Mike Adams – Natural News July 1, 2021
A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.” Just as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:
- Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
- Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose.
Here’s how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters. (You have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as “stillbirths” and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their “spontaneous abortions” calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a “spontaneous abortion” in the first 20 weeks, since they weren’t vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren’t time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn’t be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.
The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, “How to lie with statistics,” because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, “What percentage of lemons are yellow?” The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, then they declare, “50% of lemons are yellow” because it’s 50/100.
But the other 50 pieces of fruit can’t possibly be included because they’re limes, not lemons. So the correct math is 50/50, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That’s the correct answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a “spontaneous abortion” can occur. And since pregnant women aren’t time travelers, they can’t go back in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can’t do this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — then “science” has already failed its core promise: to offer “evidence-based” conclusions to understand the world around us.
Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.6%. Why? Because they’re covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.
In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is also named in numerous other studies that claim to document adverse reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant risk of adverse events? For example, here’s another study he co-authored: “Adverse events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013.”
That study concluded, “Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns after TIV-ID.”
But is that conclusion based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this same study architect has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn’t be the first time one author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn’t that what the “scientific method” demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can’t just accept bad math and call it “science” when the bad math doesn’t check out.
Spike protein injections into pregnant women an “atrocity,” warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, it’s clear that 4 out of 5 pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the small data set we have so far). And that means the “depopulation” aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such as the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should be no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to be aborted. He calls it an “atrocity” and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is “shameful.” You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b<6ab9d97
—
All this means that live births may plummet by 3.2 million over the next year, in the USA alone, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching “holocaust” levels, which is why this is being called a medical “atrocity.”
The fields of medicine and science have turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden’s land management czar once characterized human children as an “environmental hazard.”
This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere “crimes against humanity.” It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire human race by the institutions of science and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to aid humanity, but are now clearly shown to be working towards humanity’s destruction.
Learn more in today’s mind-opening Situation Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
—
And guess how the depopulation will be rectified. – By drawing immigrants and migrants into the first world countries from the third world countries. I have a feeling that the third world populations are not being vaccinated now and won’t be vaccinated in the future.
It’s perhaps fitting for our leaders that further to charges of War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity we can add a new charge of Crimes Against the Unborn. By definition this would include the mistreatment of expectant mothers and not just the child. This will certainly include the atrocities committed against the Fallujah Babies whose development in the womb was irreparably damaged by Depleted Uranium munitions. This charge most definitely applies to Bush and Blair whose armies used them.
People can be “an environmental hazard” or they can make the world much better. We got the idea of ecological balance from Darwin, but he was also always depressed because he saw in Nature only universal fights to the death. The balance he saw did not benefit any of the things actually living. Women and children, especially, like to give a living thing a better experience.
More dead gentile babies for Yahweh.
The Ein Sof smiles with appreciation for the Jewish Utopia to come.
The extermination of the goyim is now well underway. And yes, third world populations are being vaccinated too. You don’t think that the elite intend to let that rabble overrun the planet, do you?
You’ll notice it will be only white gentile births that are being terminated by the ‘vaccine’….the non-whites will continue increasing…because according to the Semitic Soviet Simian State, only non-whites are ‘indigenous’ to the earth..
What Covid vaccine? Everything the “top-down” boys and girls from the island of The Lord of the Flies are doing is planned and diabolical, and our compliance with their commands is simply irrational and insane. Are there different pokes for different folks? We cannot even know that. And how could we tell. There is no list of contents on the little vaccine vials or in their boxes. All there is is a brand name. No one knows what is really being put into them, not even the people giving the injections.
Our corrupt, lying governments have absolved all the drug companies from the duty of disclosure, and everyone else is absolved from the duty of providing informed consent. To think they would take such risks with billions of sheeple, with anything so “untested”, and when they knew damn well the vaccines were never really necessary in the first place, is beyond any credibility.
There are at least 10 different vaccines out there of the mRNA sort, and do the sheeple demand to know which one they are getting or what they will likely do to them? Of course not. They do not even have a choice of what vaccine brand to take, let alone to know what is in them, or the likely results. They just flood into the inoculation pens and put out their arms.
However, the people in charge ought to know what the likely risks are to be with the next virus to emerge from some bioweapon soup. They ought to know what substances are in each vaccine envelope and what the known risks of those substances are. But they say they do not know any of that, and they keep maintaining the vaccines are necessary for our safety, which on any fair analysis turns out to be irrational and dishonest.
For our alleged “safety” they shut down our lives for 15 months confining us to their lockstep plans hatched by their actual rulers 10 or 20 years ago. The virus was real, and our rulers had to know that it was a US military lab-enhanced virus (an actual bioweapon). They expected more deaths than actually occurred, and as for the lockdowns and all of those harms, rulers will no doubt say they had to “err on the side of caution” even though the actual numbers which came in did not warrant any of the actual restrictions and lockdowns.
Why then, if they were erring on the side of caution did they jack so high the death and case numbers? Why did the interest of maintaining the pandemic panic, fear, and all of the restrictions soon come to outweigh the actual threat of the virus?
According to the head of the Rothschild-Rockefeller-funded World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, the lockdowns, and the economic slowdowns were necessary to give all of our financial, economic, environmental and production systems a rest for the various alleged “Resets” taking place, all in accord with the 1992 UN Agenda 21 blueprint of the power moguls for the 21st century, and their first 17 goals to be achieved by 2030 according to their 2015 announcements in UN Agenda 2030, the fist totalitarian installment of Agenda 21. Schwab promises that by 2030, according to their plans which we the people had no say in formulating, we will own nothing but be supremely happy. Our lives are to be radically transformed by this “top-down” crowd of sociopathic technocrats, and everyone of our governments are in total compliance, and they continue to maintain that all of the restrictions have been necessary for our ‘safety”.
If our governments could err so far on the side of caution to suspend all of our fundamental rights and freedoms on the basis of protecting our safety from a US bioweapon virus inflicted upon us, then why would they not err on the side of caution by preventing people from taking the unnecessary vaccines with so many risks which have come to light? Why would they not also have erred on the side of caution by promoting instead of supressing in our hospitals and nursing homes, the actual treatment protocols which were working since March of 2020? If they were being so cautious for our safety then why would they promote the vaccines they said were untested? Why would they push vaccines on billions and billions of people whose harmful risks they had no knowledge about? Why would they not err on the side of caution and say that until more information was determined about the vaccines they could not be used?
On one hand, they exaggerated the death and case numbers not for our safety or to err on the side of caution, but rather to prolong the lockdown restrictions, sticking to the global script, and to maintain the pretext of a “pandemic”, not only for the financial and UN resets, but also to ensure that most of the people in the world would be injected with one of their vaccines.
The corrupt, irresponsible, script-reading, puppet rulers of our nations, will no doubt claim they had no idea of the actual risks of the vaccines because of the emergency conditions. They will do so despite their obvious efforts to artificially and fraudulently maintain those very emergency conditions as a pretext to force the vaccines and other measures on their people. They trust the sheeple never to connect any dots in any important matter. Although they may claim not to know the actual harms of the vaccines, and even if they have made any effort to track and coordinate harmful effects and deaths from the vaccines, they are not making any of that information public to us. Yet, the vaccines are for our alleged “safety”.
On one hand, our rulers exaggerate the harms of the virus to maintain the pandemic, and on the other hand they continue to distort, conceal, and suppress:
1. the medical/scientific evidence of the actual low risk to 99.9% of the population from the virus;
2. the medical/scientific evidence that only a very-tiny, clearly-identified, and easily-protected segment of the population were ever at risk of anything serious from the virus;
3. the medical/scientific evidence and use of the effective prophylactic & treatment protocols to keep people safe from the virus;
4. the medical/scientific evidence that flu vaccines were unnecessary to protect anyone from anything serious from the virus; and
5. the medical/scientific evidence showing the harms and deaths from the various vaccines.
What is certain is that the overwhelming majority of people have been jabbed and tagged with various vaccine concoctions, the effects of which they have no clue. The real purpose or purposes of the vaccines have little or anything to do with alleged safety from the Covid 19 virus or likely any other virus. If our governments do not know the real purpose of the vaccines or the likely risks, they have no business in allowing them to be administered to anyone. If they do know the real purpose and the likely risks, they ought to tell us,
My view is that they do know the real purpose of the vaccines and the likely risks, and if the vaccines were as benign as the say, then they would tell us that real purpose. Because of their stance on legal impunity regarding the vaccines, saving themselves from all legal harms and risks, while continuing to push the same substances on us which risks they say are unknown, and while they are in fact knowingly concealing all of the risks and harms from the vaccines coming to light, they have no basis now for saying they are erring on the side of caution for our “safety”, let alone maintaining any stance they believed the vaccines to be benign.
In unison, and for this summer we will now see the nations of world taper off of all the Covid restrictions, only to have them re-imposed by mid August or September with some new strain of the virus. If those vaccinated have become more vulnerable to serious symptoms of other flu viruses or diseases, that information will be totally concealed by all of the authorities. Yet, that information is and will continue to be crucial for us to make responsible decisions regarding our vital interests.
Oh come on, you people ! It is all going as per instructions, written in stone ? Georgia Guide-Stone …
Great piece here from the Health Ranger, Mike Adams. And an extremely alarming, but not particularly surprising, one as well.
In a way, I want to say any pregnant woman dumb enough to get injected with the toxic death sludge is getting what they deserve and doing humanity a favor by not reproducing stupid. But with that being said, any quack “doctor” who would recommend to a pregnant patient they get “vaccinated” with that sh!t should be thrown into the street and nailed to a tree, and any “health care” provider reckless enough to inject a pregnant woman with the toxic death sludge should be prosecuted for murder.
Bu,,,but,,, the vaccine is safe and effective!
Fred B, 7/3/2021, 1938 I agree with your analysis. To form your opinions and reach your conclusions, I do not think you necessarily have to accept the premise “virus is/was real” and|or “a bioweaponized entity from some Level IV or V laboratory”, some or all of the dozens if not hundreds of such facilities appear working in cahoots. I set aside for present purposes of discussion legitimate challenges to the entire axiomatic foundation of “modern virology”.
In my opinion, the apparent fact that no one has isolated , identified, and structurally characterized such a “virus” — work well within the scope, funding level, and (one would assume) interests of relevant Power$ That Be — strongly supports the theory of “no actual virus”. Wouldn’t the whole pandemic (psychological) operation have been fortified and leveraged by such robust, scientific findings, replicated many times in other laboratories?! Then the party line becomes “Sure it was a dud THIS TIME — low lethality, in fact comparable to the usual ‘flu bug(s)’ that make annual rounds — but how about the NEXT TIME?? All our practice and all our experience gained with ‘COVID-19’ and now an expendable SARS-CoV-2 — out of an abundance of caution — would prove worth our sacrifice, then, wouldn’t it?!”
By this time, however, we have putative “variants” of the (likely imaginary) “virus”, which may serve as the equally imaginary “second one” mentioned by smirking, mirthful Bill and Mel. Or the faux “vaccines”, some of which may contain mRNA experimental gene-tampering ingredients, may make those who took the shots more vulnerable to “flu bugs”, even to the “common cold”, with attenuated reactions far more lethal or debilitating than the “vaccines”.
As you so rightly and clearly note, we do not know; we have no means to ascertaining; and chances of finding a biochemist with expertise in genetics and a fully equipped laboratory free to work independently in our interests seem nil. The deployment of multiple kinds of [faux] “vaccines”, including syringes filled with simple saline solutions, would indeed successfully muddy the water (the data) and cover tracks best left unfollowed by the unwashed. For good measure, available data also seemed grossly and obviously falsified from the get-go!
General advice — non-medical indeed, though commonsensical — remains to avoid injection with any and all of the CONcoctions “approved” for emergency use.
As we wait to see how all of this unfolds, we can observe carefully those who have chosen what seems to me a much riskier path: one or two jabs with more in the offing! Most of us, myself included, probably have one or more members of immediate family, close friends, and others who did offer their arm. If the likelihood of experiencing and manifesting direct immediate or longer term adverse effects of the [faux] “vaccines” proves sufficiently low (say, 1 in 1,000), then we might not observe any “bad effects” given the relatively small number of “vaxxed” people we know. In some jurisdictions (Indonesia appears one), for some [experimental] preparations, the incidence of adverse effects, including sudden and unexpected deaths, may be much greater.
This poses a challenging exercise for trained epidemiologists with good data. For us laypersons having no reliable information, it seems an impossible analytical, deductive task. Still, very useful observations have come to light, for example, variations in lethality by “batch number” in VAERS (see https://www.nukepro.net/2021/06/all-covax-have-certain-batches-which.html). The Power$ That Be are not that good (yet) at prolonged planetary fraud; we should expect the truth to leak through, if inadvertently! Chin up, keep on your toes!