Nick Kollerstrom — Terror on the Tube July 19, 2014
”Now I’m going to test your numerology skills by asking you to think about the magic seven …Most of you will know that seven is quite a number” speech by Christine Lagarde, President of IMF on 15 January 2014
17 July, Eastern Ukraine: A Malaysian Boeing 777 aircraft exploded into flames at 33,000ft, allegedly hit by a surface-to-air missile
Hmm, what plane could that have been? the daily Malaysian Airlines MH17 flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was CANCELLED THAT DAY – See authentic flight data at: http://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/mh17/ so, it did not fly…
Ukraine Jets shadowed Malaysian plane before shootdown
“eyewitnesses in the Donetsk region saw Ukrainian warplanes near the passenger jet. They say they heard sounds of powerful blasts and saw a Ukraine warplane shortly before the crash. (ITAR Tass)”
This info comes from a Kiev air traffic controller who is Spanish but working in the Ukraine.
“There was an unexplained change of course of the Malaysian MH17 flight which took the aircraft directly over the Eastern Ukraine warzone. A Spanish air controller confirmed a conflict between the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of the Interior intimating that the order concerning the downing of the aircraft came from the Ministry of the Interior, which is dominated by Svoboda and Right Sector. He also said that the MH17 flight was escorted by Ukrainian fighter jets minutes before it was downed. It is worth noting that the presence of the Ukraine fighter jets reported by the Spanish air traffic controller was confirmed by eyewitness reports in the Donetsk region.
He was taken off duty as a civil air-traffic controller along with other foreigners immediately after a Malaysia Airlines passenger aircraft was shot down over the Eastern Ukraine killing 295 passengers and crew on board. The air traffic controller suggested in a private evaluation and basing it on military sources in Kiev, that the Ukrainian military was behind this shoot down. Radar records were immediately confiscated after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down. Military air traffic controllers in internal communication acknowledged the military was involved, and some military chatter said they did not know where the order to shoot down the plane originated from.
The plane was escorted by two Ukrainian fighter jets until 3 minutes before it disappeared from radar.
Shot down by a jet?
Eyewitness report: “”[I] saw a spinning plane without a wing with something falling out of it. The plane was shot down,” he told RT. “There were explosions in the sky. And apart from the loud sounds of the plane itself, I heard the buzz which fighter jets make.”
That report concurs with reports (below) of jet fighters shadowing the plane immediately before it was blown out of the sky.
Probably NATO airplanes.
Permission denied to fly high
Malaysia Airlines had filed a flight plan requesting to fly at 35,000 feet throughout Ukraine airspace but was instructed by Ukraine air traffic control to fly at 33,000 feet upon entry. Upon entering Ukrainian airspace, the ‘MH17’ plane was instructed by Ukrainian air traffic control to fly at 33,000 feet. (Reuters)
Notice the characteristic way blame is abruptly laid out, before anyone can know who did it – exactly as Blair blamed Muslims for the 7/7 London bombings, or as US authorities for 9/11 on the same day. At once the media are braying, Putin, Putin. That is the sign of a pre-staged event.
Was the crash scene itself fabricated? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XOnCckiYlk – post a comment!
Malaysian government denied access to crash site
”It would be “inhuman” if “we are not allowed” to the site of Malaysian plane crash in Donetsk Region, eastern Ukraine, said Malaysian Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai (19th July). He added that Malaysian authorities “are concerned” over the security zone of the area as evidence hasn’t been secured.”
– ie, two days after, Malaysian officials have not been allowed to visit the crash site – and don’t know who is looking after it. The Malaysian transport minister added “There is no confirmation on who has flight recorders” – they have not been given the black boxes!
Fabricated terror events do not always have real dead bodies. So let’s note that, on Saturday 19th there were reports: ”
Donetsk self-defense forces have denied the claims that they have taken the bodies of 36 passengers of Malaysian plane… Earlier there were unconfirmed reports by Ukrainian media that anti-government troops have removed the bodies. (source: RT)
Notice we have seen no reports of crying families, no tearful relatives – remind you of anything?
Buk missile system was government-owned
The surface-to-air missiles in the vicinity and possibly used were state-owned, not held by rebels:
A division of Buk missile systems of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was, according to Pravda, deployed to the Donetsk Oblast on July 15, two days before the downing of the Malaysian airlines MH17 flight. The Buk missile system has the capabilities of downing an aircraft flying at 35,000 feet. (Global Research)
While the Pravda report remains to be confirmed, Russian Defense sources confirm the presence of several missile batteries in the Donesk oblast operated by the Ukraine armed forces:
‘The Ukrainian military has several batteries of Buk surface-to-air missile systems with at least 27 launchers, capable of bringing down high-flying jets, in the Donetsk region where the Malaysian passenger plane crashed, Russian Defense Ministry said”(RT, July 17, 2014)
Of significance, the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Vitaliy Yarema confirmed that the Donesk rebels do not have Buk or S 300 ground to air missiles which could have downed the plane. According to the Kiev Post report: “Ukrainian prosecutor general says militants did not seize Ukrainian air defense launchers”
Members of illegal armed units have not seized air defense launchers of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Donetsk, Ukrainian Prosecutor General Vitaliy Yarema said. (Kiev Post)
Yarema also confirmed that according to military sources:
“After the passenger airliner was downed, the military reported to the president that terrorists do not have our air defense missile systems Buk and S-300,” (quoted by Itar-Tass).
Immediately after the downing of MH17, an adviser to the Ukrainian Minister of Internal Affairs Mr. Anton Gerashchenko stated categorically that the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 MH17:
“had been downed by an air defense missile system Buk” (without however mentioning who was behind the missile operation)
Reported from the Ukraine Interfax News Agency: Anton Gerashchenko “said on Facebook that the plane was flying at an altitude of 33,000 feet when it was hit by a missile fired from a Buk launcher.”
NB, these stories are probably bogus – “Buk missiles produce a very noticeable plume, and no one documented any. In the day of cell phone cams, I would say zero documentation of something so noticeable means no missile launch.” Jim Stone.
Israeli tampering with MH17 at Amsterdam airport?
MH17 is NOT supposed to over fly Eastern Ukraine – it flies over Western Ukraine. Jim Stone wondered: “How come it disappeared from trackers in west Ukraine and and appears to have traveled about 1000 km into eastern Ukraine some 200 km off route without being challenged by Ukrainian authorities?”
Plane shoot down: approximately 14:15 UTC. Israeli assault on Gaza: 14:00 UTC. See a connection there? And when you consider the fact that it took time to confirm the downing, the two times actually match even more closely. It blocked out the terrible news of Israel’s assault on Gaza.
‘MH17 deviated from the civilian flight path, which should cross close to the exit mouth of the Azov Sea, away from the current battle zone between the Ukraine military and militant ethnic Russian irregulars. Instead its navigation steered the jetliner on a more northerly course in contested airspace, where Ukraine military aircraft conduct both air strikes and troop transport missions, putting the Malaysian Airlines jet into jeopardy.’
Why did the plane diverge from its proper flight path? Israel has a definite connection to this airport: “Security at Schipol Airport is operated by ICTS, an Israeli-owned airport security company based in The Netherlands founded by former officers of the Shin Beit intelligence agency. Its subsidiaries are also involved in key security functions there, including ProCheck, Ramasso and I-SEC”
Source: Yoichi Shimatsu, who earlier discovered “many aspects of the Israeli security set-up at Schipol International Airport and the role of the Mossad intelligence agency in secret operations there, one of Europe’s business transport hubs” – Malaysia has been an outspoken voice in the UN and the world media on Palestinian rights in Gaza. (Y.S. was former editor of The Japan Times Weekly in Tokyo).
Paul Craig Roberts: ‘a Washington operation’
The wise US commentator Paul Craig Roberts wrote on July 17th:
The appearance of a Washington operation is present. All the warmongers were ready on cue. US Vice President Joe Biden declared that the airliner was “blown out of the sky.” It was “not an accident.” Why would a person without an agenda be so declarative prior to having any information? Clearly, Biden was not implying that it was Kiev that blew the airliner out of the sky. Biden was at work in advance of the evidence blaming Russia. Indeed, the way Washington operates, it will pile on blame until it needs no evidence.
Senator John McCain jumped on the supposition that there were US citizens aboard to call for punitive actions against Russia before the passenger list and the cause of the airliner’s fate are known. The “investigation” is being conducted by Washington’s puppet regime in Kiev. I think we already know what the conclusion will be.
The probability is high that we are going to have more fabricated evidence, such as the fabricated evidence presented by US Secretary of State Colin Powell to the UN “proving” the existence of the non-existent Iraqi “weapons of mass destruction.” Washington has succeeded with so many lies, deceptions and crimes that it believes that it can always succeed again.
At this time as I write, we have no reliable information about the airliner, but the Roman question always pertains: “Who benefits?” There is no conceivable motive for separatists to shoot down an airliner, but Washington did have a motive–to frame-up Russia–and possibly a second motive. Among the reports or rumors there is one that says Putin’s presidential plane flew a similar route to that of the Malaysian airliner within 37 minutes of one another [NB I suggest this is unlikely, NK]. This report has led to speculation that Washington decided to rid itself of Putin and mistook the Malaysian airliner for Putin’s jet. RT reports that the two airplanes are similar in appearance.http://rt.com/news/173672-malaysia-plane-crash-putin/
(For unlikely Putin-mistake story, see: Interfax news agency report” )