Peter Hitchens – Mail on Sunday April 12, 2020
Matt Hancock. Click to enlarge
Until I started travelling in the Communist world, my main experience of living under tyranny was my time at a boarding school on the edge of Dartmoor, 60 years ago.
The headmaster, an enormous, booming man, had many fine qualities. But he was given to dreadful rages, which tended to strike late on Saturday afternoons.
He would throb with fury because some of the more loutish boys had left their games clothes on the changing room floor. For some reason, he viewed this as a terrible crime closely related to murder.
So he would summon us into the assembly hall, and harangue us as darkness fell outside. The more we stood mulishly in front of him, saying nothing and with our eyes downcast, the angrier he became.
Sometimes he would hold up a pair of muddy football shorts as horrific evidence of the latest atrocity.
Collective punishments – a ban on eating toast, or the cancellation of a promised film show – would follow, along with more shouting and angry notices in red ink, threatening worse to come.
Most of us were guiltless of wrongdoing. But we were small, and he was huge. The staff seemed more scared of him than we were.
We were on a windswept hilltop miles from anywhere. We had no escape. We assumed our letters home were censored, so we put up with these ludicrous exhibitions and waited for the storm to pass.
Oddly enough, the terror did not work. People carried on leaving their clothes on the floor, just the same.
I had thought such childish things were long over in my life. But a week ago I found that I was, once again, living at the mercy of an equally petulant would-be despot.
Matthew Hancock, Secretary of State for Health, went on national TV to threaten to ban outdoor exercise if people continued to break ‘social distancing’ rules.
From a Government that claims to be preserving life and health, this threat was literally mad.
Banning exercise for any length of time will lead to the deaths and illness of many thousands of currently healthy, older people who know that such exercise is vital to their physical and mental wellbeing.
Such exercise can easily be taken while maintaining the required distance from others. The threat was a dictatorial one, of collective punishment of all for the wrongdoing of others.
This is illegal under Article 33 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions. A foreign occupier would not be allowed to do it.
Mr Hancock also said it was ‘quite extraordinary’ that some people had spent the weekend sunbathing in public places despite it being against Government guidance.
Getting into his stride, he urged people not to sit down even for a minute on a park bench, saying those who disobeyed the rules were putting their own and others’ lives at risk.
What is this nonsense? The words of Ministers and the words and actions of the police show a pointlessly bossy side to these measures – the attempted ban on Easter egg purchases, the sunbathing squad, alleged arrests of people for just buying wine and crisps, the lumpish threat by a police chief to search the baskets of shoppers.
Provided the people doing these things do not break the distancing rules, why are they wrong?
Sunbathing, for instance, probably reduces the risk of infection, and if people keep a proper distance apart, what on earth is wrong with it? Why shouldn’t someone sit on a park bench?
Mr Hancock said: ‘I say this to the small minority of people who are breaking the rules or pushing the boundaries: you are risking your own life and the lives of others and you’re making it harder for us all.’
I almost expected him to produce some rumpled piece of games kit and snarl ‘You have brought all this on yourselves’, as the nation cowered, trembling in short trousers before his unchallenged might.
Actually I try hard to follow the Government’s rule on social distancing. I do this much as I seek to respect the local religion when I go to Muslim or Buddhist countries.
I don’t believe in it, but it is only polite not to offend openly against it. And I very much urge you to do the same. Nobody should take my words as any kind of encouragement to ignore the rules.
Unlike the Government’s wild destruction of the economy, and its attack on personal liberty, it can do no harm to keep your distance from others. It might do some good.
But I sense something more going on here. The Government are trying to get us to accept a far higher level of state intrusion in our lives than we have ever endured. They are treating us as if we were unruly children.
This is despite what I regard as a quite extraordinary willingness among the great majority to do as we are asked. It has gone to their heads. They need to calm down, for the sake of all of us.
We are not children, this is not some 1950s prep school ruled by the swish of the cane, and Mr Hancock is not our headmaster.
Throwing schools, hospitals and RAF Squadrons into the Sea – our government’s economic policy
Are you trying to picture the effect of the government’s actions in shutting down a large part of the economy, strangling its own tax revenues and paying people not to work for weeks on end.
Think of it this way. It is as if Rishi Sunak and his colleagues were throwing two or three brand-new general hospitals into the sea every day; or 50 or 60 new schools; or a couple of RAF squadrons. And then they will send us the bill for this wanton waste, which we will pay, for decades, in higher taxes, shrivelled pensions, inferior public services and lower real wages.
The death numbers that just don’t add up
What do the daily death figures, supposedly from Covid-19, really mean? People who don’t know that 1,600 people die normally every day, and who don’t study the sombre official figures, or listen carefully to what officials say, may get the wrong impression.
Here are some facts for you. A week ago, at the daily official briefing, Dr Jenny Harries, the Deputy Chief Medical Officer, confirmed my point that many deaths with Covid are not necessarily from Covid.
She said: ‘These are Covid-associated deaths, they are all sad events, they would not all be a death as a result of Covid.’ What nobody says is how many are as a result of the virus.
Then, if you look at the Office for National Statistics weekly death charts, for week 13 of each year (the week which this year ended on March 27), you find some interesting things.
The total of deaths for that week in 2020 is higher than the five-year average for that time of year, which is 10,130. In fact, it is up to 11,141.
This is 1,011 more deaths than normal per week, 144 more deaths than normal per day, regrettable but not gigantic. Do these figures justify the scale of our reaction?
If you add up the total deaths for the first quarter of the year from respiratory diseases, the figure so far for 2020 (22,877) is less than those for 2013 (25,495), 2015 (28,969), 2017 (25,800), 2018 (29,898) and 2019 (23,336). Again, is this event as exceptional as we are being told? If not, why the shutdown?
Peter Hitchens should stand at the next election. His brand of common sense stands out in a sea of mediocre politicians none of whom inspires any confidence in their abilities to make sensible decisions. The whole “reign of terror” has been one big unnecessary overreaction to a serious but not population threatening illness.
This may very well be the very last chance for all people to wake up and take control over their own lives and their countries. For anyone who’s not clueing into the extremely clear fact that the world is run by FREEMASONS on behalf of bankers, whom have through absolut and indisputable FRAUD, USURPED control, by means of fraudulent credit backed BY NOTHING and created by “lender” him self. Since there is no money, there obviously cannot be any debt, can there. “Governments” are nothing more then sec.gov registered businesses, foreign businesses and people ARE NOT PERSONS. For god’s sake, startthink people, you have ZERO reason to surender to “government” thugs, too stupid to even ask questions about their own actions.
WAKE UP PEOPLE, ADDRESS THE REAL ISSUE AND THE REST WILL FOLLOW.
London 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666.The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea).The state (London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust. The state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property,until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles, he can also claim damages.When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a
name this always refers to a legal entity/fiction, Company or Corporation no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Doe: JANE
1) CEST TUI QUE TRUST: (pronou
nced setakay) common term in New
Zealand and Australia
2) STRAWMAN: common term in United States of America
or Canada
These are the legal entity/fiction created and owned by the Government whom created it. It is like owning a share in the Stock Market, you may own a share…
but it is still a share of the Stock.Legally, we are considered to be a fiction, a concept or idea expressed as a name, a symbol. That legal person has no consciousness; it is a juristic person, ENS LEGIS, a name/word written on a piece of paper. This traces back to 1666, London is an IndependentCityState, just like Vatican is an Independent CityState, just like WashingtonDC is an Independent City State.
The Crown is an unincorporated association. Why unincorporated? It’s private.
The temple bar is in London, every lawyer called to the “bar” swears allegiance to
the temple bar. You can’t get called without swearing this allegiance.
Our only way out is to reclaim your dead entity (strawman) that the Crown
created, become the executor and then collapse the called Cestui Que Vie trust
and forgive yourself of your debts and then remove yourself from the admiralty
law that holds you in custody.
When London burned, the subrogation of men’s and women’s rights occurred.
The responsible act passed… CQV act 1666 meant all men and women of UK
were declared dead and lost beyond the seas. The state took everybody and
everybody’s property into trust. The state takes control until a living man or
woman comes back and claims their titles by proving they are alive and claims for
damages can be made.
This is why you always need representation when involved in legal matters,
because you’re dead. The legal fiction is a construct on paper, an estate in trust. When you get a bill or summons from court it is always in capital letters, similar to tomb stones in grave yards. Capital letters signify death. They are writing to the dead legal fiction.
A legal fiction was created when someone informed the government that there was
a new vessel in town, based upon your birth.
Birth Certificates are issued to us by the Doc. just as ships are given berth Certificates at the Dock. It’s about commerce. We come from our mothers waters.
Your mother has a birth canal just like a ship. The ship moves by the sea current
just as we are able to move by the currency. All this information relates to how the general public are still legally tied through Maritime Admiralty Law. Through this ancient legal construct we can be easily controlled and duped. Learning about your legal fiction helps you to unlock yourself. Otherwise you are just an empty vessel floating on the sea of commerce. Parents are tricked into registering the birth of their babies.
In about 1837 the Births, Deaths and Marriages act was formed in UK and the
post of registrar general was established. His job was to collect all the data from
the churches which held the records of birth. Regis – from Queen or Crown. All people are seen to be in custody of,” The Crown”. This allows people to function in commerce and to accept the benefits provided by state. We have to understand who we are as men and women and how we can relate in the system. The City of London is a centre for markets, where merchants work. Then there is Mercantile Law. It comes from Admiralty Law. Look at the symbols in your City Courts that relate to Admiralty.
So where you have commerce and money, you also have “justice”
and “injury”.
You need to understand the bankruptcy before you can understand the judiciary.
We have accepted the claim to accept the summons, yet ONLY the dead can be
summoned. There is an obligation to accept any liability which has been created.
We are operating in Admiralty. A not guilty plea, or ANY plea admits jurisdiction.
The strawman, aka legal fiction is always guilty. Barristers and solicitors make a
living out of creating controversy. By creating a controversy you become liable for
the case.Honour and dishonour. To remain in honour you have to accept a claim and
settle (discharge) it. Then you add conditions, ie.“I accept on proof of claim and proof of loss”. This gives the liability back to them. The legal fiction is always guilty. Only in the High Court, can the real man or woman appear. Games are played on courts, hence the name ‘court’. It is a game with actors (acting on acts). It has to be treated as a game and just business. Court room dramas are misinformation. In the public, we are operating in bankruptcy and you receive benefits. It takes a lot of time, effort and study to understand and use these tools. You have to be prepared to go fully through the process, get the right tool out of your toolbox at the right time.
People need to learn how to act as a creation of God rather than a creation of Man.