Race: A Very, Very Dismal Reality
by Fred Reed | Sep 8, 2020 |
Fred Reed – The Unz Review Sept 7, 2020
A (very) black man walks up to a white five-year-old and shoots him in the head with no apparent provocation except, maybe, that the child rode his bicycle over the killer’s lawn.
A (very) black man, Emanuel Deshaun Aranda, throws a white child of five from a rooftop café for no reason other, perhaps, that (he said) he couldn’t pick up women. Unusually, the NYT ran a photo. If the races had been reversed, we all know that three weeks of media circus would have followed.
Four black teenagers kill a white girl of seventeen, Veronica Lee Baker, for no plausible reason. If you follow the link, or search of Veronica Lee Baker, you will find the killers called “teenagers,” with no photo.
We say we have a “race problem.” No. We have a black problem. Calling it a “race problem” attributes culpability to the alleged racism of whites. This absolves blacks of responsibility for their behavior. It also allows the media to avert their gaze from the endless horrific crimes by blacks against other races.
The alleged racism of whites does not exist. The country is home to millions of Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Indians, Lebanese, Jews, Thais, and Vietnamese. Few whites care. Many welcome it. Members of other races rise to high position in America. Nobody cares. The CEO of IBM is Arvind Krishna; of Google, Sundar Pichai; of Microsoft, Satya Nadella; of AMD, Lisa Su; of nVidia, Jenson Huang; the founder of Facebook and cofounder of Google, Jews. Asians dominate the rigorous technical universities, MIT, CalTech, and so on. The Latin American population is problematic because of its size and newness, but there is no Brown Lives Matter, no Latino Knockout Game, few if any racial murders of whites. Latinos assimilate, start businesses, date whites, intermarry, and there is no problem. This is racism?
Note that brutal and unprovoked murders of whites by blacks are not rare. The foregoing accounts are not cherrypicked. There are many, many of them, well-documented, sometimes collected in books, often with video in Kindle editions. The larger public knows little of them because they appear briefly in local publications but are then carefully ignored by the national media. They appear in British papers, the Guardian, the Telegraph, in the New York Post, along with videos of black flash mobs sacking stores, but not on CBS, or in the NYT, or Washington Post. If you doubt the numbers, the books mentioned below are still available at Amazon.
The black-on-white killings are clearly racial. The killers often say so during the commission of the murders. (“White girl bleed a lot.”) Why? In part because blacks are at the bottom of society, blame their failures on whites, and want revenge. There are other reasons:
Low intelligence, poor impulse control, defective future orientation, emotionalism, difficulty with abstractions. So say psychologists who study racial differences. The literature is voluminous, though suppressed. (The predictable assertion that these scientists, nearly all white, are racist is belied by their consistent finding that Ashkenazi Jews are at the top in intelligence, followed by East Asians, then whites. Racists do not establish the inferiority of their own race.)
In the murders above, note the apparent stupidity, the failure to foresee consequences, the inability to control impulses. These explain the extraordinary rate of homicide by blacks, both of whites and each other. Murder of course is not alien to any race. Mexican narcotraficantes slaughter each other in numbers. Americans kill millions in in their wars. People kill for insurance, from jealousy, in robberies. But this killing, while deplorable, is neither impulsive nor pointless nor done without thought of the future. By contrast, a black man of twenty-five kills a small child, for no discernible reason, in front of witnesses, thus virtually assuring that he will either get the death penalty or life imprison. This is not normal murder. A black man throws a white child from a balcony in front of witnesses: Stupid, impulsive, without pretext, with nothing to gain, no grasp of consequences, assured of being caught. It is a common pattern. And it is out of control.
These traits, plus poor understanding of the world beyond their visual field, and difficulty with abstract reasoning perfectly explain the senseless murders, the periodic yet unceasing riots and burning of cities, usually of their own neighborhoods and stores. Watts in 1965, much of the country in 1968, LA in1992, more recently Baltimore, Ferguson, Minneapolis. They explain the young black woman on network television sobbing that she is afraid to leave her house because the police might kill her, the black man roaring that he is tired, tired, tired of the police hunting down blacks to kill them. The absurdity of the first claim, the fact that blacks kill far more of each other than whites do, do not occur to an emotional, poorly informed and innumerate people.
Unhelpfully, the media tell blacks that their problems spring from the malevolence of whites, that they are victims, that blacks bear responsibility for nothing. Since the majority are poorly educated and rather simple-minded, they are readily manipulated. The journalists who do this are not consciously enraging blacks, and are not it the pay of Soros or Putin. They are full of righteous indignation, motivated more by hostility to deplorables than fondness for blacks (with whom they seldom associate).
Many students of black behavior have concluded that it is innate—genetic, as we say. This thought is of course verboten, an ender of careers, so many who know of it remain very quiet, as do the millions who have long suspected it. Liberals also seem to suspect it as otherwise they would say “Let’s study the matter carefully and find out.” Fairly obviously they fear what they might find, so instead they shy away from the questions in something resembling terror. In human affairs, questions avoided are questions likely to have the wrong answers.
Most people have essentially no knowledge either of genetics or mathematics and thus have to reach conclusions on a foundation of emotions, such as kindness. Other people think, “Oh my god, if these traits are innate, what now? There is no solution.” If the differences are real, as they seem to be, denunciation, hand-wringing, denial, censorship, or suppression will change nothing. And genetics advances.
If blacks as a race (there always being degrees and exceptions) cannot fit into a modern society, as seems to be the case, what now? It will be pointed out that blacks are decent people when not enraged or impulsive, that they are emotionally warmer than whites, immensely talented in music and acting, that they are human beings and should not be forced by circumstance to live in grim ghettos, that some are highly intelligent. All true. It can also be pointed out that many of my age grew up listening to the Platters, James Brown, the Supremes, to bebop and doowop and later Coltrane and Davis and so on at endless length, and that is somehow disagreeably ungrateful to think of their race as incompatible with mainline civilization. True…uncomfortably true.
But the killings, the crime, the arson never stop.
Whatever the answer might be, what we are doing now isn’t it. For all our talk and moral posturing, for all our sincere desire to improve things, the terrible academic gap persist, intractable and damning. The mass of blacks live in necrotic urban ghettos, children fatherless, schools chaotic, young men killing each other in frightful numbers: 700 a year in Chicago, 300 a year in Baltimore. Whenever blacks interact with other races—not just whites but Koreans who own stores in the ghetto, Jews who did, Latinos who increasingly appear in black neighborhoods—trouble results.
Things worsen. In today’s disturbances most of the rioters are white, the looters black, but race underlies it all. What the black mob now demands, and is getting, is the dismantling of a civilization it doesn’t like and can’t understand. Note that everything blacks demand involves degradation of some standard. Universities abandon standard English because blacks can’t learn it or are not interested. This means of course that they will “graduate” unable to write a coherent sentence, and thus remain unemployable. Universities must abandon math requirements, meaning that white students won’t know algebra because blacks can’t do it. English literature must go because blacks are not interested. Academic departments must hire black faculty, meaning professors who would never have even been considered were they white. Silicon Valley, very brain intensive, must hire blacks who will be no more than quota plugs and desk ornaments. They do not understand that free stuff has to come from somewhere, that monthly checks require an internationally competitive economy to produce them, that smart phones do not just arrive in boxes but must be invented by very smart people who know lots of mathematics. Saying this is unfair to blacks who hold down jobs and who study, yet the cities burn. It isn’t working.
It can’t go on. People are buying guns, many guns. Separation is the only answer. Blacks and whites have never managed to live together well, don’t, and show no signs that they ever will. Separation seems to be what blacks want. In university after university, they demand, and get, segregated dormitories, dining halls, and rec facilities. They react angrily when whites move into their neighborhoods. They burn their neighborhoods intermittently, but predictably, when a white does something bad to a black. They should have semiautonomous enclaves with their own police if they want police, their own universities in which they could study anything, everything, or nothing as they saw fit. Integration causes all of the problems. Not a good solution, there being no good solution, but maybe the best solution.
Write Fred at jet.possum@gmail.com Put the letters pdq anywhere in the subject line to avoid heartless autodeleton. All read, reply not guaranteed due to volume.
Source
Note “Fred” is Jewish….
Blacks are one of many weapons used by Jew satanism against White Christians, who look like police to the global criminal, being the ones who pursue truth and justice. In this case it is the thief who has an angry pet dog, not the policeman, but if we make it genetic , there is the fact that only lower Africa lacks Neanderthal DNA. This at least kills the One Race notion, and contrary to orthodox piffle, shows that Blacks are anthropological latecomers.
Fred writes:
“Separation is the only answer….They should have semiautonomous enclaves…”
What one earth is he on?
When I was growing up, what this was called was INVASION!
Geez…..
What really does Fred Reed think is going to happen if you give a state to black people? Does he truly think, as they stupidly do, that this is going to solve the problems within the black communities? They have their own city in the USA. It’s called Detroit. And look at that shithole?
If you give blacks a state, I’ll tell you exactly what’s going to happen. Blacks will fight amongst one another, murdering as they go, to become warlords. That state will turn into a black version of Mad Max. It would be like Escape From New York but with no whites and an Isaac Hayes type figure (not the musician but the character in the movie) ruling over all with an iron fist.
And how long before blacks start fleeing into white and other non black states (Yes, if you give the blacks a state, you’ll have to given the Latinos, the Muslims and all other peoples who want the same, a state of their own)? How long before blacks within, start shouting out racism towards the non blacks and demanding YET AGAIN segregation, that didn’t work and the reason they fled from previous state in said one?
You SHIP THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF BLACKS BACK TO AFRICA!!!!
You take their DNA. You find their blood haplogroup and you send them to matching areas in Africa. You tell them straight – “AFRICA IS YOUR HOME. AFRICANS ARE YOUR NATION. STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM NON BLACKS BECAUSE THEY DON’T WANT YOU!”
Of course, there will be a number of blacks who respect white people and their culture and have never caused any bother, nor had any hatred or malice towards whites and their perfectly acceptable to stay and prosper in the west, but for those in the BLM, ANTIFA, all those who push for segregation, the Jesse Jacksons, Louis Farrakhan (and all in the NOI), all those who have assaulted, raped and murdered whites can have a one way ticket to mother Africa. And that also includes all the WHIGGERS, yes the whites who have gone against their own nation to support the blacks. Remove their passports. Remove their identity and strip them of all nationality. Send them with the blacks to Africa, where they will be enslaved, beaten, raped, murdered and probably eaten, but I really couldn’t care less. Let them suffer the hell they want to bring on EVERYONE in the west.
There is a mistake here jews are NOT at the top of intelligence tables
Psychologist Hand Eysenck was the top man and wrote 80 psychology books
he did a large study on intelligence
Indo/paks came top
then white races then jews then way below was blacks
this was to monitor developments as white children were just starting to be held back and
dumbed down
I was a teacher in a school and began to se white kids leaving school unable to read and write, while black kids were given ” Positive discrimination ” or extra help to make them catch up
Most crimes in our and neighbouring schools ws committed by black kids
the met police said last month we have approx 250 black gangs on central london area
what is dont about it ?
absolutely nothing.
The killing of small time drug dealer stephen lawrence was bashed and bashed on the news and £22 million was spent to find bodies to bame
during this time 30 whites were killed by blacks
The government is to blame theu thrw away our country
bastards
This article “Race: a Very, Very Dismal Reality,” would be better titled: “Racism, a Very, Very Dismal Reality.” A race-baiter of the lowest type, Fred Reed would make Bull Connor proud. Rixon Stewart should have been there in the first place to call off the dogs. That is a basic job of any editor.
If it looks like an ape, its probably an ape.
Half a truth is a whole lie, Fred. What you say is all true, but here’s the half you left out: feral, murdering Blacks in America is and always has been only a SYMPTOM of the DISEASE named Jews.
Let us all Work For The Cure!
There is more to say about Ashkenazi IQ. Their homeland suggests 95. The world’s biggest fraudsters are likely to lie about it to get automatic authority as with made up alien contacts or mediumship. Like most people at their latitude, Sephardics have an 85 IQ, so the claim that Judaism happens to select for intelligence is wrong. Jewish power is really owed to the low-level impulse to dominate. The likes of Jesus wreck their fun, as they never do reciprocity like everyone else.
I see the guy is following the jew propaganda line that the ashkanazi scum are the most inteligent Ha! Really? then check the world I.Q chart at” http://www.worlddata.info“. The home of the yid paedo, terrorists in palastine comes in at 94 (39th position) well below the European and Asian countries even below the much maligned Irish average IQ.
Thetruthseeker.com published the WHO IQ chart on here a few months back, that read the same, but couldn’t find it but only did a cursery search.
That is a brilliant observation of how things are in America present day. It’s like a nightmarish Hollywood film of the downfall of the great nation of America. But it’s actually true, and nobody is doing anything about what will eventually be the downfall of the United States. Here in Europe it’s more or less the same. I don’t think the trend will ever be reversed. I’m afraid that America is going the same way as Rome.
“All Roads Lead To Rome”..….But America seems to be on a fast track to hell.
Knights of Malta made up Sabbatean Frankist hofjuden of the Rothchild family make the best bankers and accountants by far due to their unique genetics in this arena. This is why the roman empire have used them as their bankers. A black man will ruin everything and a white man will also not do well in comparison. A Judaic regardless of believe will do the job perfectly. Arabs come second.
During the Rep. convention many made reference to Abraham Lincoln. Lets see what he had to say concerning the above subject:
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.” –The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln edited by Roy P. Basler, Volume III, “Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois” (September 18, 1858), pp. 145-146.”
White/black incompatibility has always been self evident. After the Civil War Lincoln wanted to repatriate the blacks to Africa and maybe Brazil. Although some were sent to Liberia the jew and their lackeys prevented a more widespread repatriation.
The head guy behind Unz is Jewish and from Harvard, and apparently a Harvard prof. I have nos use for think-tank types and have always thought Unz a bit over the top on the Jewish thing, often seeming like it is controlled opposition. This article shows the media bias against whites but as you read on it appears more designed to add to racial tension and strife rather than showing how the media brainwashing is sewing division and hate.
“Ashkenazi Jews are at the top in intelligence, followed by East Asians, then whites.” Saying this in my view is complete bullshit. Ashkenazi Jews are not a separate race. They are whites from eastern Europe. If they excel as a tribe über alles in certain occupations it is because of their Talmudic inspired desire to dominate the goyim who get in their way. If it was just hard work and merit then we would be guilty of jealously, but it also involves a great deal of tribal control of finances for exclusive ends ensuring advancement.
It seems like every other tribal and racial group senses the demise of Whitey and is now trying to divide up the spoils before the race crawls into a hole and disappears. However, it is all orchestrated by the psyop masters who are most likely Whites and Askenazi Jews for the most part. Climate crisis, terrorism crisis, resource crisis, migration crisis, economic crisis, pandemic crisis, race crisis – they are all engineered and orchestrated as pretexts in order to concentrate and consolidate more and more centralized control over everyone, not only in the West but over the entire planet. Just follow the money and then you will know.
“Europe gave up on its future long ago, most fundamentally by not having children, which is the single most enduring tie to the future. A nation that chooses not to replace itself does not intend to stick around.”
Raymond De Souza, National Post, p. A12, November 11, 2011
Whomever is responsible for cultural Marxism and all of the assaults on the family system in the West over the past 60 years is both anti-White and anti-Black, and they are the ones who are the true racists, who should be exposed and made accountable.
The British government after instructing the population that foreigners to the UK must be resisted and in fact they taught us racism for W W 2
Then after the war brought us what they called n Experment and imported in loads of black people and gave them our jobs and homes.
Well after 75 years the government must admit that this experiment has not worked
Hundreds of underage girls raped across the north of england jewish gangs led by people like greville janner raped hundreds of boys in london area care homes
police gazette says 250 black gangs in the greater london area alone
Government racism and all its propaganda has failed
and we need to start humanely sending them all home
New Ideas of Liberty
Article. V.
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article;
AND that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage
in the Senate.
The 17th Amendment deprived some States of their sufferage in the Senate.
We would do well to repeal the 17th Amendment! According to the 10th Amendment , the States are distinct from the People.
This Article is talking about the State Governments, NOT the people of a State.
Florida, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and Virginia did not ratify that amendment and were deprived of their equal suffrage in the Senate, thereby profoundly effecting the integrity of every Amendment to the Constitution!
Also, the unseating of the Senators of Southern States for their refusal to ratify Amendment 14 constituted “exactly” that prohibition,
“AND that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffragein the Senate.”
The argument that the Senate shall be the sole judge of the qualifications of its members, used to justify their expulsion, flies directly in the face of Article V. The North nitpicked a small section of the powers of each House to justify the complete overthrow of the Constitution of the United States. They did not realize that it invalidated every Amendment to the Constitution, or they did not care..
I also would like to show you a few other things in the Constitution that I am sure
you will find to be very interesting.
Article 1. Section 9.3} No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall
be passed.
The 14th Amendment fails these basic tests of Constitutionality. That amendment is a bill of attainder
and it was passed ex post facto. Article 1. Section 9.3 is probably the reason that the Antebellum South so confidently seceded. Seceded or not, the North was , and still is , bound by that limitation of power. The North had no power over slavery in 1861, and it still had no legal power over slavery in 1865. The history of the 14th amendment has been well documented, and it truly is a testimony to the failure of Constitutional government.
Article 3. Section 3.2} The Congress shall have power to declare the
punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work
corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person
attained.
Article 1.Section 9.3} declared
that Congress may not pass Bills of Attainder or ex post facto laws. Now
we see an exception or a mistake. The Constitution contradicts itself here.
Attainders of treason are permitted , with some very serious restrictions
on them in order to protect the descendants of the traitors. That is us, by the
way. The most dangerous problem is the 14th Amendment.
People always say,” Congress intended…” Congress intended to enslave every Southerner born forever after , even though they are duty bound to cease and desist with the Civil War Amendments once the offending generation dies off , . with “No Corruption of Blood” which I would interpret as the powers of self government being part of the property, the beqeathment of the Southerners to their children, shall ever be applied to future generations. That provision should protect us from past Governments enslaving us forever, exactly as has been done with the 14th Amendment! Our liberty and rights are our property, as well as our slaves and our investments in Confederate War Bonds. The Congress certainly intended nothing good for any Southerner ever born again. The same can be said when attempting to balance the assertion that attainders of treason are legal with other lines in the Constitution that declare that no attainders of any sort are legal. We Southerners wrote the Constitution, and no Court can with dignity maintain that our arguments are with no weight. No Bills of Attainder means exactly what it says. NONE!!! Please notice that when the Constitution proclaims with great bombast that it is Supreme over State Laws and Constitutions, it has no jurisdiction over State laws and Constitutions
The value of our Slave investment as is the forfeiture that is their value , that is Constitutionally bound to be returned to the Southern people , as we shall not suffer Corruption of Blood or lose our property EXCEPT
during the lifetimes of the Confederate Politicians and Soldiers t hey
are now all dead. Also, the theory known as the Incorporation Doctrine
is defunct. The application of the 14th Amendment to the States and the people is illegal. The traitors are dead! The U.S. Congress, nor the United States Supreme Court, shall have any jurisdiction over the laws of the States or any her jurisdictions as to law or consequence, the 14th Amendment is hereby declared extinct, and null and void!
The application of the Incorporation Doctrine is Corruption
of Blood and is Unconstitutional. We, the Southerners living now, are
not and have never been Traitors to the United States. We are thereby
under the jurisdiction of the original Constitution . Corruption
of Blood is being allowed to function as the Supreme Law of the Land
rather than the Constitution of the United States. This cannot continue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bills_of_attainder
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_of_blood#Corruption_of_Blood
http://www.pacinlaw.org/pdf/14th_R2.pdf
http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/14con.html
I propose that any one of the Southern States expelled from Congress to force their ratification of the 14th Amendment, simply repeal their states ratification of the 14th Amendment.
Further, in black and white, Amendments are NOT Unconditional. They are a delegated power to the Federal Government, and are vested as a privilege. Notice the Articles of Confederation had no such delegation. It has been abused time and again by the Federal Government, going so far as to destroy the entire social system of the creators of the Federal Constitution. Necessary and “Proper” indeed!!!
I would like to propose what we shall call, The Doctrine of the Perpetual Negative. When the Constitution says that no power shall be exercised by the general government , that negative cannot be repealed or overridden in any way Legislative, Executive or Judicial under this Constitution except through the next Constitutional Convention.The reason is that when the Constitution says, for example, that there may be NO direct taxes, the the proposal to override it, to repeal it, violates the prohibition. The proposal, though it later be an Amendment, is itself at all times Unconstitutional, thus illegal, and null and void! Negatives may not be repealed. I submit that the 10th Amendment supports this view as well and would want to see it debated
Thanks for nothing, after years of your verbal schmutz empowered them to this point. (((Fred Reed))) = Swine!