Henrymakow.com – Oct 31, 2021
Click to enlarge
I am re-posting this article from Oct. 17 in the hope of getting a definitive answer to this question.
Are the Jabbed Connected to Bluetooth?
“The fact that the numbers change with the people passing by only makes sense when these people themselves are the devices.”
“This is “their own mark-of-the-beast-number.”
Latest! Contact tracing using cell towers and graphene oxide patented!
Pfizer Patent APPLICATION FILED in November 2020 and issued August 31, 2021.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US11107588B2/en
System and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for treatment against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen. The system comprises a plurality of electronic devices comprising instructions to generate an ID and, when in the proximity of another such electronic device, one or both electronic devices transmit/receive the ID to/from the other electronic device. Then, a score is generated based on a plurality of such received IDs. Additionally, based on information received from a server, relevant treatment instructions are displayed to the subjects based on the received information and the score. The server comprises instructions for sending to the plurality of electronic devices the information to be displayed with the relevant treatment instructions, additionally, the server and/or the electronic devices comprise instructions to generate a prediction of the likelihood of a subject transmitting the pathogen, based on the score of the subject.
Jim Stone writes- Bluetooth and the vax
The story is that many people are noticing that the vaxxed are showing up on bluetooth. I spent some time looking into this recently and it looks like people might be onto something.
There are now numerous posts, well done posts, to social media where people have tested to see if the vaxxed really are showing up on bluetooth, and it seems to be the case. When they do, they show up as an “unidentified device” with a string of numbers for the device name. Some are showing up with several connections…
By JS – (henrymakow.com)
Henry,
Here are a dozen smartphone screenshots I took Monday in front of a supermarket in Germany.
It looks like the inoculated are all having their own individual (kind of) IP address which appears on the screen when bluetooth is being activated and scans the surrounding for reachable bluetooth devices.
Okay, but they can do this with your phone, on or off. They even have long range blue tooth. Off topic: current claimed 5G isn’t actually 5G. The real start of 5G will be when 6G gets rolled out. Given that US and UK are now tech snails, its going to be a very long time before 6G is operating in the UK. Huge areas of the UK can’t get decent 4G, the market system is a failure.
My Chinese smartphone has a similar12 digit “bluetooth” code..
Henry and JS: Great job! Hang tough all!
R.C.
Fauci & Gates are both Jews masquerading as gentiles…
NO! What the author is detecting is newer Smartphones’ transmitting their BLE (Blue Tooth Low Energy) ID’s. This is a “Mesh” network made Ad Hoc by the devices without their user’s knowledge or consent.
Evil yes but not their injectables transmitting and not just for Contract Tracing.
https://www.bluetooth.com/learn-about-bluetooth/recent-enhancements/mesh/mesh-faq/
It has nothing to do with healthcare, and everything to do with political control of the slave masses.
keb123: Thanks for adding more tech in your comment. Sheeple don’t know about long range blue tooth. Rob Braxman has a great YouTube channel where you can find all things bothersome with tech.
As usual, everyone knows better than everyone else, and anyone who thinks themselves clever knows absolutely.
In the article there is someone who says “My wife first scanned 61:D5:3F:6F:7F:5B. Now she is 5F:44:C2:30:C7:9C.” Take it or leave it, but at least, if they’re telling the truth, it gives you something.
What is needed is for someone to go out into the woods, well away from any technical crap, with some vaxxed friends and to test it. Do they each give off the same number over time? Does their number only show when they’re near? If two are near, do you always get the expected two numbers. You know, scientific experiment (remember when that was the norm?).
I don’t have a smartphone nor any jabbed friends, so I can’t do it, or else I would.
If it’s true, then I doubt very much it’s harmless. Given who they are and what they’re about, if I were them I’d be using it as a kill switch. Take the next jab (ie. ‘update’ yourself) or be offed automatically by the system. So much as utter a word of dissent, and you’re toast.
YES YOU STUPID TRUSTING SHEEPLE;
YOU WILL ALWAYS BE CONTROLED !
ONLY WHEN YOU ARE DEAD YOU WILL
BE FREE (your soul) !
@ WELL
OK lets go into the woods. i dont use handys.
@KEB123
OK if not now than later they will do it !
My phone seems to be taking photos (without any prompting) by itself, on a regular basis. I’m guessing that afterwards it transmits them ‘somewhere’ to be pooled with other gazillions of images and data-mined (?). A few years ago this might have sounded far-fetched. In 2021, it doesn’t.
2 people with ‘smart’ phones need to go out to some place where there is no other signal, where they only get the signal that is shown, then walk apart from one another. does it go away? then walk back towards each other. does it come back? loners sitting in shopping malls watching god knows what appear on their screen shows nothing. if it’s true, prove it – properly.
if your owners wanted to do such a thing they’d have to invent nano machines, which don’t exist. yeah, there are things some people are calling nano machines, but they aren’t. the human race reached the limit of miniturisation 2 decades ago and hasn’t advanced one step since.
if your owners wanted to do such a thing, and they had nano machines, they’d be idiots to make them reply to people’s ‘smart’ phones. in order to get a bluetooth ‘signal’, your ‘smart’ phone has to send out a message that adheres to the bluetooth protocol. the receiver has to detect this signal and reply, again using the bluetooth protocol. the receiver needs to be able to receive a signal and transmit a signal, which requires a power source. does this sound remotely possible to you?
even if you want to believe the above, that guy that says he got 2 different numbers from his ‘wife’ – well, the whole point of a mac address (or whatever you want to call it) is to uniquely identify a particular device. It defeats the purpose if you send out a different address each time that you are asked.
I don’t know what smart phones can do nowadays but I would say smart people don’t carry one. Nor do they take a witches-brew injection that not one member of the “6 billion too many” knows what’s in it.
Guys.. we need this investigation. We need to know for certain.
No they don’t. Its all Bullshit. Humanity is controlled by a variety of ways.