Kit Knightly – Off Guardian May 26, 2020
From Ferguson to Cuomo to Cummings, the high profile Lockdown violations show the establishment don’t believe their own hype.
The debate today is whether Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnson’s Chief Advisor, should resign, or not. Whether he broke the lockdown rules, or even the law. Whether his trip was justified or if there was some perfidiousness behind it.
Mostly, they miss the vitally important point.
Professor Neil Ferguson. Click to enlarge
The same was true when Neil Ferguson – main author of the Imperial Model, and consequently the lockdown – was found to be breaking lockdown with his married girlfriend.
The press divided between the lockdown enthusiasts defending him, or the anti-lockdowners eagerly calling him a hypocrite.
Both, again, were missing the point.
Yes, it’s satisfying to cast people down for being hypocrites. Yes, it’s easy to conduct witchhunts based on shallow issues against people whose politics we disagree with. But to take part in the free-for-all is to endorse a distraction that actually reinforces the narrative, and misses the fundamentally more important issue at the root of it.
We’re all meant to be “sheltering in place” and “protecting the NHS” and “saving lives” because there is a “deadly virus”. We’re being told this is for our own safety. Because the virus is allegedly dangerous.
When the people giving us these orders do not follow them themselves, they are not showing themselves to be “hypocrites”. They are showing themselves to be liars. They are admitting they don’t really believe what they’re saying.
The best example is actually from the other side of the pond – Chris Cuomo, CNN anchor, brother of one New York governor and son of another.
When Cuomo was meant to be “self-isolating”, after allegedly getting infected, he was spotted by a cyclist socialising on the site where his new house is being built. (Days later, Cuomo made a big deal out of emerging from his basement as if he hadn’t seen his family in two weeks).
You don’t invite your married girlfriend round to your house, then send her back to her husband and children, if you really believe there’s a dangerous virus.
You don’t drive to Durham in the middle of a “national emergency” if you really believe we could all get infected and die.
You don’t break your self-isolation early to have a barbecue with your neighbours if you truly think you have a terrible disease that could make your family sick.
If I tell you you shouldn’t eat chocolate, because it will make your head explode, then I take your chocolate off you and eat it – you wouldn’t think “You hypocrite! You fool! That could make your head explode!”, would you?
You’d be far more likely to think “Hey, he lied to me so he could steal my chocolate.”
(To fully complete the metaphor there needs to be a third person there, saying “but chocolate never made our heads explode before”, and being roundly insulted by the other two as a “Chocolate Denier”, who “just wants people’s heads to explode!”)
Whether it’s Neil Ferguson or Dom Cummings or Chris Cuomo the message is the same. They are telling us they do not really believe there is any danger.
More than that, the press covering it obviously don’t really believe it either.
Look at the crush of reporters and cameramen swarm over Dom Cummings outside his home this morning:
https://twitter.com/DarrenPlymouth/status/1264612133322530816
Remember: Cummings alleged crime is “breaking social distancing rules”.
Are any of those people social distancing? Are they all wearing masks? Are they acting – in any way whatsoever – as if there is a genuinely “deadly virus” out there?
No, they’re not. Because they don’t really believe it.
The same is true of the police, who will happily man-handle someone for not wearing a mask, despite not wearing masks themselves:
https://twitter.com/BeachMilk/status/1261264070273118208
Or, without any sense of irony, mob protesters for not “social distancing”:
73-year-old Piers Corbyn was surrounded by police officers during an anti-lockdown protest in Hyde Park, London, recently. Note how the police seem oblivious to “social distancing”. Click to enlarge
Whether this is true Orwellian double-think or just old-fashioned dishonesty is not for us to judge (that’s between them, their consciences and maybe their therapists). The internal complexities are as unknowable as they are irrelevant.
The point is: The police, the press, the scientists, the politicians – everyone spouting the need to follow the lockdown rules is perfectly happy to break them.
Because they know what they’re really for, and it’s not to protect us from a virus.
This is the Guardian, so take it easy.
“You don’t invite your married girlfriend round to your house, then send her back to her husband and children, if you really believe there’s a dangerous virus.”
Furguson and his married activist girlfriend probably work unknowingly to each other for British intelligence. I would suggest that she was encouraged to avail herself to Furguson. As I understand it, she needed to travel across London to hook up with Furguson. Even if you don’t want to believe they were both state assets, I have no doubt that all of Furguson’s communications were being monitored (bugged) and if Furguson was vital to the Covid cause, he could have been warned in a variety of ways to desist with his floozy. The fact is, they were set up. The deep state realised that after nearly two decades of crap Imperial College analysis, it was time to flush Furguson down the fake news toilet.
Not only is the virus story untrue and hyped, neither Boris or Cummings had the virus or whatever the ‘virus’ really is. I’ve always held the view that Britain was ‘largely’ pre-vaccinated by some means… I don’t claim to know-how, may they use the same methods to induce medicated passivity into the sheeple of Britain. Because MI6 and Porton Down are behind the Covid pandemic, they needed to build a case against the idea that bankrupt Brexiting Britain was behind Covid, so the data on Covid death and infections needed to be hyped and the idea that Boris had suffered a bad bout of Covid.
But don’t worry, I don’t believe for one moment that I am the ONLY person to have reached these conclusions. There will be many people like me, who have established the same conclusions and some will work for foreign governments, and most of them will have access to more and better intelligence than I will ever have. Just because no one is pointing the finger at MI6 and Porton Down, does not mean they don’t know it or believe it. The blame game between China and the US is exactly the kind of international crisis that the UK is very good at creating. The Chinese reaction in Hong Kong indicates that the Chinese have had enough of MI6 and CIA interference in Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland.
You should drop the illusion that a facial mask is protecting you against COV19. To get real, you should consider helping your immune system with healthy nutrition, plenty of vitamins, especially D3 and K2, Mg & Zn, good sleep and plenty of sunshine, positive thinking, regular physical activity, and in case of infection, magnesium oil (MgCl2). Something particularly efficient is redox activated seawater – it contains a molecule our immune system produce for killing pathogens, hypochloric acid (HOCl). By the way, this will protect you also against many other ailments, including cardiovascular diseases, cancers and leukemia. Something else helping, is to stay away from the brainwashing our wish-be-lords in governments implement on the population, the mainstream media thoughts poisoning, and cultivate good spirits, healthy relationships (socializing) and much good humor (get as much lough as possible). That’s it, and forget about ‘big pharma’ and vaccines!
Best of my wishes on your journey on this marvelous planet!
@ Carl Jones.
Ms Staats (yes, that really is her name….allegedly) is imho a plant working for private intel likely at the behest of Soros. Avaaz, by whom she is supposedly employed, is a change-agent organisation using faux grass-roots ‘activism’ to effect political change by bypassing the normal mechanisms of democracy.
With the growing chorus of outrage in the blogosphere at the sheer fuckwittery of Ferguson’s “modelling’ and his appalling track record of failure at it, and the blatant conflict of interest inherent in Gates’ bankrolling him for years, I suspect removing Ferguson from the limelight was an emergency damage limitation exercise, before the clamours for him to explain himself grew so loud even the whore media couldn’t have continued to ignore it any longer and maintain even a whit of credibility.
PS I think its actually “Off Guardian” not The Guardian
ALL people have to do,is to unite.. The rest will follow