Free West Media – Jan 14, 2022
An explosive case is currently being hotly debated on social media: In France, a rich, older entrepreneur from Paris is said to have died as a result of a Corona injection. Previously, he had taken out multi-million dollar life insurance policies for the benefit of his children and grandchildren, according to a media report.
Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and the insurance company, it has refused to pay out. The reason is because the side effects of the Corona jabs are known and published. They argue that the deceased took part in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 in itself is not classed as a “critical illness”.
According to the company, an experimental vaccination resulting in death is like suicide
The insurance company justified the refusal of payment to the family by stating that the use of experimental medication or treatments, including Corona injections, is expressly excluded from the insurance contract. The family’s subsequent lawsuit against the insurance company has been unsuccessful.
The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows: “The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.” Since suicide is not covered by the policy from the outset, the insurance refuses to budge.
Scandalous verdict: taking a fatal risk is legally suicide
“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”
No surprise: Mainstream media is silent
This case has not yet been reported in France ‘s mainstream media. The case was published by the family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, on social media. Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified although there have been other warnings regarding the risk associated with the jabs recognized by insurers. In the US, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) has denied reports of non-payment.
Censorship
In recent months, many French anti-vaccine groups of the social network Facebook have been victims of sudden, unjustified closures, especially support groups for Brusa and Professor Didier Raoult. The latter has often been criticized for his positions on vaccines, hydroxychloroquine and his criticism of the mismanagement of the epidemic by the Macron government.
At the end of last year, the main support group for Didier Raoult was deactivated before it was reactivated, thanks to a mobilization on social networks and a massive relay on alternative media. On November 27, a teacher support group for Brusa was suspended. With no less than 310 000 members to its credit, the group created in March 2020 was closed for having shared the complaint by Brusa concerning the wearing of masks for children. The Parisian lawyer and his association Réaction-19 was accused of spreading a “conspiracy”.
Global difficulties for insurers due to vaccines
Actuaries have been warning that rising claims will be eroding the capital which insurers set aside to avoid insolvency. Notably, older people do not take out life insurance, which means that the claims have been from younger clients. Insurers say that they expect a rise in excess deaths.
According to Alex Berenson, the risk of injury or death from the jab is exceptionally high judging from Canadian data.
The refusal to pay for a vaccine-related death may not be surprising since globally the life insurance industry has been hit with reported claims of $5,5 billion in the first nine months of 2021 versus $3,5 billion for the whole of 2020, according to insurance broker Howden.
Dutch insurer Aegon, with two-thirds of its business in the US, said its American claims in the third quarter were $111 million, up from $31 million a year earlier.
Vaccine deaths may force insurers to raise premiums and some have indicated that they intend to punish the unvaccinated for their financial woes.
Don’t you know, a Jew died for your sins, so now its your turn to suffer & die for the sins of Jews…
I saw this story last week and checked with my life insurer (Scottish Equitable / Aegon) and they have confirmed by email that they stand by their policies whether jabbed or not.
Obviously I can’t speak for others…but before you pay another payment, check with your provider.
The insurance company is dead in the water, unless they sent out a written instruction to every policy holder notifying them of the policy risks.
No wonder Lloyd’s of London is considering downsizing and work from home to save the pennies… hilarious.
Legally they’re correct. Lawfully they’re wrong. And any future trials will be held in a court de facto and legal ‘law’.
I’m with the insurance company on this and why?
1. Covid not classed as a deadly illness.
2. WHO downsized it to nothing any more harmful than the flu.
3. Vaccine not needed regardless how much the government forces people to take it.
4. Clearly stated to be ‘experimental’ and therefore you take at your own risk.
However, on point 4. according to Reuters fact checker it isn’t an experimental vaccine:
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-vaccines-idUSL1N2M70MW
So this is something for the defence isn’t it?
We’re I the family, I wouldn’t bother with the insurance company at the moment. I’d find what vaccine he took and take the company to a court de jure and try them for genocide, armed to the teeth with facts and medical witnesses, under Nuremberg laws.
Then I’d go back to the life insurance company and try them, also, under common law for theft.
Bottom line? Man was incredibly stupid to take the covid clot shot and so is anyone else.
Evert statistic proves that the sheepproles are getting killed by these Death Jabs For Cooties, and still they get jabbed more. Very sad and wrong. I pray there will shortly be hell to pay.
R.C.
This is too vague to pass on to our injected family members. They will rightfully ask where are the court records and what is the Insurance Company?
Court records are not state secrets
If you don’t get jabbed, they can restrict your life and prevent you from earning a living, participate in recreation or shop for necessities, in some cases even incarcerate you. If you take the jab, your insurance company may decline pay-out to survivors because it is considered experimental medicine. Thus they keep all the money you paid them. Okay, so this is what the great reset is about, wonderful. :-p
Jews run the insurance companies. Then at the end of the credit cycle they scam you out of your premiums. I saw this first hand when I lived in Cleveland Ohio, LTV steel company went into bankruptcy and in Chapter 11 or 13? they canceled all the retirement plans. People had worked their lives doing back breaking work, retire and don’t get squat even though they paid in with paycheck withholding. Jews do this all the time.
The baby boomers have paid in billions (maybe even trillions) in life insurance premiums. Then when all these baby boomers retire and are getting ready to croak from old age the pull this Covid stunt, so they don’t have to pay.
THIS IS WITHOUT A DOUBT WHAT THEY ARE DOING
THEY ARE SCAMMING THE BABY BOOMERS OUT OF THEIR INSURANCE PAYOUTS
GOYIM PAY IN BUT THE JEW INSURANCE NO PAY YOU
——————-
Jim Stone spot on with this meme:
https://i.imgur.com/otDR3rz.png
israeli psychopath and criminal premier is up on fraud charges
why not murder and terrorism too ?
this excellent vid explains the failure of multiculturalism
but this was never the goal
only a staging post
we can see now that just as the red indians palestinians and tibetans were exterminated our zio government had planned the extermination of its own white people in england
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CFEkpnK0a8&list=RDCMUCREM9VRZnIJHTw-oqfwgNUQ&index=8
I wear a tee shirt with the logo
” do not have the jew-jab
i am an antisemite and proud of it
Life Assurance is the Elephant in the Room! They have been since creating The Fed. They put The Banks in place as the ultimate Fall Guys. It is always their schemes that are being played out… for now and a wee while longer anyway… The Powers That Should Not Be will soon be The Powers That Wish They Were Not!
CONGRATULATION!
Horsehockey!
Life insurance policies have a standard 2 year suicide clause. You have 2 years from the start of the policy where suicides get no pay. After that initial 2 year wait, go right ahead and snuff yourself away, the fam gets the pay.
Acts of war, terror and such are exempt, but death by mandate is not. The insurance still pays even if the government kills you with experimental toxins.
I was an licensed insurance salesman for a year, back in the early 90’s when A.L.Williams was tearing through the Mormon community replacing Whole Life policies with Term policies.
I couldn’t even sell that!! Mormons are a skeptical bunch.
My sentiments are similar to White Elephant’s – at least, with regard to the legal disputation. I, too, think that the court found correctly, in consideration of the stipulated codices of contract, given in the insurance policy.
The problematic part here is precedent. In the future, judges (in France) presiding over a court where a similar litigation case is brought, will, perforce, be under obligation, to consult with the previous ruling, to guide them in their juridical proclamations (in their most esteemed wigginess.)
Common law can be a double-edged sword.
The key phrase in the ruling is “phase three experiment.”
“The court…legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk.”
What does this mean? Well, “Phase three” of a clinical trial, seeks to determine if, given the results of phases one and two, that the remedial being tested, is or isn’t, better than any other treatment, which is already available to patients.
A better journalist would have asked how many jabs the deceased had been administered and how his “vaccine profile” correlated with a “phase three” standard. The point is, how is a “phase three experiment” measured? I presume that they would argue that, essentially, anyone outwith the laboratory trials, who has taken a vaccine is a “phase three” participant. This would mean that, at least, in France, that even the single jabbed are not covered by insurance, in the event of injury or death.
It also means that, any alternative remedy for the phantom coronavirus, is not presently recognized as being more efficacious, by the court, than those recipes Big Pharma has to offer; that is to say, any treatment, that is permitted to be spoken of within the jurisdictional discourse, allowed to a judge as reference.
That’s where a more intelligent lawyer would have aimed his litigation, surely? If there are, provably, more efficacious treatments available and they’re on record as such, then phase three trials are, according to the usual protocols, stopped and considered scientifically void. The clinical trials themselves should have been made central to the legal disputation. That way the trial would have been about the vaccine terrorists themselves and not about their victim’s failure to address contractual sleight-of-hand.