Anyone else think that sounds like the rather unpleasant man’s voice behind the masked, anonymous videos? Superior, clipped, angry. Could be a synthetic voice.
lewis jones
on November 3, 2021 at 7:40 pm
To Tosh–it is a synthetic voice.
lobro
on November 4, 2021 at 6:04 am
sorry but that chart is misleading (given that i am pureblood and intend to remain until dead).
see excel bar chart at 2:20.
It is the hourglass phenomenon; the sand in the top and bottom bulges amounts to the same total but the direction of time is one-way, so that any point the top grains have nowhere to go but down.
Similarly for the vaxx dynamics, it is chronologically constrained in that the unvaxxed can only become vaxxed, there is no reversal … like virginity, in the end they are still women (ask rachel levine👺).
This is obvious from the fact that the unvaccinated cases (orange bars) diminish over time, which only makes sense if the unvaxxed get jabbed and lose the pureblood status. Because on a fixed, e.g., /100,000 scale, the numbers should hold steady.
Whereas as the vaxxed group grows in size, so will the infection totals.
Which is not to say that the conclusions are wrong (i believe them to be right) but they are arrived at by faulty reasoning, i.e., unadjusted for absolute group sizes.
Anyone else think that sounds like the rather unpleasant man’s voice behind the masked, anonymous videos? Superior, clipped, angry. Could be a synthetic voice.
To Tosh–it is a synthetic voice.
sorry but that chart is misleading (given that i am pureblood and intend to remain until dead).
see excel bar chart at 2:20.
It is the hourglass phenomenon; the sand in the top and bottom bulges amounts to the same total but the direction of time is one-way, so that any point the top grains have nowhere to go but down.
Similarly for the vaxx dynamics, it is chronologically constrained in that the unvaxxed can only become vaxxed, there is no reversal … like virginity, in the end they are still women (ask rachel levine👺).
This is obvious from the fact that the unvaccinated cases (orange bars) diminish over time, which only makes sense if the unvaxxed get jabbed and lose the pureblood status. Because on a fixed, e.g., /100,000 scale, the numbers should hold steady.
Whereas as the vaxxed group grows in size, so will the infection totals.
Which is not to say that the conclusions are wrong (i believe them to be right) but they are arrived at by faulty reasoning, i.e., unadjusted for absolute group sizes.