Tobias Langdon – The Unz Review Dec 3, 2020
Shakespeare got it wrong. “There’s no art to find the mind’s construction in the face,” says King Duncan in Macbeth (c. 1606), meaning that psychology can’t be read from physiognomy. But Shakespeare never saw Priti Patel, the British-born Indian Hindu who currently serves as Home Secretary. When you look at Patel, do you see gentleness, humility and good-nature? I doubt it.
No, Priti Patel looks like what she is: a nasty piece of work. As I said in “A Shameless Shabbos-Shiksa,” she’s a high-T fem-pol, that is, a female politician with typically elevated levels of testosterone. She’s aggressive, ambitious and entirely without principle or loyalty to the country of her birth. That makes her an ideal shabbos-shiksa, or gentile servant, for Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), which the Jewish Chronicle described as “the biggest lobbying group in Westminster” (i.e., British politics). Lord Polak, CFI’s very powerful but little-known chief, steered Patel to a long series of secret meetings with important Israeli politicians. That definite conspiracy was finally exposed in 2017 and Patel lost her job as International Development Secretary in Theresa May’s government of grovelling goys.
Working for Jewish interests
What happened at the meetings? Only Patel and her Jewish puppet-masters know, but she certainly wasn’t conspiring with Jews to benefit British Whites. After the scandal broke, she should have been prosecuted as an agent of a foreign power and permanently excluded from politics. But that isn’t how things work in Brave New Britain. Instead, Patel bounced back to a much bigger and better job in Boris Johnson’s government of grovelling goys, in which the very powerful but little-known treasurer is the Israeli plutocrat Ehud Sheleg. Patel is now Home Secretary, supposedly overseeing law, immigration and border security for Britain, in reality working for Jewish interests as she has always done. And now she’s back at the centre of another scandal, this time about her obnoxious behaviour towards White civil servants. An official report found that she had broken the ministerial code of conduct by bullying staff and should therefore resign for the second time from the cabinet.
However, Boris Johnson decided that the rules needn’t apply to his fellow Friend of Israel, and Patel is still there. There are rumours that she’ll lose her post soon for incompetence, but obnoxiousness was not a problem. After all, she’s not been obnoxious to the only people who matter in Brave New Britain: the tiny Jewish minority that funds and controls the Conservative Party and that wields hugely disproportionate influence in the media and academia. Patel has risen to high office by being sycophantic to Jews and psychopathic to Whites.
Death-goddess Kali with White men’s heads
And she may well be a full psychopath, like a disproportionate number of politicians and of the lawyers who are massively over-represented in Western politics. For example, Patel has a psychopathic indifference to truth. She knows from the inside that Jews have controlled the Conservative government under Johnson, May, and Cameron just as they previously controlled the Labour government under Blair and Brown. That’s why she had so many secret meetings with Israeli politicians. But she would instantly condemn anyone who named and opposed the very Jewish control that she has so carefully allied herself with and worked to strengthen. Indeed, she would be happy to imprison anyone telling the truth about Jewish control. Psychopaths don’t care about truth or morality: they care about power. And some psychopaths like to exercise power in sadistic ways, as Patel did when she shouted and swore at her White staff. Which brings me to another image from Brave New Britain

That painting, called Housewives With Steak Knives (1985), is a “self-portrait … as the multi-armed Hindu Goddess Kali” by Sutapa Biswas, another Indian Hindu currently enriching Brave New Britain. Do you think the painting shows hostility towards White men? I do and I would link the psychology of Sutapa Biswas, as revealed in her painting, to the psychology of Priti Patel, as revealed in her behaviour towards White civil servants. Of course, no mainstream commentator in Britain would dare suggest that Patel’s Hinduism and Indian genetics have played any role in her obnoxious behaviour. But here at the Occidental Observer, the Home of Hate, I’m suggesting exactly that.
Pernicious parallels
After all, a very similar scandal has happened before. In 1998, a female Hindu lawyer called Kamlesh Bahl was appointed Deputy Vice President of the Law Society and was expected to rise swiftly to become its President. But Bahl was dismissed in 1999 after accusations that she was a power-crazed bully who terrorized and humiliated her White staff in just the way that Priti Patel is accused of doing.
And just as Patel got her big job despite being known to have bullied staff in her previous ministries, Bahl got her big job despite being known to have bullied staff when she was head of the Equal Opportunities Commission. Like Patel, Bahl had non-White privilege. And to round off the parallels, Bahl denied that she had done anything wrong just as Patel has done. I don’t think these parallels are coincidental. Like Kamlesh Bahl, Priti Patel is a hate-filled alien invader whose genetics and psychology are rooted in India, not in Britain.
Don’t accept immigrants from India
India is a fascinating and complex region in all manner of ways, from religion to genetics (as I acknowledged in my discussion of the Parsi Indian Freddie Mercury). But one thing is certain amid all that complexity: India is a very bad place for any Western nation to accept immigrants from. Its culture is both hugely corrupt and horrendously cruel, as one of England’s greatest writers saw long ago. Rudyard Kipling (1865–1936) was born in India and recorded life there with sharp insight and understanding. Leftists call him a racist; I call him a realist. You can see some of his realism about India in the short-story collection Plain Tales from the Hills (1888). One of the stories, with the ironic title “Beyond the Pale,” begins with these lines: “A man should, whatever happens, keep to his own caste, race and breed. Let the White go to the White and the Black to the Black. Then, whatever trouble falls is in the ordinary course of things — neither sudden, alien, nor unexpected.”
Leftists would call that racist; I call it realist. And I think it applies to the trouble caused by Priti Patel and Kamlesh Bahl. Kipling would have been horrified to see mass immigration from India into the West. And rightly so. His story “Beyond the Pale” is about a love-affair between a White British man called Trajego and a Brown Indian widow called Bisesa. At first Trajego sees some of the beauty and charm of India. Then, following a quarrel with his brown-skinned lover, he sees a little of the horror:
A week, and then three weeks, passed without a sign from Bisesa. Trejago, thinking that the rupture had lasted quite long enough, went down to Amir Nath’s Gully for the fifth time in the three weeks, hoping that his rap at the sill of the shifting grating would be answered. He was not disappointed.
There was a young moon, and one stream of light fell down into Amir Nath’s Gully, and struck the grating, which was drawn away as he knocked. From the black dark, Bisesa held out her arms into the moonlight. Both hands had been cut off at the wrists, and the stumps were nearly healed.
Then, as Bisesa bowed her head between her arms and sobbed, some one in the room grunted like a wild beast, and something sharp — knife, sword or spear — thrust at Trejago in his boorka. The stroke missed his body, but cut into one of the muscles of the groin, and he limped slightly from the wound for the rest of his days. (“Beyond the Pale”)
“Genius” is an over-used word, but I’m happy to apply it to Rudyard Kipling. His ability to understand the multitudinous realities of India was matched by his ability to describe those realities. He didn’t portray Whites as inexcusable sinners or non-Whites as immaculate saints. Instead, he was a realist, which is why he’s now called a racist. But I can see no hate or malice in his stories about brown-skinned Indians. Indeed, “The Story of Muhammad Din,” about the life and death of a tiny Muslim boy, must be one of the most moving and compassionate stories ever written – and without the insincerity and sentimentality that accompany leftist minority-worship.
Leftism mandates blindness to reality
But although Kipling could sympathize with brown-skinned Indians and recognize their full humanity, that did not make him think Indians and Whites were the same under the skin (or that White Germans and White Brits are the same). Like Charles Dickens, another literary genius, Kipling did not allow his enormous powers of sympathy to blind him to reality. But modern leftism mandates blindness to reality. That’s why the leftist Guardian can report that “India remains the most unsafe country for women in the world, with a woman raped every 20 minutes,” while simultaneously supporting unlimited immigration from India. This would ensure that India’s vibrant rape-culture found new settings, just as Pakistan’s rape-culture has been successfully transplanted to Britain.
In short, the Guardian claims to oppose rape while supporting the non-White immigration that massively increases rape. Its readers and journalists don’t recognize the contradiction. Thanks to minority-worship, leftists apply the Orwellian principle of crimestop, which “means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to [minority-worship], and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction.”
Racism is realism
And although British leftists have condemned Priti Patel and her bullying, none of them would acknowledge that she is yet another example of the harm done by mass immigration. As an Indian Hindu and shabbos-shiksa, Priti Patel supports the highly ethnocentric governments of Israel and India while working against the legitimate ethnic interests of Britain’s fast-shrinking White majority. Patel is bad for Britain, like the part-Jewish, part-Turkish prime minister Boris Johnson and like her fellow Indian Hindu Rishi Sunak, who came to the post of Chancellor from Goldman Sachs and the highly Jewish and globalist world of banking.
It is not racist to say that these aliens are bad for Britain: it is realist. Or rather, racism is realism. It is both rational and realistic to understand that race is a valid scientific concept and has huge consequences for politics, culture and criminality. Rudyard Kipling understand those obvious truths and Rudyard Kipling would have been entirely unsurprised by Muslim rape-gangs and the malign behaviour of the Indian Hindus Priti Patel and Kamlesh Bahl. But the West is no longer governed by the thinking of far-sighted White geniuses like Kipling and Dickens. Instead, the West is governed by the thinking of subversive Jewish charlatans like Karl Marx and Franz Boas.
And that’s why Britain has a hate-filled Hindu called Priti Patel at the top of government. Her sadistic behaviour towards her White staff is a portent of what will happen right across the West as Whites lose control to their non-White enrichers. Patel is bad for Britain and doesn’t belong here, which is precisely why, in true psychopathic fashion, she sniffed out and bowed before the hidden centre of power in her party: Conservative Friends of Israel. And Jews were delighted to recruit her as a shabbos-shiksa. They know that outsiders like Patel have no loyalty to or concern for British Whites.
But you won’t see anyone in the mainstream media speak these obvious truths. After all, this is Brave New Britain, where it’s against the law to speak the truth about Jewish control and minority malice. And who oversees the law in Brave New Britain? You’ve seen her pernicious punim already in this article: it’s Priti Patel, Home Secretary, Friend of Israel and Foe of Whites.
(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)



How can a woman so beautiful be so evil ?
Very easy, Jews know that British people who have suffered so much under the jews for centuries
would not countenance another jew in power, this is why people left the Labour party in hordes after Rothschild tried to bring in the millipede brothers, After Toerag-Tonys mass murder of a million iraqis experts said it has ruined the labour party for 50 years.
BTW investigation at the bot brothel Elm Hose shows Freddie Mercury to have been a jewish pedo
Left wing racists were fooled when the london mayor was revealed as a Muslim
except he wasnt, he was a zionist jew in disguise
Good article with some home and foreign truths, but this thing about the left is daft. The Guadian wants immigration because the ‘so-called’ left, which is not really left, needs a reason to exist. It is the same as the Labour party, they need a constant influx of poor by exclusion immigrants who are more likely to vote Labour, or they think they’ll vote Labour. Labour is one side of the one-party state coin.
The Jews, Zionists, and Israel wanted Brexit because the UK outside the EU was more useful to Jewish interests (US/City) & Israel. Those same interests also want the EU to break up. Why do you think Greece was stitched up by Goldman Sachs? Why do you think debts are so high in Italy and Spain, & they get so much grief from the Zionist international establishment, yet the UK is absolutely bankrupt & yet there is total silence.
Jeremy Corbyn often painted as a communist nutjob is not communist, he’s not even a mild socialist. Early on as Labour leader, Corbyn suggested that; “Britain needs a peoples QE (quantitative easing).” That’s right, borrow huge sums of money created out of thin air and give it to the sheeple & these sheeple & their little lambs will be paying this debt off with interests for generations. Corbyn never suggested that his regime would stop all borrowing from the City crime cartels & that his regime would print their own INTEREST-FREE money. Corbyn is just another fraud who supported Brexit because those East Europeans were too self reliant & worked too hard. Labour needed desperate sheeple from the Commonwealth.
It should be considered that this woman may very well be an Indian crypto jew…..(there is or was a kibbutz in Israel composed mainly of Indian jews)
Judging by surname the Jews have already made inroads into “Bollywood “…as for identifying crypto Jews without the giveaway surname…..that would be a difficult task.
Most likely there are concentrations of Indian crypto Jews in Kerala….as a result of Portugese settlements…..this is perhaps related to the resort industry there….where package tours fly in from Europe….
Alternatively her sycophancy toward the Jews has paid off handsomely.The Jews have also installed the finance minister….
Strange is it not….BOTH JOHNSTEIN AND RAAB are readily identifiable as Jews…..BUT NO MENTION OF THIS IN THE MEDIA….rather than a “D” notice being issued it’s a “J” notice…..
Jacinda Ardern the crypto Jewish PM of NZ is bringing into the small country of NZ tens of thousands of them.Already laws governing the issuance of car licences have had to be changed primarily because of Indian immigrant frauds.
The Jewish run advertising agencies have been running adverts casting Indian shopkeepers as the bees knees…..primarily because their shops have been robbed many times by Polynesian youths
It’s said the worst oppressors of any class often come from the same class. Stalin was a Georgian who brutalised the Georgians, while Margaret Thatcher was working class and hated the working class she’d grown up with. (Her father had a corner grocer’s shop not a High Street shop. That’s working class.)
On a local radio show a woman from the same school in the 1930s as Margaret Roberts (her maiden name) said Thatcher would lean out of an upstairs window and spit on poor kids in hand-me-downs when they passed beneath. She would go to school with a bag of sweets and say to the poor kids if they could guess which of her eyes was glass they could have a sweet. She didn’t have a glass eye, and would skip away laughing when they got it wrong. Locals said during the war her father sold rations to black marketeers and they believed that’s where her attitude to money came from – if you can’t afford it who cares about you?
Priti Patel is a nasty piece of work whose policies would have turned back her own parents. She’s from the neo-liberal Tory party moulded by Thatcher and like her thinks compassion a human weakness.
As you would expect, Shakespeare did not get it wrong. He meant it is easy to read faces, not an “art” you would have to learn.
London today
Politicians refused to send home 35 very Dangerous black criminal gang leaders
this is what your government does for you
https://www.rt.com/uk/508456-london-livid-dangerous-jamaicans-deportation/
GAITHERSBURG, Maryland
Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report, responded directly to many conspiracy claims here this morning at his press conference in NIST headquarters in Gaithersburg, Md., which was attended by mainstream media and a handful of conspiracy theorist media, including a representative from InfoWars.com, a Web site that puts forward9/11 conspiracy theories.
Sunder specifically addressed conspiracy claims linked to WTC 7. “Before I tell you what we found, I’d like to tell you what we did not find,” Sunder told reporters. “We did not find any evidence that explosives were used to bring the building down. The collapse was also not due to fires from the substantial amount of diesel fuel stored in the buildings.”
This guy conducted a very thorough Indian, Hindu investigation of WTC 7 and attributed the demolition to Muslims.
“Priti” and “pretty” is a neurolinguistic conceit.
Homophones for harlequins.
You don’t stay pretty for long when you befriend the Devil.
Good article! To stiffen up the speech is the right thing to do, like Tobias Langdon did in this essay. The more the main articles are tuned to the comment section the better.
And never lose the focus on the common enemy we the People have, the Jew!
The oppressors, lying, thieves, scammers, usurpers and baby killers follow the ancient Greek philosophy of Sophism which basically denies objective reality. There is no reality they say, in other words, reality is only an image of perception. The useful idiots are so programed they believe to hold the truth but what they have is a distorted perception of reality they want to impose on you, rational thinker.
Our mission is to throw objective reality into their ugly faces, and if they react in a hysterical violent way, because they can’t handle the truth, put them in a white jacket for God’s sake!
It is ominous that people can think Indians are beautiful when they are usually sun-damaged and small-headed, which means small-brained. In the Ramayana the monkeys are a lower-caste Indian.
Remember, all the non-whites (blacks, indians, jews, muslims etc) work together to subjugate, mongrelize & eradicate the white race.
Well, who would have guessed, putting a non indigenous into a position of power and authority, in England, would have worked out bad for the English? There’s a shock!
I’m waiting for Neo to come on and post his “this is what you get for going to war with Germany” reply.
You wouldn’t have found any non indigenous near Parliament in the 70’s, or the 80’s for that matter. In fact, rarely did you see women, full stop! It was Thatcher who broke that mold and then the whamen poured in after her, easily bought (as Thatcher was) to do the bidding of the Jew. Incidentally, it was Thatcher, who angered millions meeting with Jewish terrorist and Israel PM, Menachim Begin. The British still remembered the bombing of the King David Hotel (1946) back then and the subsequent hanging of British soldiers, by the Stern and Irgun gangs. And what was worse, was Begin was INVOLVED in the bombing of the hotel (along with the Deir Yassin massacre too).
And Thatcher only got in, because Rabbis told the electorate to vote for her, in Finchley, north London. She was firmly in the pocket of the Jew, as all previous prime ministers were up until Churchill, bought, like Trump (and every president before him up to Wilson) by the Rothschilds, under the control of the Zionist Focus Group.
Look at the mess of Ireland now? Their prime minister, Leo Varadkar, is a sodomite, also Indian like Priti Patel.
Britain had a commonwealth, yes, that’s for sure, but those Indians, west Indians, Africans and whomever, from wherever, not of Anglo Saxon/Celtic stock, were not, are not, nor ever will be British, regardless, how long they live within a British society. Patel is an Indian, living in British and not British. She knows it. A good many British know it and this is why so many non white peoples hate, because they know, regardless, they’ll never be British and part of something unique. They’ll always be, from whatever sh*thole, their ancestors came from, before being vomited upon Britain and the rest of the western civilization. They can play their game of make believe, but regardless, those who know who they are just laugh at the pantomime because that’s what it is.
And Patel shows her love for the British (no different to all other non British, who like to call themselves) by being a shabbos shiksa for the Jew.
Since the top-notch writer Kipling is mentioned and since misunderstanding him is a cottage industry in the MSM I will take this opportunity to point out that the White Man’s Burden described a Jewish propaganda bait that worked on the British and which Kipling hoped would not work on the Americans as they were beginning to be used as Rothschild’s enforcers and whom he was addressing. He was anti-Colonial at this point. Ironically. that is why his work got circulated.
Priti is just another dangerous psychopath let loose on us. She is just another soul seller who is deranged unhinged just like the rest who are pushing for this culling, Nothing that comes out of their mouths is true we have all been blindsided and in a way taken hostage. We are all now living in a horror movie except this one is real.
The lot of them need to be arrested and taken to the highest court in the land and done for treason and genocide but, that’s a dream that will never come true unfortunately
‘Priti’ is a tad ironic. A more suitable name for her would be, ‘Abagga Manoor.’
Sh*tty Prattle regained her Mojo via BoJo..
after going so low with a BJ on a polak Shlomo
Jews have worked for well over a hundred years to atomize white people so that that whites would lose the ability to come together, oppose Jewish supremacy and halt white genocide – the long goal. Pitri gets away with her outrageous thoughts and words because she is owned by the Jewish media and political establishment which owns virtually all the Western countries.
Not very “pretty” Patel. Not very sweet Alan “Sugar”. Not very loving “Dearlove”. These vermin clearly think such made-up names will appeal to the “stupid goyim”, but really they only serve to demonstrate their lack of knowledge of what makes the English English.
The devil’s gargoyles like to imagine themselves so superior to all other life-forms, and even to God Himself, but this fact just demonstrates that thousands of years of inbreeding produces creatures which, by comparison, would make the village idiots of earlier times seem like geniuses.
Their insane arrogance will be their downfall.
Note…The Corbyn Bros are BOTH CRYPTO JEWS…..there is no debate on that…..FACT
As for the above mentioned Margaret Thatchler….is it a coincidence that the Mad Hags electorate is FULL of Jews of every stripe.
No of course not!……Now either she was a crypto jew OR a Jewish sycophant.
Under Thatcher someone remarked that her cabinet was “more Old Estonian than Old Etonian” (making reference to the number of East European origin Jews)
All things considered Thatcher was very likely to have been a crypto jew.
(The Falklands War saved her scrawny arse….no war and she would have been told to fuck off…..which begs the question was it started with this in mind….)
REMEMBER UNDER THATCHLER THE NUMBER OF THIRD WORLD IMMIGRANTS VASTLY INCREASED and was subsequently BOOSTED by the Marrano Bliar….who actually had the audacity to state that this would break up Britains identity AND this was a good thing…..no wonder the scum of the earth is protected around the clock….because there is a very good chance he would be topped in no time.)