Mike Whitney – The Unz Review Feb 21, 2021
Imagine if an ordinary working man went on a rampage and killed 929 people and maimed 316 others. The media would naturally call such a man a serial killer or a homicidal maniac. Now imagine if a big pharmaceutical company did the same thing by releasing a vaccine that killed and maimed a similar number people. Would the drug company be treated the same as the working guy? Would their product be denounced as a “killer vaccine” and shunned by the public, or would they be praised on the cable news channels, provided lavish funding by the government, granted full immunity from liability for personal injury, waved through the regulatory process, and had the red carpet rolled out for their spectacular nationwide “Product Launch” extravaganza?
(NOTE: “According to new data released today, as of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since Dec. 14, 2020.” Children’s Health Defense) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/latest-data-cdc-vaers/
And what about the small number of critics who don’t see the vaccine as a life-saving wonder drug but who seriously believe it is a gene-altering experimental concoction that was not sufficiently tested, did not go through the normal protocols, has not met long-term safety standards, excluded critical animal testing trials, and uses toxic synthetics that can trigger anaphylaxis, Bell’s Palsy, miscarriage, Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) and a score of other potentially-lethal or debilitating long-term ailments that have not yet been diagnosed since the vaccine was rushed into service at breakneck speed?
What about these vaccine critics, what rights do they have? Do they have the right to speak their minds and express their concerns on social media or should they be smeared, castigated, blacklisted, censored and dragged through the mud?
In a free country, it is the vaccine manufacturers that should be scrutinized, lambasted and taken to task for the shortcomings or lethality of their product, but not in America. In America, it is the vaccine critics that are being condemned and targeted by the state. According to an article in the New York Post, the Biden Administration is joining forces with Big Tech to actively seek out and eliminate those people who challenge the official narrative and who reject the idea of inoculating the entire population with a dodgy experimental vaccine that poses a clear threat to one’s safety and well-being. Here’s an excerpt from the article in the Post:
The White House is asking social media companies to clamp down on chatter that deviates from officially distributed COVID-19 information as part of President Biden’s “wartime effort” to vanquish the coronavirus.
A senior administration official tells Reuters that the Biden administration is asking Facebook, Twitter and Google to help prevent anti-vaccine fears from going viral, as distrust of the inoculations emerges as a major barrier in the fight against the deadly virus.
“Disinformation that causes vaccine hesitancy is going to be a huge obstacle to getting everyone vaccinated and there are no larger players in that than the social media platforms,” the White House source told the news agency.
The news out of Washington is the first sign that officials are directly engaged with Silicon Valley in censoring social media users; Biden’s chief of staff Ron Klain previously said the administration would try to work with major media companies on the issue….
Social media leaders have vowed to squash anti-vaccine “disinformation” on their platforms, but the spreading of such content has persisted....
A Twitter spokesman said the company is “in regular communication with the White House on a number of critical issues including COVID-19 misinformation.” (White House working with social media giants to silence anti-vaxxers”, New York Post)
So, what’s going on here? Why has the government joined with big tech to actively target people who do not accept the ‘official doctrine’ regarding the new vaccines?
It’s simple, isn’t it? The government wants to control want you think by controlling what you read. You see, the oligarchs who control the government behind the mask of the political parties, assume you are an ignorant beast incapable of critical thinking. They believe that your opinions are shaped by the things you read, therefore, they want to control what you read in order to push and prod and coerce you into the behavior that helps them achieve their malign objectives. In this case, they want everyone to submit to vaccination so they can reduce global population in order to curtail carbon emissions that, they believe, are a dire threat to human survival. This, of course, is just my own lunatic conspiracy theory. Nevertheless, the question remains the same: Does the government have the right to shut me up or do I have the right to speak my mind?
According to the report above, I do not have the right to speak my mind, in fact, the government is now explicitly taking aim at people like me who–they feel– are undermining the strategic agenda of the big money elites they work for.
What are we to make of this? What are we to make of this new alliance between the State and big tech or the State and big pharma or the State and Wall Street? Are we no longer a country that is “of, by and for the people” or are we edging closer to Mussolini’s definition of “fascism” as “the merging of the state and the corporation?” It seems to me that Mussolini’s definition is much more applicable.
And what does this tell us about the way the Biden administration plans to conduct business in the future?
It tells us that Joe Biden is essentially the corporate meat-puppet that he’s been for the last 5 decades and, that now, he intends to cancel vast swaths of the Bill of Rights to accommodate his deep-pocket managers. No one should be surprised by this. Biden has always been the Establishment’s best friend.
But do the oligarchs and corporate honchos really gain anything by silencing their critics?
Perhaps, after all, China has experienced exponential growth in the last two decades and, presumably, that is the model of governance our rulers now seek; absolute dictatorial power that allows the people who own the primary industries and businesses to arbitrarily set policy and impose their own laws independent of any democratic process.
Are we there yet?
Well, if the state is able to shut us up and remove us from public platforms, we’re a helluva lot closer than anyone thought.
US billionaire Warren Buffet has sold his stock of Pfizer shares. He knows something and hopefully we’ll soon find out what it is.
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/warren-buffett-just-sold-his-pfizer-stock-why/
It’s important that we know more about the victims, including those who have suffered “adverse reactions” but yet live. We need to know the statistical breakdown for age and sex and vital health prior to vaccination, as well as the coroner’s given cause of death in the case of all fatalities and, indeed, some details of the various causes of iatrogenic maiming. Otherwise, we are effectively disenfranchised – without the substantive analytic resources, reasoned conclusions become prohibitive and even intuitive perception is less credible while it’s less tenable. So we’re stymied where we might be better able to contribute to greater understanding.
My concern, in particular, is with the adverse complications or deaths resulting from secondary drug inter-action. The synergistic effects of the mR.N.A. vaccines, like so much else about them, remain untested and unknown. How can we bring credible insight or offer advice to others where there is public censorship or governmental impediment to sharing factual data?
There seems to be little choice but to respectfully petition the families of those departed or ask of the injured survivors of the vaccine, to tell the rest of us the gist of the appertaining situation, sufficient, at least, that we might be the wiser to discern any medicinal patterns of the data, discuss it so that we might sensibly advise others about likely contraindications.
I’m aware that some readers have given up on the vaccine-enthusiast and those who are deceived by doctors but I haven’t. I think that, given the aggregate of wisdom and experience here at truthseekeruk, we could easily, between us, compile a database of possible drug contraindications for existing prescription medications or over-the-counter preparatories.
I suppose that if we had the appropriate information, there would be many a mind already investigating potentially deadly vaccine/ pharmaceutical inter-action, with growing horror and alarm, no doubt.
I felt compelled to write the above because the night before last, I endured an anxious and particularly vivid dream. I was reading an article at thetruthseekeruk about a recent investigation into the cause of female fatalities following injection of the Pfizer vaccine. The article revealed that among women of child-bearing age, in all cases proving fatal, the woman had been taking the contraceptive pill at the time of the vaccination. The second part of the article was a series of photo-obituaries of women lost because of adverse prophylactic inter-action and I read a few of these homilies before deciding it was all too morbid to assimilate. I decided instead to check out the comments section, seeking to earth myself upon the characteristic wit and native perspectives of fellow readers but for as long as I kept scrolling upwards, the photos of the dead women kept rolling up and rolling on, without any apparent cessation and try as I might, I couldn’t reach the comments section. The list of the dead was much too long, if it ever ended. So, in my dream, I gave up bothering with it all and went to bed, wondering who’d be left of the familiar contributors offering comment in the morning.
Subheading to article asks whether the merging of big tech & the state is ‘fascism’…
There’s nothing wrong with Fascism, as long as its pro-white. Since the end of WWII, the Jews & Communist scum have warped/vilified the word, as they have done with many others. This was done to prevent the white gentiles from recognizing it as the only political solution to the multifarious social ills afflicting their diseased ‘liberal-democracies’. These morons actually think these multiracial pluralistic societies they live in are ‘fascist’, where in fact they predominantly exhibit the sociopolitical ideals of Communism. Most people don’t know that Fascism was initially formulated primarily as a national/racial doctrine, than an economic one, which is merely a subsidiary aspect of its ethnonationalist basis & impetus.
I have a feeling that although the vaccine companies have been given impunity (sic) I think that will be challenged as unlawful – how can it ever be lawful? – and it will be overturned and claims put in for deaths and injuries including being unable to have children. It may take years (20?) as these cases often do but I think it will happen. Warren Buffet may be thinking something like this, but I think as a shareholder when the vaccine was developed and injected he surely can’t escape liabilities just because he no longer owns those shares. Maybe some will watch where he moves his money into to limit damage claims against it.
Ofttimes, mention of a “slippery slope” accompanies articles counseling caution concerning hazardous forms of material and|or radiation; advising of risks, the odds of death and injury given exposure; and, almost always, accepting or assuming fait accompli the step or steps already taken toward or onto that “slippery slope”. In comparison to other virulent, ill-intentioned forces (e.g., 5G, food shortages, radioactivity in air and water, chemclouding, on and on), the COVID scamdemic seems like a gargantuan, skyscraper-tall water slide. The moment you set your bottom down, dangling legs onto the smooth, glistening metallic channel that dips steeply down farther than the eye can see, then push off, relevant questions reduce to very few: How far? How fast? What do I encounter at the end of this “ride”?
Most of us – yes, I include myself – have worn a “surgical mask” on occasion during the past year or so. In the dialectic at that initiatory level, “facial diapers” pejoratively signal angry, reluctant compliance, subservience, submission. Some have silent graffiti giving voice to frustration – for instance, SCAM, HOAX – yet those wearing same have nonetheless covered their mouth and nose anyway. Having had to enter the “belly of the Beast” – the system of modern medicine [Big Med] – both on behalf of wife and myself, I have suffered the imposition of masking, the taking of temperature, and sing-song questions about signs and symptoms. When asked how I “feel”, I simply answer “Oppressed.”
Along with masking came “social distancing”. A more direct, highly symbolic division among individual human beings seems difficult to imagine. Directing young men and women to different, gender-specific dormitories at least made hormonal sense “back in the day”. Whether fewer “unwanted pregnancies” resulted during the next four years of residence, I do not know. Enforcing the keeping of a prescribed distance away from other human beings, a daily ritual of constant separation, bespeaks diabolism.
Then, as foreordained, described vividly through “predictive programming” over decades, we have tests for the “virus” and its inexorably inevitable mutant off-spring; we now have “inoculations” that do not work as “vaccines”, which, as no doubt do “chemtrails”, likely have a multiple aims and objectives, some obvious by inference, others dark secrets; we have systems for the management of information and the corralling of humans, implying the guiding of those with the Mark of the Beast to one open-air pen, those without to another, the latter leading to the slaughterhouse, both fast and hard and soft and slow kills permitted, kosher or, more likely, not.
I find myself still perched at the starting gate, way up high, gazing down and over the labyrinthine twinings of the “slippery slope” of the COVID caper.
A scientist, I see no evidence that the “virus” ever existed. STEP ONE toward and onto the “slippery slope”: Assume the virus is real, deadly, or, at least, potentially lethal to some.
As a chemist, I see no evidence the PCR test returns meaningful results. I do observe the malicious, hate-driven political, economic, social, and mass psychological manipulation of numbers of COVID cases”. STEP TWO nearing the “slippery slope”, take the official data and SPIN it for all it’s worth – one way or the other, keep people CON-fused, though kept apart.
As an epidemiologist and risk analyst, I conclude, based on numbers of deaths over time and other indicators, comparing jurisdictions that do one thing or another in the name of public health and safety, The Power$ That Be (TP$TB) have deceived us superbly. Boxing metaphor – we be on the ropes and, unlike Cassius Clay, too far gone to play “rope-a-dope” with the Adversary. STEP THREE, comply, submit, get a “vaccination ID”, a “vaccine passport”, enjoy a “new normal” for as long as you can.
After all’s said and done, one would appear still to have a relatively good chance that the second “shot” won’t kill outright. Enjoy your ride on the skyscraper-tall COVID water slide! Process trumps outcome.
Please,,, Not the Biden administration,,, that’s too legit. It’s the election thief’s regime.
Fascism is bad,,, but Nazism is worse.
And we are working on both.
Anybody who expects justice from a kangaroo court has rocks in his head.
Among his many busy endeavours, that imperturbable Champion of Britons, Michael of Bernicia, last week proceeded to have notice successfully served for a Private Criminal Prosecution, under Sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, against;
Matt Hancock (Sec. of State for Health); Chris Whitty (Chief Medical Officer, U.K.); Patrick Vallance (Chief Scientific Officer, U.K.) and Neil Ferguson (narcissistic thicko, Imperial College.) This legal notice is described in full at
thebernician.net/r-pub-v-hancock-others-2021-public-notice-of-intended-prosecution
The Bernician’s multiple-front counter-offensive against the government is a boldness of strategem that would have had Heinz Guderian purring under his whiskers. There is no layman who understands the subleties of law better than Michael and he and his legal team are very confident that they can prove criminality, beyond doubt, in the above case and in others actions being prepared or being finalized at this time, including, for example, a class action to strike out as constitutionally-invalid, the instrument of tyranny called the Coronavirus Act 2020.
If you’re familiar with his work, then you’ll know that the Bernician is not inclined to false promise or frivolousness. He has defeated the creme de la creme of the legal establishment before – in the prolonged, precedent-setting action to establish that banks behave fraudulently when drawing up mortgage contracts, so rendering the
the “death grip” contract unlawful in the first instant.
The Bernician says that all legislation passed in the U.K. since the 31st of January 2020 is void because sovereign authority has been usurped by parliament, via the provisions of Section 38 of the European Union [Withdrawal Agreement] Act, the clauses of which, quite unequivocally, declare that sovereignty is with parliament. It isn’t – constitutionally, sovereignty is with the people and is vouchsafed by the reigning monarch on their behalf, according to oath. It is upon the agreed consent of crown and commoners that government or parliament is thereforward entitled to legislate.
Remember the December 2019 State Opening of Parliament? The Queen wasn’t wearing her bejewelled bonnet and was not, therefore, acting in her constitutional role. Clause 38 is shown here
legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/1/section/38
There lots more of interest at the Bernician, including full details of the reiterated, revised and reconstituted Magna Carta of 2020.
Michael of Bernicia, a most honourable Briton, a wise exemplar and a fair good man and true.
I can hear trumpets and drums and they’re not so far off.
Comrade Napoleon is always right.
Four legs good two legs better.
All Animals are equal but some are more equal than others….