Paul Craig Roberts – paulcraigroberts.org June 3, 2021
Was slavery a wrong or an inherited institution?
Did slavery originate in the English colonies in North America in the 17th century or do its origins go back before the time of recorded history?
Is slavery racist or is it based on economic motive?
If a person wants understanding, these are important questions.
But if a person wants to engage others in emotion for the purpose of gaining preferment and its rewards, money and power, or simply to enjoy the self-righteousness of moral denunciation of one’s fellows, these questions are in the way. The fact that these questions are never asked and are not a part of black studies programs in universities or the New York Times’ fake history project–the 1619 Project–is conclusive evidence that today slavery is an emotive word used to demonize white people and to bring preferment to black people.
Slavery is presented to American school children as something that white people did to black people. Therefore, white people are racists and must pay in some way for the slavery of black people that ended in the US 156 years ago.
There are so many unasked questions. For example, how did the blacks brought to North America become slaves? Who enslaved them? The answer, which explodes the narrative, is that blacks were enslaved by other blacks.
The main source of slaves for the slave trade was the black Kingdom of Dahomey. Dahomey engaged in slave wars with other black kingdoms or tribes and became the dominant power.
As Encyclopedia Britiannica says, “Dahomey was organized for war, not only to expand its boundaries but also to take captives as slaves. Slaves were either sold to the Europeans [or Muslims] in exchange for weapons or kept to work the royal plantations that supplied food for the army and court.”
The socialist Karl Polanyi wrote the classic work: Dahomey and the Slave Trade published in 1966. The book does not fit our woke time and the black studies agenda, and it is no longer available in print.
Today Dahomey is known as Benin. On the beach at Ouidah there is a contemporary monument, the Gate of no Return, commemorating the lives of the Africans captured by the black Kingdom of Dahomey and sold to Arabs and Europeans as slaves or traded for firearms.
In other words, the origin of black slaves was black slave traders.
Why did European sea captains bring black slaves to North America? The answer is that there was fertile land capable of producing profitable crops and no labor force. Those who held land grants or charters from the English king needed labor to make the land useable. There was no other work force.
Slaves were brought to the US not because of racism but for economic motives. Black Africans sold other black Africans to merchants for firearms that established Dahomey’s dominance. The merchants sold the slaves as a labor force to those who held land that originated in land grants or charters from the English monarch and had no one to work it. Slavery was established as the agricultural labor force long before the United States existed.
This brings us back to the opening question of this essay. Was slavery a wrong or an inherited institution? Whether or not something is wrong depends on the morality of the time. At the time the black Kingdom of Dahomey and the other blacks with whom Dahomey engaged in slave wars did not consider slavery wrong. Neither did the Arabs who for centuries had raided European coastal towns for white slaves. Neither did the Europeans who brought the purchased slaves to North America. Neither did the colonists who purchased a labor force. Neither did the original slaves, captives who themselves had fought in slave wars.
Slavery had been a fact of life for millenniums. Long before white peoples had black slaves, they had white slaves, and were themselves slaves owned by Arabs. In the late 18th and early 19th centuries North Americans were enslaved when US merchant ships were captured by North African provinces of the Ottoman Empire. For some years the US Congress paid large sums to ransome Americans enslaved in Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli. President Thomas Jefferson tired of it and sent US Naval forces that captured Tripoli and broke up the practice of enslaving captured American merchant ship crews—thus in the US Marines anthem—“to the shores of Tripoli.”
Slavery was everywhere. It was an inherited institution. In the African slave wars, a man could begin the battle a free person and if defeated find himself a slave. A person born to slave parents knew no other life. In North America where slaves comprised the agricultural labor force, everyone was born into a society in which slavery was an established institution. It was the result of a choice made in a distant time when there was no alternative labor force.
The American and French revolutions, as they are called, resulted in an idealism of the free autonomous person, and those affected by this ideal turned on slavery as wrong, as it seems to be under this ideal of Western Civilization. However, it was not wrong in black Dahomey.
How one disposes of an entire labor institution and replaces it was never described by those who wanted an end to slavery in the 19th century. Landowners owned the land and the labor. To require them to free their slaves would be to deprive them of a large part of their capital. If they freed their work force, they would have to hire them back with wages, but after such a capital loss where would the wages come from? Would taxpayers fund a government program to compensate owners for freeing their slaves? These are major questions during a time period when many other major questions took precedence. To reconfigure a country’s established institutions is an extraordinary undertaking. The Communists attempted it in the 20th century, and did not meet with success.
Mechanization has replaced the bulk of the agricultural work force, but it wasn’t an available alternative at the time. If it had been, what would have provided the livelihood for the freed slaves? In the end it was sharecropping, which kept the former slaves tied to the land as they had been as slaves and as medieval serfs had been tied to the land. Instead of wages, sharecroppers shared in the ownership of the crop and the proceeds from the sale.
In the US the heavy immigration would have eventually produced a free labor force except for the fact that until the frontier was closed at the end of the 19th century, immigrants could move west and claim land they occupied. Most prefered working their own place to working as labor for another person.
Jobs offshoring has eliminated most of the American manufacturing labor force, and those who had manufacturing jobs find themselves today with diminished living standards. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robots are eliminating much of the rest of human employment. The question of human employment in a world of automation and AI remains an evaded question, just as abolitionists evaded the question of the fate of freed slaves. President Lincoln wanted to send them back to Africa or to a Central or South American destination.
If slavery was such an evil, why did Congress resurrect slavery with the 16th Amendment in 1909 and the states ratify it in 1913? To understand what I mean, ask yourself what is the definition of a slave? A slave is a person who does not own his own labor or the products of his labor. If you are subject to an income tax, you do not own your own labor.
Part of a slave’s work goes to his own maintenance. Otherwise, if he is not fed, clothed, housed, and his health attended to, his owner loses his labor. The rest of his labor could be appropriated by his owner to cover the cost of the slave’s purchase and to turn a profit. For a 19th century slave in the US the tax rate was approximately 50%. For a medieval serf, the tax rate was lower as he had less technology and therefore was less productive. A medieval serf could not reproduce if his tax rate exceeded 30%, or such was the view years ago when I studied the medieval economy. Unlike a slave, a serf was not bought and sold. He was attached to the land. Like a slave, he was taxed in terms of his labor. The lord of the manor had use rights in the serfs’ labor, and the serfs had use rights in the land.
Formerly serfs were free farmers. After the collapse of Roman power, they had no protection against Viking, Saracen, and Magyar raiders. To survive they provided labor to a chieftian who constructed a walled tower and maintained fighting men. In the event of raids, serfs had a redoubt to which to flee for protection. In effect, serfs paid a defense tax. They exchanged a percentage of their labor for protection. Serfdom became an established institution and continued long after the raids had stopped. In England serfdom was ended by the Enclosures which stripped serfs of their use rights in land and created a free labor market.
Consider the US income tax. When President Reagan was elected the tax rate on investment income was 70%. The top tax rate on wages and salaries was 50%. In other words, the privileged (mainly white) rich were taxed at the same rate as 19th century black slaves.
How is an American on whose labor the government has a claim a free man? Clearly, he is not a free man. We can say that there is a difference between a present day American and a slave, because the government only owns a percentage of his labor and not the person himself–unless the person does not pay his taxes, in which case he can be imprisoned and his labor hired out to private companies who pay the prison for the use of the prisoner’s labor.
The extraordinary failure to ask the relevant questions discussed in this essay has caused a racial division in the US infused with hatred. This hatred is cultivated every day by an irresponsible media, by the Democrat Party, by the universities, by the NY Times 1619 Project, and by the critical race theory taught in public schools. Now that all this hate has been created, how do we get rid of it? With misinformation passing as scholarly fact, how do we recover truth and escape the lies that are destroying us?
Fabulous well put.
The only people with the money to build man and maintain slave ships were the jews
such folk as bankers made good money from it
The slave ships that entered Britain would go back round cornwall and ireland kidnapping white women especially ginger haired women who fetched high prices back in africa for their lovely hair and skin
white children were sold into slavery here in the UK and were starved to keep them small enough to climb up inside chimneys to sweep down the soot, they were often burnt and did not live past their teens
other children would crawl undr the weaving looms picking up the fluff, i could go on
the UK aloowed black folk into the country in 1948 myself and parents had nevers eena black person before this
Rothschild wants to bring in 70 million more from africa
we the poeple say NO MORE
the ones we have here now do not behave so why bring in more ?
Idiot. Slavery was run by Jewish Fleets from the Dutch
‘Abigail’ owned by Aaron Lopez, Moses Levy and Jacob Franks.
‘Crown’ owned by Isaac Levy and Nathan Simpson.
‘Nassau’ owned by Moses Levy.
‘Four Sisters’ owned by Moses Levy.
‘Anne & Eliza’ owned by Justus Bosch and John Abrams.
‘Prudent Betty’ owned by Henry Cruger and Jacob Phoenix.
‘Hester’ owned by Mordecai and David Gomez.
‘Elizabeth’ owned by David and Mordecai Gomez.
‘Antigua’ owned by Nathan Marston and Abram Lyell.
‘Betsy’ owned by Wm. DeWoolf.
‘Pouy’ owned by James DeWoolf.
‘White Horse’ owned by Jan de Sweevts.
‘Expedition’ owned by John and Jacob Rosevelt.
‘Charlotte’ owned by Moses and Sam Levy and Jacob Franks.
‘Caracoa’ owned by Moses and Sam Levy.
Slave-runners, also owned by Jews, were the ‘La Fortuna’, the ‘Hannah’, the ‘Sally’, and the ‘Venue’.
Those who are of your sort, Freemason, Chicago U alum and Rockefeller graduate are always lying as you are of your father of lies.
I have a large amount of information on this so don’t even think that you know squat. Talmud 2800 slaves for each of the light, Halal, Lucifer as they are God. As the Rabbis throughout most of Israel and many of the people say, you are an animal, an idiot that thinks they are of Phoenicia which are a people Judah hated (samaritans).
Yes, we hear lots about the mistreatment of slaves. BUT…why would you harm a valuable asset?
Each person born in the UK already owes the jewish banks £35,000
the national debt grows at £5000 per second
this is why we fight their wars for them
Hitler broke free of them Oswald Mosely wanted to
but the brainwashed sheep would not folllow
they only have themselves to blAME
Hugh Miller nails it right there. All of the alleged brutality committed against slaves in the US makes no sense as they were valuable assetts.
“When yuse was slaves,yuse used to sing all the time! Campdown ladies sing dat song, doo dah, doo dah day…….”
Mel Brooks Blazing Saddles
So if you combine the essay with certain comment, you get black and jews as the traders, offering the white colonizers labour to till the earth. The whites were third, not primary in this chain,
Then there were the already white, napped, slaves.
So white and black enklaven their own.
And arabs?
Does the Jew enslave their own?
For sure through their Talmud.
So which is it, identity or similar situation?
The elite Jewish controlled media keeps pushing the slavery agenda to demonize and marginalize White people.
Biden (called Blacks roaches) is considering reparations for slavery, so are individual states.
Even Blacks on welfare (don’t have to work) have a higher standard of living than the majority of people on the planet, especially in Africa and free high quality healthcare). They also have access to Internet porn just like working and welfare Whites.
My guess is the Jews and non-Jews slave traders, as a sales strategy, probably convinced Americans Blacks from Africa were not actually humans; the opposite skin color, very different hair, odd languages, no written language, no houses, no math, no agriculture, no furniture, lived in small, simple huts in the jungle, etc.
Perhaps the slave sellers told prospective buyers, their King sold them because they were starving, no ability of sustaining a living.
Perhaps a typical sales pitch from the slave traders: For humanitarian reasons please let them live and work on your land (of course make a payment per African). You won’t take them? We can’t ship them back to Africa they’ll starve in America! They have no place to go, be a humanitarian take them!
I’m not making excuses for slave owners, I’m just offering a possible explanation for why some decent Americans may have purchased slaves.
Now, unfortunately, we have sex slaves (including children) all over the world, including in America; nobody talks about reparations not even for sex slaves still alive.
I don’t think ‘we’ need to have this debate. Slavery probably goes back to prehistories that we mostly ignore.
My own argument is that white sheeple were slaves before they started on the blacks.
We are wasting our time. The political classes and fake news have their agendas and it is convenient to have everyone at each others throats, metaphorically, while real civil unrest hasn’t really started in the West. Other parts of the world are seriously inflamed by their collapsing economies. I was talking to a friend who works in a nursery. It was shut due to lockdown, when they tried to reopen, hardly any lambs returned, because their parents had all lost their jobs.
The fascist British elite have radical plans for UK society and what’s left of the economy. There won’t be anything good in this.
Aside from my rational thesis (lol) on the Covid bioweapon, we shouldn’t look at Covid in isolation. Brexit is just a door opening into a new social hell for the British sheeple.
As I said earlier this year, these new concocted varients will see another winter lockdown and I suspect truly draconian legislation on vaccines. The UK corrupt elite will never let UK sheeple have Sputnik V, who’s sales are booming world wide.
I take my hat off to Skripal and the brave mole in Porton Down. This action may not of saved the world from MI6, but they did throw a huge spannar in their truly evil plans.
Because of my thesis which I have outlined on here many times, wheels in the Russian state media have used the jist of my thesis to directly blame the UK for Covid and that it was made in Porton Down and that they did this to better position the UK in the post Brexit World… just as I outlined in my thesis.
Because the Covid cat is now out of the bag, we now see a massive conserted attack blaming China for Covid.
Of course, this is very dangerous, because they are relying on the Russians to remain silent on exactly what they know about Covid.
As we all know, there are optimal times to play your big cards in the game. Will this time come?
Whinge-blame-swagger is the way of life of the criminal and it was not difficult to get Blacks doing this relative to slavery, while Whites are taught the opposite–to take responsibility but to the level of guilt-feeling, an unhealthy emotion if permanent. Whitey is meant to kill himself while Jews and Blacks dance on his grave.
PCR grew up in the Deep South, Georgia, in the 1940s and ’50s where they had hard segregation. He must have heard them called some nasty things and seen a lot of cruelty towards them, and I stopped reading his reflections on race because I could never tell if he was sorry for some attitudes or was excusing them.
It’s somewhat ironic to read on this site condemnation against the Jews for their racially superior attitudes and actions, then hear the same appalling racism about other races from the very same people. Often Nazi apologists who seem to have no clue what Nazism would have really meant for the world. The Nazis would have been brutal, murderous scum, and just one genetic trait of yours they didn’t like and they would have brutally ended your bloodline. There is, was, nothing noble about them.
THE JEW
I am 81 years old
in the 1950s a lot of men came home from killing German people
and had no homes to go to and became tramps.
Gentlemen of the road they were called.
Many of those horribly injured in the war now begged for a living.
I left school and worked in a small shop, i watched a man
sit on the pavement and with a rough stone and water rubbed a pavement slab smooth, he then used some sort of thin permanent marker and traced a picure on the pavement slab and coloured it in with coloured chalks.
He had no legs below the knee and his ragged trousers flapped about,
but he had a row of medals including a VC.
This meant people going by and into the shop all threw coins into his hat.
This poor ragged old injured war hero touched everybody.
The years went by and this war hero chap died, and it was only then it came out
that people had seen him go in his wheel chair to a nice big Humber car
put his wheel chair in the back, rub his legs before standing up
and he just folded his legs behind him, he had not lost them at all.
I spoke with Tom Gutteridge who owned the little shop, and he said he wasnt even in the war as he was a jew who lives in Connaught Mansions.
He just bought the medals as an easy living.
This was my first experience of the jew.
The media is not being irresponsible. It is doing exactly what is required to bring on a race war.
The media is owned by the same (((people))) mentioned in the above comment who owned the slave ships.
Why wont Paul identify the Jewish elephant in the room?
In all of PCR’s reply, not one mention of the jew. For a post entitled “The Truth about Slavery” he missed out the most important truth of all, which if it were actually taught to people, instead of the lie of the ‘white slave trade’, we wouldn’t have the problems that we do, with blacks.
But PCR, as I’ve always stated is a disinfo agent. Why? Well, he’s clearly not stupid and in every article he writes he always exludes the jew.
Good replies as well.
Also, as a thought, why would whites persecute jews, themselves having come from incredible persecution already under the English – such as the Scots and the Irish? The Scots, for example, fled Scotland to North America (and other lands) when the Highland Clearances began in 1646, continuing for the next 100 years. More so, the Scots TAUGHT the blacks the gospel and gospel music, so why would they treat them badly, as we are continually told, when they were Christians, themselves understanding persecution?
Now take the jews? They owned the ships, the slavers, the auctions. 80% of jews had slaves compared to some 15% of non jews. Their talmud specifically teaches hatred of the non jews, especially blacks. And somehow, we have forgotten jew involvement in the slave trade and clear jew hatred of blacks? Seriously?
If people aren’t prepared to educate themselves on history, when it means going outside of the usual ‘educational’ channels, then they deserve the hell that awaits them because of it. George Santayana stated: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it (Although certainly a copy of Edmunde Burke’s quote)”. Those whites who still promote the clear lie that whites treated blacks badly and prostrate themselves in front of them because of their ignorance, are simply laying the foundations for a nightmare future for their descendants.
MM stated,
“It’s somewhat ironic to read on this site condemnation against the Jews for their racially superior attitudes and actions, then hear the same appalling racism about other races from the very same people. Often Nazi apologists who seem to have no clue what Nazism would have really meant for the world. The Nazis would have been brutal, murderous scum, and just one genetic trait of yours they didn’t like and they would have brutally ended your bloodline. There is, was, nothing noble about them.”
Looks like we have a jew apologist on the site.
And you think that the west, under the national socialists would have been worse than today? Are you f*cking serious?
For starters let’s look at the one, simple reality that wouldn’t be here, today, in the west –
No jews and non whites.
Now let that sink in for a while? And I really mean LET THAT SINK IN FOR A WHILE?
Had the Germans won WW2 then this is what would have happened:
1. No BS holocaust narrative.
2. No Nuremberg for Germans, but instead one for the allied war criminals, for the bombing of Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, along with the deliberate bombing of supply lines that led to the deaths of 135,000 jews in German camps.
3. Think of all the conflicts and wars after WWII? I’m not putting a list but every conflict we’ve had, we wouldn’t.
Hitler had NO desires of imperialism. He simply wanted Germany back for the Germans and Europe back for the European peoples. So everything, especially that happened from Vietnam onwards would never have happened.
4. No false flags. No 9/11, 7/7, Madrid, Paris, Boston marathon, Sandy Hook etc.
5. No cultural Marxism, no promotion of homosexuality, no transgenders, no ’56’ or whatever different genders.
6. No usury, no jewish bankers, no jew owned msm, entertainment, academia, politics…
The list goes on and on and on and yet you talk about the hell of the west under German rule? There would be no German rule. There would simply be the continued progression of the lives of white people, as they should have been, without the jews, the blacks and the other non whites to f*ck it up and turn everyone into (false) guilt ridden fools.
I suggest you actually read up on the national socialists, out with the BS msm and academia lies and realise that you have swallowed them, hook, line and sinker.
Everything attributed to what the Germans are is actually precisely of what the communists are and vice versa.
We live under communism today and have been since the end of WW2, when they started licensing everything. Common law has been thrown in the bin to be replaced with ‘legality’/contract law and offense instead of crime. This is why we live in the nightmare we do today.
It’s so easy to spot jew/jew apologists on this site, because anyone, who has the slightest clue as to what’s going on and why, knows that a world after a German victory would be far, far, far better than the nightmare we’re now living under.
I’m sure I’m not the only one on this site who laughed at your reply. The ignorance of some people, who post here, is astounding.
This is ‘The Truthseeker’ where people come to learn the truth. It’s not the BBC or the Guardian/Daily Mail indoctrination outlets. Off you go and educate yourself.
And finally, I’m NOT a national socialist apologist, nor even a national socialist. I simply see that for the betterment of white people, Germany should have won the war. But that wasn’t to be, because the west, by then, was already under the death grip of the jew.
Any Caucasian created nation that is stupid/insane enough to import millions of bipedal apes & mongrels into it, either as slaves or ‘immigrants’, is ultimately doomed to disintegrate & regress into mongrelism, lunacy & chaos. Just look what happened to ancient Egypt, Greece, Persia or Rome. Now the same phenomenon is repeating itself in all these ‘white western’ nations. So much for ‘learning from history’ so you don’t repeat the same mistakes of earlier Caucasian civilizations..
Did the “Hebrews” leave Egypt with slaves ?
@ White Elephant
Do you reckon we need a “PCR test” to see why he won’t mention “Them”??
Ram,
The Hebrews weren’t jews, no matter how much the jews lie in order to make people believe they were. There are two lines of jews in the bible. The first line of jews come from the union of Esau (twin brother of Jacob, hated by God) with Judith and Bashmeth, both from the Canaanite tribe of the Hittites. The second line are of the union between Judah and the Canaanite woman, Bath-Shua.
All jews are Israelites, but no Israelite is a jew. The name of the progeny takes its name from the pregenitor, in this case Judah.
As much as the jew likes to promote that they are ‘pure’ and the chosen people (of which they are not), they are mongrels and know this. The jew, essentially are the peoples, created, courtesy of the miscegenation of the Israelites. And that’s what made God, very angry, in that through their lust, they destroyed the purity that God gave them.
The Jews are not Hebrews.
Robert,
As you know, a ‘PCR’ test, on ‘PCR’ would be a waste of time due to the fact of too many returned false positives. 🙂
This is true. Slavery is a natural part of all economic systems primitive or modern.
I think the fact that it only seems to be the white man who gets upset about it speaks a lot about his moral sensitivities.
The white man treated his slaves very kindly for the most part even bestowing upon them his surname; it that the action of an evil oppressor?
I guess that slavery did do a disservice to the white working class by providing slave labour at a price he could not possibly compete with in terms of wages
I know black people who are very grateful for slavery. They know that they have slavery to thank for being in the first world where they can enjoy all the things there to enjoy instead of being where they would still be but for slavery namely back in Africa where they would be a lot poorer.
Probably the biggest victims of the slavery indulged by white folk was the white folk themselves especially the poorer whites whose labour price could not compete with unwaged slave labour.
@Ram… “Brothers of the Arabs, the Hebrews, like all Semites, were the offspring of an ancient mixture of the white & black races.” –Edouard Schure; The Great Initiates
“HECATAEUS. First c. Alexandrian. Like MANETHO, he disputed the Book of Exodus story that the Jews had escaped ‘slavery’ in Egypt; contending that they had been forcibly expelled as political criminals, who had abused their usurped power.” –William Grimstad; AntiZion
SO marocco, algier, tunesia, egypt, turkey should pay reparations
for about 1-2 milion white european slaves mostly robbed by islamic
pirates . but i think the most moslems of today northafrica are the
offsprings of violated european women .
@ white elephant, what a great post having studied this topic of the “ebil natzees” over
the last 30+yrs i can agree with every point you raise
a great book to read to understand what has happened is free online as a PDF
The fall of western man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bsm99krHbvg&ab&ab_channel=JulianSchoeman
I so wish people would begin to understand the truth about the Bible and the “history” of the Jews,
They never wee in Egypt, there was no “Exodus” , nor any Moses.
Christianity was the religion of the ancient Egyptians. Read CHRIST in EGYPT. by D.M. Murdock. asap.
IUSA the KRST was born in a stable on the 25th. December, of a Virgin called IsisMaary.
He taught in the Temple at age 12 and was baptized at age 30 by Anup the Baptizer = who was beheaded.
He had 12 companions, walked on water, healed the sick and raised the dead.
He was crucified, died and was buried in a tomb of rock.
He was resurrected.
That is all in the Pyramid Texts and the Book of the Dead – to this day.
Read The BIBLE UNEARTHED. by Israel Finkelstein, senior archaeologist at Tel Aviv University.
As for slavery; Slavery was abolished in Cape Town by Jan van Riebeck in 1687!
Did you know that Napolean probably lost because Josephine had a cousin in the Sultan’s harem, and that cousin persuaded the Sultan to side with Russia? That cousin of Josephine’s had been sold as a slave?
She was on a ship sailing home to the Bahamas, returning from school in France, when the ship was captured and she was sold as a slave. No one knew what had happened to her or to the others on board that ship.
I read that in a book called The Wilder Shores of Love. Cannot remember by whom it was written!
I remember seeing this picture on PCR’s website some years ago, although it seems to have been removed.
https://www.globalnewsaruba.com/paul-craig-roberts
If Roberts was impartial and ‘a good guy’ then why would he place himself in front of a painting of someone signalling that he was a freemason?
Furthermore, PCR is always banging on about the dialectic Evil West vs East-is-Good and praises Putin. Pure propaganda but that’s his message in a nutshell.
http://redefininggod.com/category/paul-craig-roberts/
Kiwi,
Thanks for that and the link to the book by Mark Collet. I’ll have a peruse, although I guarantee that it’s not going to tell me anything I don’t already know, more reaffirm my views.
All the evidence you’ll ever need to understand that it was the jews who ran and controlled the Atlantic slave trade into America.
https://gameruprising.to/index.php?threads/who-owned-and-traded-slaves.5990/
@MM ….
What actually happened in 1930s Germany was the simple fact that the extemely arrogant and traitorous Jew Supremacist Master Race got in the face of the Hitler and his beloved Germans who merely wanted to free themselves from jews and their destructive economic schemes. The jews arrogantly declared war on the Germans (as you’ll discover in the link below) who were already sick of them for their betrayal and treachery against Germany in WW1.
THE JEWISH DECLARATION OF WAR ON GERMANY 1933
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/jdecwar.html
So, the jews got exactly what they wanted, a war. Any clear thinking American can look around and see the devastating results of the jewish control and influence on our nation. And that should tell them that the jewish yarns about the “evil” Germans are mostly, just that: yarns and propaganda. All that you know about the history of WW2 and Hitler are lies spun by jews in their media and motion pictures. They’ve written all the books you can find and they write the narrations of all the programs you see. And though Americans believe we won that war, the truth is we lost. Just look at what the jews have done to this country.
Germany tried to deport jews from Germany because they stubbornly refuse to assimilate, but instead subjugated their German hosts. Jews live as a fifth column in every nation they visit themselves upon, and have been expelled over a hundred times from various countries, states, and provinces, since 250 AD.
Thanks to this war, World War II, a war that neither Hitler or the WHITE German people ever wanted, and though they tried valiantly to avoid it, the total population of Europe was reduced by 150 million, from 542 million in 1940 to 392 million in 1950. The war caused the slaughter of over 100 million White Europeans by other White Europeans. Certainly, we Americans, and the ALL-LIES, Americans & Brits, allied with the communist butcher of millions of his own people, convinced those Germans to be like us, to kneel and bow in the presence of the “chosen”.
After all, think about itl The unmitigated gall of those Germans, to want Germany for Germans, racial pride, self determination, and the ability to rule themselves free from jewish domination. How dare they free themselves from Communism, drugs, poverty, usury, high crime, race-mixing and the catastrophic problems jews bring to any society they settle in — the pornography, faggotry, pedophilia, transgenderism, censorship, unlimited immigration, alcoholism, crime, child abuse, obesity, autism, venereal diseases, and everything else we Americans are accustomed to today are thanks to our jew masters and manipulators, who control every institution critical to America’s existence.
But, don’t be alarmed. Today, not only Germany, but in fact, all of Europe, Canada, and Australia, virtually all White homelands, and only White homelands, by the way, are in the same boat with America … up schitz creek without a paddle — because of the jews.
Years back I found this article in Mark Weber’s Institute of Historical Review dealing with slavery and the group which was historically responsible for it. The article is written by a black man, a Professor of Black History, Tony Martin. He explains in detail the trials and tribulations jews put him through after he learned that it was the jews who were responsible for the African slave trade. Upon this discovery, he incorporated what he had learned about jew slave trading into the classes he taught at Wellsley College in Boston, and subsequently, he learned a hell of a lot more about jews and their arrogance.
The article reveals the spectre of black victims suddenly discovering they have been victimized throughout history by none other than their enablers, the arch victims, the jews. It’s quite enlightening for those who do not yet understand the degree of hatred and disdain jews have for anybody who exposes them, whoever they are. It illustrates the pettyness and trickery rank and file jews exert towards non-jew even if the information in question has already been written about and published by the jews themselves. As you’ll read in this account, the jew will deny he ever wrote what you can find in publications said jew has himself authored, and the jewsmedia and jew controlled academia will go along with the lies to further squelch the truth.
There are also a number of videos still available at youtube in which Professor Tony Martin, now deceased, gives the speech repeated in the article, if you don’t feel like reading it, find the video at youtube.
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5SsGfZubKA
ARTICLE: http://www.ihr.org/other/TonyMartin2002.html