Ian Fantom – June 16, 2020

If Fascism comes to America it will come under the guise of anti-Fascism. That is a well-known saying in the United States, attributed to various figures, in various wordings, going back to the 1930s. Now the United States is in flames, with instigated riots, and their President has tweeted “The United States of America will be designating ANTIFA as a Terrorist Organization”.

What we are now seeing in the ‘international community’ is ‘Liberal Fascism’. Jonah Goldberg in his 2008 book of that title argues that over time the term ‘fascism’ has lost its original meaning and has descended to the level of being “a modern word for ‘heretic’, branding an individual worthy of excommunication from the body politic”, noting that in 1946 George Orwell described the word as no longer having any meaning except to signify “something not desirable”. The US comedian George Carlin rephrased the saying as: “when fascism comes to America, it will not be in brown and black shirts. It will not be with jackboots. It will be Nike sneakers and smiley shirts. Smiley-smiley”. Exactly.

That is just what is being described by alternative journalist Adam Green, of Know More News, in a 90 minute commentary on video clips taken from the recent riots. He shows horrific scenes of violence against people and property, with “white Antifa types handing money to black ‘protesters’, handing them bricks….”, as one Keep Talking participant summed it up. This violence has been largely downplayed by the mainstream media in the UK, but Sky News Australia broadcast an eight-minute report, also showing video clips, and posting it on the Internet under the heading ‘Trump is to right “to label Antifa as a terrorist organisation”’. At last this issue is entering the mainstream.

Organised riots

The riots were clearly organised, following the murder of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis. Genuine protestors have no desire to set buildings on fire and destroy the shopping centres of their own towns. Why would black protestors want to destroy their own communities? Something similar happened in the UK in 2011 following the shooting by police of Mark Duggan. These could not have been spontaneous riots. The speed with which those thugs took control of the protest demonstrations is a common feature of the so-called ‘colour revolutions’ of the Middle East. “Are we about to see a Colour Revolution in the United States?”, asks Kit Knightly in Off-Guardian. He compares these riots with those of Ukraine in 2014, Egypt and Syria in 2011, Libya in 2010, and Bolivia just last winter, and Venezuela every year for decades. There are calls for Trump to be removed as President of the USA. Clearly, this has all the hallmarks of an insurrection. He ends with the old joke: “Why has there never been a military coup in the United States? – Because there’s no American Embassy there”.

William Engdahl wrote in October 2017 in Global Research about ‘CIA Backed Color Revolutions’. “I have yet to find a CIA and US State Department regime change or Color Revolution in which the “democracy-building” foundations of Soros were not in a kind of harmony with the Washington State Department and CIA agenda. Maybe just a coincidence”, he wrote. In one of my newsletters I reported the discovery that George Soros’s Open Society Foundations had given a donation to Hope not Hate. I was particularly interested in that because Hope not Hate had teamed up with Antifa and Black Bloc in a menacing demonstration outside the Diorama arts studio to close down one of our Keep Talking meetings. Yet the controlled media in the UK are so kind to George Soros. I switched on my radio one morning at one minute to six, and heard the end of a Profile program on George Soros, in which Professor Humphrey Tonkin was ringing the praises of his friend George.

“Have ‘The Powers that Be’ Just Staged a False Flag to Foment a Race War across America?” asks former detective Alex Scott. There had been no sign of George Floyd being combative. “Because officers are astutely aware of video cameras everywhere I found it quite interesting that four seasoned police officers appeared to be completely unaware or unconcerned that their actions and behavior was being captured on film”, he wrote. He describes the body language of some people in subsequent interviews and describes ‘duping delight’ as “a kind of subconscious coping mechanism displayed in the form of laughing or smiling when it would be considered inappropriate”. He suggests that one witness may have been a crisis actor, since his statements made no sense. It also transpired that the neighbours of the police officer concerned did not even realise he was a police officer. Perhaps he had been an undercover police officer. Apparently he and George Floyd had been bouncers at the same night club for 17 years. So could the whole thing have been a setup?

There’s also another video, titled ‘Cop Speaks On The Killing Of George Floyd That Happened In Minneapolis By Another Cop!’. In this video the cop describes George Floyd as an ‘actor’. I don’t know what significance to put on that, since it could have been a slip of the tongue, and the ‘cop’ doesn’t identify himself. George Floyd was known to a local shop keeper, and was arrested because of a ‘Counterfeit 20 dollar bill’, which he had possibly not even known was counterfeit.

Or did George Floyd die of a drugs overdose?

On the other hand, just as I was putting the final touches to this newsletter, I received a draft article from John-Paul Leonard in the US, presenting an interesting alternative view, with forensic facts. He headed the article: ‘George Floyd Died of a Fentanyl Overdose, not Police Brutality’. To me the most salient fact from this is that the knee hold used by the police is not a choke hold, and it does not impede breathing. It is a body restraint and is not known to cause fatal injury, he writes. The autopsy shows that George Floyd’s blood contained a lethal amount of Fentanyl. “Difficulty breathing was likely a symptom of fentanyl overdose”, he writes. To me, that article sounded convincing. I wrote back, “My first thought is why it has been left to you to figure this out, when we pay professional journalists to investigate these things, and why aren’t the police and politicians telling us about this”. Perhaps they did, but it wasn’t recorded. Perhaps the police put out some statement that was ignored in the hysteria. But why was the police officer charged with murder? Was that just to appease the lobby?

If this interpretation is correct, it would explain the inappropriate body language and the signs that one wouldn’t expect if this was just racial brutality, which it appeared to be at first sight. But nothing else changes. The riots have to have been preplanned and intentionally whipped up. My guess is that they were waiting for such an incident, which they could film and make out to be police brutality, with everything else already set to go.

John-Paul Leonard then edited and updated his text and posted it on the internet.

Black Zionism

As I was writing this up, others were investigating the George Floyd incident. My colleage Nick Kollerstrom discussed this on Jim Fetzer’s The Real Deal broadcast. The description of the video runs: “The Real Deal (6 June 2020) with Nick Kollerstrom, who lays out proof after proof that the death of George Floyd was orchestrated, including at least two video takes and improper procedures by both police and EMTs, where the riots and looting are based upon a fake event, where we even have two completely contradictory medical reports, which cannot both be true. This appears to have been a fabricated event to promote a malicious political agenda and exacerbate racial tensions in the United States”. On 9 June a piece by Mike Adams appeared on Jim Fetzer’s website under the title ‘PSYOP? George Floyd “death” was faked by crisis actors to engineer revolutionary riots, video authors say’.

Then I came across a posting with a video reporting “a two year undercover investigation into the leftist radicalization imbedded within the climate justice movement that contributed to the riots in Minneapolis, Minnesota” by investigative journalist Millie Weaver. It was headed ‘Undercover Investigation – Minneapolis Riot Was Preplanned’. At the end of the video though there was an weird trailer for Infowars, which many now regard as controlled opposition, so I’m not quite sure what to make of it. The purpose of controlled opposition is to take control of the narrative with 90% of the truth, and with the rest undermine the story either with deflection from the main point, or by ridiculing the story with some incredible fantasy. Even so, it’s often worth looking at.

These riots form part of a recognisable pattern, known as ‘Problem, Reaction, Solution’. Historians aren’t telling us about this, because they start off with Establishment history books, which they believe until they get proof otherwise. If they themselves do research and come up with unexpected results they may have to keep their mouths shut if they want a career. I do the opposite; I study current affairs and then trace their origins from the past. I found the same pattern in my Esperanto research, and now find that from time to time people tell me not to talk about it because ‘the others’ won’t believe me. If that really is the case, then why would they want to intervene? I myself was surprised that just a couple of steps from the network of insiders I had drawn up I was finding links to people like Bill Gates, George Soros, Noam Chomsky and Cecil Rhodes. Then I traced things even further back, to the origins of Zionism.

The ‘problem’ was the pogroms in Russia, starting with the one following the assassination of Czar Alexander II in 1891, instigated by a gang of thugs, comparable with the current riots in the US. The ‘reaction’ was to seek a Jewish homeland where Jews would be safe. The ‘solution’ was promoted by Theodor Herzl, in calling upon Lord Rothschild to fund a Jewish State in Palestine. Yet Herzl’s diaries show that the plan was a military plan to get the Jews in Europe willingly to emigrate to Palestine, by creating fear amongst the Jewish communities in Europe. Theodor Herzl, the ‘founding father of Israel’, turns out to have been one of the most ‘antisemitic’ figures in history. The same techniques are now being employed, but this time exploiting black people in creating the chaos, so that those behind it can take control.

One only has to look at the way the Israeli press are reporting on these riots to see a sort of self-confession. Now that ‘antisemitism’ can be applied to ant-Zionist Jews, it is clear that ‘antisemitic’ has again changed its meaning. It no longer means ‘against Jews’, but now means ‘against Zionism’. ‘Trump‘s Attacks on Antifa Are Attacks on Jews’ states a headline in Haaretz to an opinion article by Ari Paul, a New York journalist. “American Jews cannot support Trump’s ‘war’ on anti-fascism and his camp’s conspiracy theories about the ‘hidden hand’ behind legitimate protest and dissent”, the article asserts . ‘Coronavirus Crisis Elevates Antisemitic, Racist Tropes’, runs a headline in the ADL’s website. I think Donald Trump may now be regretting having appeased Israel and the Zionist lobby in the US so much.

So who is behind Antifa and the current riots? Could it be traced back to those who were primarily responsible for the slave trade in the first place? “Who was really behind the slave trade?”, asks Christians For Truth in an article headed ‘Jewish Dominance Of The African Slave Trade’. It seems well documented, but I do wish people would stop attributing such things to ‘the Jews’, when most Jews would not have been involved. It’s like referring to the Mafia as ‘the Italians’. I think even the term ‘Ashkenazis’ is problematic, because the Jewish Germans were clearly a separate group from the Jews in Russia. I think that when people start talking about a ‘Jewish Mafia’ or some such term, rather than ‘the Jews’ they will bring a lot more Jews on board, and possibly avoid the next round of anti-Jewish massacres, which would only play into the hands of the Jewish Mafia, as history shows.

Riots in the UK

There have been ‘Black Lives Matter’ demonstrations in many countries following the George Floyd incident, but not necessarily accompanied by violence. In the UK there has been violence, though nowhere near the scale of the US riots. The violence has been directed mainly at the police. Winston Churchill’s statue in London was defaced, and in Bristol a statue of a leading slave-trader was dumped in the water of the harbour. Ten police officers were hurt on Friday 5 June. The following day further clashes took place. “Metropolitan Police chiefs say 27 police officers were injured, 14 alone on Saturday, and 13 across last week, while a further eight were confirmed to have been injured last night – bringing the total to 35 in London since protests began”, according to the Mail Online. Prime Minister Boris Johnson tweeted: “These demonstrations have been subverted by thuggery – and they are a betrayal of the cause they purport to serve”.

I don’t doubt that Churchill was a racist, but that’s not the reason the are inciting the crowds to attack the statue. They are trying to create chaos, in order to bring in the New World Order. If all the monuments of past imperialists were to be pulled down, then I have to wonder how many monuments of political figures would be left. I can immediately think of only two: George Orwell and W T Stead. Some high-ups in the BBC were manipulatively obstructive in erection of the statue of George Orwell, and historians have airbrushed the name W T Stead out of history, which I found to my cost when I started reviving his name in the Esperanto association. Stead had forseen the Great War, and got an interview with the Czar to explain it to him. Churchill was the main public figure who instigated it.

So who is behind this obviously organised violence? ‘Today‘s Antifa-obsessed hard right politicians are rehashing the ideas of 1930s fascists’ runs a headline in the Independent. The article is by Evan Smith, author of a new book ‘No Platform: A History of Anti-Fascism, Universities and the Limits of Free Speech’, so one might expect it to be reasonably informed. “Figures on the hard right across the English speaking world have taken up Trump’s portrayal of Antifa as terrorism, with Conservative Party of Canada candidate Derek Sloan announcing on Twitter that he would also designate Antifa as terrorists if made prime minister. In the UK, the Brexit Party’s Nigel Farage said this week that he had first labelled Antifa ‘domestic terrorists’ in 2017”, the article states. So is Nigel Farage ‘hard-right’? Of course he’s not; he was portrayed as such during the referendum debate by the anti-Brexiteers. The author shows his ignorance by labeling the Red Army Faction and Red Brigades with “left-wing terrorism”, without mentioning NATO’s Operation Gladio, which was behind much of the terrorism in Western Europe during the Cold War. Saying that blaming Antifa is a right-wing conspiracy suggests just another cover-up.

Whilst I sympathise with the injured police officers, I have to say that I think the London Metropolitan Police have brought this upon themselves by not nipping small-scale terrorism in the bud when Antifa and Hope not Hate were closing down legitimate meetings by forming menacing street mobs and telling venue organisers that we were ‘Fascists’.

Antifa a terrorist organisation

President Trump’s announcement that the US is to designate Antifa as a terrorist organisation is good news for Keep Talking, because a Keep Talking meeting in May 2017 was closed down by a menacing mob outside the venue. Claiming credit for that were North London Antifa and Hope not Hate (HATE for short). HATE has subsequently closed other meetings down, merely by name-calling, and telling the venue managers that Keep Talking is a Fascist organisation. I don’t know whether the venue managers believed them, or whether they just felt intimidated, or whether some of them, or the people controlling them, were part of this underground Fascist movement. I am, of course, using the term ‘Fascist’ in the sense that they are, referring to the strong-arm tactics of the National Socialists, which they introduced into Mussolini’s Fascist movement, rather than necessarily the Italian Fascists’ philosophy, which in any case is probably beyond the mental grasp of most Antifa thugs.

So the news that the US is to designate Antifa a terrorist organisation should give some hope to those of us who want Antifa and HATE to be declared terrorist organisations in the UK. The name ‘Keep Talking’ was taken from my sign-off motto, and it was based on the idea that we shouldn’t let these incidents be forgotten once they are over; we should keep reminding people of what the deep state is capable of. Now is the time for all organisations that have had meetings cancelled by these anti-Fascist Fascists to press for them to be declared as terrorist organisations, and a lot of individuals and groups have been affected. Whether or not such a campaign is succesful it would draw public attention to the thuggery being inflicted on our people and our democracy, and bring into question any complicity of the police and the Charity Commission.

The signs have been here for a long time, and an increasing number of people have been trying to warn the world of things to come if we don’t question the authorities more than we are doing. I had seen such signs for decades, but I only latched on to just how big this could be in 2006 following my research into the decline of the Esperanto association when the smiling assassins set upon me.

In parallel to that I was brought up in an era during the Cold War when we were all expected to be in fear of Russian atom bombs, or a Communist invasion, and if not that of terrorist bombs from the Irish Republican Army (IRA), or of being hijacked in aeroplanes by the Palestinians, or of being blown to pieces by the spate of bombings from extreme left groups in Europe. At the end of the Cold War it was revealed that these were in fact coming from NATO’s secret stay-behind armies in Western Europe, supposedly there to protect NATO countries from a Russian invasion. Instead, they were engaged in what became known as Operation Gladio. There was always something to fear. Then came the collapse of Communism, and we thought the world was going to be a safer place. During the 1990s strange things were happening, and that applied to the Esperanto movement, too. There was now growing fear of Islamic terrorism as Gladio-style terrorist bombs were being reported. Then came 9/11, which enabled a new round of fear, of wars and restrictions on our freedoms.

This for me came to a head when I was Information Officer for the Esperanto association at the same time that Tony Blair was lying about Iraq’s ‘weapons of mass destruction’, and eventually I started investigating. When tyranny comes, it comes at all levels of society at the same time.

I think Antifa, HATE, and the smiling assassins were all fundamentally terrorist organisations from the beginning. At first it just looks like arrogance, then it looks like bullying, then it looks like violence, then it looks like insurrection. Lockdown has created a deep sense of frustration amongst the population, with some of the poorer people suffering really badly. The world is tinder dry, and one incendiary event can set it off in flames. Then those behind the fear-mongering can step in and seize complete control.

Aldous Huxley: Pharmacology and Propaganda

A colleague has just sent me a link to an article about the writer Aldous Huxley under the title ‘Aldous Huxley in 1958 – Pharmacology and Propaganda Will Make The Masses Love Their Slavery’, and it includes a video of an interview gave in 1958. The article is dated 2 May, 2020, and it relates what Aldous Huxley wrote in his novel ‘Brave New World’ to the current COVID crisis. The article begins with: “As the world is forced into accepting greater and greater levels of government control in all areas of life, remember that nothing in politics happens by chance. There is a science to creating empires. Tomes have been written on the techniques of controlling masses of people. Three important axioms stand out: people are much easier to control when they love their slavery, people in fear are very easy to control, and individualism is dangerous to the state”, and it ends with: “Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is emerging all around us. Are you paying attention?”.

Medical Dissidents

Many qualified medical practitioners have spoken out against the current lockdown. I reported on nearly thirty in my recent newsletters and linked articles in The Truthseeker. The numbers would probably be much higher if people weren’t afraid of losing their jobs. I came across an article ‘LOCKDOWN LUNACY: The Thinking Person’s Guide’ by J.B. Handley. His goal is to “engage in known facts”. “You, the reader, can decide if all of these facts, when you put them together, equate to the story above”, he writes. It is a review of published information so far (on 4 June) and seems to me to be the best summary I’ve seen so far.

Now a UK surgeon has spoken out and been sacked for doing so. He is Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil, a surgeon at Manor Hospital in Walsall, who specialises in hip and knee replacements. In the video he talks about the damage and the suffering caused by effectively closing down many of the services provided by the National Health Service, and all for a virus, he says, that doesn’t exist. He may be right about that; all I know is that it has not been proved to exist, because it has not been isolated, and so the DNA sequences detected may be from antibodies rather than from a real virus.

This point is explained by Dr Andrew Kaufman, who has a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology, and is also trained in psychiatry and practises as a ‘natural healing consultant’. He explains how microorganisms are identified using the ‘Koch postulates’. These require isolating the microorganism and growing it in a culture outside the body. However, viruses cannot reproduce outside the body, and so in the case of viruses, growing them in a culture had to be dropped. Instead a new set of criteria, the ‘Rivers criteria’ was developed for the case of viruses, but this set of criteria does not present proof, but can only give a result of being “reasonably confident” that the virus exists and is the cause of an illness. In the video ‘Evidence that Viruses Cause Disease’ Andrew Kaufman reviews the medical tests reported so far to isolate the COVID-19 virus. He explains that none of the tests has succeeded in isolating a virus, and that none of them meet any of the Rivers criteria. He even states that the original medical paper that set off the rumour mill is fraudulent.

So if it hasn’t been isolated, I am at a loss to understand a tweet on 6 June by BBC Science and Tech Correspondent Richard Westcott, which stated: “Research shows: 6/9,000 different types of #coronovirus in UK. Most types died out after infecting 5 or fewer people. But 21 types now common. Type in Norwich different to type in Kings Lynn just 40 miles away! All give same symptoms”. I checked that the ‘#coronovirus’ link does specify ‘COVID-19’. I first heard that the following morning on BBC 4’s Radio news. If they cannot isolated any virus and prove it exists, how can they identify so many different types?

I don’t know whether there is such a virus as COVID-19, nor whether there is any truth behind the reported epidemic. I don’t know whether what we are being told is mostly lies or all lies. I certainly don’t believe that lockdown was a sensible response, and I see no evidence that the decision was taken for medical purposes. I reported in a previous newsletter that shortly before the UK Parliament approved draconian laws bringing in lockdown because of the COVID-19 virus a government web page announced that COVID-19 was no longer considered to be a ‘high risk infectious disease’. One of our Keep Talking people is Kevin Boyle, and he, as a physics teacher, has a way of hammering the point home, which I don’t have, as a physics non-teacher. A short video of his appeared on The Truthseeker. “Some things need repeating”, he said. “There’s something very dishonest going on here. … The truth is we’re under attack. … People should be reminded of that a thousand times a week”. He also talks about the origin of the word ‘flu’, which was ‘influenza delle stele’ – influence of the stars in Italian. He pointed out that people had noticed epidemics breaking out in various parts of the world at the same time, and it was generally thought that there was some cosmic origin. That all changed in the 1920s with virus theory, he said. The implication could be radiation from sunspots. None of this makes much sense to me yet, but I know a lot of independent research has been undertaken on the health effects of electromagnetic radiation.

Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil, the sacked UK surgeon at Manor Hospital in Walsall, also talks about the effect of 5G, which many of my colleagues have been talking about, too. I have to say that I haven’t figured this one out yet. I have just been reading an article published in May 1986 on the Active Denial System, a weapon for crowd control using microwaves of frequency 94 GHz, which is one frequency within the range of the new high-frequency 5G band. This frequency has a wavelength of 3 mm. “Documents acquired for Wired News using the Freedom of Information Act claim that most of the radiation (83 percent) is instantly absorbed by the top layer of the skin, heating it rapidly”. The article also states: “Wet clothing might sound like a good defense, but tests showed that contact with damp cloth actually intensified the effects of the beam”. I think more research is needed into just how far such frequencies can penetrate the human body, and to what extent they can cause damage within the body, or be used for controlling microchips injected into the body. On the other hand, why are such queries being left to people like me, rather than being dealt with by the authorities responsible for installing or marketing 5G?

Global Nishtarians

Dr Adil was speaking in his own capacity, but he is also the founder of an organisation called Global Nishtarians, which is a sort of alma mater organisation for the Nishtar Medical College in Multan, Pakistan. He explains on their website, “After arriving in U.K. we realised that there were many medical associations, societies and organisations in the world contributing very little for the good cause of the doctors. Some of them were only working as a dinner club members. Therefore, I thought why can’t we could make a single most effective global medical organisation which could serve in advancing medical education, scientific innovation, teaching & training, exchange of knowledge and skills, helping in publication and research work beneficial to our graduates, Alma Mater and Pakistan”. That for me was an eye-opener. I was aware of similar dumbing down in other organisations and movements. The one I happened to be involved with was the Esperanto movement; I can say that the world-wide movement has gone the same way, and that in the UK the process was completed when I was set upon in 2006. Anyone who tries to go against that will be targeted, and it seems that that is what has now happened to Dr Adil in his area of interest. Although he was speaking for himself, he will be very influential amongst the Global Nishtarians. Judging by the video of him addressing a conference in 2019 there is there the same sort of enthusiasm and energy that was behind the early Esperanto movement, whose objective was to get people talking across linguistic and cultural divides, to reduce the tendency for them to believe lying politicians who were constantly taking them into wars. The fact that this issue has come to a head amongst Urdu-speaking Pakistanis rather than amongst indiginous English speakers tells us why the globalists are so fanatical about imposing a single language and culture throughout the world.

Dr Adil is also Chairman of the World Doctors Aliance, and in that capacity has written an open letter to All Medical Professionals (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=2443528895954964&set=a.2049792008661990). It states:

Medically qualified?

Any medically qualified reader might be interested in an online congress to be held on 17th and 18th July on the topic ‘The COVID-19 Pandemic: history, present state and the consequences’. It is the International Medical Esperanto Conference (IMEK), whose working languages will be English and Esperanto. This should be a good opportunity to present alternative views on medical aspects on COVID-19. The World Medical Journal of August 2018 contains a two-page write-up on ‘Medical Esperanto’. It would be good to get the word around.

The Great Reset

So what is their agenda? The ‘great reset’ is an initiative launched on 13 June 2020 by the World Economic Forum.

Investigator Spiro Skouras explains: “This is a long-standing global governance agenda, which ties into the United Nations 2030 agenda for sustainable development, which seeks to regulate, control and redefine all aspects of life as we know it. And in June of last year the United Nations and the World Economic Forum formed a Strategic Partnership to accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030”.

Using video clips from the World Economic Forum of October 2019, he explains how immunisation for all, and ‘transhumanism’ – a word they use for integration of humans with machines – are preplanned parts of this agenda to create the ‘superhuman’ . They call this the ‘fourth industrial revolution’, but to me it sounds like advanced eugenics, leading to an emerging clandestine totalitarian world order. The Covid crisis, he says, has accelerated the 2030 Agenda. “Things that are developed to help humanity are often weaponised against humanity”, he says. Then comes an astounding video clip of Professor Nita Farahany of the Duke University, USA, who states: “One of the things I think is so essential for the free and open society is the freedom of thought, and up until now the conversation that we’ve been having is around freedom of speech. Once we can access people’s thoughts, access people’s emotions, we have to enable a space that enables people to think freely, to think divergent thoughts, to think creative thoughts, and in a society where people fear having those thoughts the likelyhood of being able to enjoy progress is significantly diminished”.

“Did you just hear that?”, asks Spiro Skouras. Yes, I did. In November 2018 Professor Nita Farahany gave a TED talk titled ‘When techology can read minds, how will we protect our privacy?’, in which she outlines the developments in technology, and says she is worried by the implications. In the end she states: “… we’re on the brink of a dangerous threat to our collective humanity. Before you panic, I believe that there are solutions to these concerns, but we have to start by focusing on the right things. When it comes to privacy protection in general, I think we’re fighting a losing battle by trying to restrict the flow of information. Instead, we should be focusing on securing rights and remedies against the misuse of our information”. In other words, we should not resist, but should trust the authorities to protect us from the abuse of that data, to keep us safe.

What was once unbelievable is now believable. They are now hiding their agenda in plain sight. Spiro Skouras explains: “She said right now the discussion has been around free speech, but basically once we get that out of the way, once we get access to people’s thoughts and get access to people’s emotions, we need to create a framework for people to think in, so people aren’t scared, so people are safe. This is absolutely terrifying. Talk about thought police. They are fully intending, and telling us right now that they plan to have direct access to your thoughts and to your emotions and be able to manipulate them as they see fit, of course for the greater good”.

“They want to redefine what it means to be human”, says Spiro Skouras, “The virus will be the excuse to burn down the old system, as we’re seeing happen right now, and out of the ashes this new system will rise”. “Global government is at our doorstep. It’s being rolled out under the justification of this Covid-1984 crisis, and at the end of the day we the people do not have a say in our future – according to them. We don’t even get a vote – according to them. These technocrats are deciding the future of humanity for us right now, and, guess what, the future of humanity isn’t human at all”, he says.

We were warned of this in 2007 by filmmaker Aaron Russo, when he recounted how Nicholas Rockerfeller had tried to recruit him. Rockerfeller told him there was going to be an event, and out of that event they were going to go into Afghanistan, Iraq and Venezuala. He laughed about having a war on terrorism with no real enemy, and people would believe it because it would be constantly repeated in the media. He said that everyone would be chipped, and if anyone wanted to protest they’d just turn off their chip. A recent video recalls this interview, and shows how everything that Aaron Russo said is now coming true (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBm_9mIEyQs). “The most incredible aspect of all: These totalitarian elements will not be forced on people; the people will demand them”, the commentator asserted.

Watch out for the World Economics Forum on ‘The Great Reset’ in 2021 – probably only in English, of course!