National Vanguard – July 14, 2020
ACCORDING TO Almon Lauber’s booklet, Indian Slavery In Colonial Times Within The Present Limits Of The United States, published by the Faculty of Political Science at Columbia University in 1913, slavery and the slave trade were nearly universally practiced among the ‘Native’ Indians prior to the appearance of the White man on the North American continent:
…Individual instances of slavery proceeded from other causes. The Indians were inveterate gamblers, and when nothing else was left, both men and women not infrequently staked themselves to serve as slaves in case of loss. Such slavery was sometimes for life, and sometimes for such short periods of time as a year or two. In case of famine, the Indians even sold their children to obtain food.
The slaves possessed by a given Indian tribe were oftener obtained through barter with other tribes. This intertribal traffic, though probably not common, was evidently far-reaching. Owing to the wandering habits of the Indians and their custom of bartering goods with other tribes, articles of copper became distributed throughout the North west, especially in Wisconsin. The Illinois Indians possessed slaves who came from the sea coast, probably Florida. The Illinois also bartered their slaves with the Ottawa for guns, powder, kettles and knives, and with the Iroquois to obtain peace. Marquette found (1673) among the Arkansas Indians, knives, beads and hatchets which had been obtained partly from the Illinois and partly from the Indians farther to the east. The Jesuit, Grelon, relates that in Chinese Tartary he met a Huron woman whom he had known in America.
The transition from the method of obtaining slaves by actual warfare and barter to that of mere slave raids was an easy one. The desire to gain the reputation of a skillful hunter, and, still more, of a brave warrior, and thus to win the esteem and regard of his tribesmen, was inherent among the natives. To be a brave warrior was to be truly a man. So eager was the Indian to acquire the name of “brave ” that he unhesitatingly underwent any hardships to obtain slaves or scalps as a proof of his qualifications for the title. This means of obtaining slaves was used by the stronger tribes like the Illinois and the Iroquois.
The slaves bartered by the Illinois were generally taken in the territory beyond the Mississippi. This the Illinois were better able to do after the coming of the whites, as they were provided with guns, while the Indians to the westward had no weapons of the sort. One of the chief sources from which these slaves was obtained was the Pawnee nation. In 1719, Du Tisne wrote to Bienville, the commandant at New Orleans, that the Pawnee were afraid of him when he arrived among them, as their neighbors, the Osage, had made them believe that his intention was to entrap and enslave them.
The same practice was followed by the other northern tribes. La Jeune, in 1632, found slaves among the Algonquin. The Indians of the Great Lakes region had a young Esquimaux as a slave in 1646. Tonti found Iroquois slaves among the Huron and Ottawa. The Dutch navigator, Hendrickson, in 1616, found the Indians of the Schuylkill River country holding Indian slaves.
And yet our government-subsidized Marxist indoctrination centers — also known as ‘schools’ — insist that the “noble” Native Indians were morally superior to the evil, greedy White Man who “genocided” tens of millions of them while robbing them blind.
Natives would trade their own mothers and daughters away for a pretty handful of beads if it suited them, as Lauber’s book makes clear.
Read the Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson of Mary Rowlandson, a young White woman who was abducted during an Indian raid in Massachusetts in 1675 — and you will quickly be disabused about any romantic idea of the “noble” Indian.
Captivity narratives contain a wealth of first-hand eyewitness accounts of what it was like for White colonists to interact with these “noble” savages — E. F. Abbott’s captivity narrative of Mary Jemison is especially enlightening.
The White man called them “savages” for a reason — and it wasn’t because of “racism” — it was from observing their often sadistic and inhuman behavior.
And, no, the Indians did not behave this way in response to how the White man treated them — “the devil made them do it” excuse.
That they would have any scruples against trading in slaves is laughable — they certainly didn’t learn slavery from the White man.
And that explains why some the earliest owners of Black slaves in America were Native Indians.
But since none of this fits into the official kosher narrative of “White Man Bad, Red Man Good” promoted in schools, this reality must be virtually ignored, except by certified academic Leftists who will use this historical information “responsibly” — certainly not to incite “racial hatred”.
Photo of Native Indian slave owner with Black slave. Click to enlarge
Thousands of descendants of Black slaves were brought to Oklahoma more than 170 years ago by Native American slave owners. The Cherokee nation voted after the Civil War to admit the slave descendants to the tribe. But recently, the tribe’s Supreme Court ruled that a 2007 tribal decision to kick the so-called ‘Freedmen’ out of the tribe could be upheld.
* * *
Original source: Truth to Power
The article is stupid. Slavery was everywhere yet Indians did not invent capitalist exploitation of lesser humans imported from another continent and treated as animals for generations. Judeoanglosaxon slavery was demonic in contrast to traditional slavery before-capitalist-era pracitised by Indians.
For sure noble Indians were morally superior to Judeoanglosaxon savages. Everybody is superior to these barbarians. Judeoanglosaxons are truly evil. Their only passion is genocide (now after shopping and watching TV).
Look at a map of Eurasia. Russia (European nation) had conquered Northern Asia. They reached the Pacific coast in ~1650 (now Vladivostok). Plenty of nations & tribes in Siberia and Far East were conquered by the Russian Empire.
Yet Russians NEVER used genocide as their policy towards these nations & tribes. Original Asian nations & tribes still live there. Some of these people adopted Russian lifestyle, some of them remained hunter-gatherers.
Example: Yakutia is strategically important and minerals rich region in the Far East. Yakutia governor here: https://www.google.com/search?q=yakutia+governor&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj25ufuqu3qAhUqx4sKHfYWClgQ_AUoAnoECAwQBA&biw=1536&bih=721&dpr=1.25
Don’t even know who is governor, don’t even care, none of them looks European. Sacha Republic governor is a local guy.
Russian Defence Minister Shoygu is only 50% Russian (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/Official_portrait_of_Sergey_Shoigu.jpg/800px-Official_portrait_of_Sergey_Shoigu.jpg). Father from Mongolian-like Tuva nation. These people still live in the land of their ancestors.
Russians were on war with Asian nations but never used genocide as policy tool. Judeoanglosaxons were doing so in Ireland, in Africa, India, Pacific, North America, Australia, China, now in Iraq and Afghanistan. Everywhere. Judeoanglosaxons are evil.
To Patrick, you ought to read a real history book before you make comments like that. My people came to the southwest before there was an America or a Mexico. The Spanish people encountered the same thing. A people virtually in the Stone Age with all the trappings. The Apache and Navajo continued to raid other tribes ( Pueblo tribes) and enslave them along with other Spanish European people that were unfortunate enough to be victims. Most other tribes did the same thing. This was duly recorded in archives available to most people who want to find truth, not the scrubbed propaganda that passes for education today.
This article is beyond stupid. It is evil. Some dumb-ass White person trying to self-justify.
Patrick: Your diatribe about Judeoanglosaxons? here is hilarious, if you where not serious. .
Euranglolanders Patrick. The most killing machine humanity has produced to date(useful tools) but they will never admit it, to grow from it.
@Norteno
enslave them along with other Spanish European people
By ur admition, the Spanish INFLUENCED the Natives. In this case, the Europeans took it a bit TOO far.
DON’T try a few play the, “You did it TOO” card.
@ Norteno
Lord Jesus the Bastard was teachning: you shall know them by their fruits.
The fruit of Judeoanglosaxon activity in North America, Australia and other places is total genocide. Starvation as a method of population control is their favourite tool.
In Canada Judeoanglosaxons target Indian women with sterilisation even now. In Australia they refused to recognize local people as human beings. They changed the policy in the 60ies, half a century ago.
Don’t tell me: „Spaniards were doing the same”.
Did Spaniards sterilise Indian women in South America in the 20th century?
Did Spaniards send blankets with smallpox to Indians?
Did Spaniards ever recognize locals as animals, like in Australia?
To some extent Spaniards were silmilar, colonisation was a Jewish project. Columbus and plenty of conquistadors were Jewish. But Judeoanglosaxons outperform Spaniards in every field.
In India they estimate total number of starvation victims during East India & British raj rule at 80 million (minimum). In 1845-48 problems with patatos were recorded everywhere in Northern Hemisphere yet Ireland was the only place of deadly starvation. Did you know that during Great Patato Famine Ireland every year was a net exporter of food? Yet (lesser) people were dying.
I am not saying that Indians were good people living in harmony and peace. What you report is a total war between Indians being a result of invasion of white barbarians. Indians were at war because their land had been stolen and people were pushed to the West.
I am saying that Judeoanglosaxons are masters in genocide. To this very day.
I did not compare Judeoanglosaxons to Spaniards but to Russians in order to give you an idea how decent nation should conquer land. For white barbarians this is unattainable model.
In support of logic …
Patrick stated in sentence #2: “Indians did not invent capitalist exploitation of lesser humans imported from another continent and treated as animals for generations.”
This appears to be a truth and it is his main point, ignored by other posters, especially the last two who resort to name calling.
“capitalist exploitation” = accumulation of assets/money with the intention of the production of further assets
Check.
“imported from another continent” Check
“treated as animals” Check
” for generations” Check.
4 points of differentiation.
To Patrick, judeoanglosaxons , really!! You now invent words that mean nothing. Your mention of “Jesus the bastard “ can only come from your demonic Talmud. I was writing in response to the article which is historically correct. This was a well known and documented by europeans where ever contacts occurred. You also are not apparently aware of different tribes conducting warfare and taking slaves long before the advent of the European. In Mexico all the other tribes hated the Aztecs for their cruelty , slavery and human sacrifices. This would still be going on today if not for European law and conquest. You apparently are hung up on negative European influence but what about the positive. If you have problems reading or researching, with Mel Gibson’s movie apocalypto. You’ll get a glance of what it was like here before the “cruel” European!
Millions died in Ireland not due to famine but due to neglect. MILLIONS of tonnes of food were shipped for sale to England. A potato blight destroys potatoes not other crops. The food that should have feed the Irish was sold as cash crops for the English landlords. End of story. Oh and instead of shooting at folk and pulling down statues maybe these same protesters instead march on Lloylds of London who financed and insured the slave trade? Or would their handlers prefer to keep that bit of information under their hats?
1. Term „Judeoanglosaxons” means nothing? Are you sure? Don’t you know that Cromwell was supported by Benelux Jews and had plans to introduce Hebrew as official language in England?
Don’t you know that famous war criminal Winston Churchill since 1948 was entitled to benefit from the „law of return” to Palestine? I wonder who was the last non-Jewish PM in London. American presidents usually belong to the tribe (http://seymourbrody.com/heroes_colonial/brody6.htm).
English&American ruling circles are driven by Judaism (Protestantism=cryptoJudaism). Genocide of Indians was necessary because these people were independent, could not be controlled with money. Prophet Isaiah was teaching so (60:12):
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.
N*ggers are not humans, Moses ben Maimon teaches so (https://www.texemarrs.com/092013/maimonides_a_racist.htm).
Modern Anglosaxon culture is created by Jews. Term “Judeoanglosaxon” hits the point.
2. I don’t want to defend Aztecs for many reasons.
Gibson is fanatic Roman Catholic, he supports his god (which is an agent of Jewish god and Gibson may be unaware of this fact) and he conveniently forgot about subsequent massacres satisfying his cruel Judeochristian god.
Once I saw statistics of deaths in the US. Hard to believe but ~50% of US deaths are abortions. Half of Americans dying every year haven’t even been born. Isn’t it ritual sacrifice? And Judeoanglosaxons have chutzpah to criticize Aztecs?
Positive „European” (=Judeoanglosaxon) influence in America is result of cherry picking.