HenryMakow.com – May 29, 2022
A meeting between F.W.Winterbotham, Head of the Air Section in the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), and SIS agent Baron de Ropp, right, on the Baltic shore in East Prussia, 1936.
Was Baron William de Ropp (1886-1973) Hitler’s British handler?
A British agent funded, advised and represented Hitler. At what point was Hitler himself a “British” agent?
“When Churchill was questioned in Parliament about British failure to support [German army efforts to overthrow Hitler,] he replied that the government had a deliberate policy of not dealing with German nationalist leaders who were considered to be a greater evil than Hitler.” (OMG)
(“The British Agent at Hitler’s Ear” updated from Jan. 2013 & Dec. 2019)
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
The name “Baron Willam de Ropp” isn’t well known. There is just one photo available, and only a short Wikipedia entry. Yet he was a British agent who may have been Hitler’s handler.
Hitler’s “daring” diplomatic & military coups, which astounded the world, were based on advanced knowledge of British intentions provided by de Ropp.
He adds credence to the argument that the Illuminati created Hitler to foment world war.
According to Ladislas Farago, William de Ropp was “one of the most mysterious and influential clandestine operators” of the era. Born in Lithuania in 1877, educated in Germany, he moved to England in 1910. After serving the British in World War One, he moved to Berlin and contacted fellow Balt, Nazi theoretician Alfred Rosenberg who introduced him to Hitler.
De Ropp worked closely with Rosenberg, who headed the Nazi Party Foreign Office. The Nazis considered him their agent in England where he organized support for the Nazi cause among a powerful segment of the Britsh elite known as the “Cliveden Set.” He organized visits of high officials and exchanges of information. In this congenial atmosphere, the Luftwaffe naively opened its secrets to the British. This was part of a larger Illuminati plan (“Appeasement”) to make Hitler think England would support his conquest of Communist Russia.
The Chamberlian agreement was made aftera secret 4 years study by neville Chamberlians government into the plans and goals of the Third Reich
the outcome after the team was taken round all the German defence establishments was that Germany was a threat to Russia not the UK.
Hitler fully beleived Briatin would keep its word to stay out of the fight against communism.
This was before Chamberlian was poisoned to bring in the jews mouthpiece Winston Churchill
Nevile Chamberlians secretaty was the MP Archibald Maule Ramsey
his book ” the needless war ” is on line, make sure you read it.
Hitler was nevera British agent but he belived in the brotherhod of all Anglo saxon peoples Germany Briatin and the USA, where Hitler has toal suport until he tok the monetary control away from the jews and gave it to his people
Makow continues with the canard about Hitler as a Rothschild agent. Germany was attacked by Western economic interests (finance captialists). Why?
Kiser’s germany operated an industrial economy under the guidance of Frederick List. Industrial capitalism uses state credit and channels new money into industry. Germany then proceeded to kick england’s butt economically, and that includes taking some of the pie away from Rothschild.
Beginning in 1933, under the Reinhardt plan the “bill system” introduced millions of new Reichsmarks of purchasing power. This is why Germany never had a great depression, as there was plenty of money stimulus to get things going, and it sure as hell wasn’t Rothschild money or foreign credit that Germany used.
Churchill admitted what it was all about:
“Germany’s most unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.”
Under Hitler, Germany stimulated her economy with work bills (Oeffa and Mefo) and for international trade, she used Schachts trading bank scheme.
Germany moved to autarky and used their own sovereign money, and further did international trade bypassing the “international predators” ensconced in London and Wall Street.
I don’t know why Makow cannot figure this out… probably because he is not a monetary historian, and thus draws wrong conclusions.
When Germany prospered after Hitler taking the economy away from the jews
Hitler and Neville Chamberlian discussed the Haushofer plan, the was the European Union
led by Germany and Britain, it was a trading bloc and a bolster against Rothschilds communist Russia, this was when Churchill according to hid csoctor Lord Moran had one of his mad fits and ordered the worlds top psychiatrist Dr Alexander Cannon to prepare him some Manchurian candidates, from the Colney Hatch mental hospital, churchill wanted
some brainwashed dupes to be secretly entered into Germany with backpack bombs and go to Hitlers speeches and stand close to Hitler and blow themselves up.
Dr Alexander Cannon refused and was sentenced to house arrest for the wars duration on the isle of man, and it was this same man who was the tutor to the king for his speech impediment not the man named in the film.
Forces Occultes was a film released in Vichy France in 1943 which showed the sinister nature of the freemasons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiMR8LuWcLs
@ Kelvin and Mefobills:
You are both correct. Makow is good in his exposure of Jewish (ZioBankster, Rothschild, Sabatean-Frankish) cult globalist machinations, but as for WW2 and Hitler Lore, he is a disinformation agent. As you both state Hitler’s schemes to avoid Jewish control ( money and other perversions), Hitler and Germany’s national personal pride, were the elements that showed the world how to defeat International Jewry. This is the secret that Jewry wants to hide from the goyim. That is why Hitler and Germany had to be destroyed. It is as simple as that and so to this day Hitler is demonized and Germany is still made to pay reparations to anyone claiming to be a Jew and a victim of WW2 atrocities for generations since then.
“The name “Baron Willam de Ropp” isn’t well known. There is just one photo available, and only a short Wikipedia entry. Yet he was a British agent who may have been Hitler’s handler.”
There you go – right at the start of yet another article by Makow to smear the greatest man of the 20th century. This de Ropp character ( whoever he really was ) MAY HAVE BEEN Hitler’s handler. So the whole article is based on a mere speculation by Makow.
Doubtless there are many secrets surrounding the machinations of Churchill and HIS handlers but there is one thing that can be said with absolute certainty and it is this: Europe and the rest of the world would be in a far better state had Germany succeeded in winning WW2. Germany’s defeat is the greatest tragedy in modern history and we are now living with it’s legacy.
This kind of version of the story rings true with me.
I am irish one side of y family hated churchill so much that anyone opposed to got their support
my dads uncles joined the german army and met hitler they mixed with top german people
henry majow is either a fool or a bollox info merchant i know what i think he is
Just before the collapse of the communist sytem in russia
The soviet archivist escaped to the qwest bringing all the wartime files
Nigel west was allowd to see some of these
They showed chuechill was a traitor o the Brits and all along under rothschilds orders was a stalin operative
yes working for them
there was no mention at all in the soviet files of hitler beinga british agent
remember that in w w 2 the russians got all our intel even before we did
through rothschlds apostles
It should be said its also untrue that angela merkel was hitlers daughter and tony liar not his son
he did not escape to chile agentina scotland or the USA
the worlds top hitler expert david Irving says henry makow is just t rying to muddy the waters
since jew media propagated multiculti,
multiperversion + multimixing i see
here more + more white mothers with
coloured partners . i would not + could
not prevent it . my rules are : let others
live as they like it . i never followed
any arteficial propaganda as seaman
looking for brown girls . it was my
absolute self decision since i never
would fall in love with a blonde . i
just dont like them . on other side i
am glad not made any child in this
hellish world . german spirit will
go down anyway . to much muddeling
of jews over hundreds of years and
their lies grow + multiply so maybe
generations after me have merited
genbot slavery . stupidity of morons
has never an end with every new
generation .
Around 1911 that little lance corporali became a “British” agent, trough the occult methods of the forerunner of the Tavistock clinic. He became quite possessed.
Makow isn’t objective when dealing with Hitler, probably due to ‘ethnic’ issues. Yet J.F.C Fuller is objective & explains the real situation & circumstances leading to WWII:
“Besides Hitler’s steady evasion of the Versailles treaty, in order to make Germany independent of international loan-capitalism, he resorted to a system of finance which antagonized the great trading nations, particularly the United States & Great Britain, who between them represented the Money Power of the world. In Mein Kampf he recognizes two forms of capitalism, the one based on the product of creative labour, & the other on usury.
“He held that, as long as the international monetary system was based on gold, a nation which cornered gold could impose its will on those which lacked it. This could be done by drying up the sources of exchange, & thereby compelling other countries to accept loans on interest in order to distribute their production.
“Therefore he decided (1) To refuse foreign interest-bearing loans & base Germany currency on production instead of on gold; (2) to obtain imports by direct exchange of goods–barter–& subsidize exports when necessary; (3) to put a stop to what was called ‘freedom of the exchanges’–that is, license to gamble in currencies & shift fortunes from one country to another according to the political situation; and (4) to create money when men & materials were available for work instead of running into debt by borrowing.
“Because the life of loan capitalism depended upon the issue of interest-bearing loans, were Hitler allowed to succeed, other nations would certainly follow his example, & a time might come when all non-gold-holding governments would exchange goods for goods & gold would lose its power. To smash Hitler’s financial system, therefore became the aim of loan capitalism.” –J.F.C. Fuller; The Conduct of War
After he rose to power I don’t think anybody ‘handled’ Hitler. He was too strong-willed to take advice let alone take orders and by then he was too powerful.
The only people powerful enough to show contempt for the Nazis were the industrialists. The toolmaker Robert Bosch was clear about his disdain for them, and when Hitler wanted to put Bosch in a labour camp to bring him to heel he was advised against it. He was told that to pick on one industrialist is to pick on them all, as the only way they could save themselves was to stick together and withdraw their business with the Party. This would have shut down the German economy and put an end to the war effort.
Kelvin,
Archibald Ramsay’s book was called “The Nameless War”
https://www.johnkaminski.info/pages/the_next_chapter/pdf/the_nameless_war.pdf
@Mefobills
I’ve been reading the Sovereign Money site you link to:
https://sovereignmoney.site/
I can’t recall reading better web articles on banking…
***
I’m not sure the Churchill quote is bone fide. I recall spending a little time looking it up. Certainly one would expect this to be his sentiment. I recall from my surfing it was said to have appeared at the front of a book for which he quote was absent in an earlier and more contemporaneous edition…I’m happy to be proved wrong, though my suspicion is that because most of us hate Churchill we want to believe everything said that strengthens our case against him is correct.
Hitler was never a British agent more than likely the whole story originated from British Intel.
The only questions are how could Hitler be so conciliatory and allow Dunkirk and not invade Britain ?
Nico X,
You ignore the many peace treaties and concessions Adolf Hitler gave to Britain. Dunkirk was a last effort to prove to the British common man that he was genuine.
Erik Blessing,
“Around 1911 that little lance corporali became a “British” agent, trough the occult methods of the forerunner of the Tavistock clinic. He became quite possessed.”
So, as a British agent during WW1 he took on one of the most dangerous tasks in the trenches for Germany, being badly injured and hospitalised, but still returning to the front and then suffering acute poisoning from the mustard gas and nearly losing his sight. He subsequently was rewarded the highest accolade in the German army for his outstanding bravery.
You actually believe he was a British agent prior to WW1?
Amazing!
I guess we’re not going to talk about Leonna Hale. She was an unarmed Black woman who was shot FIVE TIMES. So, in Ulvade, Texas, we had 19 cops sitting on their hand for an hour while an active shooter massacred 19 children, while in Kansas City, an unarmed Black woman is by police officers. COWARDS.
But we should still not be saying “British” or “German” or “Russian”–the differences are tiny, while the Jew–Gentile difference is real. These nations are a distraction. In England no Russian looks foreign.
Shawn Lion–it is hard to see your logic unless it is the crazy assertion that the police kill Black women while defending a shooter because he is White. This psy-op was a lot worse than that and is all about disarming the White Americans.
@ Simon Smith and @ MEFOBILLS
I’ve come to this discussion a little late but the quotation attributed to Churchill is certainly fake. It appears in the forward to the second edition of Sydney Rogerson’s, “Propaganda In The Next War” originally published in 1938.
Of course, the perspective of the speaker in the quotation is post- war, so had it been an authentic citation, it would have been unknown to Rogerson who died in 1939.
Churchill’s words were supposed to have been spoken in confidence to Lord Robert Boothby, the bum bandit extraordinaire, who died in 1986. Yet, the author of the second edition forward, provides no source for Boothby’s recollection. It seems a little odd to me that there should be no verifiable written record of Boothby’s account. Churchill’s words do not sound like memoire or anecdote, or even something that might have been repeated indiscreetly. The language is too precise, the phrasing too attentively constructed.
At axishistory.com when this same issue was raised a few years back, a rather intelligent contributor, cut to the chase and contacted Mr. Richard Langworth, the Director of the Churchill Centre of the International Churchill Society in London, publishers of the Chartwell Bulletin and the glossy highbrow magazine, Finest Hour. Responding to the commenter’s enquiry, Mr. Langworth was able to confirm that a thoroughly cross-referenced search of their 13 million word digital database of all of Churchill’s known utterances and writings, came up with NO hits for the attributed quotation. Churchill didn’t say those words.
Well, then, who did? The man who wrote the forward to the 2001 edition of Sydney Rogerson’s book, seems to be someone with ulterior motive. His name is David Pidcock. He’s a British convert to Islam and apparently, the leader of the Islamist Party of Britain.
I’d like to pass the baton on here to Simon Smith, if I may (if he has the time and is willing of course,) because I suspect that Simon may know a bit more than I do, about the liar Pidcock. I really can’t fathom his motives for making up the mock Churchill, as I sit thinking about it.