Why not? Because they would expose this vicious farce, the criminals perpetuating it, and end the lockdowns.
Jon Rappoport — No More Fake News April 29, 2020
I’m republishing this article, because more people are becoming aware there is something wrong—very wrong—with the “science” at the bottom of this fake epidemic.
For example, Dr. Thomas Cowan, in his recent popular video, described my proposal for a true procedure that would determine whether a new virus actually exists. If he contacts me, I have more ammunition for him.
All right, let’s jump in—
The claim of having discovered a new virus (COVID-19) is wrong (unproven).
And the claim that the main diagnostic test (the PCR) can determine whether a person is sick or is going to get sick is also wrong (unproven).
What seems to be true in the lab is not sufficient in the real world.
The first experiment would confirm or deny the accuracy of the PCR diagnostic test. The experiment would reveal whether this widespread test for COVID-19 can actually predict illness in the real world, in humans, not in the lab.
This experiment has never been done. It should have been done before the PCR was ever permitted to make claims about THE QUANTIY OF VIRUS that is replicating in a patient’s body.
Quantity is vital, because, in order to even begin talking about whether a virus can cause disease, millions and millions of virus must be actively replicating in a patient’s body.
Here is the experiment. Assemble a group of 500 volunteers, some sick, some healthy. Take tissue samples from them, and give the samples to PCR technicians. The technicians will never see or know who the 500 volunteers are.
The techs run these samples through the PCR. For each sample, they report which virus they found, and how much of it they found.
“In patients 34, 57, 83, 165, and 433, we found a great deal of the following disease-causing viruses.”
Now we un-blind those specific patients. By the test results, they should all be sick. Are they? Aren’t they? Then we would know. We would know how accurate and relevant the test is in the real world.
Of course, this is not the end of the experiment. The same samples should have been given to a whole other set of PCR techs to run. Did they come up with the same results the first set of PR techs did?
Several new groups of 500 patients each should be enlisted, and still more sets of lab techs should repeat the experiment, ending up with confirmation or rejection of the initial findings. This is the way the scientific method is supposed to work.
In the absence of this experiment, the quantitative PCR must be looked at as a rogue hypothesis that should never have been foisted on the public in the first place. It should never be used as the basis for determining case numbers of any disease.
In the “COVID-19 crisis,” all case numbers derived from the PCR should be thrown out.
The second vital experiment concerns the discovery of a new virus—in this case, COVID-19.
First of all, there is no lab procedure that can climb inside the human body in real time and record the active replication of millions of virus. The closest you can come involves the use of electron microscopy.
Suspecting the existence of a new disease-causing virus, researchers should line up, at the very least, several hundred people who seem to have the new disease. Tissue samples should be taken from them. Using correct steps of isolating-purifying-centrifuging these samples, specimens of the results should be examined and photographed under the electron microscope.
In every one of the several hundred photos, do the researchers see many identical particles of a virus they’ve never seen before; and do the researchers see that these many particles are the same from photo to photo?
If so, and if more than one group of researchers independently carrying out this procedure on the patients’ tissue samples achieves the same result…then, this is as close as you can come to saying you’ve discovered a new disease-causing virus.
Other researchers with other large groups of patients should attempt to replicate the above findings.
This vital experiment has never been done in the case of COVID-19. Not even close. Therefore, researchers can’t make a true claim to have discovered a new disease-causing virus.
In the absence of the two vital experiments I’ve described in this article, all you’re left with, concerning a single “COVID-19” pandemic and a single new cause, are: anecdote, rumor, gossip, conjecture, speculation, bad science, and lies.
Plus the horrendous damage from all the consequences of lockdowns based on those lies.
It’s essential to realize where the burden of proof rests. The scientists who claim to have discovered a new epidemic virus, and the scientists who claim their PCR can determine whether a person is sick or is going to get sick—THEY are making the assertions. THEY have to supply the proof.
“Oh, but it could be a virus, and the virus could be killing lots of people…” People saying this are caught in the trap, the COULD-BE trap. Yes, it could be a purple cow giving birth to a calf on Mars, who is then flown to China, where it infects seven bats in a dark alley in Wuhan, after which several people eat the bats…
If COULD-BE were science, the planet would remain locked down until there were no humans left.
TO READ ALL MY ARTICLES ON THE COVID LUNACY:
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/covid/
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
…the absolute best treatment of this subject I have come accross, in all the articles you have written on this so-called pandemic.
The main problem with humanity in general, I believe, is that the vast majority of the population never has any doubts nor requires clarifications from the liars using all their propaganda machinery to spew out nonsense and destructive “guidance” left and right.
On the other hand, if someone points out those lies and nonsense with a ton of logic and proof, that same majority of people would require them to name everyone involved in the conspiracy, the exact time the next lie will be told AND why they made a spelling error in their explanations or used “non-scientific” jargon…
Conditioning is so strong it’s almost impossible to undo. However, I guess trying to undo it is the only we have any hope of actually not going back to the dark ages, or worse.
Keep up the good work, it’s exceptional.
The “scientific method” has never been used on any vaccine. No double blind tests against a placebo to confirm the effectiveness of a new vaccine have ever been done as is the practice for a new medicine. Therefore this is the reason the virus has never been tested in this way, it has not and cannot be identified or proven to exist.
falsehood don’t dare to face scrutiny rather use law to enforce it and resorts to psyops trickery with the help of protistute jornalisim, the spinner.
One key point in this matter from someone who has over 30 years experience with PCR is the amount of starting material for the PCR reaction. As PCR is extremely sensitive and often has been called PCR Hell even slight variances in the amount of starting template ( in this case Covid 19 RNA ) can give wildly different results.The problem arises from the swabbing of patients in the hospitals where there will be great variances in the way the swabs were done and whether they were performed accurately from patient to patient which would be nearly impossible. At best the PCRs now performed will let you know at best the actual presence of the Covid19 and not necessarily the amount quantitatively.In any event the presence of the Covid19 in a dying patient does not necessarily mean that the Covid19 is responsible for the cause of death.
I like to address jon’s argument on the 2nd experiment, ie is there a new virus covid19? I thought there is, at least the Chinese researchers published the DNA sequence, back in december 2019?
they would not have published it if the virus is not new? yes?
John, a mental health question your GP will now ask us where to you think the virus came from. If you answer China or Gates etc you’re going on a list. If you answer there is no evidence it was lab made you’re deemed ok.
So I took it one step further with my Doc with both of these lowest common denominator points. He couldn’t argue after setting the stage for truth. Then he proceeded to show me the repo`s explaining America is fked. Yes Doc it is a very corrupt world check out their oil industry, have a nice day.