Narrated by Heather Bruno – Bitchute June 3, 2021
—
Mirrored at https://brandnewtube.com/watch/the-final-refutal-of-virology_qI429ODGLmoRotN.html
The Final Refutation of Virology
—
—
—
—
Mirrored at https://brandnewtube.com/watch/the-final-refutal-of-virology_qI429ODGLmoRotN.html
Stefan Lanka is an absolute hero and it’s so obvious that “viruses” have never caused any disease. The whole idea of “viruses” is ridiculous and those who don’t understand this seriously need to catch up.
Thanks to this woman for narrating this.
So, just to be clear, virus do exist! If it were not for virus most everything would be covered in a thin film of bacteria, because virus are the main predator of bacteria. And some virus have evolved to attack the epithelial (surface) cells of higher animals (and plants btw). This causes inflammation which induces sneezing if the epithelial layer of the nasal passages is compromised, or coughing for the same in the lungs. This is the body’s way of getting the inflammatory agent out of the system. Exosomes may well be performing this function at a cellular level.
Now, regarding CV19, yes the isolation, sequencing, and reinfection process needed to prove its pathenogenicity (known as Kochs Postulates) has not been conducted, or at least not been conducted AND published. This proves nothing either way, certainly not that CV19 does not exist! My own experience of seeing, or hearing about, folk with a common set of symptoms (prolonged dry cough, fever, feeling wiped etc) strongly suggests that there is a pathogen… So, what’s going on?
Maybe the absence of Kochs Postulates for CV19 is because that if it were sequenced then it would become clear that it was manmade! I’m still not sure about this although it’s looking more and more like it. At the very least I reckon the Coronavirus family were selected because of their mutability, that is they mutate at the drop of a hat… no 2 common colds being the same and all that.
Also I’m not dismissing the spike proteins out of existence as there is growing evidence that these are responsible for the ADRs associated with the mRNA non-vaccines!
We should not jump to conclusions. In my opinion this only shows fraud in the way virologist go about things. It does not disprove viruses exist as such.
It is one more nail in the boffin’s coffins.
The Russian naturopath and researcher is Ekaterina Sugak.
How hot can you be, with bombshell information like this?
Mirrored by Bitchute from here:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/the-final-refutal-of-virology_qI429ODGLmoRotN.html
Dr. Cray remarks stack up with the preponderance of evidence accumulated by many of us since February of last year. Viruses are coded all of the time and distinguished and identified mostly by RNA sequencing. RNA is as real as DNA. We now track many microbes with RNA sequencing. We know the presence of many substances we cannot see clearly with our vision enhancement instruments by their effects and by trial and error scientific testing, where consistency and predictability are the basis or reliability.
There is nothing better the US government right now, together with all of the other perp nations which have participated in this greatest crime against humanity in the history of the world, than to say viruses do not exist, and, therefore, the Covid never existed, that it was all a mistake caused by media panic. As the evidence of all the fraud flows in, together with the deliberate creation and release of this bioweapon, with what is most certainly a plandemic, it is nothing but a cheap dodge and likely, from people who are controlled opposition, to say there are no such things as viruses.
There is nothing that the US military would like better than some court case where it would be claimed by the aggrieved that viruses do not exist.
For SARS 1, they had cultures. They could see the virus in 1976 and in 2009 per se for their exercises but they could most certainly observe the effect of their lab viruses in lab conditions and once released in the public. It is difficult to “grown” them, but they can be concentrated in fluids, and when you are sick with a virus, that what your own body had done. PCR testing is useless for clinical scanning of populations the way it is being used, and that is most certainly a part of the psyop to exaggerate the case and death numbers as much as possible. However, PCR testing is reliable for testing under very controlled lab conditions – as we know up to 25 cycles of magnification, but not even up to 25 cycles for the way that testing is being used now by our health agencies. What we have going on is the substance of a real US bioweapon together with all of the long- practiced control and hype measures, first of all to confine us to their control grids, and perhaps to cull us in some way.
Viruses have been pictured by electron microscopy. They exist all right. saying that they don’t plays right into the hands of Establishment debunkers.
That said, it should not be taken to mean that Covid-19 exists – or at least, in the form that they claim it does. If it did, we would have been bombarded with pictures of it.
This video is not about disproving viruses exist. Hell no. We all no that viruses exist. What Stefan Lanka and the video prove is that viruses are NOT transmittable through air.
As stated before, a virus is created BY the body to remove cell toxicity. The body then removes the toxicity through sneezing, coughing etc. It’s ridding the body of heavy metals, plastics and other materials that shouldn’t be in the human body, there through man made pollution of the air, water and food supplies.
A virus is a NATURAL detoxification of the body.
As the young lady at the start stated, we see everyone with scurvy have the same symptoms all at once, but this was a vitamin deficiency (C). People however believe it to be an airborne disease. This, has thankfully been refuted, but what about the bubonic plague? That was NOT caused by any airborne carrier, we have all been told was fleas, on rats. Absolute bollox. The bubonic plague, in London, was caused by the jew, poisoning the water supply. Those who died, predominantly, were those locked inside their homes and not getting out, to get fresh air.
The whole concept is based on the bogus ‘germ’ theory.
And to finish, I’m not saying that you can’t have airborne disease. Of course you can. Deadly gases for example is one example. But the concept that viruses are transmittable from humans to humans or animals to humans is just a laughable joke, that through constant indoctrination, people do believe. The virus, is the body’s cleaner.
Don’t believe me?
Go on a huge detox and I mean only eat natural foods. Stay away from all junk. Do this for a couple of months and completely clean the body. No sugars, no fats, no e-numbers. Then once you’ve done all that, have a day of eating sugars and fats, drinking and/or smoking. When you awaken the next day you will be completely blocked or “full of the cold” so to speak. You will have exactly the same symptoms. Your body is removing all that crap from you. You have a VIRUS within, cleaning all that crap from the cells.
This is precisely what did it for me. I had been perfectly healthy all year. I cut down on all bad stuff. And then I deep fried belly pork and had it with rice. I put chilli and honey on it and it was delicious, but the next day my nose was blocked and I was coughing and spluttering. I’ve eaten pork all my life and I’ve always been blocked, thinking it was because it was just the way it was.
You cough, splutter and sneeze because the body is removing crap from within. You are NOT spreading any virus though.
DR Cray.
Is this video correct in the way scientists identify viruses? Is it the only way?
Where is she wrong?
Why should I believe you who simply says “virus’ do exist” while this video shows good reason to believe that all viruses are identified through a technique which simply does not identify a virus? Is another technique used which these people are unaware of?
If this is true then how are live vaccines made for diseases such as measles?
So, Robertvnik asks good questions! See people, critical thinking required. The issue here is the difference of being able to identify, generically, any old virus, and being able to identify, specifically, a particular species of virus.
As Anonymous says, we can see virus with an Electron Microscope. Also RR Rife, using his revolutionary Light Microscope in the 1930s, was able to time lapse photograph virus attacking bacteria with the end result being the bacterial cell bursting open and releasing newly created virus. (Incidentally his work was, and still is, heavily suppressed, which should tell us something in itself. His Particle Bx and its association with cancer, and its cure, being the main reason for this!)
So far, easy… what’s more difficult is to identify which virus, and this is where the RNA sequencing comes in… and probability. This technique may tell us with a high degree of probability which family of virus we’re looking at. But beyond that probability declines and it becomes increasingly hit or miss. So in this regard the delectable Ekaterina is right!
I’ll say also that the Germ v Terrain Theory debate is looking like a ‘Divide and Rule’ psyop, and saying stuff like ‘virus do not exist’ is, as FredB points out, playing right into the hands of Empire! To my mind the 2 ‘theories’ are not mutually exclusive; they can both be right, as indeed the research of RR Rife suggests.
Dose dependency being the key, as in is the dose too high for the immune system to cope with, or not? So, yes, it’s the terrain that defines the original form, and thereafter it’s the dose that dictates the outcome. Ok…
There is a semantics problem here that is causing a lot of smoke and dust. As I understand it, the mainstream definition of a virus is synonomous with a sub category of pathogen which is said to include some types of bacteria.
Digression: the answer to age old question “Does God exist” really depends on what you mean by “God”.
Now Andrew Kaufman was the first internet researcher that I became aware of to offer the notion that exosomes = viruses.
So on the basis of “does God” exist, “viruses” exist if not regarded as pathogens, is my take on it. Many claiming, based on the revision of “Germ Theory” are basing the non pathogenic natures of these exosomes disqualifies them from being tagged as “pathogens” and thus “viruses” viz “God does not exist”.
Bottom line: define your term lest you argue with someone that you fundamentally agree with.
Perhaps Dr Cray would like to try & claim the Euros 100,000 offered by Dr Lanka to anyone able to show the existence of the Measles virus?
Finally, the truth. Find a way to arrest those responsible for genocide and crimes against humanity. Or just go get them, do not forget the rope.
Mystic and Yogi.
Toxicity in the body called mucus. In getting rid of said toxicity in the body the body produce high temperature, shakes, etc. Bacteria is another story, Parasites etc.
Define the term virus. No such thing as a virus. Dr. Stephan Lanka is correct.
Gary Quick… viruses are not alive or dead they are inert, they have no metabolism, no reproductive system and no mobility, a bit limiting for a pathogenic contagion wouldn’t you say?
It was proven in the German supreme Court that there is no evidence for the existence of the measles virus… so what the hell are they injecting into kids??
Whatever it is they are identifying as viruses there is no proof that they are contagious or pathogenic. If “Germ Theory” were true mankind wouldn’t be here.