issued by some branch of civil government. Years ago, the United States government took the first step toward a national ID card when it mandated the requirement that all passengers present a photo ID card before being allowed to get on a commercial airplane.
“This means that the tightest security that the typical American ever confronts is airport security. This is the model for all other security systems governing the general public. Let’s go through the check-in routine together. Pretend that it’s September 11, and you are a check-in agent at either a United Airlines counter or an American Airlines counter. It is your job to ask the standard questions. “Did you pack your own luggage? Have you had it in your possession at all times?” Then you ask for a photo ID. The name on the ID must match the name on the
ticket. The photo must match the person presenting the card.” .. And, you guessed it, the name on the ID must match that on the passenger manifest held by the airline ground staff!
It seems highly likely that these revealing passenger manifests will magically disappear when the American Government realizes the dangers of allowing the public access to such incriminating documents. For that reason I have listed the full manifests on a separate page. To visit that page and copy the lists, click here.
Whether more information will be forthcoming about Home Run is unknown, but nowadays there are large numbers of people apart from the author privy to the basic data. As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be “rescued” by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet.
A casual count indicates that more than 600 aircraft in the USA and elsewhere are still vulnerable and could be used in further attacks at any time, which might help explain why America has been bombing the Afghans primarily with bags of wheat. For the first time in US history, American officials appear to be genuinely fearful of future reprisals, and justifiably so with 600 giant bombs parked on the wrong side of their missile defence shield.
It is a “Catch 22” situation. In order to make all of the aircraft safe, the flight control systems would have to be stripped out and replaced, at a cost of billions of dollars the airlines cannot afford because they are going broke. Nor is there enough time. The most innovative anti-hijacking tool in the American arsenal, has now become the biggest known threat to American national security.
For the purpose of public reassurance I would like to publish a complete list of aircraft which cannot be affected by Home Run, but I cannot do so for legal reasons. Any aircraft manufacturer not on the list might feel inclined to sue me for defamation and I can’t afford that. However, there is nothing to stop me publishing my personal choice of aircraft for a flight from, say, Atlanta to Singapore via JFK, Frankfurt, and Kuala Lumpur.
From Atlanta to JFK I would probably travel on a Boeing 737, and connect with a Boeing 777 for the onward flight to Frankfurt. At Frankfurt I would probably board an Airbus A340 for Kuala Lumpur, and finish the journey on a DC9 or a Fokker 100. Naturally I might be unlucky and pick an aircraft with an intoxicated pilot, or an unrelated mechanical problem, but apart from those minor risks I’d feel pretty safe.
15 October 2001
After this page had been hit on by more than 10,000 curious visitors, the current issue of “Business Week” (22Oct) decided to publish an unusual letter, suggesting that the events of the 11th of September would have ended rather differently if there was a capability for Ground Tower Control to “take over the controls of a hijacked plane” (issue still available at any US newsagent).
Remember, the American Federal Government kept Reagan National airport in downtown Washington, DC shut, despite the fact that none of the “hijacked” planes came from there. However, if it were possible to “take over the controls” of a plane, then it would take less than a minute for planes close to DCA airport to be diverted to a target anywhere in the capital. There were just two aircraft types involved on the 11th of September.
Eventually, after much reluctance, the government has now opened up Reagan National airport again, but ONLY for planes with less than 156 seats. Now what kind of planes previously operating happily out of Reagan National will this new “seating” restriction exclude? Hint: Among a few others, the Boeing 757 and 767.
Cynics might be tempted to conclude that, as usual, “important” politicians and bureaucrats are being provided with discreet special protection from Home Run, while everyday Americans are left to take their chances as best they can, and run the continual risk of being shot down by one of their own F16 fighters. Ignorance may be bliss for some folk, but not for those who have studied this page and realized the implications.
18 October 2001
Suddenly, more than five weeks after the attack and for no apparent reason, the most powerful newspaper in the western world published a major article “reinforcing” the myth that physical hijackers were responsible for the attacks on 11 September. No hard facts of course, no corroboration at all, just the usual pathetic series of media “sources”, all of them far too “secret” to reveal.
Within hours of this newspaper going to press, television reporters across the entire western world repeated the fiction to their own viewing publics. From London in England to Sydney in Australia, everone woke to this new “proof” that Arabs were the real culprits. Never mind public safety, please believe what we, your trusted and experienced news peddlers, are telling you. To read the propaganda, click here.
19 October 2001
During the past few days I have received many emails asking for a written explanation of who was behind the attacks on 11 September, and why. As an investigator I can prove how the attack was carried out, but I cannot prove why or by whom. Of all the work I have seen on the Internet, the closest to the truth is probably this imspired report called “Orient Express” written by journalist Israel Shamir. To read “Orient Express”, click here.
25 October 2001
Though I do not agree with the financial rationale where this report is concerned, the Colonel and his highly specialized group provide valuable additional insights into the impossibility of “hijackers” flying the attack aircraft on 11 September. To read “The Enemy is Inside The Gates”, click here.
20 January 2002
Former German Minister Von Buelow Already Knew About Remote Control
In his interview with the German daily “Tagesspiegel” on January 13th, former German Secretary of Defence Andreas Von Buelow made the following statement:-
“There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: According to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots’ hands, from outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in this case…”
Not quite so much a theory as might first appear. When I released the above report about “Home Run” remote control in October 2001, I mentioned that one European flag carrier was aware of the technology, though at that precise point in time I thought it prudent not to name the actual airline:-
“As long ago as the early nineties, a major European flag carrier acquired the information and was seriously alarmed that one of its own aircraft might be “rescued” by the Americans without its authority. Accordingly, this flag carrier completely stripped the American flight control computers out of its entire fleet, and replaced them with a home grown version. These aircraft are now effectively impregnable to penetration by Home Run, but that is more than can be said for the American aircraft fleet…”
The European flag carrier which completely stripped the American flight computers out of its aircraft was Lufthansa, the German national airline. Bearing in mind his former posts as Secretary of Defence and Minister of Science and Technology, Herr Von Buelow would have known all about this mammoth but secretive task.
How very clever (and discreet) of Von Buelow to sort of “drop the information” into the middle of an interview about the 9/11 attacks!
Home Run Part 2, click Here
The author is a former member of the Society of Licenced
Aeronautical Engineers & Technologist, London
This report may be republished unedited for non-commercial
purposes in the interests of public safety
Oops, some more elucidation about the above technology here on Jim Stone’s website regarding the same flight.
http://www.voterig.com/na5.html
Alternate way to get to Jim Stone’s website is
http://82.221.129.208/
Sometimes the site is off and if you are lucky it is available. Just like my local pub.
Here is a scientific reason why masked vaxxers love Ukraine and hate Russia and those who think don’t.
Herding vs. Thinking
Socionomics is the offshoot of the elliott wave technical analysts, it is the study why investors buy at the top and sell at the bottom, or how people surrender rational thought and herd from a different part of the brain.
Basically some people exist in a world of thinking and others in a world of emotions. Thinkers are skeptics of government claims, and herders are easily manipulated by emotive images and false narratives.
The very same group of bleeding hearts for Ukraine didn’t give a rat’s ass about Iraq. In fact the virtual signalling idiots probably don’t even know where Iraq is or there was a war. The herd creature is like the little sardine in the bait ball, always trying to find center in the group.
So if the media identifies the parameters of an acceptable citizen they will do their best to fit in – whether to wear a mask, get vaxxed, believe the narrative, and support Ukraine. These people are your greatest threat because they will also be the first to turn you in for hoarding food, voting for the wrong party, having disruptive thoughts, not complying, not paying taxes, not being an obedient slave.
The slave master need only demonize the thinker as the enemy and the herd will go for their throats.The vaxxed were told the unvaxxed were the reason for the pandemic, so the vaxxed hate the unvaxxed for non-compliance.
This control of society is electronic – it is the broadcast of Jew lies that creates this dysfunctional bloody war culture. Jews tell lies then the Goyim die.
https://www.amazon.com/Socionomic-Theory-Finance-Robert-Prechter/product-reviews/0977611256
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827453/
Beckham videoconferencing with a maternity ward doctor in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Things don’t get more fake and contrived than this, truly.
It’s right up there with “Covid = mankind’s battle for survival” and “vaccine = Second Coming of Christ”. (Those were actual ‘news’ headlines back in 2020, and far from isolated ones.)
Vaxers now demonize all things Russian? Well, of course they do! Hook, line, and sinker.
It seems the decision to vax or not is determined by one’s source of information about the vaccine. I would bet internet users, seekers especially, account for many if not most of the unvaccinated, while the vaccinated are mostly those who only heard the “safe and effective”
line from the mass media.
To Yukon Jack–something about fractally programming oneself, the ether and the world, in league with God. As with comedy we can’t do it and discuss it at the same time.