by Jon Rappoport – No More Fake News March 5, 2020
(To join our email list, click here.)
Buckle up. We’re not riding on a smooth superhighway. These roads are extremely bumpy and rough.
Public health agencies and the press are casting out a blizzard of confusing terms:
presumptive cases, infected persons, asymptomatic persons, confirmed cases, containment measures, persons connected to persons who are infected…
It is my understanding that, now, the CDC is lumping together presumptive cases and confirmed cases, and calling them: CASES.
Certainly, that strategy would immediately multiply the total number of CASES and also multiply fear among the uninformed population.
A presumptive case would be a person who has not been tested for the coronavirus; or he has been tested, but the results are not yet in.
Why is he a presumptive case in the first place? There could be several reasons. He has ordinary flu-like symptoms, and his doctor suspects he might be infected by the coronavirus, for no particular reason. He might have come in contact with a person who has been diagnosed as an epidemic case. He might have recently traveled to China—and has or doesn’t have flu-like symptoms. Maybe he has a slight cough…
You can see that “presumptive” is a quite shaky status. It means next to nothing. Nevertheless, in order to “contain the spread of the virus,” he is pinned with that label—and added to the total of CASES.
The press, looking for the next piece of click-bait, sees that, in a particular state or city, there are “25 CASES.” A reporter writes an article. The public is led to sense that, in that locale, a “spread” is occurring. No distinction is made between confirmed case and presumptive case.
Suppose, in a nursing home, where a hundred residents have all sorts of long-term health problems—including flu-like symptoms and respiratory difficulties—two people have been labeled “presumptive cases,” because they were visited by a person who recently returned from China. Now, there is an opportunity to label more residents of the nursing home “presumptive,” because they’re in daily contact with the two “presumptive residents.” Result? There are 13 “presumptive cases,” and when the press discovers this, they characterize the 13 as CASES.
But it gets a lot worse than that. As I’ve been detailing in these pages, the basic test for the coronavirus is called the PCR. A positive result is taken to mean the patient “has the virus.” He is now a confirmed case. However, the PCR has many problems.
The procedure itself is tricky, and unless done perfectly, with great care to avoid contamination, the result is useless. But even when the test is perfect, it says nothing about whether the patient is ill or will ever become ill. Why? Because the PCR never comes to a valid conclusion about how much virus is in the patient’s body actively replicating. And in order to start talking about illness and disease, millions and millions of virus must be at work replicating inside the patient.
Going even further down the rabbit hole, how was the PCR test for the coronavirus developed in the first place? We seem to have an answer from the CDC, offered up to reporters in a February 28 press briefing. A Dr. Messonnier, representing the CDC, said this in reply to a question:
“…please remember that our laboratories developed this [PCR] test kit before there were US cases. We developed it based on the posted genetic sequencing, and it was this test kit that allowed us, to identify the first cases in the United States.”
What does this mean? It seems to means that the CDC accepted the genetic sequence of the “new virus” without having an actual isolated specimen of the virus itself. Is that a problem?
If the police receive a description of a car wreck on a local highway (the sequence), should they travel to the scene and actually look at the wreck (obtain an isolated specimen of the virus)? Should they decide who was at fault (diagnose the first US cases) without investigating (having the actual virus itself in their possession)?
Researchers claiming they’ve laid out the genetic sequence of a virus, and passing the information along to colleagues, is not what you would call proof of anything. Those original researchers could have sequenced another virus. They could have made mistakes. Did THEY ever have an isolated specimen of the virus?
Developing and using a diagnostic PCR test on humans, and then telling them whether they are “victims of the epidemic,” based on received genetic sequences alone, is more than irresponsible. It’s entirely reckless.
If you’ve come this far in the article, and you’re beginning to feel that the whole system of diagnosing people with THE VIRUS is madness, I would agree with you.
Categories of cases are being deceptively juggled and merged, in order to inflate numbers.
The “gold standard” diagnostic test is fraught with difficulties, and is inherently useless.
And lurking behind all this is the question: who discovered the coronavirus in the first place, and did they ever have an actual specimen of it, a biological reality; or, working from indirect “markers,” were THEY the PRESUMPTIVES, blithely assuming their genetic sequences pointed to an entity that actually exists?
If you think a fraud on this level has never occurred before, read my piece on the 2009 Swine Flu “epidemic,” and consider its potential implications.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.
…a voice crying out in the wilderness about hyped up fakery to be found on the MSM and also the fake alt. media.
It’s in THE SCRIPT – Brought To You by “Usual Suspect” Productions..
that Corona (regardless of it dubious lethality) is not only a “cover” but is The “Chosen” Mechanism to bring about ‘The Mother Of All Lockdowns’ before IMPLOSION by War and/ or Econmic Collapse –
The numerator is the number of CV-caused dead, and is an accurate figure. The denominator should be the number infected, anf that is not known accurately, but must be a lot higher than those tested positive. There aren’t enough test kits to test everybody.
So if the denominator is too low the figure for the rate of of infection will be too high.
A great piece of coherent, incisive, thoughtful investigative reporting by Jon as always.
Points about the COVID-19:
1. Does it exist?
2. Some may test positive and might not have the disease: False positives.
3. Some might test negative and might have the disease: False negatives.
4. Inherent errors in test results due to improper sample handling and its contamination.
5. Have the virologists managed to really create a very nasty virus through genetic engineering to create perhaps a biological weapon capable of selectively targeting certain molecules on surface of cells of certain populations?
6. Could there have been multiple strains; some much deadlier than others as a multi-layered approach and strategy to decrease the population, make people sick, frighten people to accept dodgy vaccines which could create an increase in the number of patients with chronic, incurable diseases with shortened and poor quality lives who become repeat customers (patients) of the medical Industrial Complex?
7. Even if the virus exists, a minority might catch it and never develop symptoms.
8. It is said that incubation period could be up to 30 days so you might be infected and spread the disease with an R ratio of 1: 4 and yet exhibit no symptoms. However, if virus is actively replicating and is present in bodily fluids as well as inside white blood cells and thus capable of transmission to and infection of others as well as capable of being detected then why should the original person appear asymptomatic for up to 30 days as viral shedding should prompt an inflammatory response with fever, cough, fatigue, sneezes, shortness of breath, changes in blood oxygenation, etc. There are a few medical reports in Iran where patients are having respiratory problems apparently with no respiratory acidosis and no compensatory metabolic alkalosis. Is this just propaganda to make people ready to willingly accept vaccines in the future or is the virus doing something that can not be explained?
9. What about the combined effect of an influenza virus or a Corona virus and the introduction of 5G plus a world military exercise all happening in Wuhan more or less at the same time as identification of the first case of COVID-19 in China.
10. Is it thought the virus has a high mutation rate. On that basis, the PCR might not amplify the alleged segment or might amplify a different sized fragment leading to both false negative results.
11. Why is the alleged COVID-19 spreading at a much higher rates in China and in Iran? Why are both the WHO and the Iranian Government against quarantine saying that it is outmoded and does not affect the spread of the disease?
12. Why should Iranian government donate gloves to other countries when its own country does not have enough as it is and its links and its corrupt theocracy hoards gloves, masks, drugs, etc. in order to make a bigger profit from its exploited and impoverished population?
13. Iran is probably the only country whose government was actively participating in bringing hords of allegedly infected Chinese Muslim students from Wuhan and other parts of China to Iran, spreading the infection around then actively spreading infection by shifting the infected Iranian people to different geographical regions of Iran where medical facilities were far inferior to the facilities of the original hospitals from which they were transferred from?
14. Why does Iran treat its population in this way? is this just another concerted, coordinated crisis amplification to generate more fear and anxiety to further terrorize its people to submit to and accept its draconian theocracy?
15. Production and management of crises and amplification of anxiety, fear, depression, anger and infusion of feelings of emptiness and helplessness and powerlessness are one of the effective ways of mind and population control; irrespective of whether the crisis is real or invented.
16. If the virus has been genetically manipulated and weaponized and because it appears that due to the alleged high mutation rate of the viral RNA, the viral RNA sequences from different patients in the same country appear different; never mind those from infected patients from different countries; surely it would be very difficult to create a reliable vaccine even when the vaccine might appear pure, i.e. devoid of adjuvants, preservatives, etc.
17. The rate of spread of this infection in Iran seems to be amazingly fast. It now seems to have spread across all regions but the Iranian government initially lied about it ever existing in Iran; then came clean very late in time and admitted to it being a problem at a much later date doing just about all the wrong things to ensure its spread culminating in the number of both infected and dead patients being at least 20-100 times higher than the officially published figures.
18. How could so many people be infected so quickly and die in such large numbers in such a relatively short time other than with the help, coordination, active participation and spread of the infectious agent(s) deliberately; with intent to do harm, by the corrupt, sell- out ruling elite and the ruling cryptocracy in those countries? The rate of spread of the flu globally seems to be out of sink with the natural means of spread of the disease.
19. The smaller the population, the easier it is to control the people.
Big Time Numerator
I started off, a news whore at a paper
For a time, a prime insinuator
But all the time I knew that later
I would be denominator
And finally a Big Time Numerator
For a while, I was an infiltrator
Then I became an active instigator
A well renowned renumerator
And later on an operator
I’m gonna be a Big Time Numerator
You got to believe in me!
I took a job as a headline fabricator
As I became virus investigator
For a time, a dominator
Then I was exterminator
I’m gonna be a Big Time Numerator
Well don’t you know I’m going to be in the big time baby!…!
Corona Denominatrix Baby!
Voltman
Big Time Operator-Keith Hampshire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQCVTJTPTHE
Top Health Official Cashes in on Merck Stock
Story at-a-glance:
In January 2020, Dr. Julie Gerberding, former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who after leaving the CDC became president of Merck’s vaccine division, sold half her Merck stock options for $9.11 million
Gerberding also cashed out in 2016, when she sold $5.1 million in Merck stocks, and 2015, when she made $2.3 million. In total, Gerberding has made $16,592,144 from her company stock options
Gerberding’s former high-level ties to the CDC likely has had enormous influence over Merck’s financial growth, considering Merck makes a majority of the pediatric and adults vaccines recommended by the CDC
Red flags have recently been raised about Merck’s HPV vaccine Gardasil, a vaccine Gerberding promoted in a 2004 report to Congress before it was fast tracked to licensure in 2006. The U.K. recently reported a 54% rise in cervical cancer among 24- to 29-year-olds, the first generation to receive the HPV vaccine
A January 2020 report in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine warns HPV vaccine trials have not been designed to detect whether the vaccine actually prevents cervical cancer. Trials have shown, however, that Gardasil raises the risk of cervical cancer by 44.6% among women with a current or previous HPV infection
Merck Plays Loose With HPV Vaccine Data
In June 2019, I published Kennedy’s presentation of Merck’s clinical trial data for Gardasil, in which he reveals how the company hid the truth about its side effects. One way in which Merck committed fraud in its Gardasil vaccine safety trials was by using a neurotoxic ingredient in Gardasil as a bioactive placebo. This trick effectively renders its safety testing null and void, as the true extent of harm cannot be ascertained.
For the rest of the story…
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/03/06/julie-gerberding-merck.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20200306Z1&et_cid=DM473197&et_rid=824349238
Regardless, take some comfort in the truth (and the real source of underlying anxiety)…Ye shall surely die.