Irish Savant – irishsavant.net Feb 21, 2022
The hypocrisy and double standards of the left-liberal establishment – which in reality is neither left nor liberal – has been brutally underlined by the current spat between Boris Johnson and Keir Starmer. Specifically Johnson’s claim that Starmer “wasted his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile”. The explosion of outrage from the chattering classes was instantaneous. Johnson was ordered to withdraw this “smear which was the scorched-earth tactic of a desperate, dangerous man” according to ((Jonathan Freedland)) of the Guardian. There are a number of ironies here, not least that those spluttering with rage at the “smear” had spent a good part of the previous few years smearing Starmer’s predecessor Jeremy Corbyn. None more so than Freedland, who had spearheaded a vicious campaign against Corbyn for his ‘anti-semitism’. A less likely anti-semite than Corbyn would be hard to find, a fact well known to Freedland and the other media and political whores who moved in for the kill.
No, Corbyn’s real offence was that he either did not or could not root out the Jew-wise views of a rapidly growing cohort of party members, especially those in the Momentum movement who accused the Jewish Labour Movement of being more loyal to “a shady foreign power” than to the party. For instance Momentum’s then Vice Chair told a large meeting – to loud cheers! – that anti-Semitism was “no more special than any other kind of racism, and that if there is anti-Jewish feeling among Labourites, so what? The Labour Party, after all, is simply a reflection of society”. A prominent Jewish MP walked out of the meeting to a chorus of jeers and catcalls. Oh deary me. So Jeremy had to go. Hence the almost unprecedented smear campaign and worse, a plot by traitors within the party, lead by that doughty Englishman (Spear) Chukka Ummuna, to make Labour lose the 2017 General Election and thus trigger Corbyn’s removal. It worked.
And waiting in the wings was the controllers’ choice to replace him: Sir Keir Starmer. He ticked all the boxes: An unscrupulous back-stabbing careerist mired in corruption throughout his career and whose children “are being brought up in the Jewish faith of their mother and who attend shabbat dinners”. A safe pair of hands then. And he didn’t leave his side down. Immediately, despite explicit campaign promises to the contrary, he began purging the ‘anti-semites’ and promoting the traitors. Hence the love-fest from the media whores and their apoplectic reaction to Johnson’s “unsubstantiated smears”. Unsubstantiated smears were no longer unacceptable.
But were the smears unsubstantiated? Well, between 2008 and 2013, Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Savile died in 2011 before he could face justice. The Guardian again: “[Starmer] had no connection to decisions over the case, and the idea he did emerged later in conspiracy theories mainly shared among the far right.” When the public outcry reached a peak in 2012, Starmer played the go-to trick in the Establishment playbook. He commissioned an ‘independent’ lawyer he knew to write a report exonerating him. In ((Mishcon de Reya)) (“Money Laundering For Drug Dealers And Oligarchs Our Specialty”) Starmer chose wisely. Nothing to see here, lessons have been learned, let us move on. And move on he did when his term at the CPS ended. To……..((Mishcon de Reya)). No wonder his handlers love him. The suggestion of his not being involved in the Savile case is simply preposterous. The role of CPS Director is precisely to decide on sensitive high-profile cases such as this. And they didn’t come much higher with Savile having – as he himself warned police when pulled in for questioning – friends at the highest level of the Establishment. To an unprincipled careerist like Starmer this represented his passage to much higher things. Maybe even to Number 10 Downing Street itself.
Now to the dog that didn’t bark. I’m referring to Johnson’s other ‘smear’, that of prosecuting journalists. Clearly this referred to Starmer’s role in the hounding of Julian Assange. And what a role it was even though there was really no reason for the CPS to get involved as Assange had merely been questioned by Swedish police about an alleged sex crime after which no charges were deemed justified. However for some reason a prosecutor from another region took up the case. Assange was in London at the time and offered to undergo further questioning at the Swedish Embassy there but the CPS told the Swedes not to come. Eventually Swedish prosecutors did interview Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy and again decided that charges weren’t justified. This elicited a flurry of outraged emails (subsequently destroyed, and only recovered by an FOI request at the Swedish end) from the CPS. “Don’t you dare get cold feet” the Swedes were instructed and they, for reasons we can only speculate, agreed to keep the case open. Now why were Starmer and the CPS so tenacious and implacable in relation to an obscure unprosecuted sex case in Sweden while at the same time turning a blind eye to the child abuse scandals roiling under their noses in Britain? That my friends is what’s known as a rhetorical question. We all know the answer. Starmer was playing his role to perfection and Assange is now a broken man even of he never ends up in Guantanomo.
And let’s conclude with another rhetorical question: Why have the media whores entirely overlooked Johnson’s accusation of journalistic persecution? Surely this should have been the whores’ primary focus, you know, a fellow journalist and all that?
Again we know the answer to that.
It’s a sick world.
Source

I worked in the field and what i saw was this.
The government wanted to sieze the valueable land, as so many large rambling mental homes were built on prime land, they could not close these as so many patients were sexually a threat to society
so in a roundabout move they against all advice made homosexuality legal
The world famous maudley psychiatric hospital in london claimed it would escalate all crimes against children, the archbishop donald coggan agreed on a TV interview it would put children gravely at rish
The government under toerag tony D noticed and shredded the nene report which documents massive abuse of boys in 16 london area care homes by homosexuals in which the UK column said the abuse was on an industrial scale, and Blair wanted this all hiden up
Prominent UK psychiatrists were thretened with their jobs and prosecutions if they spoke out about the homosexual abuse of children
see this below
http://www.renegadetribune.com/why-has-the-queen-knighted-so-many-child-rapists/
Western establishments have captured the election process. If they must steal an election from a popular candidate like Jeremy Corbyn they must first grind his character into the dirt to simulate a fall from grace. It was still clear Corbyn had far more support than Johnson and the votes to elect him – Johnson hid in a fridge to avoid the press the day before the election ffs – and they still stole it from Corbyn; probably because he’d not have accepted the Covid fraud because there’s no evidence for it.
They seem to be bigging up Starmer to take over at the next election. Few would really vote for this man, who’s as wooden as a barstool, but now they own the elections they don’t have to. At least back in 1997 the odious Blair actually had to attract the votes. They’ll put in place this barstool as though he was elected, and like Blair he’ll have some nasty authoritarian policies the Tories wouldn’t dare introduce.
I never supported Corbyn, whose anti-racism was killing the British as fast as anything. Labour was not getting “Jew-wise”, it was still under what is, effectively, a Jewish order to never distinguish between the White British and an African criminal that just floated in on an inflatable boat, (except perhaps to admire and/or pity the African).. Corbyn pretended to fancy the brainless morlock Diane Abbot because it was not possible to feign admiration for her absent talents.
“It’s a sick world”
It sure is… and you don’t get much sicker than ZOGUK
Starmer is of course a crypto jew…to deflect questions about his children he says he is “married to a jew”.
Saville was a Marrano Catholic….in other words a crypto jew….and so we’re many or most of his acquaintances.
So all this stuff is directly connected to Jewish tribesmen….like Cameron descended from wealthy jewish bankers.His wife,who is rumoured to have had sex with the blonde zio-oaf…is extremely rich in her own right….from family money.
Truth at last , let’s have some more the country is crying out for it they are sick and tired of being ruled by stealth deceit and blatant corruption.
What did you expect to happen? You didn’t listen to Oswald Mosley or Archibald Ramsay, or William Joyce or John Amery or Unity Mitford…& now you wonder why Jews dissolved your Empire, dominate your entire political system & nothing happens to Semitic sex-fiends like Jimmy Savile…
It’s easily solved — just don’t vote for them at the next election.
Nico X–what are we supposed to do with your revisionism, build a time-machine and be Nazi in 1939? or cry ourselves to death in regret? or build a Nazi Party now, which you show no signs of doing, as if you prefer moaning about the 1940s. You are mainly a pest.
It is plainly obvious that high level functionaries are protected by the Secret Services, MI5, MI6, GCHQ, etc and that no one ever gets close to the Royal Family, major public figures etc without the security infrastructure doing a full 360 degree character check, investigate all connections and literally have the drains up on anybody getting involved closely with the Royals or anyone else. Therefore Savile (and by extension Epstein, Maxwell) et al’s interests, strengths, weakness and general risk profile would be a known quantity and thus approved of by the said Establishment Figures. Therefore the acts the likes of Savile carried out served the required purposes and needs of these Establishment entities. The said individuals (Savile, Starmer etc) are then awarded the Establishment’s Seal of Approval, typically a Knighthood or other societal leg up/badge of honour.
Both are perverts and both cover it up all the time the pair of lowlife jew scumbags