Julian Rose – Global Research Oct 11, 2020
First published by Global research March 27, 2020
The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose
***
I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.
This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.
The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
The problem is the test is known not to work.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.
And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.
And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.
Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.
They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive
PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.
There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.
All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.
Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.
You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.
Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.
Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.
Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.
But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.
- You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.
- You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.
- You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.
- You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.
Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.
They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.

The lies start in the first sentence. There are no tests for coronaviruses. They test for RNA/DNA which comes from exosomes. Exosomes are produced by the human body as part of the immune systems response to pathogens, that is any illness you can think of.
Exosomes are tiny, so tiny they are difficult to see under the best microscopes. Exosomes are between 30nm and 150nm (nanometers). If Covid exists, they claim 60nm to 160nm. The best publically available face mask, the N95 stops 95% of particles 300nm and smaller. clearly, the N95 won’t stop many Covid’s.lol Most masks, including those worn by the majority of medical staff won’t stop Covid at all.
Wikipedia: This is worth the read, despite the jargon.
Isolation
“”The isolation and detection of exosomes has proven to be complicated.[5][52] Due to the complexity of body fluids, physical separation of exosomes from cells and similar-sized particles is challenging. Isolation of exosomes using differential ultracentrifugation results in co-isolation of protein and other contaminants and incomplete separation of vesicles from lipoproteins. Combining ultracentrifugation with micro-filtration or a gradient can improve purity.[53][54] Single step isolation of extracellular vesicles by size-exclusion chromatography has been demonstrated to provide greater efficiency for recovering intact vesicles over centrifugation,[55] although a size-based technique alone will not be able to distinguish exosomes from other vesicle types. To isolate a pure population of exosomes a combination of techniques is necessary, based on both physical (e.g. size, density) and biochemical parameters (e.g. presence/absence of certain proteins involved in their biogenesis).[56] The use of reference materials such as trackable recombinant EV will assist in mitigating technical variation introduced during sample preparation and analysis.[57][58]
Often, functional as well as antigenic assays are applied to derive useful information from multiple exosomes. Well-known examples of assays to detect proteins in total populations of exosomes are mass spectrometry and Western blot. However, a limitation of these methods is that contaminants may be present that affect the information obtained from such assays. Preferably, information is derived from single exosomes. Relevant properties of exosomes to detect include size, density, morphology, composition, and zeta potential.[59]
Detection:
Since the diameter of exosomes is typically below 100 nm and because they have a low refractive index, exosomes are below the detection range of many currently used techniques. A number of miniaturized systems, exploiting nanotechnology and microfluidics, have been developed to expedite exosome analyses. These new systems include a microNMR device,[60] a nanoplasmonic chip,[61] and a magneto-electrochemical sensor[62] for protein profiling; and an integrated fluidic cartridge for RNA detection.[63] Flow cytometry is an optical method to detect exosomes in suspension. Nevertheless, the applicability of flow cytometry to detect single exosomes is still inadequate due to limited sensitivity and potential measurement artifacts such as swarm detection.[64] Other methods to detect single exosomes are atomic force microscopy,[65] nanoparticle tracking analysis,[66] Raman microspectroscopy,[67] tunable resistive pulse sensing, and transmission electron microscopy.[64]””
So, they find it extremely difficult to detect exosomes and Covid according to Wikipedia is slighly larger at 60 – 160nm.
The testing is 100% fake and this is driving the NWO Satanic policies. I’ve just been to Lidl, most sheeple are wearing masks, masks that offer ZERO protection. Not only that, if there is a virus, the use of masks without training is a huge danger. Sheeple wearing the same mask day after day. Touching and adjusting masks throughout the day. Masks that go in and out of pockets and bags, masks that are thrown on to a surface at home or work. The Covid scam is a joke. No wonder he wants to remain anonymous.
BJ, Merkel, Trump, Biden, Pelosi, Cuomo, the rest of the politicians, and the jews media, continually spew the big lie about covid. Over half the time the “news” channels focus on covid lies.
Covid is probably the most blatant example of big lie theory put into practice that ever was unless it was 9/11. Try this – when watching or reading mass media “news” try to imagine what is opposite of the story being told. That usually gets a lot closer to the truth.
What if they tested dead people? Dig them up an test them.The little Chinese kit gives up to 98 percent false positives.In Tanzania they tested a Paw Paw and a goat both were COVID 19 positive
This is a global crime in progress….
I am afraid this article says it all. I am a Ph.D scientist and have 30 years hands on experience with PCR. I can tell you that a lot can go wrong with PCR testing…and it often has been called “PCR Hell”. On paper these newer tests for the SarsCov2 virus sound good but to put it into efficient practice is a hell of a different story. I can guarantee you that the inoculums as obtained by various technicians , nurses etc will differ wildly imposing quantitative differences in the PCR results. PCRs can also vary on who is doing it even though the testing requires explicit set of procedures. From first hand accounts there have been quite a few tests where the medical personnel insist on repeating the PCR tests even though several test runs say negative. It is not uncommon to run 4 successful negative tests until a positive test appears and then the patient is declared “positive” for the SarsCov2 virus. It is important to note that the Covid19 PCR tests have 3 results : Failed test, Negative test, and positive test. The utilization of an internal positive control in the recipe for the test will tell you if the enzymes and ingredients are working. If not then it is considered a failed test. If they work and the test is negative then this “result” says negative for Covid19. Why keep repeating a series of 4 or more tests especially on a “symptomatic ” patient until a “positive ” test appears ? THE ANSWER IS
THAT WE HAVE A POLITICALLY, FINANCIALLY PUSHED AGENDA TO EXPAND THE NUMBERS FOR THIS COVID19 CONDITION…WE CALL IT A SCAMDEMIC / PLANDEMIC !!!!!