LOCKDOWN LUNACY: The Thinking Person’s Guide
by tts-admin | Jun 6, 2020 |
J.B. Handley – Children’s Health Defence June 4, 2020
For anyone willing to look, there are so many facts that tell the true story, and it goes something like this:
Knowing what we know today about COVID-19’s Infection Fatality Rate, asymmetric impact by age and medical condition, non-transmissibility by asymptomatic people and in outdoor settings, near-zero fatality rate for children, and the basic understanding of viruses through Farr’s law, locking down society was a bone-headed policy decision so devastating to society that historians may judge it as the all-time worst decision ever made. Worse, as these clear facts have become available, many policy-makers haven’t shifted their positions, despite the fact that every hour under any stage of lockdown has a domino-effect of devastation to society. Meanwhile, the media—with a few notable exceptions—is oddly silent on all the good news. Luckily, an unexpected group of heroes across the political landscape—many of them doctors and scientists—have emerged to tell the truth, despite facing extreme criticism and censorship from an angry mob desperate to continue fighting an imaginary war.
My goal is to engage in known facts. You, the reader, can decide if all of these facts, when you put them together, equate to the story above.
Fact #1: The Infection Fatality Rate for COVID-19 is somewhere between 0.07-0.20%, in line with seasonal flu
The Infection Fatality Rate math of ANY new virus ALWAYS declines over time as more data becomes available, as any virologist could tell you. In the early days of COVID-19 where we only had data from China, there was a fear that the IFR could be as high as 3.4%, which would indeed be cataclysmic. On April 17th, the first study was published from Stanford researchers that should have ended all lockdowns immediately, as the scientists reported that their research “implies that the infection is much more widespread than indicated by the number of confirmed cases” and pegged the IFR between 0.12-0.2%. The researchers also speculated that the final IFR, as more data emerged, would likely “be lower.” For context, seasonal flu has an IFR of 0.1%. Smallpox? 30%.
As the first study to peg the IFR, the Stanford study came under withering criticism, prompting the lead researcher, Dr. John Ioannidis to note,
“There’s some sort of mob mentality here operating that they just insist that this has to be the end of the world, and it has to be that the sky is falling. It’s attacking studies with data based on speculation and science fiction. But dismissing real data in favor of mathematical speculation is mind-boggling.”
Like all good science, the Stanford data on IFR has now been replicated so many times that our own Centers for Disease Control came out this week to announce that their ‘best estimate’ showed an IFR below 0.3%. In this article on the CDC’s new data, they also highlighted how the cascading declines in IFR has removed all the fears of doomsday:
That “best estimate” scenario also assumes that 35 percent of infections are asymptomatic, meaning the total number of infections is more than 50 percent larger than the number of symptomatic cases. It therefore implies that the IFR is between 0.2 percent and 0.3 percent. By contrast, the projections that the CDC made in March, which predicted that as many as 1.7 million Americans could die from COVID-19 without intervention, assumed an IFR of 0.8 percent. Around the same time, researchers at Imperial College produced a worst-case scenario in which 2.2 million Americans died, based on an IFR of 0.9 percent.
If you’re still unconvinced that the IFR of COVID-19 is roughly in line with a bad flu season, the most comprehensive analysis I have seen comes from Oxford University, who recently stated:
“Taking account of historical experience, trends in the data, increased number of infections in the population at largest, and potential impact of misclassification of deaths gives a presumed estimate for the COVID-19 IFR somewhere between 0.1% and 0.41%.”
Finally, just last week, Stanford’s Dr. Ioannidis published a meta-analysis (because so many IFR studies have been done around the world in April and early May) where he analyzed TWELVE separate IFR studies and his conclusion is so good, I’ll just leave you with it:
The infection fatality rate (IFR), the probability of dying for a person who is infected, is one of the most critical and most contested features of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The expected total mortality burden of COVID-19 is directly related to the IFR. Moreover, justification for various non-pharmacological public health interventions depends crucially on the IFR. Some aggressive interventions that potentially induce also more pronounced collateral harms1 may be considered appropriate, if IFR is high. Conversely, the same measures may fall short of acceptable risk-benefit thresholds, if the IFR is low…Interestingly, despite their differences in design, execution, and analysis, most studies provide IFR point estimates that are within a relatively narrow range. Seven of the 12 inferred IFRs are in the range 0.07 to 0.20 (corrected IFR of 0.06 to 0.16) which are similar to IFR values of seasonal influenza. Three values are modestly higher (corrected IFR of 0.25-0.40 in Gangelt, Geneva, and Wuhan) and two are modestly lower than this range (corrected IFR of 0.02-0.03 in Kobe and Oise).
Opinion #1: Dr. Scott Atlas
Soon after the Stanford study released its data (he wasn’t a study author), Stanford’s Dr. Scott Atlas (pictured) published an opinion piece in The Hill newspaper with the title, “The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation.” He wrote:
The recent Stanford University antibody study now estimates that the fatality rate if infected is likely 0.1 to 0.2 percent, a risk far lower than previous World Health Organization estimates that were 20 to 30 times higher and that motivated isolation policies…Let’s stop underemphasizing empirical evidence while instead doubling down on hypothetical models. Facts matter.
Facts do matter, but no one listened. Dr. Atlas’ article also helps frame Fact #2.
Fact #2: The risk of dying from COVID-19 is much higher than the average IFR for older people and those with co-morbidities, and much lower than the average IFR for younger healthy people, and nearing zero for children
Continues …
“Locking down society was a bone-headed policy decision so devastating to society that historians may judge it as the all-time worst decision ever made”.
The worst decision for who exactly? If you make a bioweapon and release it around the world, but in favoured nations, most sheeple are pre-protected from the worst effects, so you cook the data to make it look like you couldn’t possibly be the criminals who released it… hey, look, we got it real bad, so don’t point the finger at us, our regime leader nearly died, really, he nearly died, because the fake news said so. Blah, blah, blah.
There never was a “new” disease. The proof is in the fact that overall deaths FROM ALL CAUSES are no greater than in any other ‘flu season.
“locking down society was a bone-headed policy decision so devastating to society that historians may judge it as the all-time worst decision ever made. Worse, as these clear facts have become available, many policy-makers haven’t shifted their positions, despite the fact that every hour under any stage of lockdown has a domino-effect of devastation to society.”
Here’s another way of putting it:
Television, The Opium Of The Mentally Enslaved
Featuring Larken Rose, The Dollar Vigilante and The Disposable Heroes Of Hiphoprisy
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2020/06/television-opium-of-mentally-enslaved.html
What we also have to do is to look deep down into the rabbit hole of the cartel/cabal establishment without being drawn into it. What we see on their walls everywhere are their “plans”, redesigning the world as if it was their own backyard.
The irrefutable evidence which has surfaced, showing the deliberately-underestimated infection rates and the deliberately-overestimated deaths attributed to the Covid virus, verify that we now have totally faked mortality rates engineered by our health agencies, as directed by all of our lying governments. The same can be said for morbidity rates. This may seem preposterous to most people to think that all of our governments and politicians could be involved in such a colossal scam. Yet, everyone of them is under the thumb of the same international banking cartel, which is most certainly behind the psyop, and I am in the school of thought that it is mainly to cover the huge global financial reset and pangs to come from it, likely to take place in a matter of weeks. Secondly, I agree that we have all the UN sustainability agendas, together with the corporate centralization & downsizing measures, with more state technocratic control measures all being rolled out at the same time, also using the all-encompassing pandemic tarpaulin as cover. Thirdly, we have the enormous world flu vaccination program in the works where trillions are to be saved and a trillion or two to be made by the money moguls of the planet, which plan is feeding directly off of the havoc alleged to be caused by the virus. As we have learned with 9/11 there always are a plethora of compatible interests served in any major psyop
Based on the initial US modelling and planning from the Israeli-owned Diamond Princess the US authorities expected a death rate of about 7/700 or 1% of those with symptoms which was about 19% of the passengers.Likely based on earlier CDC flu stats the US authorities expected at the most 13% of the US population to be infected with symptoms from the Covid virus, or about 42 million people. We can safely say they expected 30 million people to have symptoms and at mortality rate of anywhere from .5% to 1% (say .75%). Therefore, it can be said that they were probably anticipating deaths in the order of 225,000. To date in the US with the flu season officially over, the total deaths attributed to Covid are at 111,000 which is a totally jacked-up number, as we in fact now know.
Some would say from the above reasoning, “What a jolly good job our authorities have done in protecting us with all of the social distancing measures, lock downs and to keep us apart and prevent us from getting infected. Why, they have saved 1/2 of the people destined to die.” Unfortunately, people who think like this are totally unable to connect any dots and that is precisely the reason the elites who are running things have absolutely no qualms whatsoever in wanting to cull the population of the world down to 500 million people who have some dot-connecting capacities. Unfortunately, our authorities in all our nations no longer deserve any praise for their efforts, except for the dictatorship of Belarus which did nothing and had only 263 deaths in a population of over 9 million.
Sure our governments expected more, but they were so disappointed in the actual death rates that they felt they had to deliberately and generously jack up the death numbers trying as best as they can to fit the entire psyop plans and to justify their fear mongering, knowing all along their control measures were just a part of the sham. All their planning went askew based on the fact that the virus was not and could not be tested in the general population. It was only lab tested under controlled conditions and no one could foresee based on lab testing that the contagion factor was low in the general population, and the virus quickly dispersed with herd immunity – precisely why a second round of something a little more contagious is so important to them now.
For the actual planners of the Plandemic, their “expectations” of a much more serious pandemic do not go back just to the modeling from the Israeli-owned Diamond Princess last February, but back to a much earlier time with facts (now denied by US authorities) that the Covid virus was in a number of US labs since 2015.
As announced in December 2019, Israeli pharma has developed a universal flu vaccine, which will be ready for mass distribution by December 2020. In the US alone, it is estimated that seasonal flus costs over $200 billion each year in medical and economic losses. Any such vaccination on a world scale would be savings in the trillions. Every government would be interested and on board. For a psyop? Yes. Then there are all of the technocratic allurements and financial resets all requiring the same cover. It all sounds like an offer no government could refuse, and especially if it was “recommended” by your actual owners, where you either take the money or your doom.
THE ELTON JOHN EPSTEIN CONNECTION
In 1989 constant reports from Social Services to the police meant Elton John had to be investigated
for sodomising young rent boys, many still at school.
Elton johns Windsor mansion had builders in to do exterior work when a man came and introduced himself as being from MI5
The builders went through his car and found he was in fact from Special Branch’s elite Royal protection unit.
As the builders got on with their work, this man would lay on the roof with binoculars and would often be there like this when they arrived in the morning, the fact that he had a flask and sandwiches suggested he had been there all night.
On a lot of mornings very young rent boys would be seen leaving Etons house.
This activity led the builders to say when Elton John went out, they would get in the window and have races down the long hall on Eltons C5 scooters, and help themselves from his huge drinks cabinet, this man said keep watch for me i am going in, the builder who kept guard watched intently as this man took Eltons address book by the telephone and photographed every page.
Later the builders decided to do the same as they were curious as to what was going on.
As they pieced the story together they realised that Elton , George Michael, Freddie Mercury, Boy George Jonathan King and others were part of a Homosexual ring abusing Schoolboy runaways and boys from 16 London care homes, this was later documented in the Nene report which was D Noticed and shredded by Tony Blair and children’s minister Margaret Hodge who helped finance PIE.
The British news outlet UKColumn described the abuse as on an “Industrial scale”
Sensing there was money to be made the builders wet to the newspapers and gave photos of boys leavig Eltons home in the early mornings, the Sun newspaper splashed it cross the next days papers, But Rothschild and Oppenheimer who finance the Murdoch empire were furious, and ordered Murdoch to back down and pay libel damages.
The reason was Elton Johns closeness to the Royal family, and who among them was also using these boys,
Sir Anthony Blunt said the only reason Rothschild allowed our Royals to stay in place is because they are secret jews.
That disgusting wretch Simon Cowell had connections to both this Homosexual group and Greville Janners mainly jewish group,
and he would put up a £150,000 defence fund for any jews up on charges of child abuse.
After the Heidi Fleiss young prostitution racket was exposed and broken up, Mossad built up the Epstein ring,
again Royals were involved this time with girls, in both cases Robert Maxwells daughter Ghislane was the cut out between Mossad and the backmail gangs.