RT – July 23, 2021
The staff of the hospital in Montelimar, in the French department of Drome, have gone on indefinite strike to protest the new rules demanding they take a vaccine against Covid-19 by mid-September or face losing their jobs.
The strike against “forced vaccination” was announced on Thursday by the CGT-GHPP trade union, and affects some 200 doctors and 1,500 nurses in the southeastern French city.
Hundreds of them gathered outside the hospital on Friday, denouncing lockdowns and vaccine mandates and chanting “liberté!” (freedom).
Hôpital de Montélimar en ce moment: Pour protester contre l’obligation vaccinale des #soignants , le personnel de l’hôpital de Montélimar a entamé une grève illimitée. #PasseSanitaire pic.twitter.com/BFX29w8qB7
— LE GÉNÉRAL🗨 (@_LEGENERALOFF) July 23, 2021
The French legislature is finalizing the proposal that would require all medical professionals in contact with the vulnerable to be fully vaccinated by September 15, or else lose their salaries and even their jobs.
“We are against mandatory vaccination and vaccine coercion,” Elsa Ruillere, local union representative, told Sputnik France. “There is no choice between tests or vaccination: vaccination is compulsory. No, we don’t agree. We want to have the choice like the rest of the world and we do not want compulsory vaccination.”
Ruillere says her union supports “free and informed consent” and is not against vaccination on principle but is against coercion. Some of the medical workers said they are waiting for the French-made Sanofi-GSK vaccine, promised for December.
Dans la Drôme, les personnels hospitaliers soignants et non-soignants de la CGT de l'hôpital de Montélimar ont appelé à une grève illimitée contre le vaccin imposé aux soignants#ApollineMatin pic.twitter.com/S7tGhnpcgn
— RMC (@RMCinfo) July 22, 2021
We are well aware of the evolution of the virus. We do not take it lightly,” Ruillere said. However, she and her striking colleagues point out that even with the rise in positive tests for the Delta variant of the coronavirus, there is no commensurate rise in hospitalizations.
“Yes, we turned ‘red’ but that’s in fact due to the positive tests. In terms of hospitalizations, we are fine at the moment, we did not need to reopen beds, we have far fewer hospitalized people than before and fewer people in intensive care,” she added.
Another union gripe is the lack of public debate, since France’s National Assembly seems to have simply proceeded on the advice of the High Health Authority (HAS), which called the vaccination mandate “justified.”
There have been widespread protests in France since mid-July, as the government of President Emmanuel Macron imposed the vaccination mandate on health workers and introduced a “health pass” requirement to access public venues with more than 50 people in attendance. The pass requirement will extend to cafes, restaurants and shops starting August 1.
There has been a 150% increase in coronavirus cases over the past week in France, attributed to the Delta variant. The government says 96% of those infected are unvaccinated.
It’s interesting that they don’t want the killer jabs but they go along with the scam about “the virus” and about “the test” and the “cases”.
But they don’t mind getting paid to shoot other people up right?
So does this mean. ?
That if minuscule micron redacts the requirement,
These medics will go back to work & carry out the draconian agenda,
or.
Do they renounces the practice, & refuse to carry out the mandate on any & everyone.
Indefinitely?
We all know these idiots want graphene mind controlled slaves via the vax.But we not interested in their plan for global mind control and tyranical medical enslaved state.Moving on,just not interested in what u selling.Goodbye.
“Yes, we turned ‘red’ but that’s in fact due to the positive tests”
The US CDC is eliminating the test as of Dec 31 because it is inadequate. This is so funny! We conspiracy theorists have tried to warn about the fraudulent test but were demonized and marginalized.
Now it’s Conspiracy Fact. One has to wonder how many conspiracy theories becoming conspiracy facts does it take to convince the masses we actually are credible.
All Lies: White Supremacy bent on killing off billions. There is a reset on going. The rich will find themselves at the end of the GUN. Laugh now, it is a SPIRITUAL world. You know no secrets.
There is no virus.
Mass Psychology
Psychological Warfare
Mind Control
Mass Hypnosis
Social Engineering
Behavior Modification.
Take back your birthright.
THE PEOPLE OF THE LIE by Dr. Scott Peck
Mystic And Yogi
https://twitter.com/WAPFLondon/status/1419968605593247760
Weston A. Price Foundation, London 🏴@WAPFLondon
Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0136-judgment.pdf
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent “may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery”. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1545.html
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask “mandate” exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make choices that will affect their health and well being on proper information.
2. Sufficient information means informing the patient of the availability of other treatments (and forms of testing).
3. That the patient is informed of the material risks of taking the medical intervention and the material risks of declining it.
If consent is given but the Patient subsequently proves that information provided at the time breached the above common law test of informed consent, the Tort of battery is committed and the medication is unlawful.
The High Court has found children incapable of providing Gillick Competency for experimental medicines with unknown long term effects. Schools therefore risk being sued for battery if ignoring Parental preferences. See Bell v Tavistock [2020] EWHC 3274 https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Judgment.pdf
These principles are discussed without reference to case law on this important NHS page on Free and Informed Consent and Gillick Competency.
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/
The fundamental common law right to free and informed consent, based on the ancient Tort of battery (tresspass to the person), are valid in all 16 Commonwealth Realms and both the Republic of Ireland and USA, where English common law is retained as a body of law.
In Ireland, evidence that English common law rights are retained can be found in the Statute Revision Act (2007) which retained Magna Carta and most of the English Bill of Rights (1688) and much, much more.
http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2007/act/28/enacted/en/html
In USA, English common law rights are retained by the 9th Amendment of the Constitution “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”, hence why US courts refer to them.
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-9/
Law that provides rights sit above normal laws in English law and provide lawful excuse to statutory obligations with this acknowledged by courts. see Art.29 Magna Carta (1297), which states: “we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right.” https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/XXIX
Another case to read is Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62 regarding Doctor’s obligation to provide information to inform consent. https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2017/62.html