Why is ‘Cultural Marxism’ so offensive?
by Gilad Atzmon | Mar 30, 2019 |
Gilad Atzmon – gilad.co.uk March 30, 2019
Earlier this week former Brexit minister Suella Braverman referred to ‘Cultural Marxism’ in a speech. All hell broke loose immediately. The former minister was attacked by the usual Jewish and Zionist pressure groups, ranging from The Board of Deputies (BOD) to Hope not Hate to the usual compromised Labour politicians. However, unlike our caricature of an opposition leader who grovels on demand, Mrs Braverman kept her dignity intact. She didn’t see any point to retract, apologise or promise not to repeat the phrase as the BOD demanded.
One may wonder why ‘Cultural Marxism’ is so offensive to some?
Because ‘Cultural Marxism’ is obviously truthful and precise in its capacity to encapsulate a crucial and disastrous transition in the evolvement of 20th century Left thinking.
As opposed to traditional Marxism that theorizes over the necessary condition toward social change by means of class struggle, ‘Cultural Marxism’ aims to introduce a change by cultural shift. At a certain stage some (neo) marxists and socialists were clever and honest enough to accept that the revolution wasn’t going to happen. The working class couldn’t be bothered and even if they could, they were too busy attending their jobs. The revolution had to be facilitated by different means.
Antonio Gramsci, probably the father figure of cultural Marxist thought, contended that bourgeois hegemony was reproduced in cultural life through the media, academia and religious institutions to ‘manufacture consent’ and legitimacy. The proletarian struggle for control of the means of production, according to Gramsci, could only succeed once an alternative culture replaces the bourgeois cultural hegemony. For Gramsci it was a ‘counter-hegemonic’ struggle – advancing alternatives to dominant ideas of what is normal and legitimate.
Gramsci didn’t see his desired cultural shift materialising. He died prematurely, jailed in Mussolini’s Italy. However, Gramsci’s ideas were adopted and developed by a list of thinkers including Wilhelm Reich and the Frankfurt School’s leading icons: Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, Erich Fromm and others. As it seems, these thinkers who have had a tremendous impact on contemporary Left and progressive thinking have something in common: they were Jews of Germanic origin.
By now the picture starts to become clear. The contemporary Left is dominated by a Jewish-influenced school of thought that preaches a constant struggle against hegemonic discourses such as traditional family values, the church, the male, the ‘white’ and so on. This school of thought also advocates against elementary liberties such as freedom of speech, evidenced by the popularity of no-platforming. It is hardly a secret that the above school of thought is a complete dismissal of every conservative value and Mrs Braverman was both astute and correct in calling a spade a spade: “as Conservatives, we are engaged in a battle against cultural Marxism…”
Mrs Braverman was accused of ‘anti-Semitism,’ despite the fact that she didn’t refer to Jews. By their unwitty actions, once again, Jewish pressure groups actually admitted that ‘Cultural Marxism is indeed a Jewish-influenced school of thought, otherwise it is impossible to conceive what was anti-Semitic in Braverman’s statement. Braverman was also blamed for repeating a ‘phrase used by mass murderer Anders Breivik,” as if referring to a term used by a mass murderer is an approval of a murderous act.
I guess that this is the right point to introduce a twist into this entire saga. It is crucial to mention that the right-wing thinkers who popularised the usage of ‘Cultural Marxism’ were actually Jewish and even ultra-Zionists. The first amongst them is Andrew Breitbart, who was dedicated to the exposing of the Neo-Marxist menace. Not far behind him in his attack is the horrid right wing ultra-Zionist David Horowitz. It is not exactly a secret that in his manifesto Breivik refers to David Horowitz’s Freedom Centre. For those who fail to remember, Breivik also quoted Jewish writer Melanie Philips’ criticism of Neo Marxist’s attitude to immigration: “It (immigration) was a politically motivated attempt by ministers to transform the fundamental make-up and identity of this country (Britain). It was done to destroy the right of the British people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language and traditions.” (Melanie Phillips, as quoted by mass murderer, Anders Breivik, in his manifesto).
I didn’t see Jewish pressure groups, the BOD, Hope not Hate or Labour MPs trying to silence Andrew Breitbart, David Horowitz or Melanie Philips. I guess that Jews and Zionists controlling the opposition and criticising Cultural Marxism must be a kosher adventure.
In Being in Time I argue that it isn’t totally surprising that Jews often dominate the dissent to Jewish cultural and ideological symptoms. If choseness, for instance, is a Jewish political/cultural symptom, it may as well be possible that self-hatred and even universalism are just metaphysical antibodies. If Cultural Marxism is a Jewish-influenced school of thought, it shouldn’t take us by complete surprise that it is also Jewish writers such as Horowitz, Philips and Breitbart who bring the anti antidotes to light.
Source
Two Christians William Lind and Patrick Buchanan were the firebrands who initially exposed the Jewish backing of cultural Marxism already by then at work for over 50 years dismantling Western civilization through Jewish-controlled finances, the media, the entertainment industry, the legislatures, public education and the courts attempting to destroy everything that matters in our civilization. Our weaknesses serve their advancement. Criticism of cultural Marxism and communism from people like Breitbart and Horowitz no doubt has been genuine, but these days that conservative push is mainly to support Zionism, and more financial and territorial hegemony for exclusive tribal interests. Unfortunately, people like Lind have been sucked in to support Zionism as well.
Following the Roman dispersion some two thousand years ago, no one can blame the Jews for sticking together to create a hidden nation of their own dispersed mainly throughout the reaches of the Roman empire. However, it was from the Jews that Christianity came to the West and the concept of chosenness and being adopted children of God was universalized such that Christians were taught to view their “neighbor” as anyone their actions could affect, making them particularly vulnerable to any group wanting to exploit their good will when it came to such things as usury.
Religious universalism was anathema to Judaism. Instead, and in their exclusiveness, they were taught that: they were at war with the world; they were chosen to rule the world; non-Jews were sub human; the ten commandments applied only to them; regarding the goyim anything goes to concentrate money and power. In working with such concerted methods over the centuries they have concentrated immense power as seen mainly through the Rothschild-controlled financial system. They have many fronts including the Chinese for many of their holdings, particularly in the West. They continue to nourish and exploit cultural and financial weaknesses and dependencies in order to advance their hegemonic goals, with very little resistance mainly because they largely control the resistance.
The irony is that when Christianity fails so does the idea of the commandments extending to everyone in God’s eyes, and with more and more people waking up to how they have been hoodwinked they no doubt will revert again to pagan gods like Oden, freeing their consciences and enabling them to resort to ruthless measures to end the stealth and control. Now some conservative Jews are coming to realize that it has been the hated Christians which has been the goose which laid all of their golden eggs. Sorry everyone. It is now too little and too late. The sociopathic ruthlessness of the Nazis, of the Marxists and of the Zionists is fast becoming the norm and the world is about to reap the whirlwind such that not even refuges like New Zealand will be out of reach.