Kit Knightly – Off-Guardian Aug 16, 2021
The latest IPCC report on climate change was released last week, and has signalled a sea-change in the ongoing “big issue”. The Pandemic was fun while it lasted, but it’s time it faded back and we got on with the next stage.
That’s not just my interpretation either, they are quite literally saying it themselves.
Usually, when there’s a big narrative shift looming, you can find one key article that tells you everything you need to know about the plan. For the IPCC report, it’s this iNews article by Andrew Marr. Where he literally uses the phrase “hinge to climate from Covid” several times:
There is a great turn coming, a change in the terms of political debate, a period of hinge. We are swinging from the many months of coronavirus obsession into an autumn which will be dominated, rightly, by the climate emergency. But much of what we have learned from Covid-19 – about the state, authority, journalism and civil society – is directly applicable to what’s coming next.”
The media have, naturally, been full of headlines on the IPCC report, with varying degrees of alarmism and insanity.
“It’s now or never!” screams the Guardian as a “climate reckoning” is upon us. The Sun calls it a “full fledged arson attack on the planet!”
But none of them outline just what the next few months have in store for us better than Marr. The goblinoid face of the establishment, who nauseatingly cheered on Blair in Iraq, can always be relied upon to keep on message. He’s always right there saying the right thing at the right time. And this piece is no exception.
He headlines “Treat people like grown-ups and they will fight climate change like Covid-19”, adding [our emphasis]:
Education works. We are following the science and as we continue to do so, we will successfully tackle climate-change issues in the same way we faced down the coronavirus.”
He never outright states what this “same way” is, exactly, but it’s not really hard to imagine what he means. His article isn’t about the future, anyway, it’s all about the past.
It’s tracking the tools deployed during the “pandemic”, and how effective they were. A performance review for the politicians and “journalists” who have successfully parlayed a “virus” that poses almost zero danger to the general public into a full-fledged remodelling of society.
He points out how politicians under-estimated how willingly people would leverage their freedoms:
To begin with [Western leaders] worried that voters would not accept restrictions on their liberties for the greater good. By and large, they were wrong. […] This shaped how Germans, Americans, the French and British – and many more – responded, and allowed societies to change direction faster than anyone would have predicted.”
How easily the media were able to spread misinformation that controlled public opinion:
The media, so often blamed for almost everything, found new ways to explain complex scientific arguments in ways that most people understood.”
And how these lessons can be applied to messaging on climate change going forward:
This is a core lesson that needs to be learned, as we hinge from Covid to climate. Public understanding of science has become a security issue. Without it, there will be no public support for the hard decisions on transport, heating and land use.”
The whole thing reads that way, like a cross between a press release and a progress report. Appearing a blithe opinion piece to the uninitiated, but having a clear second layer of meaning to those who know how to read it.
There are throwaway lines propping up globalism (“how little nature notices national borders”), and brief praise for China’s authoritarian government vs the West’s “slapdash” approach and “tardy lockdowns”, but those are B plots.
The story here is “hey guys, this all worked much better than we thought it would, we could do the same thing for climate change”.
Does this mean that the pandemic is over?
Not “over”, but certainly on the decline. It’s obvious that the press are prepping the groundwork to leave Covid behind, and turn their focus to the next stage of the Great Reset.
But, all that said, it will be a difficult sell. Harder than Covid, in some ways, because people are so much more used to climate alarm calls. For want of a better word, they have become somewhat immune to it.
What’s more, the establishment clearly knows this, because they’re keeping the pandemic warm on the backburner. Ready to bring it back to the boil should the need arise.
We’re being told the disease will be endemic, but that “Delta has changed the endgame” and that “herd immunity is impossible”
The pandemic is becoming a new forever war, akin to the war on terror. We won’t ever win it, but it will disappear from headlines until they need to shock or distract people.
Marr, for example, doesn’t declare the pandemic over, instead he says:
The pandemic is not, of course, yet over. It will end raggedly and slowly; and politicians who proclaim victory will quickly sound foolish[…]it will probably feel as if we have beaten this thing.
Before adding the ubiquitous riders that will keep the “threat” of the Covid alive in the public imagination:
The Delta variant may be the most contagious virus ever [and] can reinfect the double-vaccinated […] Britain is going to face a period of “bumpiness” in transmission rates and uncertainty about the near future […] the winter may be tough […] Booster jabs will become routine.”
There’s clearly a plan in place. He practically spells it out, claiming Covid19 will be pushed off the front pages…
Though not every day…this will be bumpy. There will be sudden scares about the emergence of a possible new variant somewhere unexpected; and urgent questions about biosecurity at Heathrow. There will be stories about outbreaks in care homes, or a sudden spike in infections in particular age or ethnic groups.
Do you see what he’s saying yet?
The pandemic isn’t over, it will just “feel” like it is, while they fill the front pages with big red numbers about climate change.
If people don’t respond to those big red numbers the way they should…well, there just might be another variant. Maybe a racist one.
The pandemic has served its purpose, but they won’t end it yet. Not until they’re sure everyone is good and scared of something else.
So what comes next?
It’s not hard to see exactly where this all leads. Mostly because they’re telling us.
Establishment voices have already talked about “climate lockdowns”, and the UK’s Science Advisor Patrick Vallance wrote, last week, about how:
nothing short of transforming society will avert catastrophe”
This isn’t new. This has been bubbling along in the background for months (I have already written two articles about it), but the message is being refined into a simple three-step process:
- Point out all the ways Covid and climate change are similar.
- Emphasise that Climate Change is much more of a threat than Covid. Use the word “existential. A lot.
- Argue that since we were willing to change to fight Covid, we should do the same for climate.[optional]
You can see it in Marr’s article.
The comparison:
The interesting thing is that so much of the world’s experience during the pandemic relates quite closely to the climate crisis – our human interrelatedness, the importance of effective governance, the centrality of science and its communication.
Followed by the “covid is worse” [my emphasis]:
Of course, the two challenges are different. So far, a little over 4.3 million people have died from Covid. Australian and Chinese academics estimate that around five million people are dying each year from the effects of climate change […] Suffice it to say that even if the Delta variant is the most infectious disease mankind has so far faced, the climate emergency is at another level – a reshaper of geography, highly unpredictable and, in short, existential for the planet and its inhabitants.
Patrick Vallance does the same in his article in the Guardian, and then again in The Times. There are several others along the same lines, such as this one from the Hill, or this one from the International Monetary Fund.
It’s also apparent that the same tactics of demonising any opposition and attempting to turn it into an opportunity to virtue-signal will be used. There are lots of articles comparing “covid denial” and “climate denial”, or otherwise attempting to politicise the issue.
So, the way they’re going to talk about (or should we say say “market”?) climate change action is fairly clear. But what are these hypothetical actions going to be?
Are we seeing any hints as to what this “transformation of society” might entail? Or what these “tough decisions” could be?
Well, there were whispers of climate lockdowns, but they have died away since the outraged reaction. There’s always talk of other schemes, like limiting flights, outlawing beef and “personal carbon allowances”, but these are hardly new.
Andrew Marr’s article contains a couple of hints. But the only specific policy he mentions is forcing households to replace their boilers (“at a high cost to millions of families”), and this somewhat creepy allusion to the importance of the Deep State:
A final lesson is that Westminster and the state are two very different things. The state includes the NHS, national science labs, networks of experts […] I now feel we should spend less time on the distracting national puppet show and more time thinking about what I might delicately call the deeper sources of authority.”
(Attacking democracy for hampering “drastic efforts” is a concerning trend, one to watch out for)
Mostly, though, the mainstream voices are being very quiet on specifics. I suspect partly to stop the spread of what Marr calls “an outbreak of conspiracy theories in new media”, but mostly because they’re not sure exactly what they want to do yet, and they don’t believe the majority mentally prepared enough.
The COP26 Climate Summit in Glasgow, this November, will be something to keep an eye on. Expect a lot of scary stories in the weeks leading up to it, and then a lot of “policy recommendations” in its wake.
We’re pivoting to climate change guys. Great Reset Phase II is upon us.
—
Can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media
Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.
It is rather simple to deduce that all the self-inflicted climate mess we are in is due to de-forestation and disrespect of nature and its gifts and Covid-19 directly exaggerates the problem.
Of course you might have seen during lockdowns when people invade retail outlets and stores and actually fight over… toilet paper. Not beer or food but toilet paper.
Now that paper is not made say from common and readily available surplus materials like sugarcane fibers but these toilet papers come directly from felled living trees.
Can you imagine a world without trees ?
Please correct me if my assumptions are wrong.
The most extreme draconian tyrannical measures being taken against citizens appear to occur within the Anglo countries, those whose head of state is the Queen and these Canada, Australia and New Zealand and their slave colonies like the outdated Monarchs and make-believe Kings and Queens of other tyrannical societies who pledge allegiance to them.
With the exception of France we never hear of so much deafening noise other than the Anglo ones, why ?
Could it be that they are doing this to distract public attention away from the implosion and discrediting of their Monarchy as ‘just another perv’ issues surrounding them royal families ?
I mean who would care for their little sexually disoriented antics when the bulk of their population are dropping like flies from ‘poisoned chalice’ vaccinations ?
The arrogance of Marr is breathtaking. The big problem for the Globalists is that their Covid plans did not work out as intended. Blowback is growing, and as the die offs ramp up in the Autumn, this will intensify.
As far as the Climate Change agenda goes, not everyone agrees that this is man made. The sun remains the biggest cause of climate changes. We are entering a grand solar minimum period, and the effects of this are unclear. Then there is weather manipulation which has been going on for decades. Nefarious entities have been using weather manipulation as a weapon across the world. Increasing rainfall substantially has been one obvious activity. It has become so commonplace, that experts cannot differentiate between normal weather patterns and manipulation from the likes of HAARP.
Before steps are taken to tax the public yet again using their lies about climate change, there has to be a public debate involving all climate scientific views. The Globalists will have to prove their models are 100% accurate, not just convenient fiction.
I was very disappointed and then angry, and then resigned, about public compliance at Easter 2020, but, unfortunately, we cannot just write the public off as stupid, because we are tied to them, living in their world, but I do see them as an alien life form. My hope that they had been getting wise in the last twenty years was dashed last year, and, if they are now, it is horribly sluggish, and they look like lapping up the climate lies.
USRAHELLs deep state torches arson since
some years with space laser DEweapon :
CALIFORNIA; OREGON; SOUTH EUROPA;
AUSTRALIA !
SIBERIA TOO !
Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observers (YouTube & Web) completely trashed the IPCC report, so much so that NASA hit back and Ben did a repost video where he destroyed them again.
The IPCC ignores huge swaths of science and cherry picks to make its point.
They are desperate when growing numbers now know that the climate is controlled by our Sun and the galactic current sheet, and they wack the Earth every 12,000yrs, or so.
Imagine that elites realise there are major events which they have no control over, no solutions, & no political will to try & save even a fraction of the sheeple.
They’ve spent trillions, especially in the US where they’ve built massive underground facilities, often under mountains. The fake news tells us these are military bases, of course, this is just a cover. Why would you put large numbers of military personnel who are heavily male biased, into large underground bases? It doesn’t make sense. Not only that, these facilities are not fit for purpose, to survive the effects caused by our Sun micronova.
Here in the UK, they are carrying our a so called restoration of the Palace of Westminster which is going to cost countless trillions. How much of this spend is actually going on the restoration? How much is being spent on elite survival facilities?
As for Covid, this ruse has many objectives, talk about using one rock to kill 20 birds, because this is the reality. I’ll just dwell on one of those birds. Draconian rules/laws are conditioning the sheeple for coming events that are beyond human control.
I read a good saying when David Icke used it in an article. “If you believe in the economy but not the environment try holding your breath while counting your money.”
They have been geoengineering the atmosphere for decades by spraying an array of chemicals to control the weather (think drought in western US for one) which can be used militarily (Iran has stated at the UN that the US has used drought as a weapon against their country). There may be other purposes. Psychopaths run the world, all governments are criminal organizations except a few and their leaders are assassinated or removed somehow. There’s an agenda happening in the world, deep societal changes, it’s all connected. We’re running out of time.
GeoengineeringWatch.com.
Yes, global warming turns to another ice age… after the ‘dark star’ (burnt out brown dwarf) passes by, short pause and then the regular, 3600yr main body comet cluster pushed by a galactic ‘wave’, only not the usual 12k type, but the longer term 309900 type… that first brought ‘modern man’ to this planet in its Eden state… first the ‘good’ shepherds, then the apple/temptation to much greater experiences, 100x more, thus the ‘Fall’ as the ‘dark’ shepherds took over and Eden became Purgatory. That’s the symbolism of events. What is near at hand is the endgame as Mother Nature is approaching to close the current school term, thus the Grand Reset… can the Satanist/negative polarity maintain control of the chaos they generate to push the planet into the next level/density of study? How many will ‘graduate’ to each side? Remember how Marx said it all comes down the decisions of a small minority? That minority is those that have really woken up, made their Choice and empower it…. the rest will recycle. This is what Davidson sees in that 12k galactic wave sequence, but within it is the 3600 main body comet cluster as well as those smaller cluster remnants that have devastating effect regionally, such as when they took out Western Rome… a few centuries later taking out Eastern/Byzantinian Rome when the psychos Justinian and his wife ruled and wanted to redo the whole empire…. remember how the surging Moslem empire waited so long before moving north to take Byzantium? Have you read of the plague the comets brought? This time is different, not the usual reset within the school, but a change in the ‘schoolhouse’ itself… another level of experience… another spatial dimension will arrive etc.
So, of course NASA et al have to adjust to the reality of existence, trying hard to maintain control along the way, gaslighting etc… spreading chaos globally, as it’s what they feed off of, so expect a lot more of it as they to ensure their continued dominance and control, even as TSHTF and they have to hide DEEP underground. Said to start before the end of ’27… so, sometime between now and then, the ‘curtain’ will start to fall. There is a method to the apparent madness of life here in Purgatory, Platos Cave, the Maze, the Matrix… a game or school for each fractal of consciousness to wake up and face reality… to ‘know thyself’…. as above, so below. etc. Keep your eyes on the prize… the ‘brass ring’ etc…. stay focused on your Choice… positive or negative… the two polarities will be going their separate ways soon. Tree of Life… first the positive, then the negative, then you make your Choice. So, of course, the current PTB want to limit your ability to think straight, to keep you distracted, same as always, only this time it’s “for all the marbles”. Time really is running out., stressing themselves out as well as the rest of us…
COVID, Climate Change, Carbon Footprints, Red Meat, White Privilege, War on Drugs, War on Terror…on and on it goes. Always some bogeyman out there to induce fear, panic & hysteria. Meanwhile, our rights, freedom and liberties are taken away, piece by piece, not to mention the horrific damage to other so-called hostile nations around the globe. Money, Power, Influence are the greatest challenges we face and the people that so willingly want to exert, employ and use their powers to enforce their will on the people. The fuse to the powder keg is already lit. When the whole shebang blows is the question.
Has anybody wondered why the global warming hysteria had been very quiet for the last few years but, the press has recently started up the alarmist rhetoric again?
If you are curious about this conundrum you should look up ‘Climategate’. This relates to the court scientists which were propagating all the alarmist rhetoric. A whistleblower hacked into their e-mails, a number of years ago, which showed these ‘scientists’ manipulating the data and peer review system, even outright lying about the data and laughing about it. Laughing about manipulating the raw data which is being used to change our lifes for the worse and costing us incredible amounts of money!
Over a thousand e-mails sent between the court scientists were put out by a whistle blower
An e-mail from Phil Jones, head ‘scientist at the Climate Research Unit , university of East Anglia to Michael Mann of Pennsylvania state university;
“P.S. I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a freedom of information act!”
These two people were Canadians Ross Mckitrick, a statician and Steve McIntyre an engineer. They were asking Jones for the raw data so they could replicate his findings.
E-mail from Phil Jones;
“ McIntyre and McKitrick have been after the Climatic Research Unit data for years. If they ever hear there is a freedom of information act now in the United Kingdom, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send it to anyone.”
E-mail from Phil Jones February 21st 2005;
“Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it.”
Guess what. McIntyre and McKitrick filed an FOI . Jones replied they had lost most of the data whilst moving office. Uneffingbelievable!
E-mail from Phil Jones;
“Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith regarding the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report? Keith will do likewise.”
E-mail from Phil Jones;
“I’ve just completed Mike’s nature trick of adding in the real temperatures to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”
Thus, manipulating the raw data.
E-mail from Michael Mann to Phil Jones;
“So what do we do about this? I think we have to stop considering ‘Climate Research’ as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in this journal. We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board”
E-mail from Phil Jones to Mike Mann July 18th 2004
“The other paper by MM is just garbage- as you knew. De Freitas again. Pielke is also losing all credibility aswell by replying to the mad Finn as well- frequently as I see it. I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow- even if we have to redefine what the peer review literature is!”
reply from Phil Jones;
“I will be e-mailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.
There we have it, these court scientists were attempting to corrupt the peer review principles.
This could also be a sign of they waking up to the fact that there could be huge ADE (antibody dependency enhancement) problems to come with the vaccines. That is what all the deaths with the animal experiments told them. Even with only a distinct possibility of that occurring they would need another crisis to deflect everyone’s attention.
The people running the world not only are huge insider-trading crooks, using all knowledge for their own advancement and interests, but they are all so dishonest even with each other that everything they do now is a complete Fk up.