Irish Savant – irishsavant.net Oct 5, 2021
Some time ago I wrote about the rich career path open to otherwise talentless unscrupulous liars as – and this is funny – fact checkers. Reminds me of Mark Twain’s aphorism “If you don’t read the newspapers you’re uninformed. If you do read them you’re misinformed”. Touche! Or this. “The editor’s role is to sift the wheat from the chaff. And print the chaff”. And now we have the transhumanism project, the merging of man and machine, which promises the Luciferian dream of human immortality, and which also opens up a series of new and exciting career paths.
One of the most promising is that of the bioethicist. “Bioethics is the study of the ethical issues emerging from advances in biology and medicine. It is also moral discernment as it relates to medical policy and practice. It includes the study of values relating to primary care and other branches of medicine.” Specific areas of interest include manipulation of the human brain and nervous system, cloning and other forms of asexual reproduction, drug and vaccine testing, abortion and end-of-life care. A most interesting sphere of study I’m sure you’ll agree.
One of the first things I noted about the field is that it’s dominated by Jews. From this fact I drew two conclusions. One, that there’s mucho moolah to be made, and two, that, one way or the other, the goyim will end up getting the shaft. Indeed two of the most prominent practitioners bear out my conclusions. For instance if Peter Singer – the doyen of bioethicists – had his way not too many shiksa pregnancies would produce functioning adults. According to him fetuses are neither rational nor self-aware, and can therefore hold no preferences. As a result the preference of a mother to have an abortion automatically takes precedence over the life of the fetus. He then effortlessly segues into straight-up infanticide. “Killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living.” Which taken to its logical conclusion would give a bored parent the right to ‘terminate’ a child aged up to two years – or even more – given that the child presumably would not by that stage have expressed an interest in a longer life.
Moving from hatched to despatched we encounter Ezekiel Emmanuel, another luminary in the field. I had entertained genuine fears of my keyboard’s spontaneous combustion when typing his name and the word ‘ethics’ in the same sentence. You see, despite Zeke (brother of Rahm) being Professor of Medical Ethics at the University of Pennsylvania he doesn’t really have an ethical pedigree. His father enjoyed nothing more than reminiscing on his days as an Irgun terrorist, in particular how he had stuffed the bodies of the Deir Yassin massacre victims down the village’s well. And Zeke was the one who came up with the Death Panels component of Obamacare.
And he doesn’t think anyone should live beyond 75 years. “There are not that many people who continue to be active and engaged and actually creative past 75. It’s a very small number. … And even more important, for most people, is the biological decline in cognitive function. If you look at really smart people, there aren’t that many writing brand-new books after 75, and really developing new areas where they are leading thinkers.” Well I suppose that’s true. But how many people are writing brand-new books and becoming leading thinkers before they reach that age? This guy is stupid as well as evil. Unsurprisingly he also supports forced vaccinations. For the public good, of course.
The career is so rewarding not least because it gels perfectly with the NWO goal of population control. Unrestricted abortion, infanticide, euthanasia and deadly vaccines will do a great job in getting the numbers down. So off you go! Klaus Schwab, Soros, Gates et al will ensure fame and fortune if you choose the path of the bioethicist.
It’s not just population control. In the UK there are also a number of sinister, well-funded ‘foundations’ and ‘charities’ devoted to promoting euthanasia. All were involved in promoting the infamous ‘Liverpool Pathway’ murder scheme.
The sheeple are/have been conditioned. Just consider the majority of sheeple have agreed to be jabbed, mostly with gene therapies (most sheeple can’t grasp this point), & they never needed to be jabbed.
Just the act of going to get their jabs is a form of conditioning, inclusivity, typical sheeple behaviour.
We have no idea what the accumulative effects of repeated jabs/boosters, but we can assume sheeple behaviour has been enhanced, not just by the jab act, but by the sum total of suspect ingredients and external forces used to control these substances.
I would suggest jab program is part of a multi-faceted attack on the flocks. Sudden death, long term injuries, often leading to early death, sterilisation, behaviour modification & the slow drip in to transhumanism.
This new (?) malaria vaccine which is bound for the little lambs in Africa, will no doubt contain some form of sterilisation.
They want a cull, how deep, difficult to say. They want to cut/cap life expectancy, they want to cut costs, speed up the personal money cycle, which has/will happen with earlier death.
But I don’t think transhumanism will be available to the sheeple. These sickos who advocate killing babies and lifespan caps, they don’t grasp that such rules will creep. Get to 16 and fail the grade, death, why not death at 55?
We are lectured about the benefits of AI, all their suggested uses for AI are actually repressive. No one talks about AI governments, AI legal systems where we all have access to the law. No one talks about AI systems paying taxes? If you introduce AI systems into health care, and they do the work of 100 sheeple who were each earning 100k, you’ve just lost a lot of tax and even if you still employ those 100 sheeple in other roles, you’ve expanded the system, created growth, but the tax take hasn’t changed. There’s talk of online sales tax, it’s just chat, so we are decades away from taxing AI and my guess is that AI will get such a massive foothold that 30yrs time, no one will have the courage to collect the lost taxes. Assuming we’re around in 30yrs time.
There’s this assumption that AI and transhumanist lifeforms (not human) will be as inventive as generations of sheeple have been in the past. The biggest problem for AI, is that its going to have a tsunami of information and no policies. So AI implements a policy, but in a nano second, that policy is binned based on new data. We already live in an age where huge leaps in tech are binned, because they don’t fit into the business/product cycle. This problem will have true AI systems bogged down & nothing will get done. Of course, I say this assuming AI and transhumanism becomes a thing.
We can use AI against our corrupt elites. We have one party systems, so we should be clamouring for AI governments, AI legal systems. Imagine the City crime cartels controlled by AI that dishes out justice to the white collar crooks. How about an AI HMRC? AI diplomacy?
We are in the midst of the 4th industrial revolution and we truther are missing a many opportunities to change the system, & if we fail to act, we’re finished. I think we’re finished anyway, but ever the optimist.
Our problem is that we have no science, or even debate, about the immortal soul. Instead, we have religions which relegate it to another world at death, and Science, which has to be dragged kicking and screaming even to acknowledge the soul, which really invented all the gods and even IS them sometimes. Personally, I do have a science; soul is on my Periodic Table of magic, but that is only a map, not the commentary. People telling truths get less than a foot-note in history, which is the Jews’ yarns.
All this in just a few decades. imagine that satan is feeling the time pinch..
Subheading to article should read: “…rich rewards in the field of white population control…”
Zuckerberg, Bezos and the Google founders plan to live for ever, however the technology won’t be available to the plebs, of course.
‘Who wants to live for ever? Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg do’
Silicon Valley’s billionaires are ploughing a fortune into tech to keep them ticking
Madeleine Spence
Sunday September 12 2021, The Sunday Times
What do you do when you’re so rich you could live to be a hundred and still not spend a noticeable fraction of your fortune? Buy yourself some more time. Literally.
Who wants to live for ever? Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg do
Silicon Valley’s billionaires are ploughing a fortune into tech to keep them ticking
What do you do when you’re so rich you could live to be a hundred and still not spend a noticeable fraction of your fortune? Buy yourself some more time. Literally.
The Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, 57, was reported last week to be among the backers of a new “rejuvenation company”, Altos Labs, a Silicon Valley start-up that has set its sights on understanding why we age and how we might prevent it — and ultimately work out how we might live for ever.
Bezos is not the only billionaire looking towards his end days. The men behind Google and Facebook are also dabbling in the dark art of manipulating mortality. But are they altruistically investing for the good of humanity — or is this a vain personal attempt to cheat death?
It wouldn’t be the first time Bezos has shown an interest in slowing the ticking of the clock. In 2016, along with the PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, 53, he contributed to a $116 million investment in Unity Biotechnology, a start-up developing “therapeutics to slow, halt or reverse diseases of ageing”.
This time, the Russian-born billionaire, venture capitalist and physicist Yuri Milner, 59, worth a modest $4.8 billion to Bezos’s $202 billion, is also said to be contributing capital to Altos Labs. While the specifics are still the stuff of speculation, on its board is Shinya Yamanaka, a stem-cell researcher from Japan who won a Nobel prize in 2012 for figuring out how to biologically reprogram cells to make them more youthful.
The anti-ageing industry once involved health supplements, hair-plugs, Botox and expensive face creams. But in the past decade it has undergone a slick Silicon Valley makeover. Now, it’s the Longevity Industry — and Bezos is a newcomer to the quest.
Eight years ago, the Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, both now 48, started and put $750 million behind a new research and development arm called Calico Life Sciences, the brainchild of Bill Maris, 46, of Google Ventures. Its mission: to understand the biology that controls human ageing.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative — set up by the Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg, 37, and his wife Priscilla Chan, 36 — includes in its remit curing, preventing or managing all disease by the end of the 21st century. While they may shy away from using the L-word (longevity), completing that mission would undoubtedly lead to longer lifespans.
According to Yuri Deigin, a scientist who founded Youthereum Genetics, a company that aims to “cure ageing”, the past decade has seen huge growth in the field: “It’s kind of a booming area now … there’s a lot of money being thrown into researching it.”
The Silicon Valley mindset of “fail fast and move on” means the landscape is littered with weird and wonderful start-ups, many of which are conducting research that might feel more at home in a Bram Stoker novel.
There are those looking at how to hoover up the detritus that our ageing cells gather over time, pills that mimic the biological benefits of being in a near-starving state, gene therapies fiddling with chromosome casings, the reprogramming of cells, and parabiosis studies, which entails stitching together old and young mice so the former can reap the rejuvenating rewards of the latter’s young blood. Microscopic worms and naked mole rats also feature heavily.
Whichever theory makes the big breakthrough, Deigin is certain it’s a matter of when, not if. And this, he says, is thanks to the inevitable attraction that the search for the elixir of life holds for the billionaire backers: “They have really nothing to lose but money, and they have a lot of money to lose.”
However, according to Rowan Hooper, a biologist and the author of How To Spend a Trillion Dollars, such anti-ageing ambitions are unlikely to be of a broader benefit to humankind. “Billionaires, especially in Silicon Valley, see everything as a problem that can be solved. Ageing is just the problem that needs to be solved.” He suggests that while the likes of Zuckerberg and Bezos at times dress these puzzles in philanthropic, world-saving language, “if you really want to globally and equitably extend human life and health, then you need to invest more broadly in a very basic approach and instantiate universal healthcare across the world.”
It is not, however, all billionaires. “It seems pretty egocentric, while we still have malaria and TB, for rich people to fund things so they can live longer,” Bill Gates said in a 2015 interview, in reaction to the founding of Google’s Calico.
Even Tesla’s Elon Musk, no stranger to age evasion — he has a considerably thicker head of hair now than he did a few years ago — saw an opportunity to poke fun at Bezos last week: “If it doesn’t work, he’s gonna sue death!” he wrote on Twitter. In past interviews, striking a more serious note, Musk has expressed concerns about overpopulation.
Ethical implications aside, Hooper does admit that the tech start-up way of thinking, along with the deep pockets and big dreams of its billionaires, is likely to benefit science in other, perhaps unforeseen ways, much in the same way that the Cold War space race eventually gave us the technology for smartphone cameras.
“We’re getting loads of research done into cell biology and genetics, and all of that is telling us huge amounts that we don’t know about how we live and grow and get old,” he says. “And that’s really valuable stuff — even if it doesn’t, and it won’t, lead to the elixir of life and an immortal race of billionaires.”
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/who-wants-to-live-for-ever-jeff-bezos-and-mark-zuckerberg-do-g68w8tbcm
Just Pater Familias again. Only this time by “experts”.
In ancient Rome, head-of-household held the right to kill children who were deformed or idiots, and in some cases if they were the wrong sex or just one too many.
Rome never altered this, and other cultures accepted the basic point. The famous Cossack story “Taras Bulba” ends after the title chief captures his traitor son, and says: “I gave you life, I can take it away.” Then the old man kills the son.
Usually Miles Mathis gets on my nerves, but his recent piece, ROME, is quite worth the time to read it. It turns out he also won Latin awards in school, and his new direction looks promising. For instance: The great historian Flavius Josephus’ real name was Yosef ben Matityahu.
Mathis on ROME: http://mileswmathis.com/caesar.pdf
History might just be circular after all.
@Franz,
thanks for that informative bit on Miles Mathis’ Caesarian speculations.
Like you, I get intrigued and annoyed by Mathis in equal measure.
He is definitely bright, erudite and tireless but often seems to fall off the limb having gone too far, so that in the end the reader must temper his judgment accordingly, which is fine with me though others may get trapped in delusional spaces.
He mixes and conflates mythology with historicity with abandon to arrive at desired conclusions, I mean WTF, Aeneas, Greek demigod born of the top goddess Venus (Athena) shags Dido, the Carthaginian queen, favored of yet another senior goddess Juno (Hera) to *maybe* produce Ascanius, the founder of Rome, whose alternate name was Julus, the progenitor of the Julian line—hence Julius Caesar was a JEW!!! because, Carthage had close link with Judaism.
(sound of a branch cracking under BS overload)
But all in all, a fun read, i admit, i was entertainingly lured away from the topic of Judaic bioethics scam, of which I have more than a cursory knowledge and experience—yes, it is all revolting garbage invented for the usual reasons by the usual suspects, just like psychology, etc.
Yeah well the ‘Jones’ (Carl & Lewis) should know all about the ‘Sheeple’…coming from a nation of sheep shaggers
To Who–I have twice objected to the use of the word “sheeple” by Carl Jones, but he argued in favour of it.