Introduction – May 24, 2021
Rudlof Steiner
I’ve had a number of mentors in my life but the two most important and recent were both Steiner adherents. One was in fact head of the Steiner church in Hammersmith, London. While the other took me and others, through Steiner’s lectures paragraph-by-paragraph, and my case, often sentence-by-sentence.
The head of the Steiner church in London, Rachel Shepherd, told me that I would get involved in something “political”. That was nearly 25 years ago and at the time it seemed far-fetched. I was still recovering from a serious motorcycle crash, in which I sustained in the words of the surgeon who operated on me “serious and extensive brain damage”.
At the time it was enough for me to formulate a simple daily routine, let alone fathom the depths of political intrigue.
Rachel has since passed away but she subsequently re-appeared as I was preparing a small newsletter that was to be the forerunner to this website. Her appearance was as if to confirm what she had told me while she was still alive.
When I last saw her alive, Rachel inferred more of great import. Including that “over-population” was NOT going to be a problem.
In the years since I’ve pondered why precisely she thought that it wouldn’t be a problem. She didn’t say whether this would be because of mass starvation or war or the implementation of successful birth-control policies. Just that over-population was not going to be something to worry about.
From what I could gather, in her view a far bigger problem would be the emergence of Ahrimanic forces in the world.
For those unacquainted with Rudolf Steiner’s teaching, Ahriman was a diabolical entity first referred to by the ancient Persian Zoroastrians.
Ahriman is in his element in the physical realm. Indeed, in some respects the physical realm is his dominion and he wants confine humanity here entirely. Thus his influence is particularly prevalent in the world of banking, the scientific materialist viewpoint and in allopathic medicine with its heavy reliance on pharmaceuticals.
From this perspective nothing is considered real unless it can be physically quantified and measured.
Although Steiner and the ancient Zoroastrians referred to this entity as Ahriman, he would be more commonly known today as Satan. It should be noted moreover, that according to Steiner Satan/Ahriman is quite distinct from Lucifer. The two are different entities with different attributes and modes of operation.
According to Steiner Ahriman would incarnate in human form in the late 20th century somewhere in North America. From here he would amass great financial power and ultimately wield great political power globally.
I’m not going name who I believe he is. Suffice to say that I believe that Ahriman/Satan is alive and in human form and will leave readers to draw their own conclusions as to whom he may be.
What follows is from a lecture given by Steiner in 1919. Ed.
The Ahrimanic Deception By Dr.Rudolf Steiner
The Rudolf Steiner Press – Sept 20, 2020
—
The problem isn’t overpopulation but the distribution of land ownership (too much land in too few hands left unproductive); and poor water management as water is in private ownership so water conservation isn’t in the interests of the groups who claim to own it. They need to sell it to profit.
I live on the fringes of a national forest and this year it’s particularly noticeable how few plant-eating flies there are coming in my windows. It’s the end of May and I’ve not seen one. There were enough to bug me last year but about the only things getting in now are moths. They’ve killed off the pollinators.
Sounds a bit like John Lash …. he went through a Steinerish period.
When we talk about Ahriman or Satan we are admitting that we are not monotheists. I would like people to embrace this fact and be dualists, Taoists, and then have a chance of consistency. It is when you are in a conflict and not winning that you reach for the fantasy of One Power that you can ally with or tap into. In the days of many-gods, you would seek to combine their forces. They are illusions too and our real elements begin with the duality of existence and non-existence, both of whom are total.
Rixon,
I’ve read much of Steiner, so this video is nothing new, however I feel I have to correct you and Steiner on this:
“Although Steiner and the ancient Zoroastrians referred to this entity as Ahriman, he would be more commonly known today as Satan. It should be noted moreover, that according to Steiner Satan/Ahriman is quite distinct from Lucifer. The two are different entities with different attributes and modes of operation.”
There is no Lucifer.
“What?” I hear you say. It’s one of the biggest deceptions of history for there is no ‘Lucifer’ in the Hebrew or Greek bibles.
Let us look at the passage in the bible (and only passage) where the word Lucifer appears:
Isaiah 14:12 (KJV) “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”
If you look at all literal translations of the Hebrew and Greek Septuagint bibles, you’ll find something along the lines of:
Isaiah 14:12 (YLT) How hast thou fallen from the heavens, O shining one, son of the dawn! Thou hast been cut down to earth, O weakener of nations.
Isaiah 14:12 (TAB) “How have you fallen from heaven, O light-bringer and daystar, son of the morning! How you have been cut down to the ground, you who weakened and laid low the nations [O blasphemous, satanic king of Babylon!]”
Isaiah 14:12 (AMP)“How you have fallen from heaven,O [b]star of the morning [light-bringer], son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the ground, You who have weakened the nations [king of Babylon]!
As you can see, no mention of the word Lucifer. The name, infact comes from a Roman translation of the Latin: ‘Lucem Ferre’ (shortened over time to Lucifer) meaning ‘light bringer/bearer of light’.
Source
Who God is actually speaking about, in Isiah 14:12 is Adam and his expulsion from the Garden of Eden, with Eve.
It is the Book of Enoch that speaks about the ‘watchers’ who are the fallen angels, who come to earth to teach man the forbidden arts. Their leader was Semjaza, the most important of all the counsel leaders. Azazel was another who taught men the art of strengthening metal to make weapons of war. It was they who laid with the daughters of man, giving rise to giants, who were known as the nephelim and this intertwines with all other mythologies especially the Roman & Greek heroes like Perseus, Hercules, cyclopes etc. There are bones of giants, in fact thousands of archeological digs have uncovered giants standing well over 20 ft high. It was the flood, that God sent to cleanse the world, of the nephelim and fallen angels, but many remained alive. Those ‘giants’ you see today, such as in American wrestling, all have distinct looks – El Gigante, The Great Khali, ‘Jaws’ from the Spy Who Loved Me (Richard Kiel) and many more all contain genes from the giants of old.
The story of the watchers also coincides with the Sumerian Anunaki theory as well, which has brought the concept of Planet ‘X’ Nibaru and much of what Yukon Jack speaks about and David Icke, about being trapped in a mental prison. The thing is folks, there is no galaxy. They’ve never left earth. They’ve never been on the moon and the Mars mission was filmed in a desert in the US, probably Nevada. It’s been debunked so many times, simply by showing constant rock formations being used multiple times. They use CGI to fool you all, just like in the Frank Baum’s ‘The Wizard of Oz.’ You’re all still being deceived and the more wonderful and better technology becomes, the more you believe the deception. We’ve traveled 8 miles into the earth and yet the Hubble Telescope is showing pictures millions of lights years away? GTFOH!!!! It’s a grand deception folks and you’re all falling for it.
Lucifer was not the greatest angel, for he never existed. The whole story of Lucifer is a laughable joke, but there very much IS a Satan, the master of the Earth realm who tempted Jesus and continues to tempt man, to be his servant and amass material fortunes.
I translated “The Return Of The Antichrist And The New World Order” by Irish scholar Patrick Heron, into Spanish, 2012.
You can not get meaningful epistemology (the science of what’s what) without becoming knowledgeable about the edits, wilfull or not mistranslations, and grand fuckery overall, suffered by those texts.
If it ain’t lobbed into hard stone or etched into clay, it’s probably an edit you are reading.
Same goes for Buddha’s word being written down for the first time, 500 years after he was a corpse.
Remember the broken telephone game.
And that mask that Rudolf made is obviously very similar to those used by Joe Biden actors today.
Bill? Elon? Jeff? Mark?
My wife and I have read The Ahrimanic Deception out loud to each other twice, in full. It is an amazing read! I would love to know how it was for you to have been able to have it read and explained to you in such detail. Now I know why I consider your website so important. Thank you!
Steiner no doubt himself an early manifestation of Satan who spreads truth and deception at the same time.There is good and bad we know these forces have been opposing each other for millenia. He lost me at that the crux of the gospel is opposing,contradictingviewpoints,therefor invalidating the gospel due to contradictions,nonsense. The crux of the gospel is the fact that happened,God manifest in flesh, Christ,who died for our sins to redeem us from hell.
How did he miss that???
Hell via negative waves is taking and sucking us into the pit right now via magnetism.The positive waves or influence from God is under attack.Uplifting,positive, lifegiving waves.Knowledge and light is being replaced by deception and darkness and magnetic pull into hell aka Luciferian illumination…Steiner was part of that agenda.Evil has now become so real it is manifest.Ahriman is here no doubt and Steiner would have been his first disciple.
What Steiner is promoting or was is duality.Under duality all is evil.All is good.Good and evil are one and the same.This is the foundation of Illuminati thought.Dangerous theory.But very entising.This is a new age religion.This will become the new religion.
#decoeli
You Ai bots?
Or just ignorant as hell?
The Antichrist will probably be European. Obama is some kind of freak but I can’t see it . Ahriman is probably a powerful demon. It amazes me that those who are happy to conjecture/prattle haven’t given the topic the slightest attention.
To Jerry–you will not be escaping duality, and your unity will only be your will, in the end limited and unsuccessful. Remember our opposition to the non-binary people? Because we are binary? Reader and writer are a duality, with text as the medium. Messiah and disciples are a duality, and past and future, and the 3 times 2 directions of Space. I had to abandon the inadequacies of monism in 1986 (May 31, tea-time, to be exact) and I saw only big smiles on people for the rest of the summer. Yin is not in existence yet still contributes half the character.
@WHITE ELEPHANT
i presume you are a flat earther .
Harold Walace Rosental interview confirms the jewish devil, he
calls lucifer they worship . therefore JHWH, alla, ahriman, demiurg
for me is all the same : SATAN master of the material dualistic
universe and his effects i encounter every day when i go out house.
already the katharer, albigenser, bogomiles did know this master
and had very much to suffer by katholic bishops. now today we have
the proof of vatican the house of satan and JEW WORLD ORDER ,
WEF;CIA;MOSSAD;MI5+6,CHEMTRAILS; COVID SCAM
POLITICANS;FREEMASONS proof it. there dont need to be born
one devilish man in 20th century. he ruled this dualistic universe from the
beginning of time. but this is not the only universe !
antisemit,
Please read what I’ve written. Please try to understand the concept of the name ‘Lucifer’ and the etymology behind it. There is no Lucifer. Lucifer does not exist. There is a Satan and do not confuse the two. One is real, while the other is a false creature, created from a latin translation of ‘bright star/bearer of light’. The jews worship Satan. Just because Rosenthal says Lucifer, it shows that he clearly cannot understand the difference between him and Satan.
My understanding is that Steiner’s malevolent triune are avatars bourne of the energetic relationship between the Earth and in turn; Saturn, the Moon and the Sun. He called Saturnine energy Asuric; regressive Moon energy, Luciferic and retarding Sun energy, he referred to as Ahrimanic. Ahriman is not Satan. Ahriman is solar.
His is a negative aspecting of the light and illumination and warmth of the Sun, reconfigured as the dark and occultation and the cold.
Ahriman has to be solar because he could not be the anti-christ otherwise; Jesus traditionally being associated with the Sun.
According to anthroposophy (which must surely be a less ugly word in German,) Ahriman is machine-like and withering. This “mechanistic” notion tallies, in some respects, with the ancient grecian understanding of the Sun as a mediator of light, a secondary principle, which draws upon a primary source to direct ultra-violet nourishment toward Earth. You could easily argue that this is a mechanical understanding of solar cosmology. The “machine-principle” also nuances plasma theory, which says that the Sun functions to bring perturbation to the ether to generate light. The Sun is a modality of the Ether. A Ch’i machine, if you like. A shiney cog.
Ahriman purposes to stymie the spiritual consciousness of mankind and in Steiner’s remodelling of theosophy, prevent an evolutionary progress to the Jupiter, Venus and Vulcan modalities of humankind’s further ascension. This, of course, is most akin to Helena Blavatsky’s assertion that mankind’s ultimate destiny is to incarnate on Mercury.
It’s an interesting consideration as to how and in what ways anthroposophy can be seen as Steiner’s personalized rendition of theosophy.
I’ve been familiar with Steiner’s sculpted bust of Ahriman for years now and I’ve always thought that it looked conspicuously like a Vorticist-style, Cubist interpretation of George Bush jr.
So, as a guess – and because Rixon isn’t prepared to share his own intuitions, regarding whom this Ahrimanic incarnation might be – I plump for – (in the hope that Rixon relents and reveals his thoughts) – a son of the Bush-Harriman lineage. Whether product of George W. or Jeb or any of the other three surviving siblings of George H.W. and Barbara, I don’t know. Let’s throw dice.
Nostradamus, whom I would be cynical of, so this is merely gaming, named the anti-christ as “Mabus.”
Marvin Bush, the fifth of the six progeny of George H.W. Bush, incorporates “Mabus” into his name. He’s too old to fit Steiner’s profile but it may be that one of his (adopted) children is the aspirational anti-christ. Marvin has an adoptive daughter called Marshall Bush, which name also incorporates “Mabus” – but about whom I know very little. She was born in 1986.
It is not impossible that Ahriman will incarnate as a woman. The ancient Celts held that the Sun was feminine; as did the Finno-Baltic people and there are other cultures also which held or continue to hold the same.
Yet, Ahriman, perforce, is a corruption of solar energy. So, look for a living descendent or adoptee of the Bush-Harrimans, alive today, of whom, I’d wager that the greater probability is, that the individual in question, the spookmeister without peer, is a woman to man transsexual and either 21 or 22 years old at present.
# lewis jones, yes duality exists and there is no escape from it.But its not absolute truth.It only comes very close to it and that is its flaw.That makes it a dangerous weapon if used for evil on the masses.
Absolute truth?
Well that is the million dollar question.
But duality can easily be used to lead people into a Luciferian agenda or deception.
Thats my issue with it.Otherwise you spot on.
To andyay–there were months or years when I grappled with the question of whether light was masculine or feminine. It is now found in the hybrid/solution column of my map of the Cosmos, at level 5, with any other primitive coil or vortex. At 2, 3 and 4 I have the three well-known spatial dimensions. Yang is always trying to escape yin and her hybrids of herself and yang.
If I understand you, Lewis, you would have it that the Sun is androgynous?
I too have given some consideration to the essence of the Sun; as to whether or not it characterizes a masculine or feminine principle. I remain open-minded on that question but there does seem to be a diaphragmatic quality to the Sun, which is of an essentially feminine principle.
I’m not sure I understand your last sentence. There is not just the yin and yang. Creation is trinary. There is also the living water, which defines the yin and yang and contains it. Were either the yin or yang to seek to escape from the other, both would instantly cease to exist because the living water would dissolve back into the void of potentiality once again. All three are interdependent for their being. Unless you’re saying that the yin quite fancies the idea of eternities of beauty sleep.
To andyay–yes, I count sixteen androgyns but I call them hybrid/solutions of an old conflict, and when I spoke of the sun I really only meant light and the rest of the spectrum, which is an escape from 3D space. A circle is the escape from the first two dimensions. When it goes dark a sun is confined to the first four dimensions.