Christians For Truth Nov 25, 2020 – via Darkmoon
ARTHUR TOPHAM, Canadian political dissident
“I can no longer say the word ‘Jew’ — it’s FORBIDDEN!”
As the result of political pressure brought to bear by B’nai Brith — an international Jewish supremacist group — Arthur Topham, a Canadian dissident who was convicted of an online ‘hate crime’, now faces strict new probationary rules on his public expression concerning Jews after allegedly breaching his sentencing conditions:
Arthur Topham, who ran a publication from his rural home near the central Interior city of Quesnel, was convicted in 2015 of communicating online statements that wilfully promoted hatred against Jewish people.
As part of his sentence, Topham was forbidden from publishing or publicly posting information about “persons of Jewish religion or ethnic origin.”
But in October, a provincial court judge ruled Topham had breached that condition by creating new posts throughout 2018.
Late last week, the judge sentenced Topham to a 30-day conditional sentence and three years probation for the breach, placing strict new conditions on Topham’s public posts.
For the next three years, Topham is forbidden from publishing or printing publicly any reference to or information about the Talmud, Zionism, Israel, and the Jewish religion, ethnicity or people.
Topham is also forbidden from publicly posting the names of people he knows to be of Jewish origin.
According to court documents, he will still be allowed to publicly name his wife and her family, but not to mention their ethnicity or origin. During his original trial, Topham told the court his wife is Jewish.
In addition to the terms of his three-year probation, Topham will serve a 30-day conditional sentence, with a nightly curfew and a requirement to remain in B.C. He’s also prohibited from having weapons, liquor, or alcohol.
“Justice has been served,” said Ran Ukashi, National Director with B’nai Brith, a Jewish advocacy group that’s been closely following the case.
“It serves as a deterrent for others, to realize there are consequences, there’s a price to pay,” said Ukashi.
“There are limits to … free speech and promoting hatred against identifiable groups is not on,” he said.”This person has been given opportunity after opportunity to not behave this way.”
A retired teacher now in his 70s, Topham was first charged in 2012. A website he produced featured frequent posts with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and demonized Jewish people, according to evidence at his trial.
At his original trial in 2015, Topham’s lawyer argued the posts were political satire, did not incite violence, and included materials that could easily be ordered on Amazon.
Topham’s case was the first hate crime prosecution in B.C. in almost a decade.
It drew support from the Ontario Civil Liberties Association, which champions free speech, as well as from self-proclaimed “white nationalists,” who attended Topham’s jury trial in the Quesnel courthouse, 700 km northeast of Vancouver.
Paul Fromm helped to fund Topham’s defence and covered his trial through video blogs from Quesnel. Monika Schaefer, who served jail time in Germany for Holocaust denial, also attended court.
For an in-depth background report on the plight of Arthur Topham, please read Lasha Darkmoon’s essay here.
“Violence” as defined by the court — at the behest of international Jewry — is any comment or fact that the Jews do not like and want suppressed.
The Jewish supremacists at B’nai Brith fear that if the public ever found out about the monumental crimes and lies committed by Jewry, they would rise up with torches and pitchforks and demand revenge — as if they were still living in Medieval Europe.
But the Jews don’t need to prove that there is any real victim here — not one single hair on the head of a Jew anywhere in Canada — or the entire world for that matter — was harmed by anything Arthur Topham has written, and yet we are led to believe that he has virtually precipitated another metaphysical “Holocaust”.
The Canadian court would have us believe that Topham, whose wife is Jewish, might well say or write something that could endanger the life of his own Jewish wife! — a “logic” that would leave even George Orwell gobsmacked.
Topham’s sentence is clearly a warning to everyone — don’t read, write, or even think about the Jews unless it’s in a fawning, laudatory manner—and even then, you still might manage to offend them.
Even the slightest criticism of a Jew—no matter how meticulously factual and warranted—is apparently prima facie evidence of intent to commit murder.
In fact, don’t even try to best a Jew in a business deal—that is now considered an act of “economic genocide,” according to German courts.
We encourage you to read Arthur Topham’s website, radicalpress.com, and decide for yourself if he is trying to expose Jewish lies and criminality or surreptitiously inciting others to commit violence against the Jews.
Arthur Topham really is going about this the wrong way.
“There are limits to … free speech and promoting hatred against identifiable groups is not on” – Ran Ukashi, National Director with B’nai Brith
No there aren’t. You can say whatever you want, about whomever you want, that is of course if you’re jurisdiction is law of the land and not the law of the sea.
Topham could make a HELL of a lot of money against these cases.
How?
1. Get a common law birth certificate and take back his legal fiction.
2. When he gets one of these court summons, to their court de facto stitch up courts, he replies that if they wish to do business with him, it’s going to cost them and that he charges by the half hour at, say, $150,000.
3. He arrives in the court room and remains seated when everyone tells people to stand when the judge comes in.
4. He refuses to pass the ‘bar’ and enter the dock, stating that he will “remain on land and be charged under common law”.
5. He makes a point of NEVER answering any of their questions, thus contracting him to their law of the sea.
6. When the judge speaks, he interrupts him stating – “please look at the birth certificate”? The judge will see that it’s a common law birth certificate and SHOULD instantly state: “I have no authority over the living man”. If the judge continues to try and prosecute, then he’s breaking the law and can be arrested by a police man, under common law.
But you see, Topham plays this game continually with them. Off he goes, to their gunfight, where they give him the gun, they haven’t loaded and he, obviously, loses. All of these court de factos are kangaroo courts.
They would be unable to take Arthur Topham to a court de jure to try him under common law, because there is NO common law against freedom of speech. People fail to understand this.
A crime is that which brings injury through theft, physical assault and murder of another party/s. “But he hurt my feelings and said things I don’t agree with” is not a crime under common law.
If you play their game, that’s rigged for them to win, you’re going to lose. Time to get some common sense.
Never contract with the police/judiciary unless you know what you’re doing.
Take back your legal fiction/legal person from the authority of the state. Get a common law birth certificate and ID, along with information showing you have authority over your legal fiction/legal person.
Represent yourself in court and never employ a legal advisor/solicitor. Their game is to help the court get more money out of you.
http://www.commonlawcourt.com
I hate the Jews. Say it all day.
More realistically, the good “anti-racist” Jew who is married to a Jew is happy that the Jews can silence peope.
This ethnicity that you mentioned above that no one can say anything about is the only group that has agencies/spies all over the world doing whatever they want even if it is a crime but no one can talk about it…double standards that no other group gets away with. Is this because all is controlled by them and consolidated by against every one else? Lets us have an open televised discussion!!!
Now that democracy and equity.
He looks Jewish, sort of like an Einstein. His wife is Jewish. Ever think that all of those people who appear to be so anti-Semitic, like Makow, Brother Nathaniel, and a lot of people who make extreme comments are controlled opposition to create a justification for Zionist oppression of any fair criticism of their efforts to dominate and control everything.
The Hundred Flowers Campaign, was a period from 1956 to 1957 in the People’s Republic of China during which the Communist Party of China encouraged citizens to express openly their opinions of the communist regime. When the critics came out of the closet the pragmatic Mao rounded them up, interned and liquidated as many of them as he could.
“Canada” is not a real nation. Don’t worry, neighbors to the north, Americans will free you, after we have disposed of our own Communist traitors.
Another comment by Joker has been blocked. Yet the comments by the Christians, apes & Communists appear.
As a Canadian, I am fully ashamed of my country. Like most western state countries, we live in an occupied country. B’nai B’rith is the acting government now and has been for some time. To silence this great man at this time is unforgivenable. I hope to live long enough to see the B’rith brought down for all time.