1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Health
  4.  » 
  5. Coronavirus
  6.  » They Knew Covid “Vaccines” are Ineffective

Henrymakow.com — Dec 2, 2021

Fiona Godlee, Editor in Chief, British Medical Journal

The project to string everyone along at the greatest human and financial cost was outlined in August 2020 by the editor of the BMJ (British Medical Journal):

‘So instead we are heading for vaccines that reduce severity of illness rather than protect against infection, provide only short-lived immunity, and will at best have been trialled by the manufacturer against placebo.

As well as damaging public confidence and wasting global resources by distributing a poorly effective vaccine, this could change what we understand a vaccine to be. Instead of long term, effective disease prevention it could become a sub-optimal chronic treatment. This would be good for business but bad for global public health.’

Covid 19- Less Haste, More Safety

By Fiona Godlee – (henrymakow.com)

Few can doubt that we need a vaccine for covid-19 as soon as possible, and great strides are being made, including in our understanding of the immunology of SARS-CoV-2.1

But what damage may result from the race to create one?

The World Health Organization has produced guidance on minimum characteristics for a vaccine, including 50% efficacy, temperature stability, potential for rapid scale-up, and proper evaluation against comparators.

But, writes Els Torreele, these basic requirements are being rapidly eroded by the prevailing view that anything is better than nothing.2

So instead we are heading for vaccines that reduce severity of illness rather than protect against infection, provide only short lived immunity, and will at best have been trialled by the manufacturer against placebo.

As well as damaging public confidence and wasting global resources by distributing a poorly effective vaccine, this could change what we understand a vaccine to be. Instead of long term, effective disease prevention it could become a sub-optimal chronic treatment. This would be good for business but bad for global public health.

 

Continues …