Introduction – Jan 2, 2022
The karmic consequences of Prince Andrew’s ties with Jeffrey Epstein are bearing down inexorably on the prince. No doubt the royal legal advisors see it in more mundane terms, but this explains why the other members of the royal house have been distancing themselves from Prince Andrew.
They knew this was coming. That’s why the royal house formally cut ties with Prince Andrew last year.
With the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell on sex trafficking charges the focus is now turning on those who actually participated in the abuse of young girls, which could mean charges of sexual abuse against Prince Andrew. While this is to be welcomed, we note that a crucial element in Epstein’s sex abuse operation is still being overlooked by the media: Mossad’s involvement.
The corporate media is staying silent about how Mossad used Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to gather compromising material on Western public figures and politicians. The object was to put them into a position where they could be pressured or blackmailed into doing Israel’s bidding.
US judge delivers double setback to Prince Andrew’s abuse case battle
Edward Helmore and Mark Townsend – The Guardian Jan 2, 2022
Prince Andrew, 16-year-old Virginia Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell. Click to enlarge
Two of Prince Andrew’s efforts to prevent or stall the progression of Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s sex assault lawsuit against him were blocked on Saturday when a US federal judge ordered the prince’s lawyers to turn over key legal documents, increasing pressure to settle claims before a crucial court hearing this week.
Judge Lewis A Kaplan, in a written order, told the prince’s lawyers they must turn over documents on the schedule that has been set in the lawsuit brought by Guiffre who claims she was abused – aged 17 – by the prince on multiple occasions in 2001 while she was being sexually abused by financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Kaplan also rejected arguments by the prince’s lawyer, Andrew Brettler, on jurisdiction grounds after they argued last week that the lawsuit should be dismissed because Giuffre, a US citizen, no longer lives in the US. Brettler has called the lawsuit “baseless”.
The prince’s lawyers claimed evidence was so strong that Giuffre does not reside in the US that it was pointless to exchange evidence until that question is resolved because it could result in the lawsuit’s dismissal.
They argued that Giuffre has lived in Australia for all but two of the past 19 years, has an Australian driver’s licence and lives in a $1.9m (£1.4m) home in Perth, Western Australia, where she and her husband, an Australian national, live with their three children.
In a statement, Giuffre’s attorney, Sigrid McCawley, called the request to halt the case “just another in a series of tired attempts by Prince Andrew to duck and dodge the legal merits of the case Virginia Giuffre has brought against him. All parties in litigation are subject to discovery and Prince Andrew is no exception.”
Judge Kaplan, in a written order on Friday, noted the prince’s lawyers have requested that “extensive” materials be turned over by Giuffre by 14 January, including documents related to where she has lived.
The rulings come before an important case hearing in New York on Tuesday, one day after the scheduled public release on Monday of a 2009 settlement agreement between Epstein and Giuffre that lawyers for Andrew had hoped would protect him from Guiffre’s claims.
The developments follow revelations that Giuffre’s lawyers are reportedly claiming they have up to six witnesses linking the duke to his accuser on the eve of the hearing into a civil lawsuit filed by the 38-year-old, in which she accuses Prince Andrew of sexual assault.
In a separate development, Andrew’s lawyers are also reported to have not provided documentary evidence that he has the “inability to sweat”, despite the claim supporting his denial against allegations he had sex with Giuffre.
The duke is also said not to have so far named any witnesses to support his alibi that he was in Pizza Express in Woking on the night in 2001 he was accused of having sex with Giuffre.
The developments intensify Andrew’s predicament as he faces intense pressure over his friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell.
Last Thursday Maxwell, 60, was found guilty of recruiting and trafficking young girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.
the hiedi flies affair was beautiful would be actresses forced to prostitute themselves for israel in the hope of hollywood parts this was a israli blackmail tool
so was boystown
and so was the greville janer kray twins amazing james randi set of jewish homosexuals who terrorised 16 london care homes
and all kept quiet by childrens minister margaret hodge and ester rancid from childline
newly knighted Tony Blair D noticed all paperwork on this as he was a tool of mossad
I think Andrew’s “I don’t sweat” is now one of the three biggest lies in the world, just above “This is going to hurt me more than it’s going to hurt you”, and just below “I look forward to my day in court”.
I don’t think he wants reminding about the other two, either.
The really interesting question is why Maxwell hasn’t been suicided. She is being kept on ice for a reason.
F*ck “Prince” Andrew. F*ck the parasitic treasonous “royal” family, the whole lot of them. The child molesting Andrew should be stripped naked, horse-whipped, and rolled in pig shit, all right in front of Buckingham Palace, then put in general population in a dank prison to find out first-hand what even hardened criminals think of child molesters.
We’re arguing about something that happened more than two decades ago. This bitch was a hooker, ok? She was over the age of consent. She already got well paid to settled the case, etc.
The statutes of limitation have countless logical reasons, first of which is that with time, true memories fade, while opportunities to ‘re-remember’ differently increase exponentially.
Pray some bimbo from 20 years ago doesn’t decide to recall that you ‘raped’ her 25 years ago. These are the cases that will be cited as to why you can’t complain. Wake up folks.
This has only happened because of illogical and unconstitutional ‘interpretations’ of law which violate the concepts of bill of attainder and ex post facto. Be careful rooting for such ‘justice’ – it always bites.
R.C.
Even more than Prince Andrew and the other “celebrities” that used these underage girls for sex, the people who REALLY should be indicted are the spy agencies (Mossad, CIA, MI 5&6) who not only utilized this blackmail information, but made Espstein’s operation possible!!!
THEY should be in the docks and THEY should have their lives forfeit for these atrocities!
There were dozens of these kids used by diry jews to blackmail so many
lets see israel punished for this