Vanessa Beeley – Patreon.com June 21, 2020
We now have mortality data for the first few months of 2020 for many countries, and, as you might expect, there were steep increases associated with the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in each one.
Surprisingly, however, these increases did not begin before the lockdowns were imposed, but after. Moreover, in almost every case, they began immediately after. Often, mortality numbers were on a downward trend before suddenly reversing course after lockdowns were decreed.
This is an astonishing finding. But before I discuss its full import, and pose some questions to those who still defend the utility of lockdowns, I want to present the data that proves it.
Here’s a series of charts by the Financial Times showing overall mortality and “deaths in excess of normal levels” in 2020 for a number of countries:
Click to enlarge
Imagine if the media fear-mongered every season of influenza, as they “(e)specially have for this psy-op. I suspect we’d all be dead from idiotic hysteria.
Stay in, can’t be getting vitamin D? Don’t exhale your CO2? Eat the junk food that’s proliferated endlessly because it’s “no contact”? Social distance to completely minimize the herd immunity effect?
So mysterious!
This type of misunderstanding and misinterpretation of data is not welcome.
This data proves that in spite of deaths by trauma (road accidents, violent crime) drastically dropping because of lockdown, deaths, according to registration of death certificates, damatically increased. Factor in the 14 day incubation period of COVID-19 and the statistics fit the facts, the virus is real and lockdowns work (common sense really).
The problem is people are irresponsible and lazy and don’t want to do any real research, they spot a couple of anomalies and, hey presto, it’s a false flag, because we’ve been peppered with for them last decade.
How can it solely be a false flag if it was released in China by accident?
This study ends with the question ends without a proper conclusion to be worth very much except to perhaps raise a lame suspicion which should have led the author on to other things.
The ending question is: “Most attempts to answer these questions would probably involve the assertion that the authorities in every country had some notion of the true prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic. But we know now that that was not really the case. In the early weeks and months of 2020, testing was extremely limited.”
If you look at the diagrams with the little hockey-stick graphs and read the paper, you will see that the evidence from China, South Korea, and especially the Diamond Princess is missing and not even referred to. Yet, those are the very sources which all the governments represented in the graphical diagrams can say were responsible for their decisions for the draconian lockdown measures. In particular, if they were ever really challenged they could say that despite the inconclusive evidence from China and South Korea, the initial alleged 7 deaths from Covid out the alleged 700 infected on the Diamond Princess, in the ships compliment of 3,600, showed a death rate of 1%. All the plandemic governments can recite this in unison as the major pre-waring to justify their lockdowns. The governments can also easily say that precisely because of the testing being “extremely limited” or unreliable, they had no choice but to follow the WHO precautions at the time, or that they just followed the precautions of the other nations. Furthermore, the deaths attributed to Covid in Italy can be used as an excuse as their lockdowns on February 21 were 2 weeks before those in Spain and 3 weeks before the other nations.
The author also uses data from the Financial Times and the Economist, which many regard as most dubious as sources if any objectivity was desired. These publications with their exponential graphical representations and captions to make it appear everywhere there are high initial deaths, are simply hyping the scare to justify the economic and social lockdowns. The governments can say they imposed the restrictions just in the nick of time.
If you go back to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg’s early March presentation, you will that he made it very clear that both the data from China and from South Korea did not indicate any real high incidence of deaths what would not be expected in any flu season. It was clear or ought to have been to any qualified and honest epidemiologist or virologist that there was no basis for any massive lockdowns or even any social distancing.
Then if one is to question the evidence from the Diamond Princess, things become extremely suspect. China without any proper way of testing for the number of infected as a denominator for determining the death rate (which is still the case), in its clown-like, government-orchestrated fake news, with people keeling over dying everywhere, imposed massive quarantines and lockdowns before anyone ever heard of anyone dying on the Diamond Princess. The fake news and government-media hype is the first smoking gun, and I am not saying China is solely responsible because it is very clear to me and many others that we are in a massive international psyop.
Our governments have done everything in their power exaggerate the number of deaths. In my area when the virus allegedly hit, there was a huge cluster in one nursing hospital for the very elderly. There were more measures to protect those in ever participating perp nation to protect those not at risk than those at risk. Yet, if our nations had really relied on the evidence of the Diamond Princess and South Korea they would have seen the very clearly defined and very small risk group, which clearly did not necessitate any massive lockdowns or preventive measures.
What we have here is not just a plandemic but an attempted holocaust, where it can be proven by virtue the clear evidence of all the make-shift efforts by all of our governments to deliberately exaggerate the death numbers. Yes, the pandemic is a pretext for lockdowns for our governments to control us for various other measures they intend to implement, but the real evil most people keep missing and cannot seem to understand, is that the pandemic planners actually expected far more people to get really sick and many more to die, not because of any precautions from the data from China, South Korea, or the Diamond Princess, but because of obvious earlier planning, and likely testing under very controlled conditions. If their lockdowns and restrictions were based on data from these nations and the Diamond Princess, then when the emptied hospital wards were not filled and the actual deaths numbers were lower than expected, our governments would have been very relieved and even publicly rejoiced. However, they were clearly disappointed, and in fact they rewarded hospitals to count anything as Covid. Worse still, there is now evidence coming in that Covid infected patients were even deliberately clustered with other very vulnerable elderly people. This is clear evidence that the pandemic psyop scrip writers and producers expected the virus to be more lethal than it actually turned out to be, and to keep up the scare and to maintain the psyop and the economic shutdowns they had to make shift their plans by their crude, clumsy, and criminal efforts to make the numbers as high as they possibly could.
If I am wrong about this then please give some credible explanation. Why exaggerate the numbers of deaths? Why pretend the empty hospital wards were full? Clearly all of our governments were in lock step to a planned scrip and once the pandemic was in motion from China they could not alter it. They had no way of knowing how their little engineered Covid virus would act once released in the general population. It is clearly by the grace of God they made this most fortunate oversight.
Jeannie Wallis:
“Very interesting how global mass fear and chaos all seem to have arrived on almost the same day! How amazing! Great piece of information.”
“Q: If health authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which exceeded normal deaths?”
Because one of the main reasons for the lockdowns was to allow the mass murdering super-state to operate without having to deal with all the witnesses to their crimes.
– Voltman
Murders Spiked When The Lockdowns Were Imposed
Eustace Mullins on ‘Murder by Injection’
https://grizzom.blogspot.com/2020/06/murders-spiked-when-lockdowns-were.html
I wrote a short piece, some few hours ago, that was refused. I see now, that my premisses where wrong. Sorry about that. Anyway, its probably because it upsets me so, I gather. Having read the figures that are also presented here, I can not but conclude, that governmental such, are shaped, to conform to a certain narrative. It makes me feel bad, cause my country chosed a lighter response to the ”plandemic”, and got me feel a little proud. But of course I suspected it. They shaped the figures up! Several times I read the official figures, and they where not worse than 2018. But there was something wrong with them!
Checking Swedish figures during the time-frame presented, 16/3-26/4, total deaths, that is all causes, are actually significantly higher than in the above graph. Its 2400. And the figures continue at this altitude until recently. They are of course not in the same league as Ferguson and Fauci prognosed, but they represent a notable anomaly. The article implies that the figures are to closely linked to lockdown dates, to be reliable, especially if covid was around at a far earlier date. Or, could the article also be read as implying, that lockdown and social distancing, caused a higher mortality rate? One should also consider that graphs constructed as above give a certain impression. But nevertheless, I cant escape the fact of the figures and the graphs, that both something unusual happend, and that lockdown dates are suspiciously synchronized.