Wayne Allensworth – The Unz Review Aug 31, 2021
Thirty years ago this month, Communist hardliners in the Soviet Union launched the “August Coup” against Mikhail Gorbachev’s reformist government. It failed and instead the Communist Party itself was suppressed, after 74 years of totalitarian power. Hopefully the current communist coup in the U.S. will similarly fail—but it’s worth examining why our managerial globalist regime enabling it retains a hatred for Russian’s current ruler, President Vladimir Putin, that is as intense as it seems inexplicable.
From “Russiagate” to charges that anti-globalists are shilling for Putin, the shrill accusations of Russia being behind every nefarious activity the global managers can imagine, to the comparisons of Putin to Hitler…On and on the trail of hatred goes, for fear is behind it.
Understanding the obsessive fear and loathing of Putin’s Russia requires historical memory, something our society is woefully short on, but it’s necessary for anyone seeking such understanding to back up to the end of the Cold War and recall the circumstances that gave rise to globalism.
The Fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War
The Berlin Wall fell in 1989. The Soviet Union remained standing, but was fragile, reeling from Gorbachev’s policies of glasnost (“openness”) and perestroika (“restructuring”), which had unleashed a firestorm of previously pent-up popular frustrations. The Soviet economy was in shambles. The Soviets were losing their Eastern European satellites and nationalism was pulling the USSR apart at the seams.
I used to find it exceedingly difficult to explain to Americans the chaos and despair in Russia that followed the Soviet collapse. But with our country following its own path to self-destruction, perhaps that will no longer be the case. As the state and economy collapsed, their money worthless, their jobs evaporating, with crime, disorder, and corruption rampant, life expectancy plummeted in post-Soviet Russia. The longstanding Russian curse, alcoholism, became an endemic phenomenon in Russian life. Abortions substantially exceeded births, suicides soared, and the state apparatus and law enforcement collapsed along with the unkept utopian promises of a failed system.
The rug had been pulled from under the feet of the Russian people, the narod who had suffered so greatly, but who had felt pride in Soviet achievements—Yuri Gagarin and the Soviet space program, the country’s superpower status, and above all, their victory over Fascism in the Great Patriotic War. Now that was all apparently gone with the wind, and the proud Russians had to rely on Western aid, including aid from the International Monetary Fund, to survive, however unsteadily, however forlorn.
Nearly one year after the great collapse, your faithful observer was in Vladivostok, in Russia’s Far East. Vladivostok was formerly the home of the Soviet Pacific Fleet. At the time, the rusting hulks of the newly formed Russian navy were abandoned in their docks, listing and lifeless. I walked past them on a cold day in November, and they looked like bizarre modern sculptures, unguarded, unwanted, a gallery with an audience of one.
At the naval base on nearby Russky Island, Russian sailors had gone unfed, as their officers failed to provide rations for months. A number of them starved to death.
A winter storm had frozen the port city on the Sea of Japan’s Bay of the Golden Horn. The streets were covered with ice and packed snow, the power grid failed, and without heat, the residents of Vladivostok had begun dismantling wooden structures to burn to warm themselves. Police were deployed to stop the city from descending into chaos. They were supposed to arrest the people carrying off fence planks and other wood they had gathered, but they often ignored them.
As I left the unguarded naval docks, I trudged through the snow and ice, and noticed an old woman pulling a sled loaded with wooden planks. I pulled the sled up an incline for her. She crossed herself and blessed me, and I noticed a militia officer—a policeman—casually turning his head and pretending not to see.
A week later I was in Moscow. Beggars were quite common: amputees, destitute pensioners, old war veterans wearing their threadbare uniforms and tarnished medals, the very old and the very young, as armies of orphans took to the streets of Russian cities. Street vendors, often educated people who had worked in industry or for the state apparatus, hawked all sorts of cheap goods, often Chinese in origin, on the sidewalks of the dingy capital’s streets.
Through it all, I noted the good will of many of the Russians I met, people who seemed glad that the Cold War was behind us.
That emotional warmth would not survive the “shock therapy” economic policies of the Russian government that, on the recommendation of Western advisors, had gone all in on neo-liberal reforms, lifting price controls and beginning the massive selloff of Soviet era assets. Gradualists had warned that the country might collapse under the strain, and it nearly did. The political and economic dislocations that followed the Soviet collapse, along with the unpopular economic policies (“shock without therapy“) helped ignite a political conflict between President Boris Yeltsin and the legislature, the Russian Supreme Soviet, that would end with a mini-civil war in Moscow, when tanks commanded by Defense Minister Pavel Grachev (the tank crews were reluctant to take such orders from lower ranking officers) blasted the parliament into submission in October,1993.
The “Wild 90s” traumatized the Russian people in ways Westerners failed to fully understand at the time. And they also failed to account for historic Russian distrust of the West—the flipside of the good will I had seen so much of early on in Yeltsin-era Russia. By the end of the 90s, with NATO intervening in the ruins of Yugoslavia, bombing, among other sites, targets in Serbia, a traditional Russian ally, even Yeltsin had had enough and made his displeasure known to “friend Bill,” as he called President Clinton, to no avail.
Russia, humiliated in its war with Chechen separatists, would soon face the prospect of NATO expanding eastward toward Russia’s borders, though the Russians thought they been promised this would not happen. Relations with the West would continue to go downhill for some time. But a turning point, though few realized it at the time, was reached when an ailing Yeltsin resigned on New Year’s Eve, 1999, elevating Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to the presidency.
Western triumphalism and globalization
The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 was a seminal moment in Cold War history. To all intents and purposes, the Cold War with the Soviets was over. We would later hear talk of a post-Cold War “peace dividend,” a return to normal relations with the countries of the world and, hopefully, a much smaller military budget and a decrease in the vast array of American defense commitments made during the “twilight struggle” with Communism. Some of us looked forward to a time when Americans could set down the heavy burden President Kennedy had urged us to take up in his inaugural address. We had borne the burden of doing battle for “the free world,” and it appeared that there was at least a fair chance that America would come home.
It was not to be.
1989 also saw the publication of an essay by Francis Fukuyama in The National Interest, an essay that would become a widely discussed book, one that was a blueprint of sorts—at least in a cruder, simplified form—for globalism. The book, published in 1992, was The End of History and the Last Man.
What Fukuyama posited wasn’t that all struggle, strife, and achievement—what most of us think of as “history”—would end, but that human development had reached an end point: the apex of the evolution of mankind’s social, economic, and political development had been attained in liberal democracy.
Market economics was the most efficient method of producing material wellbeing. There simply wasn’t anything else. The Cold War had been a struggle of alternative developmental models and democratic capitalism had won—now the rest of the world would, perhaps in fits and starts, accept that as the only viable developmental path.
So went the theory.
Foreign policy realists and old-fashioned patriots might have mocked Fukuyama (and probably partly misunderstood what he was saying). But their real failure had been to misunderstand the nature of the Cold War itself. Traditionalists had viewed the battle as one against “godless Communism,” a fight to protect traditional values and social-economic structures. However, they had allied themselves with a Liberal-Left nexus that tightened its hold in the West with a victory in another war—the war against Nazism and Fascism.
The victory in that war solidified liberalism’s ideological triumph in the West, and further extended its cultural and social reach in popular entertainment, education, and the corporate world. A “long march” of the Liberal-Left through the institutions would marginalize—and later, practically outlaw—anything that even vaguely resembled a genuine Right in America. “Fascism,” which the Liberal-Left took to mean any manifestations of what they considered dangerous atavistic impulses like patriotism and religious and social conservatism, had been defeated. The Right was on “the wrong side of history,” as the defeat of Nazism and Fascism had shown. Any doubts about the developmental vector of the West and the world in general was deemed suspect by a globalist elite (and its minions in mass media) that was taking shape well before the Cold War was over.
The passage of the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965 was a key point in the evolution of the Left-Liberal managerial regime during the Cold War. Opening the immigration flood gates was part of the Cold War architecture of the era. The propaganda aspect of the Cold War was fought in ideological terms as a clash between Communism and Capitalism (“the Free World”), a war of ideas, not of countries with concrete national interests and distinct peoples. Hart-Celler, which opened the door to non-European immigration, was an ideological extension of the Civil Rights legislation of the era, which was used in Cold War information campaigns to counter Soviet anti-capitalist and anti-U.S. propaganda.
Discrimination of any kind was viewed by US elites as arming the Communists with useful propaganda points—a Western democracy discriminating against the colored peoples of the earth undermined the global anti-Communist line.
Universalist language in American political discourse wasn’t anything new, but the Cold War went a long way toward promoting America as an idea, not a real place or a people with national interests to defend.
Thus, a global elite spawned during the Cold War, bolstered by Cold War era ideological abstractions, had consolidated its stranglehold on power in the Western world. The United States wasn’t exactly the leader of “the Free World,” but, rather, had become the seat of an expansive globalist project.
The Military-Industrial Complex had interests of its own, and peace wasn’t one of them. Globalist billionaires and the “Deep State” had become the not-so-Hidden Hands that manipulated “democracy” for their own ends. Ending the global “geopolitical architecture” that was established during the Cold War would be a direct, existential threat to their power.
“Globalization” was a popular media buzzword even before the Internet made a truly inter-connected world possible. The collapse of Soviet Communism, increased global “migration,” and “free trade” agreements, together with the expansion of transnational corporations, global air travel, and cellular communications, facilitated the realization of the One World dream of a transnational system. Internationalism, dating back at least to the failed League of Nations, became transnationalism as global technological infrastructure evolved.
“Putinism” as an alternative developmental model (“Cold War II”)
Another mistake traditional patriots made at the end of the Cold War: believing—inadvertently echoing Fukuyama—that the great ideological battles of the 20th Century were over and that “we” had won. They missed the fact that their own reason for fighting the Cold War was not shared by an internationalist elite—and that this elite’s ideology had morphed into a nascent form of globalism.
As James Burnham had theorized in The Managerial Revolution (1941), mid-20th century economic, technical, and political power had fallen into the hands of a technocratic elite, the “managers” who also oversaw rival forms of the managerial system in Fascist and Communist regimes. The battle among them was one for global hegemony. So “we,” traditional patriots, did not win the Cold War. “Our” managerial elite notched a victory over their rivals.
As Burnham wrote, the “free enterprise system” was no longer the venue of bourgeois proprietors, but of corporate managers. Together with their counterparts in mass media, the educational system, and the bureaucracy, this managerial, technocratic elite comprised our permanent government.
Godless capitalism had triumphed over godless Communism.
By the end of Yeltsin’s presidency, Russia’s traditional suspicions of the West had been re-ignited, and the man Boris Yeltsin chose to succeed him, Vladimir Putin, would fight another war with the Chechens, preserve the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation, and revive the Russian state apparatus. He curbed the influence of prominent Yeltsin-era “oligarchs,” and, with some luck (especially rising oil prices that had tanked under Yeltsin), improved Russian living standards.
Most importantly of all, those developments boosted sagging national pride. Russians value order above all, something that is understandable considering their turbulent history, and Russian identity is strongly connected to great power status. As their country became a player in world affairs once more, Russians again felt pride in their homeland. Higher living standards and revived national pride, along with at least a semblance of order, were the bedrocks that Putin built his popular support on.
The malaise that had afflicted the country under Yeltsin, and on into the early 2000s, dissipated under Putin. He proved to be a skillful player in the game of factional politics, as he used his connections with a number of Russia’s influence groups (“clans“) to create a balance among them. Elites could breathe easier—assassinations of top-level players in politics and business became far less common. Many ordinary Russians could afford consumer items, vacations, a car, even foreign travel. A sort of tentative optimism, for Russians are a fatalistic people, reshaped Russian reality—today, life expectancy in Russia is about 74 years, up from 65.5 in 2000. Life expectancy for Russian men has soared from about 58 in the 90’s to 68 years.
The bargain struck between vlast (the authorities) and Russian society was derzhavnost (great power status) and a measure of prosperity, in exchange for a limited “managed democracy” and “stability.” Since most ordinary Russians believed politics to be none of their business and enjoyed a new world of consumption (albeit quite limited by Western standards), it seemed a good tradeoff.
To be sure, after more than twenty years of power, the “new” has worn off the Putin system, and recent events (especially pension reform that raised Russians’ retirement age, as well as inflation that has eroded real incomes), together with weariness with Putin’s extremely wealthy cronies (a number of the Yeltsin-era “oligarchs” were displaced by Putin-connected magnates who control vast state and quasi-state enterprises), has increased discontent in Russian society. The perennial Russian problems of bureaucratic incompetence and corruption are as prevalent as ever.
Yet popular protests have never gelled into a countrywide movement directed against the Kremlin, despite the best efforts of the “non-systemic opposition,” whose best-known leader, Aleksey Navalny, is now serving a prison term. A crackdown on opposition media outlets and the forced exile of a number of other opposition figures, together with the Kremlin administration’s control over “systemic” political parties, has prevailed, at least for now.
At the same time, “Putinism” has resisted the incursion of what we now call Woke ideology. A law banning “homosexual propaganda” is indicative of policies that earned Russia and Putin the ire of the “global community.” When friends have asked your faithful servant why the global elites hate Putin with such visceral intensity, my usual reply has been “No gay pride parades in Moscow.”
That’s an oversimplification, of course. Russia, for instance, has forcefully re-asserted its might in its traditional sphere of influence. The 2014 annexation of Crimea sparked a wave of anti-Russian sanctions by Western governments and general hysteria in the West over “Russian expansionism.” A series of attacks on and assassinations of Russian exiles has not endeared the Kremlin to the West, and not without reason.
Yet the myopic globalists, totally lacking self-awareness, failed to acknowledge that their hegemonic aspirations of homogenizing the planet as defined by their ideological precepts were themselves, by definition, expansionist. Russia’s sharp reaction to post-Cold War Western/globalist triumphalism, which interpreted the fall of the Soviet Union as opening the door to globalist expansion across the vast Russian sprawl in Eurasia, was entirely predictable.
As it turned out, a great “twilight struggle” between opposing worldviews was not over, something many of us failed to understand in 1991. “Cold War II” is the follow on to Cold War I, just as the Cold War itself was a spinoff from World War II.
“Liberal democracy” vs. “nationalist authoritarianism”
In short, Vladimir Putin’s brand of quasi-democratic national conservatism, blended with an authoritarian cult of personality (albeit a mild one by Russian standards—Putin is hardly an autocrat, as he is hemmed in by commitments to powerful interest groups) and suppression of potential anti-Kremlin rivals; Russia’s revival as a world power; the rejection of Woke politics and “homosexual propaganda”; the revival of the Orthodox Church as a force in Russian life (though the Church’s spiritual influence over its flock is more apparent than real); as well as Russian actions in the “Near Abroad” (the 2008 war with Georgia and the annexation of Crimea, for instance); and the promotion of a “multi-polar” world, with Russia moving closer to China to balance a globalist West, have made Putin the face of what globalists interpret as an alternative developmental model—one that rejects the End of History triumphalism that once swept globalist circles.
The Putin-controlled Kremlin has enriched the president’s cronies. But has proved wise enough not to empty state coffers, distributing enough income from oil and natural gas exports to raise Russian living standards. Putin has effectively played the role of “the good Czar,” descending from on high to take on ordinary Russians’ day-to-day complaints (access to natural gas lines for heating, local officials’ broken promises, health care for remote areas, the list goes on and on) in what Russian media dubbed “manual control” mode.
Vladimir Putin himself is everything globalists hate—he’s a perfect “patriarchal” foil for Woke ideology and zealous globalists.
What’s more, as globalists see it,”Putinism,” in the form of populist pushback against globalism, has also reared its head in the UK’s Brexit vote, in Viktor Orban’s conservative Hungarian nationalism, and, most of all, in the person of Donald J. Trump.
Of course, the notion that Trump, a weak president who couldn’t manage the White House, much less “Drain The Swamp,” was an authoritarian Strong Man is laughable. But it’s predictable given the mentality of the globalists and their Leftist allies. For them, any support for traditional values and patriotism is by definition “authoritarian.” Traditional social structures (the nuclear family, marriage, churches) are themselves deemed anti-egalitarian, and thus, oppressive and archaic. “Democracy” means adhering to the precepts of a globo-Leftist worldview and its utopian ideals.
Thus, Trump, like Putin and Orban, was portrayed as a fascist dictator—which he was, in the World According To Globalism.
But there’s something else to consider: the longing for a return to order, an end to chaos, and the repudiation of Woke ideology that underpinned the emotional investment so many “MAGA” supporters had in the unlikely figure of Donald Trump.
Early on, his Internet supporters produced memes depicting Trump as “God Emperor.” That yearning for decisive leadership did not go unnoticed by the globalists and its Leftist militant arm.
Hence the Regime Media’s sharply negative reaction to Tucker Carlson’s interviewing Hungary’s Viktor Orban, and to Carlson’s sympathetic portrayal of what the national-conservative (“right-illiberal“) Hungarian leadership is doing, including limiting immigration. This fed the beast of globo-Leftist fantasies about what the “Deplorables” are all about.
Rod Dreher has been in Hungary for a while and, in responding to David Frum’s harsh criticism of Orban, explained why Hungarians, despite some misgivings about corruption under Orban, nevertheless support him:
I have spoken to plenty of Hungarians who assume — as many people in the post-communist countries of this region do — that their leaders are going to indulge in corruption…One of them said that she doesn’t like the government’s corruption, but believes that Hungary can live with it. What it can’t live with, she said, is the kind of corruption that says it’s okay to teach children that they might be one of fifty genders. That form of corruption can destroy a society.
Tucker In Budapest: Blowing People’s Minds, The American Conservative, August 3, 2021
And in Russia, a major reason Putin has remained in power so long has become apparent to this observer: lots of Russians have observed what is happening in the West—and they have come to the conclusion that if the choice is between Pussy Riot and Putin, they’ll take Putin.
Wayne Allensworth is a Corresponding Editor of Chronicles magazine. He is the author of The Russian Question: Nationalism, Modernization, and Post-Communist Russia , and a novel, Field of Blood. He writes at American Remnant.
(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
THE SHROPSHIRE FEW
Memories of an 83 year old Shropshire lad.
When Churchill was agitating for another war on Germany
the peace movement was headed by the men of shropshire
at first the local Shrewsbury newspaper covred the mens campaign of support for Neville Chamberlains peace treaty.
But the main news began a disinfo campaign labelling the men Neo-Nazis
and demonising Shropshire as Shopshite.
With Churchills murder of Chamberlian, the King spoke out anout the horrors he saw on both sides in W W 1 and refused to support another pointless war,
the King was a heavy smoker and was ill with this when Churchill had his death speeded up, the King realised what was happening and accused his doctor Lord Dawson of Penn of his murder just before his end, the other peacemaker
Edward VIII was slid out under the guise of an affair with Wallace Simpson
Churchill with the aid of his speech writer John Colvile, actually wrote Edwards resignation speech to the nation.
With no high level support the Shropshire Few as they were called were rounded up in dawn raids and never heard of again.
Dad was a good man but like many who fought in the first world war did not see the point in another one, mum spoke until her death about what happened to dad and the other men, but a Beefeater at the Tower of London on his death bed said
in the days before huge pits were dug in the Tower grounds for ” drainage”
he said in the early morning half light the men dozens maybe scores of men opposed to the war were brought to the Tower of London, lined up and machine gunned
and put into the drainage pits.
We were sworn to secrecy and told any man who spoke out both he and his family would pay a high price.
They said these men were Hitler supporters 5th columnists and wanting to destroy Britain, this was a total lie, they just did not want to fight another war for Churchill and the jews.
This, as elsewhere, assumes that there are a group of people ‘in charge’ who are doing their best for the people and the country. This is bollocks. The people in charge are the same everywhere, whether you want to call it democracy or communism or fascism or a dictatorship. They are living the life of riley and using you as a slave. The one and only difference between a ‘democracy’ and any other is the ‘chance’ to ‘vote’, which is worthless.
From the article:
The passage of the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965 was a key point in the evolution of the Left-Liberal managerial regime during the Cold War.
Hart-Celler, which opened the door to non-European immigration, was an ideological extension of the Civil Rights legislation of the era, which was used in Cold War information campaigns to counter Soviet anti-capitalist and anti-U.S. propaganda.
Brian USA: Regarding the elite Jewish deceptive immigration legislation (Celler was Jewish) the supporters of the legislation claimed it was mostly symbolic regarding civil rights, it would not change the demographics, I’ve seen the quotes from the politicians.
From the Kevin McDonald book Culture of Critique:
“In the end, the 1965 law passed because it was advertised as nothing more than a moral gesture that would have no long-term impact on the ethnic balance of the US. However, to its activist supporters, including the Jewish organizations that were critical to its passage, immigration reform was what it had always been: a mechanism to alter the ethnic balance of the United States (see Ch. 7).”
From Hugh Davis Graham in his 2002 book Collision Course:
Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas. These included the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, and the American Federation of Jews from Eastern Europe.
In 1965, an immigration bill arrived that Jewish groups could support. The Hart-Cellar Act sought to dismantle the quota system in place since 1924 and finally opened the doors to Asian, African and Middle Eastern populations.
https://www.jta.org/2014/11/30/archive/from-the-archive-jews-welcome-the-stranger
“Lehman is the reason for the immigration legislation of 1965,” she said. That was the Immigration and Naturalization Act, which overturned the 1924 immigration law.
Herbert Lehman, the Jewish governor of New York State who went on to represent the state in the Senate.
“Lehman pushed and bankrolled the legislation,” Dr. Kobrin said. “He did not get to see it passed — but he got it passed.”
Dr. Kobrin, the Russell and Bettina Knapp associate professor of American Jewish history at Columbia.
https://jewishstandard.timesofisrael.com/jews-immigration-and-american-ideals/
The deceptive elite Jewish immigration legislation is why the USA went from almost 90 percent White to now about 57 percent White. Most large cities in the USA no longer have a White majority.
Go to Black, Hispanic and Asian countries throughout the world and tell them they’re going to become a minority in their own country due to new immigration legislation and see what happens.
First, Russia, China and others never made the final step to actual communism. There have always been very wealthy sheeple in Russia and China.
I’ve long held the view that the West (for want of a better word) is communist with incentives. The majority of sheeple earn within a fairy narrow band, they buy similar clothes of dubious quality and they mostly eat the same terrible food. We have a wide choice of cars, but in reality they are almost identical using shared parts and have similar levels of performance.
Most universities are terrible, but there is a step up level for the academically gifted or if your a wealthy foreign student.
We are all repressed, but most don’t know it, let alone understand it. Most are brainwashed by the system. We have what is in reality a one party state. Our local authorities are run by none elected bodies, if your bag is democracy.
Worst of all, Western regimes are fascist. The so say elected are totally embedded in the world of finance and corporatism.
Since the PPT (Plunge Protection Team) was formed under Reagan, there’s been no free markets, & no genuine price discovery. With rates at zero, negative or slightly positive, time no longer has any value. This means the economy is completely disfunctional and economic data is rigged. Immigration and money printing are the only mechanisms of growth.
Many on here, and writers use the term ‘liberal’ or libertarian. This is a sad joke. Libertarianism doesn’t exist. Oh, sure, it’s banded about, but only to screw one section of sheeple over another, or spend more debt on the favoured.
Today it was quietly announced that the regime will give local authorities an extra £5 million for housing the Afghans… What this really means is that British sheeple just got fecked over again, as if another regime fecking makes that much difference. Remember, most of these Afghans heve been earning good money, they were well off middle class Afghans before the US/UK occupation started. They’ve had decades to spoof away their saving into neutral state bank accounts, or they did this when Trump made his deal with CIA controlled Taliban.
The idea that there’s some sort of communist coup going on is just plain daft. It’s always been this way. If you believe this communist coup crap, you are brain dead. If you think Labour or the Democrats are socialist, you are an idiot. If you think the Socialist Workers Party (name?) is a viable alternative, you are a muppet! SWP is completely infiltrated by MI5, just like the trades unions.
A lot of the articles and comments are here are like reading a 1990s edition of Popular Mechanics.
Is it a coincidence that the current Ratchild looks exactly like Nosferatu? Geopolitics has been a choreographed game overseen by the head vampire ever since the Russian Royal family were murdered in 1918.
> Putin Offers Alternative to Globalism. That’s Why Our Ruling Class Hates Him
BS. Putin is on good terms, even a friend of Kissinger and others of the same ilk. He’s a thug playing the good guy in the same old globalist playbook (hegelian dialectic) so that the public can be herded into the ’softer’ version of the NWO. Except it won’t be. Paul Craig Roberts and others sell this spiel. “West bad (particularly the US), Russia good.” All by design.
a shop i go in is rented from the council
the lady in there today said the council is insisting
they do not take cash and insist on cards
and customers still wear masks
she saidbusiness has dropped 50%
and she does not know if she can carry on
what madness that they do what the council says what business is it of theirs ?
A good article. However, one must add that Jews are the enemy of Russia today, just as with 1917.
Jews lead the drive to destroy Russia again. In all, Putin has been good for Russia. And I am happy he
has thwarted the goal of the Jew and Freemason Illuminati Satanists to destroy Russia again. I am sure
the Satanists are very unhappy that they can not now plunder the vast natural resources of Russia. The
real question is whether or not Putin’s replacement will be up to the task of extending and expanding
what Putin has achieved. Of course, Putin is corrupt, but it appears he is a true Russian patriot.
The Great Vladimir Putin offers his alternative to Globalism. He is just as much controlled opposition as Adolph Hitler was, the Greatest Gay Bully ever alive. Only fools believe these clowns.
I think the first time I heard ‘woke’ mentioned and didn’t fully understand what it meant was when Ricky Gervais mentioned it at the Golden Globe two or three or four years ago.
He claimed his audience was woke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJOb9xHggS4
Anyway, Russians are not ‘woke’, Putin is not a woke president and the Orthodox Church has made a comeback.
During the Cold War the USA had continous B52 flights round the clock with H bombs on board, this was to keep them off the ground and in the air
we are told this was in case of a Soviet attack.
FOI info releases say there were 32 crashes with these bombs on board
and several tragedies were narrowly avoided.
In the same FOI request, Israel refused to disclose how many radiation leaks there had been from the Dimona plant.
The USA had Remote viewers watching and say the number is easily in double figures.
The claim is that Remote Viewing is something new, but this is not so
in the Suez Crisis of 1956 a team called Out Of Body Experiencers used OBE’s
to spy on Egypt, the team which included a London girl who was just a teenager
is said to have provided valueable info back to London.
But it was Winston Churchill’s Black team in w w 2 who used what was then called Astral Projection, to leave their bodies and find secret weapons sites like Peenemunde, where Hitlers Revenge weapons were being built,
remember Hitler thought Britain would stick by its treaty with Germany made under Neville Chamberlian, this is why the German rockets were named revenge weapons.
Astral Projectors according to Roald Dahl and Dennis Wheatley also claimed Aleister Crowley like Churchill a 33rd degree mason used this tool to find hidden submarine bases, where U boats were built or repaired.
They say there is nothing new under the sun, and Remote Viewing is nothng new.
Churchill’s occult team had approx 30 people, i know as my father was one of them.
Its all an act. The Overlords playing chess against themselves; which goes right over the heads of the goyim…They installed this Putin puppet to make the white wingers of the world think there’s still some ‘white nationalist hope’ out there. Just search for ‘Putin wears yarmulke’ to see who it really works for. Don’t know how a guy wearing a yarmulke is opposed to the global Jewish ‘ruling class’, but maybe some Christian or moron can explain that one to you. He’s probably of Jewish ancestry, playing his phony ‘nationalist’ character role like Trump…
Tony O’Neill: Isn’t it strange that Lord Jacob Rothschild looks like he could be twin brother to the Queen’s cousin and “Boss of Bosses” of global freemasonry…The Duke of Kent?
‘
Even as a kid back in the ’60s watching the news while waiting for kid’s TV to start I always thought American was the danger behind the Cold War. Those big silver aircraft carpet-bombing Vietnam and Cambodia had white stars painted on their sides not red ones. The war was in Asia not America. The lies may have conned the grown-ups with their excuses but as a kid I wasn’t listening so the BS just went over my head. But the images of gunfire, bombs, fire, death and panic will always stay with me, Uncle Sam.
The IMF is mainly an instrument of the Rothschild financial dynasty, and has always followed the Rothschild pattern of concentrating more and more wealth and power into fewer and fewer favored hands. Together with the lesser Rockefeller financial dynasty behind the World Bank they not only control the UN and its polices and agendas, but in every nation they have entered with their loans or established their central banks, they have debt-rigged them mainly through stealth and corruption in order to control them. It should be no surprise when we scratch the veneer of the fake history courses we are fed in our places of alleged “learning”, that we find that it is these same two dynasties which are mainly responsible for spawning and sustaining communism in Russia, the USSR, eastern Europe, China and in SE Asia.
Neither of the dynasties could have expanded and taken over so much without utilizing massive deception, fear mongering, and oppression, nor without their stealth of creating, amplifying, and orchestrating a steady stream of perils and problems, and then being the very ones to provide all of the solutions. If you study the history of US banking and foreign Rothschild finances manipulating that industry to destabilize it from the 1870’s you will see the dialectical pattern at work of creating problems to provide “solutions”, such that within 20 years through the overwhelming use of their money power, the US became another of its vassal sates, and that the later 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve merely solidified and made permanent that which had already been accomplished. With their money and loans they make entire nations completely dependent on them, while they appoint their loyal functionaries to run and control them.
Within 20 years of opening trade with their prodigy nation, communist China, in 1979 our nations were systematically turned from creditor nations into debtor nations. It was all planned decades in advance. Now they are using the alleged great Western debt bubble, for which they in fact are totally responsible, as their main leverage with our governments and major corporations to usher in their New World Order with a centralized global government and a currency which they intend to totally control just as they have used and abused the US fiat dollar as the leading reserve currency to expand their wealth and power. It is this unjust dependency due to this long history of debt-rigging to gain control which is the real basis for their “top-down” control everywhere throughout this Plandemic, to usher in their UN Agendas and their WEF resets, which is fundamentally no different from the many other fake or totally exaggerated perils they have engineered for their planned hegemony über alles.
Little Putin is just another Jewish puppet. If he wasn’t, he would have called the Covid hoax for what it was. It would have been over before it started when the lack of Russians dying became apparent.
“The Great Vladimir Putin offers his alternative to Globalism. He is just as much controlled opposition as Adolph Hitler was, the Greatest Gay Bully ever alive. Only fools believe these clowns.”
Controlled apposition? Thus spoke a moron, troll or Hasbara, who seems to be
obsessed with homosexuals and spends their useless existence projecting their homosexuality onto others.
The Jews told you that, and you believed their lies and calumny.
“OY VEY! It’s anudda Shoah, which means youse Goyim will have to pay for this till the end of time, at least 666 gorillion shekels & in either Gold or Diamonds, none of that funny FED money, that will be used to heat your homes Goyim, just like what we did to your German brothers during the Wiemar Republic, till that nasty Notsee Hitler came to power, & kicked our cheating, chiseling, thieving, kid diddling asses out of Germany.
But we showed them, screw around with our fiat money game & we will destroy your nation!”
Liberalism and Communism are the cheeks of the same backside (Godless Humanism)! When you speak of an “alternative”, you need to define it properly.
Just as baby Tiger-Sharks kill one another while still inside their mother’s womb… Liberal-Market-Democracy too was born as the final Shark that had already killed own brothers and sisters… so indeed this was the end of history! However all of these “ism”s, have the same root and DNA in their epistemology and differ only in approach. So a real alternative must be a different creature altogether!
Besides… a unique ideology that can become a global alternative on the offensive, must have a dream that can sell! Now that American dream is done for… and people are tired of stupid double standard shallow human rights and liberal values… the world is thirsty for a new dream!
To MM–they wanted you to hate White America. The Jew news is always Race War.
Adolf Hitler was not controlled opposition what bollox
he put the german rothschilds in prison
The vid shown below ofa black gang attacking and robbing passing white folk
is why putin will not allow them into russia
http://www.renegadetribune.com/shocking-video-shows-2-men-beaten-robbed-while-women-twerk-over-unconscious-bodies/
To Margaret Taylor–Hitler killed only White people and helped to set up “Israel”.
Lewis Jones conveniently forgets that it was Britain (Balfour Declaration) in 1917 that made a contract with the Zionists (Rothschild et al) to establish a Jewish State in Palestine. This was arranged before the world even knew of Hitler & prior to the inception of the NSDAP. Hitler had nothing to do with creating ‘Israel’, since it was a British-Zionist project all along. Even after WWII ended, the British aided their Jewish allies in migrating to Palestine & combating Arab resistance, until the Jews repaid their British allies by blowing hundreds of them up & the British left in 1948.
Hitler was actually opposed to any Jewish State in Palestine, for he was aligned with the Grand Mufti, who resided in Berlin during the war.
http://theunhivedmind.com/UHM/hitler-was-a-zionist/
Also Mr. Jones neglects to mention that it was Britain/France that started the war against Germany, so they’re the ones ultimately responsible for the deaths of millions of white gentiles, not Hitler.
@Erik Blessing…keep believing in your Jewish ‘savior’…
Nico x: Hitler was a British agent.
Peter Appleby: Very astute observation.
“keep believing in your Jewish ‘savior’”…
And the irrefutable evidence that he was Jewish?
Carl Jones,
And your irrefutable evidence for this statement from untainted sources.
“Hitler was a British agent.”
And your irrefutable evidence from untainted sources?
@ Erik Blessing
The National Socialists originally wanted to settle Jews in Madagascar, so I supposed they were Madagascar nationalists according to your double think. Duh!
The Final Solution was the resettlement of Jews outside German territory as they had no other option but to go along with this “Transfer Agreement”. How does that make them Zionists, unless you are the local village idiot?
No one who is informed questions this? So what is your point?
Another intellectually challenged idiot posted on another thread, that Goebbels secretary was homosexual. So by a big leap of the imagination Adolf Hitler was Homosexual, and the halfwit Goy believed it.
All of this nonsense has been debunked many times, but these IDIOTS keep repeating in.
If you repeated this behaviour in School you would be considered a child with learning difficulties; and there are a few of them posting on here and not contributing anything of worth, but trying to hold every one back. What are their motives thinking people should be asking?
The bottom line is that we are now in crisis, and not moving forward; and recognising real issues like usury which the National Socialists succeeded in abolishing and transforming the lives of the German people.
But these idiots, trolls, or Hasbara keep repeating it hoping there are enough losers, dead beats and no hopers like themselves who believe such self-evident nonsense.
I would like to ask each of them what they have contributed to further understanding of unfolding events other than to give their worthless lives meaning, to make their wretched selves feel better.
It is notable that http://www.christiansfortruth.com does not entertain these cranks.
@Bryan..I guess you’ve never read your own New Testament. For if you have, you wouldn’t be asking me this question. The NT reveals that Jesus was a circumcised rabbi (Luke 2:21; Mark 9:5) who went to Synagogue (Luke 4:16) & taught ‘Salvation is from the Jews’ (John 4:22) All the Apostles were Jewish too. Just read your Bible.
@Carl Jones..you’ve probably been reading too many anti-Hitler Makow articles. From reading the comments by most of these anti-Hitler individuals, they’re usually either Christians or Jews. They have issues with Hitler because he was anti-Christian & anti-Semitic, so they dream up stories that he was some ‘agent’ etc..
“1917/Balfour Declaration/before the world even knew of Hitler”
Historical fact: Adolph Hitler lived in Liverpool from November 1912-April 1913.
Bryan: no such thing as an untainted source. By expounding an idea or theory, one hopes to expose more truth. Your reply kinda proves what I’m saying is closer to the truth than you are, even thought you don’t expand your thinking.
Nico x: I don’t hold Makow in very high esteem. Mind you, been reading his stuff for a very long time, but I am no supporter of Makow, & he’s had no influence on me regarding WW2 or Hitler.
@ Nico X,
I have in fact read the new testament, so that is an erroneous statement to make.
Luke 2:21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
Circumcision was common among the population as a whole in the middle East for hygiene reasons at this time, so proves nothing.
Mark 9:5 does not mention this. “Peter said to Jesus, ‘Rabbi, it is good for us to be here. Let us put up three shelters–one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah.'” Rabbi at the time meant teacher by the way.
Luke 4:16 He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He was bought up in Nazareth which suggests he was a Nazarene.
John 4:22. King James Version … Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.
These Jews you are referring to are not the Jews of the Bible, but in fact are the Scribes, Pharisees and Seduces of the time. Also the vast majority of Jews today are imposters who call themselves Jews but are not.
Revelation3:9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie — behold, I will make them to come and worship at thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. So anti-Semitism is a misnomer as they are and were not Semitic.
These Jews today are imposters and are not the Biblical Jews of the Bible.
What is difficult to understand about this?
I am not here to argue but to establish the truth. There are many versions of the Bible so we have to try and establish the truthful authentic translation.
The Bible is a large book, and even careful readers can interpret it in a variety of ways. But not all of these ways are Christian ways of understanding.
Adolf Hitler did not go around denouncing Christianity because he knew he would never convert people this way; as politics is the art of the possible.
“From reading the comments by most of these anti-Hitler individuals, they’re usually either Christians or Jews. They have issues with Hitler because he was anti-Christian & anti-Semitic, so they dream up stories that he was some ‘agent’ etc.”.
You are correct about these individuals who let their religious beliefs get in the way of truth, and are blinded by dogma. So they are certainly not Truth-seekers.
Adolf Hitler was for a large part of his life a practicing Catholic, and believed Christianity was a force for good. National Socialists were slowly introducing Pantheism in Germany and these diehard “Christians” could tolerate this. This is why Admiral Wilhelm Canaries of the Abwehr was so blinded by hate he was prepared to destroy the German war effort by passing on secrets to the allies. He was a traitor to the German people and cause.
Buddhism = God is in everything.
Pantheism = God is in everything.
Jesus Christ: In my father’s house are many mansions. He is in my house, and I am in his house. He is all in all.
These dogmatic “Christians” are just religious zealots, akin to Muslim zealots, Marxist’s, Darwinists and other belief systems which are designed to divide and rule, and these blinkered people never get it, and never will.
What happened to Christs teachings of abiding in the truth?
“Historical fact: Adolph Hitler lived in Liverpool from November 1912-April 1913.”
And the evidence for this?
And if he did,? Why did he commit a crime by living in Liverpool?
@ Carl Jones,
See my last post and get up to speed!
“Historical fact: Adolph Hitler lived in Liverpool from November 1912-April 1913.”
There is not the slightest evidence that Adolf Hitler had any idea of the Balfour Declaration and he was an unknown at this time and could not speak English as there is no record if this.
You are making fool of yourself and grasping at straws like a drowning man.
All truth is relative, and no absolute truth exists; and other bullshit.
“The whole concept of “relative truth” sounds tolerant and open-minded. However, upon closer analysis, it is not open-minded at all. In essence, to say that “God exists for you but not for me” is to say that the other person’s concept of God is wrong. It passes judgment. But no one really believes that all truth is relative. No sane person says, “Gravity works for you, but not for me,” and proceeds to jump off tall buildings believing no harm will follow”.
You see…even after their own Hebrew Bible proves them wrong, these Christians still persist in their Semitic delusions. Thus there’s no point in debating these people. And now they want you to believe the Nazis viewed Christianity as a ‘force for good’. More nonsense…for in 1941 the Nazi Party Chancellery issued an edict to all Gauleiters that: “National Socialism & Christianity are irreconcilable.” Hitler was born a Catholic, but like many, he rejected Christianity as an adult.
“Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. –Hitler
Bryan: Hitler was based around Tavistock area, while he was in the UK being prepared for his WW2 role.
I’ve no interested in being up to someone else’s speed. Speed is relative, you should be at your destination by now & you’ll know ‘everything’.
I am not getting bogged down with all this as I have a life to live.
You are being very selective with your quotes, so are not seeing the complete picture, and taking things out of context to suit your belief system, like a lot of posters on here.
“As a Christian, I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.” In a 1928 speech, he said: “We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity … in fact our movement is Christian.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler#:~:text=As%20a%20Christian%2C%20I%20have,fact%20our%20movement%20is%20Christian.%22
“In short, there is overwhelming evidence that Hitler saw himself as a Christian doing God’s work (even if his own church often opposed him), and that he saw atheism as one of many insults to the German nation requiring ruthless suppression.”
https://inference-review.com/letter/hitlers-christianity
“Around 1937, when Hitler heard that at the instigation of the party and the SS vast numbers of his followers had left the church because it was obstinately opposing his plans, he nevertheless ordered his chief associates, above all Goering and Goebbels, to remain members of the church. He too would remain a member of the Catholic Church he said, although he had no real attachment to it. And in fact he remained in the church until his suicide”.
— Extract from Inside the Third Reich, the memoir of Albert Speer
“Despite how often Christian apologists try to argue that Adolf Hitler is an example of the evil caused by atheism and secularism, the truth is that Hitler often proclaimed his own Christianity, how much he valued Christianity, how important Christianity was to his life, and even how much he was personally inspired by Jesus – his “Lord and Saviour.” There is plenty of evidence that he was critical of Christian churches for seeking independence from the state, but his vision of “Positive Christianity” was significant to him.”
https://www.learnreligions.com/adolf-hitler-on-christianity-quotes-248190
“Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. –Hitler.
This was towards the end of the war when he got exasperated with the likes of Karl Doenitz the German admiral, and other dogmatic Christians who were all hindering his war efforts; which is totally understandable. And you should have noted that none of my posts are dogmatic, as dogma is the root cause of our problems.
There is overwhelming evidence that he was building positive Christianity in Germany, and was totally opposed to mainstream Christianity with its dogmas, as I am.
Lean to separate the wheat from the chaff!
@ Carl Jones,
OK! If that makes you feel better.
@ Carl Jones,
Some claim Adolf Hitler went to Argentina after the war. Others claim he went to Spain; and others claim he went to Scotland.
And all claim “evidence” for their tin foil hat conspiracy theories.
They are all delusional cranks like you!
“Historical fact: Adolph Hitler lived in Liverpool from November 1912-April 1913.”
” Hitler was based around Tavistock area, while he was in the UK being prepared for his WW2 role”.
There are a lot of fools on here exposing their stupidity and gross ignorance for every passer by to see.
You have to be a special kind of stupid to buy in to this hocus pocus.