Henrymakow.com — Dec 14, 2021
“We see a future world without enough to go around, and therefore we must learn first to control it and then to share what is there as we deem most advantageous to those whom we choose. That is what power is for.”
“If people will allow such vaccines to invade their own bodies and their children’s in order to comply and to be the same or “equal” to “everyone” else they most certainly will not object to or oppose their wealth, use of resources and life styles being equalized as well.”
“Everyone must do the same. In all communist nations we have fostered, it is customary that for “equality” for the desired and planned “levelling” in this new order, in order for people to have the same in their needs and wants, everyone has to be psychologically trained to obey the same commands”
“The universal vaccine programs not only open the door for behavior control through gene modification and enhancement, but more importantly for the present operation – psychological behaviour control with the vaccines is even more fundamental. Regardless of whether or not the vaccines are unnecessary and useless regarding the virus, or even harmful for many, they are the most uniform and concerted psychological weapon ever devised to control human behaviour.” — Jacob Rothschild
Why did JR Tell Us the Truth? I polled my readers. This is what they said. And the awful truth.
by Henry Makow PHD
Roughly 2/3 of the 180 readers polled answered: “They always tell us what they’re going to do.”
The remainder answered – “No one will believe it’s him.” 10%
– “We can’t recognize truth when we see it.” 10%
– “He feels unassailable.” 14%
The real reason JR told us the truth is…(wait for it)
He thinks the truth doesn’t matter any more.
When your religion is redefining reality to suit your interests, then you are going to deny reality i.e. truth.
He is quite outspoken on the subject.
Jacob has a mental problem. And he thinks he can bring us down to his level…
Frankly l don’t believe Ratchild spilled the beans. This is black propoganda designed to demoralise people. In saying that it is remarkable how similar Ratchild looks to Nosferatu.
“They always tell us what they’re going to do.”
But some of us haven’t told THEM what WE are going to do.
Jacob did not tell you the truth. I told you the truth.
Think about it.
All humanity is now living at the time of the onset of the Biblical “mark of the beast.” According to Revelation 13:16-17, “He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, except he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” 666
But there are MANY who will refuse to take this mark even if it means they will be killed. The ones who refuse to take the mark are those who do not worship the beast nor his image, and whose names are written in the Book of Life. The battle is between God and Satan for your eternal soul.
Never forget Jake, born loser. And soon your meaningless life will soon be….LOST.
Look. It wasn’t all true. The only compliance they need or want is for certain folks to get the you-know-what in the arm. Which will make them unwell and no longer living.
I see the fabricated Ratchild scam, just like that fake Kissinger ‘eugenic quote’, is still being promulgated for the morons to buy…
With all due respect to this site, I sincerely doubt that the above quotes are actually from Jacob Rothschild. First of all, if you are a trillionaire with that kind of power why tell the slaves anything at all? Why would you care or even be concerned what we think? Why would it serve you to let on to any plan that they have for us? Think about it, when humans decide to kill millions of chickens or cows because of some disease, would we care about communicating our intentions before hand?
If JR actually wanted to talk to us he would just invite some Jew journalist into his mansion and have a nice cup of tea and tell us his philosophy and plans, like this interview:
Lord Rothschild Discusses How His Family Created Israel – Full Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIA4EkvpLtc
What I am saying is that JR and his family are completely unconcerned about musings on the internet. He doesn’t give a rat’s ass what we think, never did, and has no obligation to tell us anything. When a wealthy developer levels a poor section of town, is he concerned about what the welfare tenants think? No, he couldn’t care less, and the less says the better.
We can imagine what we want and make Rothschild a monster in our eyes, we can even imagine that this one person is controlling the world, and is the force behind the world vaxx program, but do we really know what is really going on? No we do not. But what about Fauci and Gates and Pfizer? They have their own agenda, they want to make money. We do not know if JR is actually the director of the genocide.
My first guess is the off world owners of the planet, they have decided to cull the herd. Using telepathy, they influence world leaders to the agenda they want. And all our loving god beliefs are just mass delusions of abandoned specie, a genetically created hybrid specie gone feral on the planet’s surface. We are unwanted, and the power in the heavens above us has no concern about us whatsoever and the proof is how we are treated now and historically, and in our holy books which tell us the gods tried to wipe us out with the Flood.
The real struggle we are having is rationalizing our innermost god beliefs to reality. We think god loves us, we think god is coming back to rescue us, and now we are being wiped out yet none in heaven even care at all, it is only our delusion to think so.
as NICO X said many times :
truth is not important for them +
they would not listen to it.
only POWER counts to install lie .
Were there only four options available to readers? That’s less than generous, I’d say – especially, given that the thematic substance of each, is blandly generic.
Canvassing the public for their opinion isn’t usually engaged, either, with a mind toward oneupmanship and the gazumping of the pollsters with a fifth concealed option, (which, in contradistinction, we’re told, is actually the correct one) to then cheerily declare that everyone, in fact, has got it completely wrong! “Haha, fools, it is I, Henry Makow, who wins first prize!”
With regard to the most popular response, “they,” most surely, do NOT always tell us what it is that they’re going to do. They may prefigure their actions by referencing their intentions in cartoons or films (where C.G.I. is available to them) but these allusions are, in effect, encrypted until revealed by the action itself. Retrospective discovery isn’t and can’t be “predictive programming,” a sophistry so conspicuously derived from the grimoires of transhumanism, that its crudity would make the Borg blush.
The purpose of such televisual and cinematic intimations, is to give black magic conjurations, etheric resonance in the past, after the completion of the working. This anchors the spellcraft vibrationally and sustains the duration of its willed desire. Turning time backward is a Luciferic prerogative. In order, so they say, that Lucifer might regain his rightful place in heaven.
I suspect that Jacob Rothschild would, indeed, have thought that a great many people would reject his missive as bogus but equally, he would have known, that significant numbers would not and would instead err towards the post’s authenticity. I do, personally. Considerations of plausible deniability are unlikely to have influenced Mr. Rothschild in the least.
“We can’t recognize the truth when we see it.” The third choice, implicitly, eschews all reasonable doubt and any hesitancy in the matter, to make the issue singularly about the readership’s own capabilities and imputes a more general, public deficit, in discerning veracity from falsehood.
If Henry had only thought about it for a bit, he might have perceived how patronizing this notion is; how it fails to see that the truth, during these phantasmagoric times, is arrived at by adjustments of understanding, more commonly than it is through Damascene epiphany.
A novice truthseeker learns by increments, most usually, according to the tolerances of the individual psyche, in accommodating sustained paradigm-wreckage. It is only by this (often gradual) process of discovery that analytic acumen develops and perspectives can be reoriented with honest conviction.
We may, indeed, have our eureka breakthroughs but schooled truths should never be taken as truths upon trust. A period of assimilation is often needed by the novitiate and is always warranted.
If you wish to give voice to an issue, a tenor of informed caution in your declaratives is more apposite than advocating for absolutes, which have been arrived at by someone else’s mapping. As educationalists say, “it’s not the destination – it’s the journey.” Confectionary for the self-loathing.
“He feels unassailable.” Well, that’s certainly true but why does he? Does he believe that his wealth and power render him invulnerable? I would be sure that he doesn’t believe that.
Even if Makow’s own answer had been included among the original options, the fourth, would be the one I’d opt for, because it is a true statement and it best hints at the greater truths.
Henry Makow’s own adjudication of Jacob R.’s frankness, that “he thinks the truth doesn’t matter any more,” is predicated upon the implausible assumption that the truth and what it might stir up, did once matter to him. I don’t think that this is the case.
I hold to that which I stated, at the time of Rothschild’s comment at this site. Jacob R.’s post was a profile-perfect iteration of personality traits, defined as psychopathic in the clinical literature.
Mr. Rothschild is deprived of empathy. He cannot feel the pain of others and suffers from parietal dysfunction, which inhibits emotional depth, prevents moral apprisement and precludes any mitigation of compassion in your actions. Psychopaths can murder a child, then sit down, unperturbed, at the dinner table, to enjoy a hearty meal. The only thing that psychopaths feel is the appetite of their own senses, which require constant nourishment from an ever-escalating gradient of depraved carnality, to satisfy.
Psychopaths cannot be appealed to. Moral imperatives are impenetrably abstract vagaries to the psychopathic mind.
I think Jacob R. wrote the comment, partly in mockery of Henry Makow, whom he seems to consider as some type of race traitor. Rothschild spoke candidly in consideration of the wider audience because psychopaths are very assured of their personal competences and their own intellectual ascendency and will, as a habit, scoff over-confidently at the perceived inadequacies of character in others.
There’s a lot of chutzpah in Jacob R.’s attitude. He is telling the truth, though, but the truth unconsciously betrays his personal, clinically psychopathic predisposition and not merely a superciliousness deriving from wealth and power.
He doesn’t act according to religious or ideological injunction.
Mr. Rothschild told the truth irregardlessly because his psychiatric disorder tends toward misjudgement. Jacob Rothschild is, quite identifiably, by clinical criteria, a psychopath. I wouldn’t ponder for too long upon the supposedly craftful purpose spurring his spites.
@ Yukon Jack
I wrote it. I have confessed thrice now, and I applaud Henry for carrying on with the thought line. It was written from the perspective of what one of the most powerful establishment people on the planet would likely think if he went “slumming” down to our level, or depending on your point of view, if he deigned to respond to the elevated views of Henry. It was also written to stimulate debate in an effort to deal with the justifications of the rich and mighty in their manner of treating the common people, obviously with the less regard than they would give to any rodent or vermin they considered as unwanted.
I applaud Henry for his constant efforts in tying to wake people up as to what is really going on, and I pray that the real Jacob will come to share his concerns.
As for God Jack, if you keep trying to do away with the actual Almighty in our lives then all you are doing is further empowering those at the top of the earthly dung heap to play God and to exterminate you as they see fit. If you want mankind to follow your comic book Annunaki aliens to the stars and the distant galaxies, we will first have to realize how great God really is, that we must love him with all we have got, and that we must also love our neighbors as ourselves.
I’ve been thinking about Niccolo Machiavelli and his instructional manual for realpolitik, “The Prince,” written in 1513. His slim guidebook toward successful statescraft, influenced the author(s) of The Protocols and it remains a much beloved text by tyrants.
Machiavelli was the first to conceive of a distinction between private and public morality, appertaining to statesmanship, something which I remember Hilary Clinton alluding to. The maintenance and stability of power depends, in Machiavelli’s schema, on the willingness of those who rule, to by-pass the law, whenever necessary, to ensure their continuity of governance.
Machiavelli attached great importance to fear in his entreaties. Fear of punishment, he advised, should inform every edict, impressed with a coat-of-arms, in soft wax. Brutishness is becoming of leaders. Deceit and unscrupulousness are necessary, if unfortunate requirements, for the perpetuation of sovereignty. The extermination of rivals is imperative. Hesitancy in murder only encourages challengers forward and would cause the rulers’ own downfall.
Machiavellianism is a grand banquet of edifying wisdoms to the Narcissist, the Sociopath, the Paranoid Schizophrenic and the Psychopath. It’s easy to see how “The Prince” influences politics in our time and conspicuously so in the case of Jacob Rothschild.
As the insidious eminence grise, Niccolo Machiavelli, himself once said; “better a leader is feared than loved.”
Rothschild isn’t frightening, though – just in need of immediate medical intervention.
@Yukon Jack
I can empathize with the ‘prison planet’ motif but I must always be cautious of ‘concretizing’, hence the ‘prison’, reality. Or, as the Night Sky Sangha Guy once said….
“What ‘this’ actually IS defies one’s most skillful exploratory and explanatory prowess so the wise seeker relents to the palpable and ever present bliss field of streaming mystery as an alternative to fussing over the myriad distractions fomented under the veil of implicative narration.”
I agree with Yukon Jack’s logic about the authenticity of the Jacob R letter.
Let’s just ditch the absurdity, Henry, or you are gonna lose cred with us.
@ Think About It
If what you say is true, then both Henry and yourself, are imbeciles. When exactly did you confess three-times-over of your authorship? I don’t recall any admissions at this site, before now.
If it’s true, then the charade is over. It would truly be despicable, if you have deliberately sought to distract the readership across two sites, for the sake of indulging narcissistic gaming.
I’ll wait upon the assessment of my fellows, before I proceed in my condemnations. I cannot see that the tone of your post, could, in any way, be taken as satirical.
The devils covenant with God is that he has to reveal the evil action planned to mankind as a warning or declaration before perpetrating it. This is a mercy and trial from God to mankind, a choice to challenge the evil or acquiesce it to ones own spiritual detriment.
@antisemit….Excellent
@ Think About It
And you would uprbraid Yukon Jack for his espousal of atheism and his taste for Sitchen, while you yourself casually entrain others, to involve them, without their knowledge, in a clandestine social experiment, in willful affrontary of their right to dignity?
You are not entitled to introduce trickery into public dialogue and should you imagine that you are, you are woefully misgiven. Why would anyone, with any intelligence, ever again, trust anything whatsoever that you say? You’ve negated your credibility quotient forever.
It’s difficult to imagine the aridity of emotional intelligence that could contrive of such a hoax and somehow consider it, in reflection, a legitimate endeavour, worthy of praise in its continuance. I say that you’re nothing but a liar.
What did you expect to achieve? Was it for reward? Did it bring excitement to your loins; the prospect of humiliating others for less than scientific discovery? Your ill-intending subterfuge and your dismissive “nothing to see here” exculpations reveal an arrogance of temperament and describe a heart that’s so constricted by imaginings of ego, that it atrophies. Scurrilous deceit will be your legacy to the world. Think About It, you divvy.
@ andyay
What I say sir is what I believe to be the truth. Is your real name “andyay” when you make a comment? Is that a lie? Of course not. When one really tries to think about what is said in a comment, it is not the name being used which counts for anything. It is the message. Henry has focused on the substance of a comment made to one of his articles, as if it were a key to how the establishment could be justifying to themselves that which is the biggest fraud and crime against humanity in human history, and which likely when it is all over will make the holocaust seem like child’s play.
Apart from your ad hominem concerns, is it a lie or trickery if someone were to post a comment on this site with the handle “Donald T”, or even “God” and you personally thought the comment fit like a glove from what you had already discerned about that person or being? Would you think the comment was actually posted by Trump or God?
If, for instance, a person like Yukon Jack, who appears to know a great deal more about God than the rest of us, were to find some comment under the name ‘God’ in response to one of his essays on his own site, and then he discerned based on his personal beliefs and his extensive knowledge about God, that it really was God stooping down and posting a comment on his site to him (to him, to little old Yukon Jack, personally), well even if you believed in miracles, and you thought that was just the sort of thing God may say, would you really think it was God who made the comment? Likely not, but it just may get you thinking a little more about what God may be thinking and telling you.
Clearly, at least in my view all of the evidence indicates that the top-down order behind the entire Covid fraud does not care a rat’s ass (as Yukon Jack would say) if the vaccines harm people or not. The evidence, and the evidence alone, and not a Rothschild, a Fink, or a Francis nickname, is telling us that the ultimate purpose of the vaccines has nothing to do with our health or making us safe from a virus, but that the real purpose is mainly universal compliance in simply taking them. Both psychologically and biologically they are intended to control us. Furthermore, the entire plan only really makes sense from some point of view at the top of the pyramid. Cui bono?
Anyone who is awake knows that the scam is being carried out by one single top-down order with no opposition from any major institution, all of which are in fact in lockstep clearly following the same script, and that no top-echelon person whether, a Rothschild, or a Fink, or a Francis would ever admit to us common people (the very ones they are spending so much on to deceive), that the pandemic and the vaccines are simply pretexts to control us for their totalitarian New World Order and designs. Yet, that is exactly what many of us firmly believe they are doing, based on the evidence.
Do not those with vast wealth and power have a duty to ensure that such deeds as releasing a bioweapon virus on the world, and forcing virtually everyone to take totally unnecessary and harmful vaccines DOES NOT HAPPEN? If they do not know what is going on, or they are oblivious to how their power is being abused, then perhaps it ought to be distributed more evenly among the people for their protection.
@ Rixon Stewart
Is Think About It telling the truth? Did he and Henry Makow, together, fabricate the Jacob R. correspondence? If so, I would very much like to hear your thoughts on it.
@ Think About It
It isn’t that I would usually question someone’s truthfulness. It was the grandiosity of your confession that threw me.
Yes, my real name is Andy and my surname begins A, Y – hence the diminuitive.
Your attempts to justify your deeds do not hold. What on Earth is all of that discursive fallacy about “God” posting and people believing it’s actually God? Are you that blandly conceited? Sophistry won’t recoup your standing. Your intentions were to deceive. The deception wasn’t a one-off but was continued severally across FIVE articles and two distinct websites.
Can you not see that debate predicated upon a fraudulent proposition is valueless? If the motion forwarded is pure invention and nobody knows, it is a psy-op, by definition. Do you get that? Henry Makow and yourself, in a shocking manipulation of the public engaged a psychological operation for the purpose, both, of your own pleasure – to project a possible aspecting of a tyrannical personality for curiosity’s sake – and to gauge the response your artifice brings.
There’s no validity in manipulation. It never brings truth. If intelligence extracted during torture is unreliable then how would any data attaching to trickery have any worth? You have very poor judgement, Think About It and so does your compadre. Can’t you see that your interpolated gaming is insultingly patronizing?
Why, precisely, did you choose this website to bring your mockery to? Why not another? Your contempt for the truthseeker is highly apparent.
The readership and commenters here are ordinary folk, seeking out truths that are denied to them elsewhere. How much confidence have you instilled by your base antics? How many new-comers or casual visitors have you curdled? How much enthusiasm did you hope to exhaust? How many wayfarers did you hope to misdirect?
If you are not of paid agency, then you really need to look deep down inside your own soul and ask of it, “Did I do well? Did my endeavours assist others? Was my contribution to the world spiritually edifying? Am I worthy before God?”
If you feel no perturbation in your heart, signalling that you are venal and in error, then you are lost and I don’t want to know you.
I also am very skeptical that the beak-faced inbred sack would post anything anywhere.
Wonder what it would be like to never have to work, and have everything given to you from the sweat and blood of billions… I guess you wouldn’t give a sh*t about anyone if you had zero spirituality like these drones.
I care about everyone except these authorities (archons), of the demiurge.
The comments are the only things worth reading on these sorts of posts, and I wish Yukon Jack would get a website again. I have huge respect for anyone who tells his view up-front when it contradicts the vast majority of people – especially when they don’t mince words and ramble about nothing – kudos yukon.
And in the End in this below our dignity life (brought about by his kind):
“The closer you get to the meaning, the sooner you know that you’re dreaming” (dio).
@ andyay
Well Andy it appears that thou doth protest too much. It is comment section where few if any are not anonymous and for obvious reasons. Wake up. No one is offended unless they are shy of the actual truth being told, which it all will be some day. Once you wake up to the fact that the world is run by a bunch of demented control freaks, likely in bed with Satan, as Henry has so often said, then perhaps you will not be so offended.
In any case you keep keep avoiding the substance of the original comment. Why do you think that those in control of this top-down order are trying to have “everyone” on the planet vaccinated with their so-called “untested vaccines”. There is no real emergency. They do not protect people. They certainly do not to make anyone safe from any virus. They are clearly a pretext for something else. Therefore, as some truthers say, it must be to cull us, while others say it is to track us. I say the reasons of this old corrupt order with their old plans from some 50 years ago for their “New Order” are clearly to establish biological and social control, but mainly at this stage, for psychological control, but altogether it is obviously a great deal more sinister than just an obedience test.
The facts that the vaccines are to control us fit perfectly with all of the evidence of the planned pandemic intended to usher in their Agendas and the Resets, which all the the people in high places are totally responsible for one way or another. This s not a novel allegation against any of them, Nor am I alone in these views because the evidence which they are deliberately ignoring and will not respond to is now overwhelming, and all of them will be held accountable.
@ Think About It
I have no disputation with the thesis that the purpose of nearly two years of sustained public entrainment, constitutional abrogation and murder by injection, is a means toward achieving hegemonic control over the people and resources of the Earth. I have framed the narrative in the same way, myself. It’s not as if it’s a novel conceptualization, that hasn’t been so framed before.
I don’t understand your presumption of its contentiousness to me nor why you should think that it has pertinence as a determinant in anything that I’ve previously said. It’s extraneous to my complaint.
You may, while ruminating upon your infantilism, find it supplicant to distract yourself with the drama of things I made no mention of, to occlude the things that I did say – but it won’t do as any defense, in consideration of my stated remonstrance. I should repeat it then: you were one of two individuals, who knowingly engaged the truthseeker and its readership in a psy-op. You mounted a hoax, just to excite a public response and provision you with data, indeterminate of loci, (which I hope you mean to publish, by the way,) and equally also, to satisfy some fantasy role-play exhibitionism. That you can’t see that your scheme was arrogantly exploitative at all, isn’t something that I can do anything about that.
The article and the comment have been featured at other sites, apart from here and at Makow, you know, including at the attentively vigilant beforeitsnews.com
What regard will those other sites have now, toward the truthseeker? You must have known that a hoax which catches attention, if or when revealed, will necessarily damage the credibility of the site where it originated from – and diminish the standing of the relayer of the hoax. Your actions were tantamount to subterfuge, whether intended or not.
I have an uncomfortable intuition that you were more readily anticipating congratulations for your accomplishment; for your literary prowess, the convincing construal of voice, the apposite phrasings and the elegance of your diction. “Oh, quite masterly achieved, sir. Well done you!”
– I would even go as far as to say that, the percipience which allowed for your authentically rendered, bravura portrayal, is almost suggestive of personal familiarity with the man himself. You certainly caught his distempers well. If you are not acquainted, I don’t doubt that you must have studied him closely.
Good for you, Think About It. You do a passable Jacob Rothschild.
Try doing him at the Bank of England next time.
Only about half of commenters use a name that might be real while the other half are scared of something and cannot put their names to their opinions, either because the opinions are wrong or the person is weak. I surprise myself by not disdaining all the anonymity, but I do have extra respect for the candid ones. With the JR text I at first thought the prose style was superior to that of Think About It, which came after, but this seems to have improved. It is still possible that there was regret and some damage limitation, and the whole thing is still not clear, except that telling truth seekers that truth does not matter was always crazy–but I discussed that, and it required confusion in JR.