Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Contradictory, Shifting & Evasive Testimony Is Protected From Questioning

John Wear – wearswar.wordpress.com June 6, 2018

Eye witnesses say that for months after the killings the ground continued to spurt geysers of blood….

Famed Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal…. wrote that he tried to commit suicide by cutting his wrists while incarcerated by the Germans. Instead of letting him die, the Germans sent him to the hospital where they nursed him back to health…

Eyewitness Testimony of German Genocide of European Jewry

Inevitably when anyone questions the genocide of European Jewry, eyewitness testimony is raised as proof that the genocide happened.  However, most of the eyewitness accounts of the Holocaust story have proved to be extremely unreliable.

For example, John Demjanjuk, a naturalized American citizen, was accused by eyewitnesses of being a murderous guard at Treblinka named Ivan the Terrible. Demjanjuk was deported to Israel, and an Israeli court tried and convicted him primarily based on the eyewitness testimony of five Jewish survivors of Treblinka. Demjanjuk’s defense attorney eventually uncovered new evidence proving that the Soviet KGB had framed Demjanjuk, and that documents supposedly showing him to be a guard at Treblinka were Soviet forgeries. The Israeli Supreme Court ruled that the eyewitness accounts were not credible and that Demjanjuk was innocent.[1]

Another example of false witness testimony of the Holocaust story occurred in the case of Frank Walus, who was a retired Chicago factory worker charged with killing Jews in his native Poland during the war. An accusation by Simon Wiesenthal that Walus had worked for the Gestapo prompted the U.S. government’s legal action. During Walus’s trial 11 Jews testified under oath that Walus had murdered Jews during the war. After a costly four-year legal battle, Walus was finally able to prove that he had spent the war years as a teenager working on German farms. An American Bar Association article published in 1981 concluded in regard to Walus’s trial that:

“…in an atmosphere of hatred and loathing verging on hysteria, the government persecuted an innocent man.”[2]

It would be impossible for me to discuss every eyewitness account of the Holocaust story. To illustrate the unreliability of eyewitness accounts of the Holocaust story, I will analyze the eyewitness accounts of probably its three most famous survivors:

  1. Elie Wiesel,
  2. Simon Wiesenthal, and
  3. Viktor Frankl.

Questioning Wiesel’s and other authoritative claims is now illegal in an increasing number of nations, including those who fought AGAINST Germany in WWII. Aside from nations that overtly make it illegal, many other countries also have broader laws that criminalize questioning the genocide of , , , Jews… Even in America it is acceptable if you lose your job and livelihood for questioning the testimony of these and other revered witnesses.

Elie Wiesel, whose autobiography Night written in 1956 helped him win the Nobel Peace Prize, never mentions homicidal gas chambers in his book. Instead, Wiesel writes that Jews were killed en masse by being thrown alive in burning pits.[3] If there had actually been homicidal gas chambers at Birkenau, one would think that Wiesel would have mentioned the gas chambers in his autobiography. Also, if there had been burning pits at Birkenau, these would have shown in some of the Allied aerial photographs taken of Birkenau in 1944.

Wiesel forgets gas chambers

Wiesel invents gas chambers

Wiesel also mentions in Night that he had surgery on an infected foot in January 1945. The German authorities at Birkenau gave Wiesel and other hospital patients unfit to travel the option to remain in the camp. Wiesel and his father decided to evacuate Birkenau and travel to Buchenwald with the Germans rather than be liberated by the Russian army.[4] If Birkenau had been a place of mass exterminations, why would Wiesel choose to travel with his supposed killers? Also, why would the German authorities at Birkenau leave behind thousands of witnesses to their genocide if a policy of genocide had actually taken place at Birkenau?

That Wiesel survived his internment at Buchenwald is, of course, the result of a miracle. Wiesel states:

“In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 persons to their deaths each day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”[5]

Today no credible historian believes that 10,000 Jews per day were executed at Buchenwald.

A remarkable witness himself, Wiesel assures us that he has met other remarkable witnesses. Wiesel states in one of his books that after Jews were executed at Babi Yar in the Ukraine:

“Eye witnesses say that for months after the killings the ground continued to spurt geysers of blood. One was always treading on corpses.”[6] Wiesel repeats this claim later with some embellishment: “Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it.”[7]

This story lacks all credibility.

Wiesel does not seem to know that photos taken at Babi Yar shortly after the alleged mass executions of Jews show no indication of any mass grave site or any disturbance of the foliage or ground cover.[8]

Famed Nazi-hunter Simon Wiesenthal also reports a trip to a German camp hospital in his book The Murderers Among Us. Wiesenthal wrote that he tried to commit suicide by cutting his wrists while incarcerated by the Germans. Instead of letting him die, the Germans sent him to the hospital where they nursed him back to health.[9] If the Germans were intent on committing genocide against European Jewry, why would they make the effort to send both Wiesel and Wiesenthal to the hospital to restore their health?

5a42047c5bb8f

Viktor Frankl’s book Man’s Search For Meaning has been ranked by the Library of Congress as one of the 20th century’s 10 most influential books in the United States. Frankl describes his experiences at Auschwitz in this book as if he had spent many months there. In reality, Frankl was in Auschwitz only for a few days in October 1944 while in transit from Theresienstadt to a sub-camp of Dachau. Frankl has admitted this to the American evangelist Robert Schuller:

“I was in Auschwitz only three or four days…I was sent to a barrack and we were all transported to a camp in Bavaria.”[10]

Frankl’s short time in Auschwitz is substantiated by the prisoner log from the sub-camp of Dachau, Kaufering III, which listed Frankl’s arrival on Oct. 25, 1944, six days after his departure from Theresienstadt.[11] Thus, Frankl’s descriptions of his long stay at Auschwitz in Man’s Search For Meaning are false and inaccurate.

The unreliability of eyewitness testimony of the Holocaust story has also been commented on by some historians. Jewish historian Samuel Gringauz criticized what he called the “hyperhistorical” nature of most Jewish survivor testimony. Gringauz wrote that

“most of the memoirs and reports are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors bias, partisan attacks and apologies.”[12]

Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed in 1986 that more than half of the testimonies of Jewish survivors on file there are unreliable. Krakowski said that many survivors, wanting to be a part of history, may have let their imaginations run away from them. He stated that many of the testimonies on file at Yad Vashem were later proved to be inaccurate when locations and dates could not pass an expert historian’s appraisal. Krakowski commented on the Jewish survivor testimony,

“Many were never in the places where they claimed to have witnessed atrocities, while others relied on second-hand information given them by friends or passing strangers.”[13]

Although seldom mentioned in the press, numerous eyewitnesses have reported that they did not see any evidence of genocide in the German concentration camps. One of the first to dispute reports of German genocide was Paul Rassinier. Rassinier was a French professor of history who was arrested during the war for passive resistance activities, which included helping to smuggle Jews into neutral Switzerland. Rassinier stated that although he suffered greatly during the war in the Buchenwald and Dora concentration camps, he never saw any evidence of homicidal gas chambers or any program to exterminate the Jews. After reading sensationalized accounts that he knew were false, Rassinier felt it was his ethical duty to tell the truth about the camps and refute the false claims being made in the world’s press.

Rassinier wrote extensively about his own experiences and observations in the German camps. He also began to research the entire issue of German genocide against the Jews during the war. Rassinier concluded that the death toll in the camps was far lower than alleged. He also concluded that the deaths in the camps were not caused by a German program of genocide,[14] but rather primarily by the poor conditions of the camps attributable to the economic collapse of Germany during a devastating war. Rassinier had nothing to gain personally from taking his unpopular position, and after suffering greatly in the German concentration camps, he then suffered intense persecution in postwar France for his courageous writings after the war.

Thies Christophersen was another witness who said that the alleged genocide of Jews during the war never happened. Christophersen supervised about 300 workers, many of them Jewish, at Auschwitz from January to December 1944. On a number of occasions during this period he visited Birkenau where allegedly hundreds of thousands of Jews were being gassed to death. In a memoir first published in Germany in 1973, The Auschwitz Lie, Christophersen wrote that during the time he was at Auschwitz he did not notice the slightest evidence of mass gassings. In March 1988 at the Ernst Zündel trial in Toronto, he also successfully answered numerous pointed questions by the prosecuting attorney about his experiences at Auschwitz.

After The Auschwitz Lie was published, Christophersen received thousands of letters and calls. He wrote in regard to these letters and calls:

      Many of those who contacted me can confirm my statements, but are afraid to do so publicly. Some of those are SS men who were brutally mistreated and even tortured in Allied captivity. I also immediately contacted those who claimed to know more about mass gassings. My experiences were precisely the same as those of French professor Paul Rassinier. I have not found any eyewitnesses. Instead, people would tell me that they knew someone who knew someone else, who talked about it. In most cases the alleged eyewitnesses had died. Other supposed eyewitnesses would quickly begin to stammer and stutter when I asked a few precise questions. Even Simon Wiesenthal had to finally admit before a Frankfurt district court that he was actually never in Auschwitz. All of the reports I have heard about are contradictory. Everyone seemed to tell a different story about the gas chambers. They couldn’t even agree about where they were supposed to have been located. This is also true of the so-called scholarly literature, which is full of contradictions.…[15]

Ursula Haverbeck at 89 years of age poses such a threat to humanity she has had to be jailed for a period longer than many rapists… to protect us. She questioned the eye witness accounts of the Holocaust and the ongoing consequences for Germans. Her sentence at her age could reasonably deemed “For Life”.. Click to enlarge

Another eyewitness who did not see any evidence of genocide of the Jews is Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich. Dr. Stäglich, a German judge, visited Auschwitz several times during the Second World War as a German orderly officer of an Anti-aircraft Detachment. Dr. Stäglich published the following account of his visits to Auschwitz:

      On none of these visits did I see gassing installations, crematoria, instruments of torture, or similar horrors. The camp gave one the impression of being well-kept and very well-organized…

The camp reminded me of the German Labor Front camp in which I served out my six-month stretch in the Labor Service, except that Auschwitz was, of course, considerably larger…None of the inmates behaved as though they were in fear of mistreatment, let alone death.

On the later point, one encounter with inmates especially sticks in my memory. As some comrades and I were standing near the camp one evening, we caught sight of a big gang of inmates returning to camp from work in the industrial plants. They were escorted by a relatively small contingent of SS-men—mostly older people—and seemed to be thoroughly undisciplined.

They talked loudly among themselves, laughing all the while. Two or three inmates dropped out of line when they spotted us, opened their flies, and made water. Although this gesture could have been interpreted as a sign of contempt for German men in uniform, the SS guards ignored it completely. Later, whenever I heard that mortal terror prevailed in the concentration camps, I had to recall this incident. That is hardly the way people who are in constant fear of death behave.[16]

Another credible eyewitness is the Austrian-born Canadian Maria Van Herwaarden, who was interned at Birkenau starting in 1942. Van Herwaarden testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that she saw nothing at Birkenau that resembled mass murder. She did testify, however, that many of the inmates at Birkenau died of typhus and some inmates committed suicide.[17] No prosecution witnesses were called during this trial because the prosecution knew of no survivors who could withstand cross examination by Zündel’s defense attorney.

Screenshot-2018-5-29 BetterWisdomThanGold on Twitter What does scientific research say about the Holocaust Some scientists [...](2)

Click to enlarge

ENDNOTES

[1] An excellent account of John Demjanjuk’s trial is provided in Sheftel, Yoram, Defending “Ivan the Terrible”: The Conspiracy to Convict John Demjanjuk, Washington, D.C., Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1996.

[2] “The Nazi Who Never Was,” The Washington Post, May 10, 1981, pp. B5, B8.

[3] Wiesel, Elie, Night Trilogy, New York: Hill and Wang, 2008, pp. 51-52.

[4] Ibid, pp. 98-100.

[5] “Author, Teacher, Witness,” Time Magazine, March 18, 1985, p. 79.

[6] Wiesel, Elie, The Jews of Silence, London: Vallentine Mitchell, 1968, p. 37.

[7] Wiesel, Elie, Paroles d’étranger, Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1982, p. 86.

[8] Ball, John C., Air Photo Evidence, Delta, British Columbia: Ball Resources Services Limited, 1992, p. 108.

[9] Wiesenthal, Simon, The Murderers Among Us, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967, pp. 37-38.

[10] Frankl, Viktor, “Dr. Robert Schuller Interviews Viktor Frankl: How to Find Meaning In Life,” Possibilities: The Magazine of Hope, March/April 1991, p. 10.

[11] Pytell, Timothy, “Extreme Experience, Psychological Insight, and Holocaust Perception; Reflections of Bettelheim and Frankl,” Psychoanalytic Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 4, Oct. 2007, p. 646.

[12] Jewish Social Studies, New York: Conference on Jewish Relations, Jan. 1950, Vol. 12, pp. 65-66.

[13] Amouyal, Barbara, “Doubts over Evidence of Camp Survivors,” Jerusalem Post, Israel, Aug. 17, 1986, p. 1.

[14] Rassinier, Paul, The Holocaust Story and the Lies of Ulysses, Costa Mesa, CA: The Institute for Historical Review, 1978.

[15] Christophersen, Thies, “Reflections on Auschwitz and West German Justice,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 1985, p. 118.

[16] Stäglich, Wilhelm, Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence, Institute for Historical Review, 1990, p. 293.

[17] Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers Ltd., 1992, pp. 253-255.

Source

11 responses to “Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Contradictory, Shifting & Evasive Testimony Is Protected From Questioning”

  1. When is the truthseeker going to reprint the recent article in the mail about a musician jailed in Britain for 9 weeks for singing a supposed anti semitic song?.

  2. We are now living in the same times as the Russians did after the 1917 Jewish takeover of their land. We are also living in the same reality as Germans did post WW1 before the rise of Hitler. We live under the controlling legality of Jewish talmudism, where everything has a monetary value, owned by the Jews for them to parasite off of us.
    And of course we are all forced to ‘love’ and ‘worship’ Jews as the ‘chosenites’ who do no wrong, who are a poor, wrongly, persecuted people and everything about them is good and honest.
    While our society falls further down into the pits of degeneracy and depravity, brought about by Jews, their lives continue to rise upwards as they become an even more protected people within western societies they have absolutely no right in being in, or being classified of that nation. They are the parasite within the beautiful apple, hidden away, unexposed, rotten turning everything into doom and despair as the destroyers they are.

    “But it’s not ALL Jews” is the usual BS reply you hear from people. And if this be so, why do they remain silent? After all, they are supposed to make up only 1% of the population, of the lands they live in, don’t they? They could easily speak out against the wrongs of their ruling Jews within couldn’t they? But they don’t. The rabbis teach them their Talmudic ways, to protect fellow Jews, regardless of the wrongs they do. This, therefore makes ALL Jews complicit in the wrongs done by the ‘so called’ few within them. Whites, unlike Jews, always call out those within their people who do wrong and bring them to justice. This never happens within Jews. When was the last time you saw Jews speak out against ‘bad’ Jews? You didn’t. They don’t. They never have and they never will. They’re a tribe, who stick together and their survival has lasted because bad Jews are still Jews who must be protected.

    The holocaust is a lie.
    There was no mass extermination of Jews.
    There were no gas chambers, other than those used to fumigate clothes.
    There were no 6 million murdered.
    Twelve+ years ago I would never had made this statement but it’s amazing what the truth does to the indoctrinated mind.

    The bottom line about Jewry is simple – they are 100%, pure evil.
    Humanity needs to make one simple choice in life; you either remove the Jews from your lands (exile and imprisonment on another land, or mass extermination of) or they WILL exterminate 95% of the world’s population and rule in greater Israel.
    You need to STOP this insane belief that there is goodness within Jewry. There isn’t. There never was and there never will be. They are the destroyers in this world and they want it all for themselves, save enough goyim to be their slaves.

    This is why the west no longer seems right. This is why suicide is rising. The Jew controls it. They have destroyed the cultures and community. Everything has a monetary value. People are trained, from an early age to be tax slaves, to chase money as the be all and end all in their lives. House prices are rising continually to the point that no one is ever going to be able to own their own house. The cost of living also continues upwards with an unparalleled wage to compensate.We are being bled dry, by the Jew and when you tell people this all they can do is shout ‘anti Semite’ as the mindless automatons have been programmed to.

    There is only one evil in this world. It’s the same evil that’s existed since time immemorial. It is, of course, Judaism.

  3. Send us a link to the article and we’ll post it.

    Rx

  4. Rixon,

    All you need to do is do a search for Alison Chabloz jailed and you’ll find the Jew press doing its best to make sure the world never exposes their lies.

    Tiberius,

    There’s a Daily Mail article which, of course, makes her out to be a demon, as the Jew press most certainly would do. I can deal with that but it’s the comments after. Looking at the Best rated, it’s overwhelming support for Jews and pure hate on Alison Chabloz. There are such stupid comments as: “imagine how she would feel if a family member had been murdered by the nazis?” I was all for believing that some 100million people died/were murdered in WW2, of which a very small percentage were Jews.

    This is one of the reasons I HATE Jews. They go for the jugular and cast the truth to the wind. They must always be painted in a good light and anyone who speaks anything contrary to Jews must be pilloried and castigated, which they do through the control of the press. Horrible, disgusting, loathsome, vile, despicable people is what they are. Maybe my views would somewhat change if local Jewish groups spoke out about jailing a woman for exercising her freedom to speak freely, but they don’t, which shows, overwhelmingly, that Jews stick together like glue and make sure anyone who speaks out against them is destroyed.

  5. I have come to the exact same conclusion, by my own reasoning, research, and writing:

    “The bottom line about Jewry is simple – they are 100%, pure evil.”

    “There is only one evil in this world. It’s the same evil that’s existed since time immemorial. It is, of course, Judaism.”

    I might add, the Holocaust is extremely severe defamation against the Germans.

    And I might add that Christianity was formed out of the evil of Judaism and it is not much better. Those in favor of Christianity do not understand how they have been subverted by the parent religion. Christianity can not separate from the parent, the two are are JOINED AT THE HIP SEAMLESSLY ALL THE WAY UP TO THE TOPS OF THEIR HEADS in an inoperable Siamese twin condition.

    Christianity is a derivative religion, the parent Judaism taints the Christian message and because of the internal flaws, allowed the rise of Evangelicals and the Zionist Christian movement which has empowered Israel to commit terrorist acts against the native Palestinians without any sympathy from these Christ following evangelicals.

    The hearts of Evangelicals have hardened because their alliance to Israel. You can tell these Christians that Israel did 911 and they do not want to hear it, and as far as Israel is concerned, they get a free pass. Thus a nation like Amerika, loaded to the gills with these people, is in mortal danger. Belief in a Jewish savior will be the real reason why Amerika fell into tyranny.

    No matter how bad it gets, most Christians will never go against the Jew and thus all Christian nations are damned to extinction, unless of course, a great orator akin to Hitler comes to power and energizing the people to fight back and regain their sanity from the Judeo death cultists.

  6. Harbinger and Tiberius write the absolute truth
    Both Moshe Solomons Dr David Cohen and Harriet Kaplan have said Ellie the Weasel was never in a German work camp
    its as big a bag of stinking lies as the Ann Frank story

  7. how we ca\n fight back against the war on our people by the jews
    http://www.renegadetribune.com/fighting-back-against-the-israel-lobby-ordinary-americans-can-organize-and-win/

    The 89 year old German lady lived near one of the big German work camps she knew what went on because she saw it, this is so wrong that Ursula Haverbeck should be in prison for telling the truth
    what a lovely heroic lady, shamed all the big brave men didnt she ?

  8. The truth exists before the lie does, it will exist after the lie has gone.
    Three man on a park bench playing a game of chance, then a fourth man comes up and says the world is coming to an end.
    The first man says well I shall go to the church and pray.
    The second man says well I shall go to the pub, get drunk and buy six whores.
    The third man says well sir I shall finish the game, yes sir I shall finish the game.

  9. The number 6,000,000 seems to be based on prophecy (this number was consistently reported since the late 1880’s until now) and any critical examination shows that that number appears to be at least a little high.

  10. In reply to : Harbinger

    “The holocaust is a lie”. I fully agree and the lie is starting to shatter, when it cannot be questioned, something must be wrong:

    “There was no mass extermination of Jews”. I fully agree, though would absolutely welcome such a thing now, (total extinction)

    ” There were no gas chambers, other than those used to fumigate clothes”. I fully agree, absolutely no factual evidence can be supplied. (and you cannot question it)

    “There were no 6 million murdered”. I fully agree, in fact the sickos have lowered that number, however it would have been good for humanity had there been six million or more, as they are like fleas on dog. sucking the life blood out of the dog.

  11. Sofar as I have read these Comments here I can only say that I am totally astonished be cause in Gemany they would already send me to jail for a few jears . Therefore I can only admire these gallant writers and Truth Lovers . It took me 40 years to find all these shocking answers . But then again , the yews are not making a secret out of what they are really thinking abaut the gentiles . It can all be read in their Books . It ist the gentiles wich seem to be unwilling or to dumb to realise what sort of DANGER is luring here . People should read : The biologikal Yew , by EUSTACE MULLINS . He really recocnised this terrible menace and why People are so blind not to see what danger they are in .Adolf Hitler ist the most hated Man on the planet . He had anderstood what was happening to his Peole , unfortunatly were our natural Friends and neighbors , the english People not willing to see the the danger as well . They still admire Winston Churchill .This will destroy the White race in Europe , UNLESS …………Please exuse my english .