Ethan Huff – vaccinedeaths.com Nov 16, 2021
Fake television “doctor” and treasonous criminal Tony Fauci is finally admitting that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” he pushed so hard for Americans to take are both worthless and deadly. His solution, however, is to get even more of them in the form of “booster” shots.
On November 12, Fauci appeared on an episode of The New York Times‘ podcast “The Daily” to discuss his upset over the fact that half of America refuses to get any of the jabs from “Operation Warp Speed.”
As it becomes increasingly apparent that the injections are not stopping the spread – and are, in fact, fueling it – Fauci says that people can expect so-called “breakthrough” infections to accelerate.
“They are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups,” Fauci rambled, referencing data out of Israel showing that the jabs simply are not working.
“It isn’t just the elderly. It’s waning to the point that you’re seeing more and more people getting breakthrough infections, and more and more of those people who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital.”
One would think that based on this new information, Fauci would be urging an immediate halt to his jab push in the interest of public safety. Instead, Fauci wants people to line up to get more injections, which he claims will flatten the curve.
“If one looks back at this, one can say, do you know, it isn’t as if a booster is a bonus, but a booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have,” Fauci stated.
“I think … that the boosting is gonna be an absolutely essential component of our response, not a bonus, not a luxury, but an absolute essential part of the program.”
Branch Covidians call for Americans to “self-determine” whether or not they need booster shots
Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are apparently not moving fast enough for Fauci and others like him in approving booster jabs, some states like California and Colorado are sidestepping the agencies and doing whatever they want.
Tomás J. Aragón, the director and state public health officer for California’s Department of Public Health, wrote a letter on November 9 to local health providers urging them to ignore the science and expand booster eligibility to all adults.
“Allow patients to self-determine their risk of exposure,” Aragón emphasized, the suggestion being that doctors, pharmacists and even the federal government need to step away and let every Branch Covidian who wants them to get as many mix-and-match boosters as they want.
“Do not turn a patient away who is requesting a booster,” Aragón added.
Fauci agrees, having declared two days later that booster shots are “safe and effective” and “dramatically increas[e] the response not only immunologically, but also when you look at the clinical data from Israel, it’s very clear that it reverses some of the waning effect that you see in people who have been vaccinated six months or more.”
As a caveat, Fauci threw in his opinion that the original vaccines still work, even though they clearly do not. He then played verbal gymnastics to try to sound science-y and smart.
“We’ve given the full rein to prove what it is that you need to make them work,” Fauci rattled on nonsensically about the boosters.
The latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” genocide and Fauci’s role in perpetrating mass death on humanity can be found at Genocide.news.
Sources for this article include:
This is the third time in less than two weeks that this line has appeared in the first sentence in an article on this website.
“That the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19)”.
There’s zero evidence that the Covid bioweapon originated in Wuhan. So-called alternative news media are written by the NWO. Totally fake.
@Carl Jones
I think the problems we have in getting to grips with this are partly semantic.
For example. In so far as people were falling down in Wuhan the cofactors of 5G and possible previous jabs, gave a symptomology related to high altitude exposure: the failure for the blood to absorb oxygen. This was ascribed the name covid-19 with the assumption that the (non isolated) isolated sars cov 2 corona virus was the culprit. I recall there were other altitude symptomologies described in New York, the cruise ships, and other places.
Now prior to the “vaccine rollout”, in parallel with the above we’ve had people with various sniffles and the fake PCR tested also diagnosed as”covid-19″.
So up to this point we’ve had two symptomologies – if this is the right description – that have been ascribed the same cause: the non isolated virus. Both scenarios ascribe causality to this phantom virus. Now, from a semantic point of view we may call the Wuhan and related 5G cases “covid 19” as we may indeed call them “apples”, “widgets”, or “coathangers”, as long as we DIFFERENTIATE from the fake (sniffle) PCR cases.
A newer semantic complication with the “vaccines” is that new illnesses – the variants – have arrived with new symptomologies with the same generic name “covid -19” ascribed as the illness.
Another layer of confusion is added by the continuation of germ theory that is still being believed by those pulling in the same general direction of most of us.
***
So, I think it’s the same old philosophical problem. Terms have to be defined and understood by those using them. I doubt if most of us are on the same page definitionswise. And it goes without saying that obfuscation serves the powers that be.
Sooner or later this lying excuse-for-a-man will meet his expiration date, and he will go directly to judgment. Only then will he wake up to the horrors that await him on the other side…he will reap forever what he has sown in his life time.
Carl Jones – most agreed – I always feel the same – that author(s) are doing great disservice to the message they attempt to convey, but this “Wuhan/China virus/jabs, etc. – if they substituted for jew/israel, that would be much closer to the core of it.
@Carl Jones
Where is your evidence of a bioweapon?
The alleged “virus” referred to as “covid19” has not been isolated or identified – ergo, it doesn’t exist.
Her we’re talking about a Talmudic compulsory liar Tonino il Fuccherino Fauscista, who has killed billions and threatening to kill billions more, and who must be stopped, tried, and executed by LETHAL INJECTION straight in his buco di culo, live on Mondovision TV for Humanity to rejoice.
Compulsive liar, sorry…
“gonna be an absolutely essential component”
“Gonna”, Herr Doktor? Are they “gonna”? I mean really “gonna”.
What’s next, “gots to be”?
Phuck off you insipid little gnome.
History will judge this time period harshly.
We allowed this mad psychopath Fauci to dictate our demise.
BTW Fauci won a million dollar prize from Israel.
And like the first commenter said
there is no such thing as Covid-19
this whole thing is a media driven hoax and some day when the masses awake from the media cast spell they will wonder why they wore a mask when masks do nothing to stop viral transmissions
this whole thing is an exercise in word spell madness and proves that most people are crazy and maybe even bat shit insane
… and now “normal” people are eager to vaxx their own children
YES FAUCI
you are a good actor spreading hope
for the hopeless insanes . spit on them!
they have it earned , stupid sheeple.
not wanting to learn.
life is a learn process !
@ Simon Smith
It’s true what you say. There are, indeed, particular difficulties with the covid lexicon because key concepts within the narrative are, of themselves, disputed.
If you choose to comment on a covid piece, it can become more than a bit laborious, having to state your disputation with the intellectual premises of the article each time and you wonder if it’s necessary to delineate your own terms of reference again, before you can proceed. I think it’s foolish to presume that others keep tally of the things that you’ve said. They may hold on to some of it but the responsibility for intelligibility is ever your own.
If, for example, you dispute the existence of viruses, an entire index of familiarly associated words loses value; “germ” does, “contagion,” “pandemic,” “vaccination” – all become problematic.
A feature writer or an author of books can reject a paradigm, offer an alternative theory and continue upon their narrative without feeling the need to continually adjust the reader back to their conceptual starting place.
For the downtrodden commenter, no such luck, unfortunately, as you find yourself having to begin again from the beginning or, without preliminary disambiguation, risk being misunderstood.
Using inverted commas to indicate a semantic disputation is orthographically kinky but it helps when your patience for euphemisms runs thin.
Different paradigms diverge of metalanguage. Value-judgements inform consensual definitions and sometimes, it’s behooving to distance yourself from consensus by confronting its definitions. This may make for more difficult conversation but needn’t mitigate against persuasion. Pursuing the truth does, as you say, ultimately, beg an involvement with meaning itself. The more complicated the exposition, the more effort it requires. Truthsayers have always had the more difficult job to do but then, we’re used to that.
Just some Jew masquerading as a wop.
When Fauci dies and “crosses over” to the other side, will he be judged and sent to hell?
No one knows because all of that statement is based on unproven assumptions.
There is no evidence for:
God
Judgment
Sin
Hell
Souls
Souls making the transmigration journey to another realm
But if you believe that Fauci will get judged after death you will not act to stop Fauci now.
Thus the theory that the state is ultimately behind the Christian myth of judgment. You can get judged in this life by the state. Judgment in this life by others and the courts is real, and afterlife judgment is a projection by wishful thinking.
Thus the comment by Ann Blu above is in my opinion self destructive because the good are made to stand down in the face of evil because of religious beliefs.
And would we not be better off if good people kill bad people? I think Kyle Rittenhouse just proved that.
(And how much you want to bet Jewish supremacist organizations like the ADL and SPLC and the FBI and Soros are behind the scenes manipulating the BLM riots. How likely is it large piles of bricks are conviently placed at the riot area before the fact. Coincidence? Hardly.
Then when some outsider like Rittenhouse shows up and guns down the ADL recruited rioter scum and mows them down, the good man gets prosecuted by the evil Jew legal system which is mightily upset that the peacemaker upset their left wing revolutionary commie plans.
And I am sure Ann Blu (a good loyal Christian and believer in God and Bible) would disaprove that we should kill the rioters and drag the ADL out of their buildings and put them to death – without a trial- for undermining our free society)
There is a big difference between freedom and religion.
@andyay
Yep. I think alot of the time people aren’t really disagreeing but misunderstanding each other.
I do feel on the whole we’re all pulling in the right direction…
Having said that, I find it curious I’m more right than anyone else and measure their correctness by the deviations from my own version of truth 🙂 🙂 🙂
The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.
At thing point I don’t recognize the world anymore. I knew people were stupid in general but I didn’t know it was mentally retarded level stupid. There is no justice, there is no honor, there are no valuable lessons to learn. Just kill me already this world is bullshit.
Cheer up, Jim.
We’re no worse off today than we were, whenever it was that they say we were, when we were less well off than before.
Now that, surely, should be cause for optimism.