Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD – Doctors For Covid Ethics Dec 15, 2021
The evidence
We herewith present scientific evidence that calls for an immediate stop of the use of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. We first lay out why the agents cannot protect against viral infection. While no positive effects can be expected, we show that the vaccines can trigger self-destructive processes that lead to debilitating illness and death.
Why the vaccines cannot protect against infection
A fundamental mistake underlying the development of the COVID-19 vaccines was to neglect the functional distinction between the two major categories of antibodies which the body produces in order to protect itself from pathogenic microbes.
The first category (secretory IgA) is produced by immune cells (lymphocytes) which are located directly underneath the mucous membranes that line the respiratory and intestinal tract. The antibodies produced by these lymphocytes are secreted through and to the surface of the mucous membranes. These antibodies are thus on site to meet air-borne viruses, and they may be able to prevent viral binding and infection of the cells.
The second category of antibodies (IgG and circulating IgA) occur in the bloodstream. These antibodies protect the internal organs of the body from infectious agents that try to spread via the bloodstream.
Vaccines that are injected into the muscle – i.e., the interior of the body – will only induce IgG and circulating IgA, not secretory IgA. Such antibodies cannot and will not effectively protect the mucous membranes from infection by SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the currently observed “breakthrough infections” among vaccinated individuals merely confirm the fundamental design flaws of the vaccines. Measurements of antibodies in the blood can never yield any information on the true status of immunity against infection of the respiratory tract.
The inability of vaccine-induced antibodies to prevent coronavirus infections has been reported in recent scientific publications.
The vaccines can trigger self-destruction
A natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus) will in most individuals remain localized to the respiratory tract. In contrast, the vaccines cause cells deep inside our body to express the viral spike protein, which they were never meant to do by nature. Any cell which expresses this foreign antigen will come under attack by the immune system, which will involve both IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. This may occur in any organ. We are seeing now that the heart is affected in many young people, leading to myocarditis or even sudden cardiac arrest and death. How and why such tragedies might causally be linked to vaccination has remained a matter of conjecture because scientific evidence has been lacking. This situation has now been rectified.
Histopathologic studies: the patients
Histopathologic analyses have been performed on the organs of 15 persons who died after vaccination. The age, gender, vaccination record, and time of death after injection of each patient are listed in the table on the next page. The following points are of utmost importance:
- Prior to death, only 4 of the 15 patients had been treated in the ICU for more than 2 days. The majority were never hospitalized and died at home (5), on the street (1), at work (1), in the car (1), or in home-care facilities (1). Therefore, in most cases, therapeutic intervention is unlikely to have significantly influenced the post-mortem findings.
- Not a single death was brought into any possible association with the vaccination by the coroner or the public prosecutor; this association was only established by our autopsy findings.
- The initially performed conventional post-mortems also uncovered no obvious hints to a possible role of vaccination, since the macroscopic appearance of the organs was overall unremarkable. In most cases, “rhythmogenic heart failure” was postulated as the cause of death.
But our subsequent histopathological analyses then brought about a complete turnaround. A summary of the fundamental findings follows.
| Case # | Gender | Age (years) | Vaccine (injections) | Time of death after last injection |
| 1 | female | 82 | Moderna (1. and 2.) | 37 days |
| 2 | male | 72 | Pfizer (1.) | 31 days |
| 3 | female | 95 | Moderna (1. and 2.) | 68 days |
| 4 | female | 73 | Pfizer (1.) | unknown |
| 5 | male | 54 | Janssen (1.) | 65 days |
| 6 | female | 55 | Pfizer (1. and 2.) | 11 days |
| 7 | male | 56 | Pfizer (1. and 2.) | 8 days |
| 8 | male | 80 | Pfizer (1. and 2.) | 37 days |
| 9 | female | 89 | Unknown (1. and 2.) | 6 months |
| 10 | female | 81 | Unknown (1. and 2.) | unknown |
| 11 | male | 64 | AstraZeneca (1. and 2.) | 7 days |
| 12 | female | 71 | Pfizer (1. and 2.) | 20 days |
| 13 | male | 28 | AstraZeneca (1.), Pfizer (2.) | 4 weeks |
| 14 | male | 78 | Pfizer (1. and 2.) | 65 days |
| 15 | female | 60 | Pfizer (1.) | 23 days |
Histopathologic studies: findings
Histopathologic findings of a similar nature were detected in organs of 14 of the 15 deceased. Most frequently afflicted were the heart (14 of 15 cases) and the lung (13 of 15 cases). Pathologic alterations were furthermore observed in the liver (2 cases), thyroid gland (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 2 cases), salivary glands (Sjögren`s Syndrome; 2 cases) and brain (2 cases).
A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:
- inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endothelitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
- the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
- a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.
Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.
This combination of multifocal, T-lymphocyte-dominated pathology that clearly reflects the process of immunological self-attack is without precedent. Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals.
Conclusion
Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs. That myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to very frequently occur in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, is self-evident.
Beyond any doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death. We note that both mRNA and vector-based vaccines are represented among these cases, as are all four major manufacturers.
The authors
Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg Unversity of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.
Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsquently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

A “mistake”?… What “mistake”?…
These are not vaccines. They were never meant to protect humans. For all I know, there is very likely no such thing as “covid”. The jabbing has a multitude of purposes, all of them nefarious.
I do wish that medical professionals would desist from discussing this is in medical terms. Whatever they have to say, one way or another they just feed the official narrative of a “deadly virus” and “vaccines” that are supposed to treat us against that virus. ENOUGH ALREADY. Stop muddying the waters of what is a political / ideological / occultic project with your ” endothelial cells” gibberish. It’s laughable.
I shouldn’t really talk about this, but I think it is important.
I know someone (UK surf) who is in a French hospital & is probably close to death. I saw this person just before the deadline to get into France. Healthy for their age.
I won’t go into specifics, but they were rushed into the local hospital on Boxing Day and later transfered to a bigger city hospital. They were scheduled for surgery, but this was delayed due to tired kidneys (failing) in the pre-op tests, then they were moved to another ward, I am guessing an ICU ward where they put them into a drug induced coma. They do this to so say protect the brain & other things. Now that is all I know at this point.
So the thing is, this person was definitely double jabbed and probably had a booster… I don’t know the exact rules for France
. Most with this condition at this age would at least get an operation, and remember, I do not know all the details and probable never will, but I am wondering if the jabs compromised their immune system so much that they aren’t dying of the problem, but dying because they simply don’t have the basics to fight what appears to be multiple organ failure?
‘IF’ they die, no one is going consider the Covid jabs as a possible cause. Maybe this is the new health normal, that you get ill with X condition, but your immune system isn’t there, so they don’t operate. I would have expected with all things being equal, to live another 25/30 years. The state, the city pension funds and the capital movements, IF they die, is a massive win, win for the elite. Home owner in expensive area. Big pensions since uni and I know they had fairly big stock portfolio. Talk about motive…
As I say, I don’t know all the facts. You must pass pre op tests in the UK, just like France & elsewhere, but it is very easy way to end a life. There’s always a chance they’ll pull through, but.
If we don’t share these accounts, we will never know what is going on. And I do not want any comments about the person or how I might be feeling. I didn’t put this up for some sympathy kick.
It’s very difficult to see through the medical jargon, but this is easier than most. I’m beginning to understand the situation from a pathologist’s standpoint.
I was wondering how they might be able to spread a nasty bio-weapon around a country when they choose to because delivery must be a problem, but I’d say the best way to do it would be through the mail system.
Contaminate envelopes which don’t need real addresses on them. Buildings no longer standing in streets pulled down will do, then send them across the country. Just a few hundred envelopes might do it, but enough so they go through every sorting office across the country – or even targeted postcodes – and as they run through the sorting system they contaminate belts, rails, mailsacks and God knows what else. After that legitimate mail runs through the system and gets contaminated, and residents and businesses spread it unawares simply by handling their own mail.
They passed away this morning.
@pig-swillfly
That would be a plan if sickness spread and we “caught” them. But evidence shows time after time, that we don’t “catch” any viruses from another person.