Paul Craig Roberts – paulcraigroberts.org July 20, 2020
Some black Americans have created a black version of the KKK. They have even adopted similar terminology. The leader is called “Grand Master Jay.” The job of the organization, NFAC, is “to protect the black community” from white people.
The KKK’s job was to protect the white Southern community, which was under attack by Reconstruction.
The NFAC sees the plight of the American black exactly as the white liberal elites want blacks to see it—oppression and abuse by whites. This keeps the American people divided and power safe in the hands of the corrupt elites.
Grand Master Jay wants black people to secede from the US just as the Southern States seceded. As Abe Lincoln believed, Grand Master Jay believes that blacks and whites can’t live together.
If the NFAC cannot get a piece of the US set aside for blacks as a black country, Grand Master Jay’s “other aim is for an exodus to Africa, to establish our destiny and build our own nation,” another of Abe Lincoln’s intents for black Americans.
Grand Master Jay echoes many prescient observers, such as George Orwell, when he says: “When a people are denied knowledge of their culture and history of self, they have nothing to be proud of.” https://www.rt.com/usa/495109-nfac-black-militia-blm/
His statement is one with which many white Americans would agree. Our history has been taken away from us by falsification by white liberals. The falsification of American history is institutionalized in the educational system and is ongoing as the New York Times’ 1619 Project.
Falsification is especially the fact in the case of the so-called Civil War. The name itself is a falsification. A civil war is when two sides fight for control of the government. The southern states that seceded did not fight for control of the US government. They fought because they were invaded. The northern states fought to prevent secession. Nothing in historical documents is more clearly established. Yet the War of Northern Aggression is falsified as a war to free black slaves from southern racism, despite Abe Lincoln’s many assurances to the contrary.
That the War to Save the Union had nothing whatsoever to do with ending slavery is totally clear from everything Lincoln said prior to his presidency and during his presidency. The evidence is overwhelming. Consult the War Aims Resolution, Lincoln’s letter to Horace Greeley, Lincoln’s speedh in debate with Stephen Douglas, Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address, the Corwin Amendment, the Emancipation Proclamation.
In the US Constitution slavery was not a federal issue. It was a state issue until the 13th Amendment in 1865. The issue between the North and South was not slavery. On the surface the issue was the tariff. The deeper problem was that the North and South had different cultures. They were really different nations. The South was agricultural. The North was industrial. The South wanted free trade. The North wanted protection from British manufactures. Northern elites wanted the South to subsidize northern industry with higher prices.
The northern elites also wanted empire. They did not want a second country competing for the lands west of the Mississippi River. The northern elites were determined that the South remain part of the United States.
The issue between North and South was whether secession was constitutional—a state’s right or an act of treason or rebellion. The South took the Founding Father’s position that the union was a voluntary act that could be repealed by a state. Lincoln took the position that the union was permanent and any attempt to leave the union was an act of rebellion that could be ended by military force.
The legal/constitutional argument was between the Jeffersonian South and the Hamiltonian Lincoln. The 10th Amendment gave states the right to secede. Lincoln countered with the argument that the union implied perpetuity unless destroyed by rebellion. This is why southerners were called “rebels.”
The South wanted their secession to be constitutional in order to deprive the North of a pretext for invasion. This made it impossible for the Southern states to argue that they were seceding because of the tariff. The tariff was a federal issue. The Constitution gave the federal government the right to pass tariffs. So the real reason the South was leaving the union left the South with no constitutional argument. On the other hand, slavery was a state’s right guaranteed by the Constitution. This caused the South to seize on the noncompliance of some northern states with the federal law requiring the return of run-away slaves and make a constitutional issue out of it. This argument then appeared in some of the secession documents of the southern states. See: https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/11/13/a-civil-war-lesson-for-the-uneducated/ and https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/23/know-called-civil-war-not-slavery/
It is clear enough that the Constitution was on the side of the South, but the northern elites valued the empire and centralized power more than they valued the Constitution and states’ rights. In an attempt to weaken support in the North for war against southern secession, the South concocted an argument that the refusal of some northern states to return fugitive or run-away slaves, as required by Federal law and the US Constitution, meant that northern states had already violated the union and therefore the South’s leaving was not the cause of the breakup of the union. This argument was strained, because Lincoln gave assurances that he intended to enforce the Fugitive Slave Law.
The claim that the war was fought over slavery has no more basis than this concocted argument by southerners attempting to prevent Lincoln’s invasion of the Confederacy.
The honest, truthful, and accurate Lincoln scholar is Thomas J. DiLorenzo. He is a northerner from Pennsylvania who has the southern trait of despising liars. His just published book, The Problem with Lincoln (Regnery, 2020) will walk you through Lincoln and his war in ten chapters totaling 161 pages and ten appendices totaling 56 pages.
In order to prepare readers for a later review essay of DiLorenzo’s book, below I quote from some of the official documents in the appendices.
The War Aims Resolution passed the House on July 22, 1861 and the Senate on July 25, 1861. The two US Representatives and the three US Senators who voted against it were expelled from Congress. The declaration of war against the Confederate States of America states: “this war is not waged upon our part in any spirit of oppression, nor for any purpse of conquest or subjugation, nor purpose of overthrowing or interfering with the rights or established institutions of those States, but to defend and maintain the supremacy of the Constitution and to preserve the Union.”
Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune, asked President Lincoln what the purpose of the ongoing war was. On August 22, 1862 Lincoln answered: “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the union and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union.”
By January 1, 1863, General Robert E. Lee had delivered defeat after defeat to a succession of Union generals leading far larger armies than the South could muster. With the North tiring of war and discouraged by defeats, Lincoln tried to foment a slave rebellion within the Confederacy that would compel Confederate soldiers to leave the army and return to protect their women, children, and homes. The Emancipation Proclamation (January 1, 1863) failed to foment a slave uprising. The proclamation states that it is an act believed to be warranted by “military necessity” and “as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing” the southern rebellion. The Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves in territories controlled by the Confederacy and, therefore, was meaningless. No slaves were freed in terrorties controlled by the Union. Lincoln’s own Secretary of State ridiculed the proclamation for freeing slaves in territories we do not control and leaving them in slavery in territories we do control.
In the time between his election and his inaugeration, Lincoln got a constitutional amendment—the Corwin Amendment—passed by the House and Senate and its ratification by states underway. The amendment reads: “No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said state.”
The Corwin Amendment was a bribe to the South to stay in the union. It passed the same day that the tariff that drove the southern states out of the union passed. Lincoln’s message to the South was clear: stay in the union, pay the tariff, and slavery is forever protected from federal intervention. The South left the union because the South was more concerned with the tariff than with slavery.
In his Inaugural Address (1861) Lincoln states: “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” Lincoln goes on to say that this has forever been his position as many of his similar and never recanted declarations make clear. Moreover, he adds, those who nominated and elected him see it the same way and placed the sanctity of states’ rights in the Republican platform.
In debate with Stephen Douglas (September 18, 1858), Lincoln stated: “I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
[Black Lives Matter Aligns With Lincoln and White Supremacy Against Miscegeny — https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/07/20/black-lives-matter-aligns-with-white-supremacy-against-miscegeny/ ]
Lincoln’s policy was to expel blacks to Africa or to a South American country. DiLorenzo cites Phillip Magness’ “Lincoln and Colonization:” “Ulysses S. Grant made a serious push to annex the Dominican Republic, intending in part to create a refuge location for freed slaves.”
If you consider the hard facts of Lincoln’s own words over the years, you can see how totally corrupt are so-called “Lincoln scholars.” These frauds have invented a false history whose purpose is to serve the ego and moral self-righteousness of white liberals, almost all of whom are Democrats but who worship a Republican president that they concocted. No such Lincoln exists as the one fabricated by “Lincoln scholars.”
Consider also that if something as transparent as the so-called “Civil War” can be misrepresented in US education for decades, what cannot be misrepresented by the elites who rule us by controlling the explanations?
After reviewing DiLorenzo’s new book, we will have a look at a newly published monograph by John Remington Graham that presents us with the thesis that the War of Northern Aggression was instigated by powerful banking interests for the purpose of creating a large national debt that would enable bankers to rule by controlling the flow of money and credit. The bankers understood that war required the fomenting of hatred, and they underwrote the fomenting of hatred of the South by the North. Graham provides strong circumstantial evidence, and it is a thesis that warrants research.
Paul Craig Roberts is often off his game. This time, WAY off.
BLM and allied organizations and thugs do not care what Lincoln was or wasn’t, or how many times white men kill each other and what they call their wars.
This is about ethnic cleansing, world-wide, and it’s European Derived Caucasians who are being cleansed. The rest is slush and gush.
If it were only the Confederacy being misrepresented, it would not matter. This is about all of Europe. As long as each European group defends only its own, the whole of us will be gobbled up as we bicker.
As an earlier American slogan put it, UNITE OR DIE. It meant only the Colonies then. It means all Europeans now. Time to see the big picture.
Abraham Lincoln will have had his flaws just like every other person but I think he was one of history’s greatest figures.
Ditto what Franz said. PC Roberts blames “white liberals” for what their bankster puppet masters force on them by the power of money, blackmail, and other forms of subversion.
PC Roberts seems to be a media puppet for bankster jews. PCR uses the word white 14 times in ascribing blame for racial trouble, but uses the word jew zero times.
PCR does better in his discussion of the civil war, confederacy, and north vs south. The idea that slavery comes from the south or that people from the south are more racist than in the north is another big lie created by the Jews media.
The South has often been labeled as the “bible belt” by mass media. Bankster Jews hate Christianity, so naturally the Jews Media portrays the south in the worst ways.
Slavery originated in the original 13 colonies before the southern states even existed. Later, as people moved from those original 13 colonies in the northeast to the south and west, they brought slavery with them. Slavery originated in the north, not the south.
When Lincoln made his emancipation proclamation to free slaves, Lincoln applied it only to the confederate states. The proclamation did not apply to states which remained loyal to the north.
Lincoln proclaimed the southern slaves free in hopes that southern slaves would join the north in its fight against the south. Slaves in northern slave states were not freed until after Lincoln was dead.
As with the holocaust lies against Germany, the Jews media promotes lies and hate against the south. The anti-christian Jews hate the south more than the rest of the nation because they think of it as “the bible belt,” a den of Christians.
To find out more just google “Jew Klux Klan” or “Jews created the KKK”
Fully concur with Franz!
Only one other point: Any White woman laying with, fighting for or demonstrating for BLM is an enemy of the White race and therefore no mercy to be given.
If you think the Civil War was about slavery, you are a FOOL. If you believe that the 911 attacks on America were from Osama bin Laden, you are a fool. If you think the Federal Reserve system is part of the US federal govt, you are a fool. Dr Roberts is correct in most of his writing. Lincoln fought to preserve the Union. The Southern states that seceded thought they had the right to voluntarily leave a union that they had previously voluntarily joined. Of course, the “hand” of the Satanic British Illuminati in the Civil War is there. Do you know who Judah Benjamin was? The story of Booth is much, much more complicated that it appears. But, the TRUTH does not matter now. It is too late. Put on your face diaper, sit down, and shut up. Khazars RULE you. If you want to know the truth of the Confederacy, find Robert Selph Henry’s THE STORY OF THE CONFEDERACY, published in 1931.
What do you expect to happen when you import & integrate millions of bipedal apes into your nation?
Wow, I should have said bing “Jew Klux Klan” or “Jews created the KKK” instead of google “Jew Klux Klan” or “Jews created the KKK” in my post above.
Bing gives “2,580,000 Results” from a search of “Jews created the KKK” but Google gives ZERO results. The Jews who run Google don’t want searches of “Jews created the KKK” to work.
The phony Google search results on “Jews created the KKK” are one more confirmation of the POZ plan for Jews to control mass media –
Protocols of the Elders Zion –
http://www.whale.to/b/protocols.html
Paul Craig Roberts is obviously not a Lincoln reader. Lincoln did champion the abolitionist cause in his campaign to the White House, and that issues actually triggered succession once he was elected. Lincoln would have been content to confine slavery to the South and not let it spread into the new territories to the west, letting it die a natural death. The strongest issue, however, to unite the North to prevent succession was not anti-slavery, it was the cause to save the union, and in the midst of a very powerful and hostile Britain wanting to divide the US, the cry “United we stand. Divided we fall”, initially had more currency and import for continued independence than any justification to free the slaves. As the war wore on, however, it is clear from most historians, that in Lincoln’s mind the only real justification for the slaughter was to end the scourge and sin of slavery once and for all.
Was Lincoln a “white racist”? Probably, 90% of the US population was racist at that time, and probably at least 90% of the world as well, according to our present-day standards. Apart from race, one’s ancestry and origins were highly important in those times, and as you go further east even today in the US, the establishment families appear to be more conscious of their pedigrees than those out west. I would be interested in knowing if in DiLorenzo’s scholary work, he made the error which the politically correct idiots of today constantly make of judging the really great people of the past with modern day conventions. Aristotle probably had slaves and likely had prejudices which favored Macedonians, but such does not discount his contributions to the entire world.
Lincoln was against intermarriage with the blacks, and even perhaps believed, like most other whites at the time, they were of an inferior race. The idea of superiority had a lot to do with learning and technological improvements in all areas of life, which was not readily seen in black nations or in most other areas of the world. White people then according to our modern standards were generally very proud of their advancements in learning and civilization, and being able to dominate the world militarily certainly contributed to such notions, as is the tendency in all cultures. However, since then and with the advancement of education on a world scale the lesson to us all is that every race has unique distinctions and gifts and everyone is capable once given a chance to lift themselves up at least socially and technologically. Lincoln was not in favor of keeping anyone down and especially in chains because of their race. As for our present multicultural, politically-correct ideas of what “up” is, when we look back to the more robust people of the 19th century, in many ways they were likely more superior to the sheeple of today, should we invoke any truly universal standards of good and evil.
If the States had a leader today with as much integrity and wisdom as Lincoln, things like the control of his nation by the international banking cartel (which he opposed), and their Covid plandemic, would not have lasted two seconds in the nation. On the religious side of things, he did not belong to any Christian denomination and was not a church goer, but he did know his bible and was an ardent believer in Divine Providence guiding him and his nation. In the few years before his death, there is evidence of his coming to Christ.
To put things in a more realistic perspective of the differences, in the midst of the war, the Union side was in the process of opening up the western territories. There was the problem of the native Indians, which of course the whites for the most part believed were savages and inferior. Lincoln was faced with two alternatives. On one hand he said there were those who wanted to exterminate the natives, and on the other. there were those with “the more Christian” view who said they should be put on reservations. He fortunately decided on the later, there being no real movement for integration at the time. It is a sad history, but at least we can say that without Christianity there would have nothing to stop the kind of ruthlessness and genocide which has gone on all over the world at the hands of most conquering people.
That was the way the world was in those days, but we of all races continue to cast a blind eye to people who are killed, displaced or persecuted because a more powerful group, race or religion considers them to be inferior and usually in respect to quite shallow and selfish standards. We also have to remember that we do stand on the shoulders of many people who were truly great, and because there were faults and evils in their lives, and in the societies they represented, that is no reason to tear down our memories and the honor we ought to give them for the virtues which shine through everything, and is a benefit to everyone.
It doesn’t matter what President Lincoln actually was, it is all a game of perception is the present moment to create the emotional energy to tear down Amerikan history so that no one knows who Lincoln was or why the civil war or anything.
Jews are destroying nation states and histories of all nations so no one knows their past so Jews can control the masses in the present.
The end game is all nations, all religions, all institutions that aren’t Jewish are completely destroyed and forgotten leaving Jews as the rulers of the world. Gods.
In the near future the only thing anyone will know is that Jews are divine and the goal of the average person is to serve them and lick their feet. Absurd as that sounds, they are well on their way of moving the world in that direction.
We can fight back, we could nuke Israel and return the world to sanity, but the big roadblock are all the non-Jewish Zionist goyim, like that fat demon pig John Hagee who is convincing so many that Israel is the apple of God’s eye.
Neo, you’re upset because some bipedal ape banged your woman.
You must also love bipedal apes, as you constantly write about them. What is it that you like about them? Sense of humour, large genitals, skin colour, what?
Here is something PCR left out of his essay about the civil war.
The Lincoln Putsch: America’s Bolshevik Revolution
“Communist communities were numerous in the North and the Midwest in the 1850s: Fruitlands at Concord, Mass.; the Owenite community of New Harmony, Indiana; the various Amanite communities in Iowa.” https://codoh.com/library/document/the-lincoln-putsch-americas-bolshevik-revolution/en/ The government of the city of Chicago in the 1850s and 1860s came strongly under German socialist influence. https://www.confederateamericanpride.com/lincolnputsch/
In fact, there are those who believe that Honest Abe was Jewish. After all, his name was Abraham. His great-grandfather was named Mordechai . Lincoln was the only President not to have a formal religious affiliation. He was neither raised in a church nor did he ever belong to a church.
And there’s more… The town of Lincoln, in eastern England, whence his ancestors came, has an interesting Jewish history. A Jewish community was established there in 1159. During Crusader riots, the Sheriff of Lincoln saved the Jews by giving them official protection.
When Abraham Lincoln was assassinated, whole Jewish communities sat shivah. Rabbis all over the country eulogized the fallen President. https://www.barbrastreisand.com/news/abe-lincoln-jewish/
Anyone remember the greeback dollar Lincoln created? Well from what I have heard Lincoln needed money to fund the war against the South. The London bankers wanted to charge high interest rate so Lincoln said screw you and started printing the greenback dollar. Of course London threaten, thus Lincoln made the war about slavery knowing that the British subjects were dead against slavery and during that time the Royal navy was capturing every slave ship they could and freeing their captors and that would ensure that the crown would not intervene on the Souths behalf. There were a few British exchange officers with some Confederate units during the civil more as observers or for advise. When Lincoln was assassinated in the theater by Booth, the printing of the greenback almost ceased immediately.
To Franz, well said , the attacks will be leveled at all people of European decent, whether it’s Anglo , French , or Spanish , in truth all caucasians. When I was in the military A lot of Blacks showed the same amount of aggression to all who weren’t black, even the whites who went out of their way to befriend them.