Ethan Huff – Natural News Sept 2, 2019
A growing number of scientists are abandoning the evolutionary theory once proposed by Charles Darwin, as it simply does not hold up to scientific scrutiny.
One of these Darwin dissenters is David Gelernter, a well-known writer and professor at Yale University who has publicly announced that he is now done with Darwin’s theory because it has too many “holes,” and is painfully outdated.
On the other hand, “intelligent design,” as it is often called, should not be dismissed, according to Gelernter, because it is a “serious” theory backed by evidence that, in many cases, is far more compelling than anything Darwin and his acolytes have ever presented.
In Gelernter’s view, it is a real shame that “free speech” about opposing theories like this are often squelched through scientific consensus to Darwinism, which he says has become its own “religion” to many of the academics who adhere to it.
Writing in an essay that he entitled, “Giving Up Darwin,” Gelernter notes that one of the foundational tenets of Darwin’s theory of evolution, the idea that a given life form has the ability to evolve into a completely different life form, has basically never been adequately demonstrated using the scientific method.
“Darwin’s theory predicts that new life forms evolve gradually from old ones in a constantly branching, spreading tree of life,” Gelernter explains in his essay.
“Those brave new Cambrian creatures must therefore have had Precambrian predecessors, similar but not quite as fancy and sophisticated,” he adds. “They could not have all blown out suddenly, like a bunch of geysers. Each must have had a closely related predecessor, which must have had its own predecessors.”
For more about how the scientific establishment rejects opposing theories to Darwinism not as a matter of science, but as a perpetuation of the “religion” of evolution, be sure to check out ScienceTyranny.com.
The fact that it is virtually impossible to create a functional stable protein proves that Darwin’s theory of evolution is a lie
Gelernter also points out in his paper that it remains a “near impossibility” to create a functional stable protein, which means it is even more impossible for one to just pop up randomly in nature as Darwin’s theory of evolution would require. This alone, it would seem, disproves Darwinism largely on its own, further illustrating the religious nature of believing in evolution, which in many ways has already been thoroughly disproven.
“Immense is so big, and tiny is so small, that neo-Darwinian evolution is – so far – a dead loss,” Gelernter explains.
“Try to mutate your way from 150 links of gibberish to a working, useful protein and you are guaranteed to fail,” he goes on to explain. “Try it with ten mutations, a thousand, a million – you fail. The odds bury you. It can’t be done.”
Stopping short of actually subscribing to the intelligent design theory, or the idea that an intelligent God created all things, Gelernter does admit that it remains an “absolutely serious argument,” and one that serious, honest scientists would do well to consider as they aim to hone in on the origin of all things.
However, many establishment scientists patently reject it, and are more than willing to “destroy” anyone who dares to even propose it as a possibility – their closed minds and willful blindness on the subject impairing their ability to engage in any type of critical thinking on the subject.
“What I’ve seen, in their behavior intellectually and at colleges across the West, is nothing approaching free speech on this topic,” Gerlernter says.
“It’s a bitter rejection, not just – a sort of bitter, fundamental, angry, outraged, violent rejection, which comes nowhere near scientific or intellectual discussion. I’ve seen that happen again and again. ‘I’m a Darwinist, don’t you say a word against it, or, I don’t wanna hear it, period.”
Sources for this article include:
Darwinism has become a pseudo-religion because of an obsession among certain groups with denying the possibility of any kind of “designer” or “supreme being”, of any intelligence superior to our own. They’re so determined to eliminate religion and spirituality, keeping Humanity locked in the “this one life is all we have” nonsense that they’ll cling to any alternative and viciously enforce it.
What happened to REAL science, which has as it’s starting point the fact that WE DON’T KNOW ANYTHING until we find out?
Real science is (or rather, was before any kind of open-mindedness was declared “politically incorrect”) about continually asking questions and updating what we thought we knew as new facts are discovered, not blindly continuing to state unprovable THEORIES as if they were established fact.
If Darwinism had the answers, there would be no distinct species, but merely an endless progression known as “life”. Even if we limit our thinking to the hominid group, there could no distinction between chimpanzees, gorillas and Humans because every intermediate stage would still be walking among us.
Science has been abolished by the tyrant, who doesn’t want the “cattle” thinking for themselves. At some point in the future, real scientists will have to start again from the absolute beginning.
The missing link between Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens might be Anunnaki intervention. The contention of Bible believers that humans didn’t evolve from Apes (or common Ape ancestor) may be true according to Zacharia Sitchin and his translations of Sumerian cuneiform.
According to Sitchin and now Dr. Sasha Lessin, the creation of man by genetic engineering is the real story covered over by Genesis, which is a religious retelling of our creation story. According to them, man is a hybrid domesticated specie, created by in vitro when Enki (chief geneticist) placed a fertilized Homo Erectus (Naledi?) egg into the nurse Ninmah. The first man they called Adamu, the location of these experiments was the E.din, in southeast Iraq at the top of the Persian Gulf.
The artificial creation of man does not negate the Evolution theory like the article claims. Man’s genetic evolution was cut short by tens of millions of years by extraterrestrial intervention, they made us in their image using their DNA, a high crime and immoral act.
I think the Sitchin story of our origin is logically consistent and backed up by the evidence. How did Homo Sapiens just show up in the blink of an eye, same for civilization itself which should of taken a very long time. What about the domesticated animals and plants needed to keep man alive? Where did they all come from, are we to believe caveman domesticated wheat? Hardly!
@Yukon Jack
Your argument is a self perpetuating cycle that has no beginning.
So your aliens created Mankind, ok let us take that as truth for a moment.
Who created your aliens?
Did they evolve like Darwin claims? Yet under evolution it would have taken these aliens Billions of years to evolve to the point where they could develop space travel and genetic technology to enable them to crate us, or just jump us forward in evolution.
So long in fact, that after they evolved enough and came to us, there would have not been enough time for us to evolve to the current point we are at…
But say another species did the same to them? So the other species took x billions to get to the point where they could kickstart the other alien species, then that species took millions longer to get to kickstarting us, which took millions of years to get to present day…
This is a never ending circle that just makes the likelyhood of it all false, given there was nothing before the big bang, but given the limited time since we estimate the big bang to have taken place, no where near enough time for any species to evolve out of nothing but gas and minerals (because life had to start at the micro organism stage, so there was nothing at the time of big bang that could evolve to produce life), let alone for them to evolve then kickstart any other species evolution upto current day Mankind.
But you keep believing what you are force fed at school and hold onto as some kind of part of your identity.
God is the only power that Man will die for, to enforce the law of God over the law of Man.
Governments and secret societies know this, they have witnessed countless tyrant regimes over the centuries fall as a result of Man holding to God’s decree over the decree of unjust rulers.
Hence their instistance on depopulation globally and removing God from peoples minds.
Corrupting the words of God whenever possible, where it is not possible, create division in the relgion so the people of that religion twist the word of God to suit their narative on the religion, so they can attract more people than the other sects.
Now that we are technologically advanced to the point machines can be used to ease everyday life, weapons can allow for a lone Man to kill hundreds (potentially thousands) of unarmed Men, Women and Children. There is no need to keep a massive and uncontrolable population on Earth.
They wish to cement their position and rule over the limited slave labourers they allow to live, to maintain basic levels of Man power which they believe will allow them to succeed where countless civilazations have failed.
Not enough people to rise up and topple them.
Even if there somehow was enough people to topple them, they will never have the firepower to outgun those in charge.
Hence the gun laws in most the world, the pushing for removal of weapons in those countries who still have citizens armed, such as we see in the USA at present.
The removal of all other weapons such as knives, as we see them trying to push for in the UK with increased knife crimes and murder in the past few years.
The worst part is, as you see in the UK, gun crime is only increasing each year, so criminals are the ones with the guns and the people are helpless against those criminals.
But we were told removal of guns would stop criminals altogether. Which has been proven a lie.
They even taunt us with their plans through media like The Hunger games, Maze runner and countless other examples in media, be it movies, TV or games.
But they give us hope with these films, that the people somehow can succeed against all odds.
In real life it will be like insects getting sprayed to death, then those that remain will know never to try it again…
It will become cultural traditions in the name of self preservation, to never oppose the ruling class, that will be self enforced by the slave class to prevent the slaughter in the past, from ever coming about again.
Elevating the Ruling class to God like status among the slaves.
Darwinism is the biggest bullshit operation from unthinking moron ? C Darwin the Grande Poobah of Morons, who has brought misery to this world ?? Survival of the fittest, gave us WWI/WWII/Judeo Bolshevik usurpation of Russia & 30 million Russian Christian “holocausted” ??
But see Kropotkin, “Mutual Aid, a Factor of Evolution ??
Did any Darwinist moron read it ?? Or even heard of it ??
Nahh.. Don’t bother with a Russian writer ?? He can’t be right, he’s not English ??
David Gelernter is an observant Jew. As a Muslim who always laughed at Darwinism.
Thanks to David, I must now consider Darwinism as a real possibility that has some probability.