What an idiot. There’s no such thing as ‘hologram technology’ that could convince even a child of any such thing (if there were there’d be such illusions being used everywhere for entertainment – father christmas landing on your roof at christmas, aliens spaceships hovering over cities all over the world, cinema characters walking up the aisle at a movie theater, etc). Even if there were (and there isn’t) there’s the obvious quesion why bother? Just crash real planes. It’s much easier. He really showed his ‘knowledge’ when he said it was missiles that were ‘somehow’ projecting a plane around them. Let’s say all that (nonsense) is true, then what happened to all the passengers? Are all their surviving relatives in on the scam too? Really, it’s people like this that give ‘conspiracy theorists’ a bad name. There’s scores of real sane things that prove the buildings were blown up, you don’t need this nonsense by an attention seeking whoever he is muddying the waters. By the way, anyone that’s ever used video footage that has passed through a computer encoder knows that it’s very easy to turn a plane shape into a ball, or even for it to disappear entirely – that’s just how encoders work. The only film footage where you wouldn’t get this effect is a raw video (eg. an avi video with a sequence of still frames one after the after, with no encoding between frames), and none of the videos on the internet are that, especially the one’s on youtube, which have been reencoded so many times as to render them so blurry it’s a wonder you can see anything at all. Try it for yourself – get any video and reencode it multiple times and see what happens.
lewis jones
on September 12, 2021 at 12:25 pm
To Nope–have you forgotten that all advanced technology is “Classified” so that the public or enemies can be kept in the dark?
John
on September 12, 2021 at 12:55 pm
To nope
You make some good points..but…
there could be good reason to keep quiet about “hologram technology”. If such technology was revealed to the world and used for mass entertainment, then if it is true (and I wouldn’t know if it is) that a fake alien invasion may be used to fool the world we are being attacked by aliens so as to create a World Government, then such a hoax would be less convincing if the Public are accustomed to seeing hologram technology. It just wouldn’t have the same effect of terrorising people (“familiarity breeds contempt” as it were).
And talking of fake alien invasions, I do know that many years ago the Daily Mail published a short piece about the Americans having a plan (which they did not carry out) to create a fake Second Coming of Jesus just before invading Cuba. The thinking behind this was that many Cubans are religious and if the population thought that the “Second Coming” was taking place before their very eyes it would so disorientate them that they would be less able to respond to the surprise attack. (I kid you not).
I was so impressed with this article I cut it out of the newspaper and I believe I still have it. As with many things in my house, I just can’t find it!
Jack Witchity
on September 12, 2021 at 1:01 pm
This endless round of “how” has wasted some much time and so many great intellects.
The only questions that really matter are who and why.
Greg
on September 12, 2021 at 1:28 pm
A manifest hoax. As for the rambling rebuttal above: They say that the moon landings can’t have been faked because thousands of people work at NASA – but thousands weren’t in on it. By the same token, the passenger lists were simply faked.
nope
on September 12, 2021 at 3:00 pm
@ lewis
Using that theory you can invent anything you like and expect the entire world to believe it. If you really believe it then I pity you.
KidKip
on September 12, 2021 at 3:22 pm
Yep, another bought and paid for arsehole trying to convince us that real aircraft were involved – get a fucking grip. The dark cabal had all their ducks lined up with prepared scripts and dummy film footage ready to roll. Its actually amazing to realise just how brain dead the average punter is – still asleep after 20 fucking years.
Name Your Enemy
on September 12, 2021 at 5:03 pm
To ‘Nope’:
Okay Jew. But we know you’re a desperate liar.
Know Your Enemy
on September 12, 2021 at 5:23 pm
I used to enjoy Controversial TV back in the day, Rich Hall and all.
Occams
on September 12, 2021 at 5:32 pm
The ‘how’ can be argued for the rest of life on earth, so short of snatching and waterboarding Cheney or Nutsnyahoos………
Holographic technology does exist and if the military or deept state have it, it will be maybe 50 years in advance of what is in the public domain. What we do know is that it was not a real plane that crashed into the South Tower.
This nope character is an obvious troll. How can he call someone an idiot when they have spent two decades investigating footage that is clearly fake and then pointing out the fakery. Hologram technology is decades old so who really knows how far “they” have developed it? A missile self projecting a simple hologram around itself is the perfect camoflage and would seem to be the obvious next step for the military to take and is, initself, probably decades old. But they certainly wouldn’t want the general public suspecting it.
UVW
on September 12, 2021 at 9:30 pm
Mr. Richard Hall brings an interesting perspective by his video analysis, discerning what may be possibly true and what may be not. This is all about scientific investigation and testing of hypotheses.
Unfortunately, due to our so called modern world of credentialing, the system to include the media has made criminals of anyone who volunteers an opinion without being officially licensed in the field, or if licensed, censored if opinion does not follow the official narrative. In some cases to include lawyers, doctors and engineers, have had their licenses to practice terminated.
The only ones allowed to escape the matrix’s incarceration are the elite politicians, ultra wealthy entrepreneurs, and their dirty henchmen. All others are either silenced, blackmailed or terminated.
Nico X
on September 12, 2021 at 10:06 pm
Even if it is faked, it doesn’t matter, since the people who orchestrated the controlled demolition of the WTC are not liable, since they possess total politico-economic power. Remember, power supersedes the ‘law’.
The author admits to the possible use of some secret high technology. I don’t consider a missile covering for a plane to be such secret, high technology. How about a reverse gravitational craft made to look like a plane? U.F.O.’s have been observed crashing into water at high speed and tunnelling into the earth, owing to the powerful force field surrounding it. So, one would have no trouble slicing through heavy steel girders and concrete, producing that cartoonish, cookie cutter cutout of a “plane” in the sides of the towers where “planes” supposedly flew through. The technology has existed for a long time and is cheap and reliable and right for the job, so why not use it?
Carl Jones
on September 13, 2021 at 7:05 am
Nope: You’re so wrong. I was the first to postulate the no plane theory. Because I had no clout on the Internet and didn’t want any, I contacted James Fetzer and told him my ideas. I don’t mind that he made a hay with them.
I met Fetzer in London at a meeting. David Shsyler was there, but I didn’t speak to him.
Simple science says there were no planes. The wings, especially the wing tips can’t melt into a building built with massive girders. Some or most of the wings would fall to the ground. Also, 90%+ of aviation fuel would pass through the tower. Visible fire balls, real or CGI came from stationary fuel source, not fuel travelling at 570mph.
No plane in a field, no plane at the Pentagon, & no planes at the WTC. Having said that, planes were hijacked, planes and some sheeple needed to disappear. Note, at peak time, the two WTC planes were less than half full, go figure.
Towers brought down with micronukes in the basements, preplanted explosives (thermite too slow) & EMF weapon to turn concrete to dust.
So called experts make me laff…the planes wer misiles made 2 look like planes and or the planes wer digitally added. Or even remote controlled. Laser guided.. (theres 3 things that cud explain.)I dare u 2 go frame by frame. Esp the 2nd planes abroach. Any way no 1 and i mean no 1 watched the planes hit. All news n videos allowed that day wer fake. Even the images r poor quality. No1 watched the live feeds per say. Apart from time delays the whole news packages wer fake. Do ur home work. And do it with out prejudice
What an idiot. There’s no such thing as ‘hologram technology’ that could convince even a child of any such thing (if there were there’d be such illusions being used everywhere for entertainment – father christmas landing on your roof at christmas, aliens spaceships hovering over cities all over the world, cinema characters walking up the aisle at a movie theater, etc). Even if there were (and there isn’t) there’s the obvious quesion why bother? Just crash real planes. It’s much easier. He really showed his ‘knowledge’ when he said it was missiles that were ‘somehow’ projecting a plane around them. Let’s say all that (nonsense) is true, then what happened to all the passengers? Are all their surviving relatives in on the scam too? Really, it’s people like this that give ‘conspiracy theorists’ a bad name. There’s scores of real sane things that prove the buildings were blown up, you don’t need this nonsense by an attention seeking whoever he is muddying the waters. By the way, anyone that’s ever used video footage that has passed through a computer encoder knows that it’s very easy to turn a plane shape into a ball, or even for it to disappear entirely – that’s just how encoders work. The only film footage where you wouldn’t get this effect is a raw video (eg. an avi video with a sequence of still frames one after the after, with no encoding between frames), and none of the videos on the internet are that, especially the one’s on youtube, which have been reencoded so many times as to render them so blurry it’s a wonder you can see anything at all. Try it for yourself – get any video and reencode it multiple times and see what happens.
To Nope–have you forgotten that all advanced technology is “Classified” so that the public or enemies can be kept in the dark?
To nope
You make some good points..but…
there could be good reason to keep quiet about “hologram technology”. If such technology was revealed to the world and used for mass entertainment, then if it is true (and I wouldn’t know if it is) that a fake alien invasion may be used to fool the world we are being attacked by aliens so as to create a World Government, then such a hoax would be less convincing if the Public are accustomed to seeing hologram technology. It just wouldn’t have the same effect of terrorising people (“familiarity breeds contempt” as it were).
And talking of fake alien invasions, I do know that many years ago the Daily Mail published a short piece about the Americans having a plan (which they did not carry out) to create a fake Second Coming of Jesus just before invading Cuba. The thinking behind this was that many Cubans are religious and if the population thought that the “Second Coming” was taking place before their very eyes it would so disorientate them that they would be less able to respond to the surprise attack. (I kid you not).
I was so impressed with this article I cut it out of the newspaper and I believe I still have it. As with many things in my house, I just can’t find it!
This endless round of “how” has wasted some much time and so many great intellects.
The only questions that really matter are who and why.
A manifest hoax. As for the rambling rebuttal above: They say that the moon landings can’t have been faked because thousands of people work at NASA – but thousands weren’t in on it. By the same token, the passenger lists were simply faked.
@ lewis
Using that theory you can invent anything you like and expect the entire world to believe it. If you really believe it then I pity you.
Yep, another bought and paid for arsehole trying to convince us that real aircraft were involved – get a fucking grip. The dark cabal had all their ducks lined up with prepared scripts and dummy film footage ready to roll. Its actually amazing to realise just how brain dead the average punter is – still asleep after 20 fucking years.
To ‘Nope’:
Okay Jew. But we know you’re a desperate liar.
I used to enjoy Controversial TV back in the day, Rich Hall and all.
The ‘how’ can be argued for the rest of life on earth, so short of snatching and waterboarding Cheney or Nutsnyahoos………
The ‘WHO’….
Israel and the US. Period.
Which is why ‘Cui bono?’ was never asked aloud
Holographic technology does exist and if the military or deept state have it, it will be maybe 50 years in advance of what is in the public domain. What we do know is that it was not a real plane that crashed into the South Tower.
https://weedbreezesonfreeenergy.blogspot.com/2009/11/1994-us-air-force-launches-top-secret.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4N0Ewb_OVsU
https://www.corbettreport.com/deep-state-technology-is-decades-ahead-of-commercial-technology/
This nope character is an obvious troll. How can he call someone an idiot when they have spent two decades investigating footage that is clearly fake and then pointing out the fakery. Hologram technology is decades old so who really knows how far “they” have developed it? A missile self projecting a simple hologram around itself is the perfect camoflage and would seem to be the obvious next step for the military to take and is, initself, probably decades old. But they certainly wouldn’t want the general public suspecting it.
Mr. Richard Hall brings an interesting perspective by his video analysis, discerning what may be possibly true and what may be not. This is all about scientific investigation and testing of hypotheses.
Unfortunately, due to our so called modern world of credentialing, the system to include the media has made criminals of anyone who volunteers an opinion without being officially licensed in the field, or if licensed, censored if opinion does not follow the official narrative. In some cases to include lawyers, doctors and engineers, have had their licenses to practice terminated.
The only ones allowed to escape the matrix’s incarceration are the elite politicians, ultra wealthy entrepreneurs, and their dirty henchmen. All others are either silenced, blackmailed or terminated.
Even if it is faked, it doesn’t matter, since the people who orchestrated the controlled demolition of the WTC are not liable, since they possess total politico-economic power. Remember, power supersedes the ‘law’.
The author admits to the possible use of some secret high technology. I don’t consider a missile covering for a plane to be such secret, high technology. How about a reverse gravitational craft made to look like a plane? U.F.O.’s have been observed crashing into water at high speed and tunnelling into the earth, owing to the powerful force field surrounding it. So, one would have no trouble slicing through heavy steel girders and concrete, producing that cartoonish, cookie cutter cutout of a “plane” in the sides of the towers where “planes” supposedly flew through. The technology has existed for a long time and is cheap and reliable and right for the job, so why not use it?
Nope: You’re so wrong. I was the first to postulate the no plane theory. Because I had no clout on the Internet and didn’t want any, I contacted James Fetzer and told him my ideas. I don’t mind that he made a hay with them.
I met Fetzer in London at a meeting. David Shsyler was there, but I didn’t speak to him.
Simple science says there were no planes. The wings, especially the wing tips can’t melt into a building built with massive girders. Some or most of the wings would fall to the ground. Also, 90%+ of aviation fuel would pass through the tower. Visible fire balls, real or CGI came from stationary fuel source, not fuel travelling at 570mph.
No plane in a field, no plane at the Pentagon, & no planes at the WTC. Having said that, planes were hijacked, planes and some sheeple needed to disappear. Note, at peak time, the two WTC planes were less than half full, go figure.
Towers brought down with micronukes in the basements, preplanted explosives (thermite too slow) & EMF weapon to turn concrete to dust.
Project blue beam.. No such thing as holographic technology.. yer ok…
So called experts make me laff…the planes wer misiles made 2 look like planes and or the planes wer digitally added. Or even remote controlled. Laser guided.. (theres 3 things that cud explain.)I dare u 2 go frame by frame. Esp the 2nd planes abroach. Any way no 1 and i mean no 1 watched the planes hit. All news n videos allowed that day wer fake. Even the images r poor quality. No1 watched the live feeds per say. Apart from time delays the whole news packages wer fake. Do ur home work. And do it with out prejudice
If you still haven’t visited Simon Shacks website http://www.septemberclues.info I recommend that you do